OpenAI's ChatGPT Agent Is Haunting My Browser
I have four instances of OpenAI's ChatGPT Agent—the generative AI tool released last week, which can run searches and perform tasks on the web—already open with each running in its own tab. I've given these first four agents relatively simple jobs based on ChatGPT's suggestions. One is clicking around to find a birthday gift on the Target website, and another is generating a pitch deck about robotic dogs. I open a fifth tab in order to try something more experimental: I want to see how good this ChatGPT Agent is at chess.
After typing in some instructions, I watch as a ghostly cursor floats across my screen and the ChatGPT Agent goes to Chess.com and plays an online opponent, all in a virtual browser. Things go south pretty quickly. The game's strategy isn't what trips up the AI tool, it's the act of moving the chess pieces that actually proves to be the most difficult. 'I'm focusing on accurate positioning as I continue playing despite earlier misclicks,' the agent says in its internal log before eventually quitting and letting me know that the controls were too difficult to navigate.
Over the past few years, browser developers have integrated AI tools with middling success. Though, in recent weeks, the idea of a web browser enhanced by a baked-in generative AI chatbot has resurged with the release of OpenAI's ChatGPT Agent and Perplexity's Comet.
The two releases are quite different in their execution. Comet is a stand-alone browser, so you can use it to surf the web and then summon the AI assistant to help write an email or complete a menial chore. OpenAI built its browsing tool inside of a chatbot; you talk to the chatbot through a web interface to give it tasks, and then the bot runs its own virtual browser inside your browser to complete them.
Both releases can take control of cursors, enter text, and click on links. If this trend takes off, these kinds of AI-powered browsers could transform the internet into a ghost town where agents run amok and humans rarely venture. Tangled Web
Despite the continued AI hype, my initial impression of OpenAI's ChatGPT Agent is that the glitchy feature currently seems like a proof of concept instead of a fully baked release. When executing the various tasks I gave it, the ChatGPT Agent often clicked wrong or fumbled through other errors. Additionally, its guardrails appeared inconsistent; while some explicit prompt requests, like asking it to fetch pornographic videos or 'find a dildo,' were denied by the agent, ChatGPT spent 18 minutes shopping for the perfect 'c-ring' on an X-rated website for adult toys: 'I've gathered details on 10 metal cock rings, including various prices and features.'
I also couldn't help but wonder how this approach to browsing the internet might further hollow out the market for digital display ads, a business that's already struggling. My agents passed over ads for everything from rental cars to real estate investments. If you're not actively watching the agent click around in real time, you can watch replays afterward and see everything that appeared in the browser while the AI tool was in control, ads included. It makes sense that users would speed-scrub through a replay now, while the nascent feature is filled with errors. But if the accuracy rate for AI agents improves over time, then fewer people will feel the need to watch over their agent's shoulder, and fewer humans will be seeing those ads. At that point, it's hard to imagine advertisers sticking around.
The more I watched replays of its actions, the more the agent gave me an unsettling, eerie feeling—not of being understood, but of being mimicked. It was like an obsessive robot stalker had watched humans through a window, meticulously taking notes about how they used the web in an effort to replicate their actions. It was able to do a hollow imitation of human behavior, but not able to grasp fully why individual decisions were being made. The skin of my arms filled with the kind of goosebumps you get hearing a human-like laugh while walking home alone late at night, looking around, and only seeing a lone crow perched high up on the telephone wire.
Further leaning into the psuedo-humanness, the ChatGPT Agent is programmed to generate descriptions, from a first-person perspective, of each step on its journeys around the internet. While clicking, the simulation 'thinks' and sometimes gets 'confused.' As a whole, the ghostly agent is stuffed into an ill-fitting human suit.
Running five OpenAI agents simultaneously in my browser quickly became overwhelming, and I couldn't actively track what each of them was up to. Yet, boosters of generative AI adoption and 'multi-agent orchestration' see this kind of approach as child's play.
'I'm excited by simulation tech where 20,000 AIs are all working alongside each other,' says Allie K. Miller, an AI-focused business consultant. Miller's approach to AI agents is more aligned with Silent Hill —and its fully haunted ghost town—than a small-scale haunting like The Conjuring .
This grandiose vision of the agentic future upheld by AI proponents—thousands of phantom bots swarming the web at once, all at the direction of a single person—still feels a long way off. My artisanal quintet of agents struggled with the handful of tasks I gave them, even when the prompts were just the ones suggested by ChatGPT. The agent I sent off in search of a birthday gift clicked on the wrong thing multiple times, similar to the chess-playing agent that couldn't click on the right game piece. The agent generating a pitch deck took 26 minutes to gin up a presentation, and the results looked rushed, like something a struggling middle schooler would create the night before an assignment was due.
Taking forever to generate mid results? Now that's what I call a spooky story.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT How To Turn $10 Into $1 Million: Here's What It Said
According to the latest Global Wealth Report from financial services firm UBS, there are nearly 24 million millionaires in the United States. With millionaires seemingly lurking around every corner, I wondered how I could join their ranks. Read More: Find Out: I asked ChatGPT how I could turn $10 into $1 million, here's what it said, and whether the advice is worth considering. Not Impossible When I asked ChatGPT to make me a millionaire by turning my $10 into $1 million, I was thrilled to hear it wasn't impossible. The chatbot, however, did acknowledge that it may require time, skill, and, often, some luck. The AI tool broke down my options for joining the financial elite into three overarching categories: realistic, long-term Strategies, moderate-risk, high-effort options, and high-risk, low probability paths. Discover Next: Realistic, Long-Term Strategies ChatGPT offered two long-term options for turning $10 into $1 million: investing in the stock market or starting a low-cost business. The chatbot recommended adding to the initial investment each month. It said that if $100 a month is invested in an S&P 500 index fund with ~10% annual return, I could become a millionaire in around 35 to 40 years as a result of compounding interest. While most financial experts agree that investing is the most solid way to grow wealth, it may take more than $10 to reach millionaire status. Market volatility may also derail the strategy. It is strongly recommended that hopeful investors meet with a financial advisor first to develop the right plan moving forward. According to Fidelity, potential investors should first determine what they are investing for, the most part retirement, before deciding on a stock. A financial professional can then help determine what account is best based on individual needs and goals. The second option suggested by ChatGPT was to start a low-cost business. This can be achieved, according to the online platform, by spending the $10 on a domain and then creating a blog or selling a digital product. While this may seem easy enough, in reality, it takes a level of expertise to get an online business started and even more to make it successful, given the crowded industry. Moderate-Risk, High-Effort Options The next set of options, as suggested by the popular chatbot, involves a little more risk and a lot more effort. In the moderate-risk category is flipping, arbitrage or skill-based work. As noted by the AI platform, the success of these depends on skill level, scale, and effort. Arbitrage involves the buying of an asset in a lower-priced market and selling it in a higher-priced market. ChatGPT recommended doing this via online marketplaces such as eBay and Craigslist. The other suggestion in this category is to spend the $10 on learning a new skill and then monetizing that skill. While perhaps oversimplified, this idea can be utilized by anyone. The Future of Jobs Report 2025 by the World Economic Forum noted that 39% of workers will see their existing skill sets transformed or even outdated over the next five years. Learning a new skill may not turn someone into a millionaire overnight, but it could make them more marketable. High-Risk, Low-Probability Paths The final pathway recommended by ChatGPT is best left to gamblers and those with incredibly good luck. In the high-risk, low-probability category is investing $10 in cryptocurrency or taking a chance on a penny stock. The second option is to gamble the money or buy a lottery ticket. As explained by the AI tool, opting in to these high-risk strategies will most likely just result in the loss of $10. More From GOBankingRates New Law Could Make Electricity Bills Skyrocket in These 4 States I'm a Self-Made Millionaire: 6 Ways I Use ChatGPT To Make a Lot of Money 5 Strategies High-Net-Worth Families Use To Build Generational Wealth Mark Cuban Says Trump's Executive Order To Lower Medication Costs Has a 'Real Shot' -- Here's Why This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT How To Turn $10 Into $1 Million: Here's What It Said Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) Is The Largest Position In My Trust, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN)'s shares have lost 1% since the firm's latest earnings report, as investors worry about the firm's cloud computing business. After the earnings, Cramer asserted that one reason the firm is facing a growth slowdown with its AWS business is due to over-reliance on its custom Trainium AI chips. This time, he discussed Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) retail business as well: 'So I think that, there isn't anything in my mind that says that, you take warehouses being up, that employing people in warehousing. . .And then you take a look at what Amazon's doing. You read how their big warehouses have no people. And them I'm supposed to conclude that the problem is warehouse employment? You need to be a little more granular than the Labor Department. 'Hey by the way, let's not forget. We are going to have a number of drug stores in this country that is probably about one fifth of what we have now. And that was the Amazon factor. So you're going to get your food, you're going to get your drugs, it's going to come to your house. It's a whole new world. And Amazon's got it. Let's just walk away from the idea that web services is declining just for a few minutes please.' While we acknowledge the potential of AMZN as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
WIA Gold Limited (ASX:WIA) stock most popular amongst individual investors who own 39%, while private companies hold 34%
Key Insights WIA Gold's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public 52% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders Insiders have bought recently AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. If you want to know who really controls WIA Gold Limited (ASX:WIA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 39% to be precise, is individual investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Meanwhile, private companies make up 34% of the company's shareholders. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about WIA Gold. Check out our latest analysis for WIA Gold What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About WIA Gold? Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. WIA Gold already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at WIA Gold's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. It would appear that 5.3% of WIA Gold shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is Capital DI Limited, with ownership of 18%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.6% and 6.9% of the stock. We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track. Insider Ownership Of WIA Gold The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. It seems insiders own a significant proportion of WIA Gold Limited. Insiders own AU$67m worth of shares in the AU$433m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling. General Public Ownership The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 39% stake in WIA Gold. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. Private Company Ownership Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 34%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company. Next Steps: I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with WIA Gold (including 2 which are a bit concerning) . If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
