logo
Trump's Tariffs Explained: What You Need to Know as Inflation Picks Up Again

Trump's Tariffs Explained: What You Need to Know as Inflation Picks Up Again

CNET5 days ago
The off-again, on-again nature of US tariffs in 2025 has many consumers anxious about the future.
James Martin/CNET
The One Big Beautiful Bill might've made it across the finish line but tariffs still remain the dominant focus of President Donald Trump's economic agenda. This is especially true as the US Labor Department announced recently that consumer prices rose 2.7% in June, the highest spike since February, and a report from CNBC found that prices at Walmart, one of the largest retailers in the US, have steadily gone up since Trump's tariffs entered the conversation.
After unleashing market chaos on April 2 ("Liberation Day") when he unveiled a laundry list of heavy tariffs for countries around the world, they were paused for 90 days after the stock market dramatically tumbled. That 90-day pause was supposed to end earlier this month but have been been extended again through Aug. 1. More recently, the administration hiked tariffs against Canada to 35% and threatened Brazil with a 50% rate.
Amid the uncertainties and upheavals, Trump has barreled forward with his plans, including doubling the tariffs on steel and aluminum imports and announcing a new plan to increase the rate for China to 55%. He also hyped up a trade deal on July 2 that leaves Vietnam's import tax rate at a historically high 20%. The sweeping tariff initiative will likely affect your cost of living, which we know from our surveys is something you're worried about.
That all came after Trump's push hit its biggest roadblock yet, when the US Court of International Trade ruled late last month that Trump had overstepped his authority when he imposed tariffs. That ruling was stayed, but the fight is likely to head to the Supreme Court. All the while, major US companies like Apple and Walmart have butted heads with the administration over the tariffs and their bluntness about how tariffs will make affording things harder for consumers.
Should You Buy Now or Wait? Our Experts Weigh In on Tariffs Should You Buy Now or Wait? Our Experts Weigh In on Tariffs
Click to unmute
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Skip Backward
Skip Forward
Next playlist item
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
0:00
Loaded :
0%
0:00
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
Share
Fullscreen
This is a modal window. This video is either unavailable or not supported in this browser
Error Code: MEDIA_ERR_SRC_NOT_SUPPORTED
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Technical details :
Session ID: 2025-07-25:dce0bd601bb37e029646c8a1 Player Element ID: vjs_video_3
OK
Close Modal Dialog
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text
Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background
Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background
Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Close Modal Dialog
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Close Modal Dialog
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Should You Buy Now or Wait? Our Experts Weigh In on Tariffs
Amid all this noise, you might still be wondering: What exactly are tariffs, and what will they mean for me?
The short answer: Expect to pay more for at least some goods and services. For the long answer, keep reading, and for more, check out CNET's price tracker for 11 popular and tariff-vulnerable products.
What are tariffs?
Put simply, a tariff is a tax on the cost of importing or exporting goods by a particular country. So, for example, a 60% tariff on Chinese imports would be a 60% tax on the price of importing, say, computer components from China.
Trump has been fixated on imports as the centerpiece of his economic plans, often claiming that the money collected from taxes on imported goods would help finance other parts of his agenda. The US imports $3 trillion worth of goods from other countries annually.
The president has also shown a fixation on trade deficits, claiming that the US having a trade deficit with any country means that country is ripping the US off. This is a flawed understanding of the matter, many economists have said, since deficits are often a simple case of resource realities: Wealthy nations like the US buy specific things from nations that have them, while those nations in turn may not be wealthy enough to buy much of anything from the US.
While Trump deployed tariffs in his first term, notably against China, he ramped up his plans more significantly for the 2024 campaign, promising 60% tariffs against China and a universal 20% tariff on all imports into the US.
"Tariffs are the greatest thing ever invented," Trump said at a campaign stop in Michigan last year. At one point, he called himself "Tariff Man" in a post on Truth Social.
Who pays the cost of tariffs?
Trump repeatedly claimed, before and immediately after returning to the White House, that the country of origin for an imported good pays the cost of the tariffs and that Americans would not see any price increases from them. However, as economists and fact-checkers stressed, this is not the case.
The companies importing the tariffed goods -- American companies or organizations in this case -- pay the higher costs. To compensate, companies can raise their prices or absorb the additional costs themselves.
So, who ends up paying the price for tariffs? In the end, usually you, the consumer. For instance, a universal tariff on goods from Canada would increase Canadian lumber prices, which would have the knock-on effect of making construction and home renovations more expensive for US consumers. While it is possible for a company to absorb the costs of tariffs without increasing prices, this is not at all likely, at least for now.
Speaking with CNET, Ryan Reith, vice president of International Data Corporation's worldwide mobile device tracking programs, explained that price hikes from tariffs, especially on technology and hardware, are inevitable in the short term. He estimated that the full amount imposed on imports by Trump's tariffs would be passed on to consumers, which he called the "cost pass-through." Any potential efforts for companies to absorb the new costs themselves would come in the future, once they have a better understanding of the tariffs, if at all.
Which Trump tariffs have gone into effect?
Following Trump's "Liberation Day" announcements on April 2 and subsequent shifting by the president, the following tariffs are in effect:
A 50% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports, doubled from 25% as of June 4.
A 30% tariff on all Chinese imports until the new deal touted by Trump takes effect, after which it will purportedly go up to 55%. China being a major focus of Trump's trade agenda, it has faced a rate notably higher than other countries, peaking at 145% before trade talks commenced.
25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and 35% on those from Canada. This applies only to goods from each country that are not covered under the 2018 USMCA trade agreement brokered during Trump's first term. The deal covers roughly half of all imports from Canada and about a third of those from Mexico, so the rest are subject to the new tariffs. Energy imports not covered by USMCA will be taxed at only 10%.
A 25% tariff on all foreign-made cars and auto parts.
A sweeping overall 10% tariff on all imported goods.
For certain countries that Trump said were more responsible for the US trade deficit, Trump imposed what he called "reciprocal" tariffs that exceed the 10% level: 20% for the 27 nations that make up the European Union, 26% for India, 24% for Japan and so on. These were meant to take effect on April 9 but were delayed by 90 days due to historic stock market volatility, and then delayed again to Aug. 1. These rates are subject to change until that new effective date, and some have already been altered: the rate against Japan was upped to 25%, the same as the rate against South Korea; Trump has also threatened a 50% rate against Brazil. Another deal announced on July 23 lowered Japan's rate to 15%.
Trump's claim that these reciprocal tariffs are based on high tariffs imposed against the US by the targeted countries has drawn intense pushback from experts and economists, who have argued that some of these numbers are false or potentially inflated. For example, the above chart says a 39% tariff from the EU, despite its average tariff for US goods being around 3%. Some of the tariffs are against places that are not countries but tiny territories of other nations. The Heard and McDonald Islands, for example, are uninhabited. We'll dig into the confusion around these calculations below.
Notably, that minimum 10% tariff will not be on top of those steel, aluminum and auto tariffs. Canada and Mexico were also spared from the 10% minimum additional tariff imposed on all countries the US trades with.
On April 11, the administration said smartphones, laptops and other consumer electronics, along with flat panel displays, memory chips and semiconductors, were exempt from reciprocal tariffs. But it wasn't clear whether that would remain the case or whether such products might face different fees later.
How were the Trump reciprocal tariffs calculated?
The numbers released by the Trump administration for its barrage of "reciprocal" tariffs led to widespread confusion among experts. Trump's own claim that these new rates were derived by halving the tariffs already imposed against the US by certain countries was widely disputed, with critics noting that some of the numbers listed for certain countries were much higher than the actual rates and some countries had tariff rates listed despite not specifically having tariffs against the US at all.
In a post to X that spread fast across social media, finance journalist James Surowiecki said that the new reciprocal rates appeared to have been reached by taking the trade deficit the US has with each country and dividing it by the amount the country exports to the US. This, he explained, consistently produced the reciprocal tariff percentages revealed by the White House across the board.
"What extraordinary nonsense this is," Surowiecki wrote about the finding.
The White House later attempted to debunk this idea, releasing what it claimed was the real formula, though it was quickly determined that this formula was arguably just a more complex version of the one Surowiecki deduced.
What will the Trump tariffs do to prices?
In short: Prices are almost certainly going up, if not now, then eventually. That is, if the products even make it to US shelves at all, as some tariffs will simply be too high for companies to bother dealing with.
While the effects of a lot of tariffs might not be felt straight away, some potential real-world examples have already emerged. Microsoft has increased prices across the board for its Xbox gaming brand, with its flagship Xbox Series X console jumping 20% from $500 to $600. Kent International, one of the main suppliers of bicycles to Walmart, announced that it would be stopping imports from China, which account for 90% of its stock.
Speaking about Trump's tariff plans just before they were announced, White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said that they would generate $6 trillion in revenue over the next decade. Given that tariffs are most often paid by consumers, CNN characterized this as potentially "the largest tax hike in US history." Estimates from the Yale Budget Lab, cited by Axios, predict that Trump's new tariffs will cause a 2.3% increase in inflation throughout 2025. This translates to about a $3,800 increase in expenses for the average American household.
Reith, the IDC analyst, told CNET that Chinese-based tech companies, like PC makers Acer, Asus and Lenovo, have "100% exposure" to these import taxes, with products like phones and computers the most likely to take a hit. He also said that the companies best positioned to weather the tariff impacts are those that have moved some of their operations out of China to places like India, Thailand and Vietnam, singling out the likes of Apple, Dell and HP. Samsung, based in South Korea, is also likely to avoid the full force of Trump's tariffs.
In an effort to minimize its tariff vulnerability, Apple has begun to move the production of goods for the US market from China to India.
Will tariffs affect prices immediately?
In the short term -- the first days or weeks after a tariff takes effect -- maybe not. There are still a lot of products in the US imported pre-tariffs and on store shelves, meaning the businesses don't need a price hike to recoup import taxes. Once new products need to be brought in from overseas, that's when you'll see prices start to climb because of tariffs or you'll see them become unavailable.
That uncertainty has made consumers anxious. CNET's survey revealed that about 38% of shoppers feel pressured to make certain purchases before tariffs make them more expensive. About 10% say they have already made certain purchases in hopes of getting them in before the price hikes, while 27% said they have delayed purchases for products that cost more than $500. Generally, this worry is the most acute concerning smartphones, laptops and home appliances.
Mark Cuban, the billionaire businessman and Trump critic, voiced concerns about when to buy certain things in a post on Bluesky just after Trump's "Liberation Day" announcements. In it, he suggested that consumers might want to stock up on certain items before tariff inflation hits.
"It's not a bad idea to go to the local Walmart or big box retailer and buy lots of consumables now," Cuban wrote. "From toothpaste to soap, anything you can find storage space for, buy before they have to replenish inventory. Even if it's made in the USA, they will jack up the price and blame it on tariffs."
CNET's Money team recommends that before you make any purchase, especially a high-ticket item, be sure that the expenditure fits within your budget and your spending plans. Buying something you can't afford now because it might be less affordable later can be burdensome, to say the least.
What is the goal of the White House tariff plan?
The typical goal behind tariffs is to discourage consumers and businesses from buying the tariffed, foreign-sourced goods and encourage them to buy domestically produced goods instead. When implemented in the right way, tariffs are generally seen as a useful way to protect domestic industries.
One of the stated intentions for Trump's tariffs is along those lines: to restore American manufacturing and production. However, the White House also says it's negotiating with numerous countries looking for tariff exemptions, and some officials have also floated the idea that the tariffs will help finance Trump's tax cuts.
Those things are often contradictory: If manufacturing moves to the US or if a bunch of countries are exempt from tariffs, then tariffs aren't actually being collected and can't be used to finance anything. This and many other points have led a lot of economists to allege that Trump's plans are misguided.
As for returning -- or "reshoring" -- manufacturing in the US, tariffs are a better tool for protecting industries that already exist because importers can fall back on them right away. Building up the factories and plants needed for this in the US could take years, leaving Americans to suffer under higher prices in the interim.
That problem is worsened by the fact that the materials needed to build those factories will also be tariffed, making the costs of "reshoring" production in the US too heavy for companies to stomach. These issues, and the general instability of American economic policies under Trump, are part of why experts warn that Trump's tariffs could have the opposite effect: keeping manufacturing out of the US and leaving consumers stuck with inflated prices. Any factories that do get built in the US because of tariffs also have a high chance of being automated, canceling out a lot of job creation potential. To give you one real-world example of this: When warning customers of future price hikes, toy maker Mattel also noted that it had no plans to move manufacturing to the US.
Trump has reportedly been fixated on the notion that Apple's iPhone -- the most popular smartphone in the US market -- can be manufactured entirely in the US. This has been broadly dismissed by experts, for a lot of the same reasons mentioned above, but also because an American-made iPhone could cost upward of $3,500. One report from 404 Media dubbed the idea "a pure fantasy." The overall sophistication and breadth of China's manufacturing sector have also been cited, with CEO Tim Cook stating in 2017 that the US lacks the number of tooling engineers to make its products.
For more, see how tariffs might raise the prices of Apple products and find some expert tips for saving money.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The SALT income tax deduction cap was increased to $40,000 in Trump's bill. Should you take it?
The SALT income tax deduction cap was increased to $40,000 in Trump's bill. Should you take it?

Boston Globe

time16 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

The SALT income tax deduction cap was increased to $40,000 in Trump's bill. Should you take it?

For the last seven years, the tax code has limited the amount taxpayers may write off for state and local taxes to $10,000. Prior to that, the cap was a much more generous $40,000. Advertisement The $10,000 cap was imposed by Congress as part of the first Trump administration's mammoth tax cut plan. It was quite costly to taxpayers in places like Boston's western suburbs, where local property tax bills range in excess of $25,000 (and where the state income tax is 5 percent and the sales tax 6.25 percent). Indeed, for some of the state's wealthiest residents, local property taxes plus state taxes exceeds $40,000. (Taxpayers must choose to include state income taxes or state sales taxes in their calculations, but not both.) This year's tax and spending bill, pushed by the current Trump administration, reversed what the previous Trump administration did by quadrupling the cap back to $40,000. It was done mostly to keep Republican Congress members who represent wealthy suburban districts on board for a bill that, overall, favors the well-off over those struggling to get by. Advertisement Here's what you should know about the SALT income tax deduction. Who qualifies for the SALT deduction? All taxpayers who pay state and local taxes may take the deduction, but it only makes sense for those who are relatively well-off. A threshold question for all federal income taxpayers is whether to take the How does the standard deduction work? The amount of income tax a taxpayer owes is based, logically enough, on how much income the taxpayer has. The more income, the more taxes . But the tax code allows for gross income to be reduced by a multitude of deductions, producing a taxable 'adjusted gross income.' Wealthier taxpayers who can afford CPAs and tax lawyers scour the tax code for deductions, while the vast majority of taxpayers simply accept a lump sum 'default' deduction, known as the standard deduction, which is set by Congress. What are the most common deductions for those who itemize? Besides state and local taxes, common deductions are for mortgage interest on a primary residence or second home; charitable contributions; and out-of-pocket medical and dental expenses. All are subject to certain limitations. Why take the standard deduction instead of itemizing? If all your itemized deductions come out to a sum that is less than the standard deduction, then the obvious choice is to take the standard deduction. Taking the standard deduction is also less time-consuming. Advertisement How much is the standard deduction? The standard deduction was greatly increased — almost doubled — under the first Trump administration tax cut. For individual filers it went from $6,500 to $12,000; for joint returns, $13,000 to $24,000. The tax bill enacted this month bumps up the standard deduction for single filers to $15,750 and for joint filers $31,500. It's a huge increase, one that benefits the vast majority of taxpayers, including those with lower and moderate incomes and do not itemize. What percentage of taxpayers take the standard deduction? Taxpayers have overwhelmingly — and increasingly — opted for the standard deduction. Since the 2017 tax cut, the percentage of Americans who take the standard deduction has skyrocketed to more than 90 percent, compared to less than 70 percent as recently as 2020. How long has the SALT tax reduction been around? It dates back to the advent of the federal income tax more than a century ago. Initially, the SALT deduction was unlimited, meaning you could deduct from your taxable income every dollar you paid in state and local taxes, without a cap. How has SALT changed recently? The biggest change came when, at Trump's behest, a Republican-controlled Congress in 2017 capped it at $10,000 over the objections of many blue state lawmakers. What was the rationale for reducing the SALT deduction in 2017? Trump in his first administration successfully lobbied for one of the largest tax cuts in history, including much lower personal and corporate income tax rates, higher standard deductions, and a doubling of the child tax credit. (A tax credit is a dollar-for-dollar reduction in taxes owed, as opposed to a tax deduction, which is a reduction in taxable income.) The 2017 tax cuts, however, were not offset by spending reductions. One relatively minor way the 2017 law sought to pay for the tax cuts was by slashing the SALT deduction by 75 percent. Advertisement What were the politics behind the 2017 SALT reduction? The SALT deduction favors mostly blue states that vote reliably Democratic in presidential elections. The Trump administration apparently felt politically safe imposing a heavier tax burden on taxpayers in states Republicans consider unwinnable. So why did the Republican-controlled Congress this year increase the SALT cap to $40,000? This year's tax bill passed the House by the slimmest of margins, 215-214, with all Democrats opposed and two Republicans voting against it on the grounds it explodes the national debt. Before the vote, a few moderate Republicans from blue states lobbied for increasing the SALT deduction cap. Doing so was apparently the price bill proponents were willing to pay to keep those few crucial Republican votes in line. When does the higher SALT deduction go into effect? Immediately. Taxpayers can take advantage of it before next year's midterm elections, which affords a modest political advance to Republicans. (Some of the most serious — and unpopular — cuts to the social safety net won't go into effect until after the midterms, another possible political advantage for Republicans.) How long will the higher SALT deduction continue? It will increase by $1,000 each year through 2029, but then revert back to $10,000 in 2030, unless Congress says otherwise. Got a problem? Send your consumer issue to

GDP soars and Trump's economy roars. Liberals still won't give him credit.
GDP soars and Trump's economy roars. Liberals still won't give him credit.

USA Today

time16 minutes ago

  • USA Today

GDP soars and Trump's economy roars. Liberals still won't give him credit.

Will Democrats put politics aside and applaud as the American economy shows a strength and resilience that so many of them doubted? Probably not. Thanks to President Donald Trump's bold policies, it appears that the United States will avoid a recession this year − one that so many liberals were predicting only months ago. Will Democrats put politics aside and applaud as the American economy shows a strength and resilience that so many of them doubted? Probably not. The Bureau of Economic Analysis on July 30 released more good news about our nation's vibrant economy. Gross domestic product grew a healthy annual rate of 3% in the second quarter after recording a less than 1% decline in the first three months of this year. Fears of a recession should now dissipate like morning haze after the sunrise. Nearly all markers of a strong economy are in top form. Unemployment is low, hovering at 4.1%. The past three months have seen steady job growth. Average hourly earnings for U.S. workers grew 3.7% over the 12 months ending in June. Consumer spending is expected to rise, and there's been a modest uptick in consumer confidence. The Consumer Price Index, which measures inflation, increased 2.7% over the 12 months ending in June, far below the 40-year high recorded in President Joe Biden's term. Even the average price of eggs has dropped dramatically, to $3.31 per dozen, down from a spike to $8 in February and back to roughly the same price level as a year ago. Stock indexes continue to grow at a strong pace, recovering from the sell-off this spring driven by concerns over Trump's tariffs. The Nasdaq and S&P 500 have set multiple record highs in July, a boon to millions of Americans with retirement accounts and other investors. On the tariff front, Trump's new trade deal with the European Union should be a catalyst for further economic growth, particularly in the energy and construction sectors. If this is what a recession looks like, let's keep it coming. Critics said Trump was destroying the economy Despite such healthy economic markers, I doubt I'll see many kudos offered to the Trump administration for powering past a recession, which the left predicted in doomsday terms. Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman wrote in May that Trump and "MAGAnomics" were "destroying the economy and waging war on the middle class and the poor." The headline thundered that Trump was "making America backward again." Opinion: Trump's EU trade deal ushers in a golden age for blue-collar workers Interestingly, Krugman claimed that the U.S. economy was in good overall shape when Biden left office in January. He charged Trump with wrecking the economy in a mere three months. Now, that the data clearly shows otherwise, will Krugman admit his errors? I doubt it. Krugman, to be fair, wasn't the only so-called expert spouting off about our supposedly crumbling economy. CNN published an analysis in April with a headline that claimed "Trump took the US economy to the brink of a crisis in just 100 days." That same month, the Center for American Progress bemoaned that "President Donald Trump's decision to unilaterally launch a global trade war could be one of the worst economic statecraft blunders in American history." I read these articles in the mainstream news media and wonder if we share the same universe. Do progressives not see the same healthy economic markers that millions of other Americans and I see? The answer, of course, is that they do see − but they are too blinded by partisanship to admit it. Good economic news should be nonpartisan I don't have a problem with liberals criticizing Trump. Sometimes he deserves it. But when it comes to obvious wins like a blossoming economy, the constant derision is tiresome and pedestrian. A robust economy under any president is good news for Americans, regardless of their party affiliation. Right? I didn't care for Biden's leftist policies. But I didn't cheer when the economy struggled. It was bad news not just for Biden but, far more important, also for our nation and its citizens. More than a year after Biden entered the White House, annual inflation spiked to 9% in June 2022, the highest rate in four decades. Americans were hit with sudden increases in food, housing and transportation costs. Opinion: Nvidia CEO says Trump gives America an advantage. Hear that, progressives? Compounding the pain, the Federal Reserve acted to cool inflation by raising interest rates, which pushed up consumers' payments for auto, housing and credit card loans. Democrats tried to blame decisions made in Trump's first term, including federal spending used to fight consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. But Biden spent more even as the pandemic began to wane. In 2024, more than half of American voters said the economy was the issue that mattered to them the most. It's why Trump won more than 77 million votes and returned to the White House. Now, he is delivering on his promises to rebuild our nation's economy. But not everyone is happy about it. It's too bad liberals can't separate economic success from Trump's party affiliation. I can't help but wonder if they wanted a recession so they could blame Trump even more. Nicole Russell is a columnist at USA TODAY and a mother of four who lives in Texas. Contact her at nrussell@ and follow her on X, formerly Twitter: @russell_nm. Sign up for her weekly newsletter, The Right Track, here.

Grassley rips Trump demands to force judicial nominees through Senate: ‘I was offended'
Grassley rips Trump demands to force judicial nominees through Senate: ‘I was offended'

New York Post

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Grassley rips Trump demands to force judicial nominees through Senate: ‘I was offended'

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) tore into President Trump Wednesday after the commander in chief called on Grassley to scrap a tradition that Democrats have been exploiting to scuttle Trump's judicial nominations. 'Last night, I was surprised to see President Trump on Truth Social go after me and Senate Republicans over what we call the 'blue slip,'' Grassley, 91, said during a committee hearing. 'I was offended by what the president said, and I'm disappointed that it would result in personal insults.' Advertisement The 'blue slip' tradition dates back more than 100 years and involves the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman consulting the senators from a state where a US attorney, circuit or district court nomination is pending. If both senators from that state give a negative assessment of the nominee — marked on a blue slip of paper — the president's pick doesn't get considered by the Judiciary panel. Most recently, New Jersey Democratic Sens. Cory Booker and Andy Kim used the blue-slip power to block consideration of Alina Habba's nomination to serve as US Attorney for the Garden State. Advertisement The president responded by withdrawing Habba's nomination, clearing the way for her to serve in an acting capacity. 'Chuck Grassley, who I got re-elected to the US Senate when he was down, by a lot, in the Great State of Iowa, could solve the 'Blue Slip' problem we are having with respect to the appointment of Highly Qualified Judges and U.S. Attorneys,' Trump lashed out on Truth Social Tuesday evening. 3 Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley gave a rare clapback against President Trump. Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post 'Put simply, the President of the United States will never be permitted to appoint the person of his choice because of an ancient, and probably Unconstitutional, 'CUSTOM.'' Advertisement So far in Trump's second term, Republicans have only confirmed five of his judicial picks, behind the pace of former President Joe Biden, who had eight judicial nominees confirmed at this point in 2021. An additional 10 judicial nominations remain pending, part of a backlog of about 250 picks awaiting confirmation, according to a Washington Post tracker. 3 President Trump has been vexed by a slow confirmation process in the Senate. Andrew Leyden/ZUMA / 3 Senate Republicans are exploring ways to green light President Trump's nominees. REUTERS Advertisement The Senate is scheduled to break later this week for its monthlong August recess, but Trump has urged Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) to keep working through the scheduled break to clear the backlog. Despite the slow pace, Republicans have been apprehensive about eliminating the blue slip out of fear Democrats could exploit the lack of guardrails when they retake the Senate. 'Now, to people in the Real America – not here in Washington, DC, an island surrounded by reality – the people in Real America don't care about what the blue slip' is, but, in fact, it impacts the district judges who serve their communities and the U.S. Attorneys who ensure law and order is enforced,' Grassley explained. Democrats have also been taking advantage of some of the Senate's arcane debate and voting rules to slow-walk many of Trump's picks, which have caused Republicans to threaten recess appointments. Recess appointments allow the president's nominees to go through when the upper chamber is on recess, sidestepping the cumbersome confirmation process. Traditionally, the House and Senate hold pro forma sessions, even during recesses, to block the executive branch from making such appointments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store