Chhattisgarh HC acquits 2 in electrocution case citing lack of evidence and victim negligence
high court acquitted two men convicted in an electrocution case, citing lack of evidence and the deceased's own negligence.
The court overturned the lower court's verdict, which sentenced the men to six months' rigorous imprisonment in the two-decade-old case.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
"The death of the deceased was wholly of his own negligent act.
The deceased was not trained in electrical work but skilled in mechanical tasks. Despite this, he climbed the electric pole to connect a wire, indicating his own negligence. Being an adult and sensible person, he was expected to understand the risks involved in handling electricity. If he chose to proceed despite the dangers, he alone is responsible for the consequences," Justice Radhakishan Agrawal remarked in his order.
The case stemmed from an incident on May 4, 2004, where
died after being electrocuted while connecting a thresher machine to an electric pole at Sitapur in Surguja district. The prosecution alleged that the accused,
and
, asked Shahjahan to connect the wire, assuring him the power was disconnected.
The trial court and the appellate court convicted the men under Section 304-A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which deals with causing death by negligence.
However, Justice Agrawal, in his order, noted that the prosecution failed to establish a direct link between the accused's actions and the deceased's death.
The court observed that key witnesses, including Mansoor Khan, the deceased's brother, admitted in their statements that they did not witness the incident. Mansoor also acknowledged that his brother was not an electrician but a mechanical worker. The court further noted that the deceased was an adult and aware of the dangers of working with electricity.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
"The prosecution has utterly failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt that the deceased died because of the act of the accused persons/applicants," the court said.
The court also pointed out inconsistencies in the witnesses' statements, including the omission of Shamim Khan's name in the initial police report. The judge cited Supreme Court rulings, emphasising the need for a direct nexus between the accused's negligence and the victim's death.
The high court allowed the criminal revision and acquitted Shabbir Khan and Shamim Khan. Their bail bonds will remain in effect for six months, as per legal procedure.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Quota anomalies' in 69K teachers' recruitment in UP: Candidates protest outside minister's place
Alleging reservation scam in 19,000 posts in 69,000 assistant teacher recruitment, a large number of candidates from reserved categories staged a protest outside basic education minister Sandeep Singh's residence at Mall Avenue here on Monday. Policemen taking away one of the protestors in Lucknow on August 18. (HT photo) From there, police sent them to Eco Garden in vehicles. The education directorate at Nishatganj was turned into a fortress in the wake of the protest. 'We have not yet got justice in this recruitment,' the protesters claimed. They said if the government does not take the initiative for hearing in the Supreme Court and keeps getting dates after dates from the apex court, they will stage sit-in protests every day in Lucknow and also gherao the residences of BJP leaders. Talks were held with additional chief secretary, basic education, Deepak Kumar, on the issue but nothing came out of it, said one of the protesters Dhananjay Gupta. On the call of Pichda Dalit Samyukta Morcha's state president Sushil Kashyap and state patron Bhaskar Singh, the 'aggrieved' candidates claimed to have sent hundreds of letters to the Chief Justice of India in which it was, as per the protestors, clearly stated that for the last 12 months the plaint of the candidates was not being heard in the Supreme Court and dates were being given one after the other due to which they were very upset. The protesters said in such a situation, the apex court should start hearing their case so that they can get justice. Sushil Kashyap and Bhaskar Singh alleged that in the said recruitment, OBC category has been given only 3.86% reservation instead of 27%, SC category has been given only 16.2% reservation instead of 21% and thus in this recruitment, Basic Education Rules 1981 and Reservation Rules 1994 have been violated. They also alleged that the original selection of this recruitment was not being made public for the last 5 years despite the order of a division bench of the Allahabad high court issued on August 13. 2024, 'which shows that there has been a huge reservation scam in the said recruitment'. Basic education department officials said the matter was pending in the court and they will abide by the order of the Supreme Court.
The Wire
27 minutes ago
- The Wire
Assam Police Invoke Sedition Law in Second Case Against The Wire, Naming Varadarajan, Karan Thapar
Law The summons was issued on the very day the Supreme Court granted protection to The Wire's journalists from any coercive action in relation to an FIR filed in the state on July 11 and issued notice on the news platform's writ challenging the vires of Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (R-L) Siddharth Varadarajan, Karan Thapar and Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma. Photos: File/PTI New Delhi: On August 12, 2025 – the day the Supreme Court issued notice on The Wire 's petition challenging the constitutionality of the new sedition law and protected its journalists, including founding editor Siddharth Varadarajan from any 'coercive action' by Assam Police in a case filed in Morigaon in July – the Guwahati Crime Branch summoned Varadarajan and senior journalist Karan Thapar in a fresh 'sedition' FIR filed by the state police. The summons for Varadarajan, issued by police inspector Soumarjyoti Ray under section S.35(3), BNSS, referred to an FIR (03/2025) registered at the Crime Branch, Panganj, Guwahati, under sections 152, 196, 197(1)(D)/3(6), 353, 45 and 61. However, the FIR date was not mentioned, no details of the alleged offence were provided and a copy of the FIR was not included – as the police are legally obliged to do while serving a summons under this section of the BNSS. The summons was received at The Wire 's office here on August 14. Today (August 18), an identical summons was received in the name of Thapar, for the same FIR. Claiming that 'it is revealed that there are reasonable grounds to question you to ascertain the facts and circumstances from you, in relation to the present investigation,' both Varadarajan and Thapar have been directed to appear at the Crime Branch office in Panbazaar, Guwahati on Friday, August 22. 'Failure to attend/ comply with the terms of this Notice can render you liable for arrest', the summons adds. While the FIR registered against Varadarajan in Morigaon on July 11, 2025, pertains to a complaint filed by a BJP officeholder over a story published in The Wire on June 28, 2025 (IAF Lost Fighter Jets to Pak Because of Political Leadership's Constraints': Indian Defence Attache), it is not apparent what article or video the Crime Branch FIR relates to. Even in the Morigaon case, as The Wire 's counsel Nitya Ramakrishan informed the Supreme Court, the FIR was kept a secret and it was only through well-placed sources that it became possible to learn of the complaint, the date of the FIR, and the criminal sections invoked. It was on this basis that The Wire approached the court to challenge the vires of Section 152 of BNS and the bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi issued notice. Section 152 of BNS ('Acts endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India') is the rebranded version of India's earlier sedition provision (Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, Section) that the apex court stayed in 2022. Varadarajan and Thapar have responded to the summons by drawing attention to the requirement – laid down by the Supreme Court – for FIRs to be made public and copies given to the accused. They have also noted a Karnataka high court judgment which says that a police summons without a copy of the FIR accompanying it is invalid. The Wire 's legal representatives in Guwahati say there is no trace of the FIR in the magistrate's court. Reporters in Assam have also failed to get the police in Guwahati to provide any details about the new case. In their response to the summons, both Varadarajan and Thapar have said they are ready and willing to cooperate with any investigation, but the preconditions laid down by India's constitutional courts have to be fulfilled in any case. Please note, their reply says, that they "cannot be conceivably summoned and expected to answer questions on a matter, to ascertain the 'facts and circumstances in relation to the present investigation', without being supplied with the contents of the FIR to which your investigation pertains." The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Advertisement
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bombay high court quashes magistrate's notice to HDFC Bank MD in defamation complaint
Mumbai: Bombay high court recently quashed and set aside an order of Girgaon magistrate issuing notice to HDFC Bank Ltd managing director and CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan in a criminal defamation complaint filed by a trust that manages Lilavati Hospital, Bandra West. Justice Shriram Modak in the August 5 order held that the magistrate had to record verification of the complainant's statement before issuing notice to the proposed accused under Section 223 (examination of complainant) of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. "There is a purpose of recording verification. It gives the magistrate an opportunity to ascertain whether to proceed further or not," he said. The private complaint was by Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, through permanent trustee Prashant Mehta. Jagdishan challenged the magistrate's June 16 order. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai | Gold Rates Today in Mumbai | Silver Rates Today in Mumbai Senior advocate Aabad Ponda, for the trust, said the magistrate had not yet taken cognisance of the complaint and that is why even though the verification statement is not recorded, he was justified in issuing notice. Agreeing with senior advocate Ravi Kadam, for Jagdishan, Justice Modak said "after filing of a complaint there has to be verification of the complainant and witnesses and prior to decision on taking cognizance, the proposed accused needs to be heard". He granted the magistrate "liberty to proceed with the matter by recording the verification of the complainant and all witnesses, if any, and then pass appropriate order". Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
