&w=3840&q=100)
Buying a second-hand car? Why insurance transfer is crucial for buyer
Why insurance transfer is crucial
'Transferring the existing insurance policy to the new owner's name is not just a formality, it is both legally mandatory and financially crucial,' says Saurabh Vijayvergia, founder & chief executive officer of CoverSure.
The law allows a 14-day window for completing this process. Beyond that, any claim made under the old owner's name can be rejected outright.
'A car insurance policy has two parts, own-damage and third-party liability. While third-party cover automatically transfers, the own-damage section needs formal transfer. Without it, no own-damage claims will be honoured,' said Neel Chheda, chief underwriting and data science officer of TATA AIG Insurance.
According to Paras Pasricha, business head, motor insurance at Policybazaar.com, the process involves submitting necessary documents and paying a minimal transfer fee to the insurer. The required documents include the original RC, valid insurance certificate, PUC certificate, Form 29 and 30 (signed by buyer and seller), address and ID proofs, and, if applicable, a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the bank.
What happens if you don't transfer insurance?
If you drive without transferring the insurance, you could face serious issues.
'The new owner might face claim rejection and penalties for driving without a valid insurance policy, while the seller could face legal issues if the buyer meets with an accident,' Pasricha warns.
While the third-party liability cover automatically continues under Section 157 of the Motor Vehicles Act, own-damage coverage does not, says Surender Tonk, vice-president, Insurance Brokers Association of India.
'If the insurance is not transferred, the own-damage section of the policy will not work, and any damage or loss to the insured vehicle will not be payable,' he says.
'If the policy isn't transferred, the new owner is essentially uninsured for own-damage claims. Any accident-related expenses will have to be borne out of pocket,' adds Chheda.
Can you modify or switch insurance?
Once the policy is in your name, you are free to upgrade or modify it.
'As a buyer, you do not have to stick with the previous owner's insurance terms. You can and should upgrade to a comprehensive cover or even switch insurers entirely,' says Vijayvergia. However, Tonk points out that while the base policy can be transferred, some add-on benefits like zero depreciation may not carry over to the new owner.
What about the No Claim Bonus (NCB)?
A common misconception among buyers is that the seller's NCB (discount for claim-free years) gets transferred with the car. That's not true.
'NCB is linked to the individual policyholder, not the vehicle,' says Arti Mulik, chief technical officer, Universal Sompo General Insurance. 'The seller can retain the NCB for their next vehicle, but the buyer starts fresh,' Mulik said.
'The entitlement of NCB follows the fortune of the original insured and not the vehicle or the policy. Buyers don't get any benefit from the seller's NCB,' adds Chheda.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
Ramannakunta lake beautification gets green signal; ten sites proposed for open gyms
The Secunderabad Cantonment Board (SCB) on Tuesday (July 15, 2025) gave in-principle approval for the rejuvenation and beautification of Ramannakunta Lake in New Bowenpally, marking a major step toward transforming the long-neglected water body into a vibrant recreational and ecological space. The Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA) has proposed a detailed plan for the lake's revival, including desilting, bund strengthening, stone revetment, and the creation of amenities such as open gyms, children's play areas, and a walking track. 'The beautification of Ramannakunta Lake has been approved by the Board. We are now awaiting a No Objection Certificate from the Army since the lake falls under their jurisdiction. The project is intended not just to enhance the area's livability but also to improve groundwater recharge and local biodiversity,' said Madhukar Naik, CEO of SCB. The proposal is part of a wider slate of urban development initiatives discussed during Tuesday's Board meeting, which saw deliberations on infrastructure, public health, and civic administration. Elevated corridor project moves forward The board discussed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with HMDA for infrastructure development in lieu of direct cash compensation for the Defence land. Instead of depositing ₹303.62 crore into the Consolidated Fund of India, the State Government has proposed carrying out development works such as underground sewer upgrades, strengthening of the Picket and Hasmathpet nalas, and stormwater drain construction across various Cantonment wards. An escrow account, as mandated by the Ministry of Defence's corrigendum dated July 8, will track expenditures and project milestones. HMDA will also be responsible for funding any cost overruns or shortfalls. Eye care for employees On the healthcare front, the Board is expected to finalise an MoU with Maxvision Eye Hospital to offer cashless eye treatment to SCB employees and their dependents. This step aligns with Central Government directives allowing treatment at CGHS-empanelled hospitals at CGHS rates, thereby eliminating the need for upfront payments by beneficiaries. The SCB has approved the installation of open gym equipment across various residential colonies and parks under its jurisdiction. The initiative aims to improve public health infrastructure and promote fitness among residents. In line with this, the Board is also considering the approval of specific locations for the installation of the open gym equipment. A total of ten sites across different wards have been proposed, ensuring equitable access to fitness amenities in multiple neighbourhoods, added Mr. Madhukar Naik.


Time of India
19 hours ago
- Time of India
NoC must for all new highrises within 56km radius of Mys airport
Mysuru: The Airports Authority of India (AAI) has mandated a no-objection certificate (NoC) for all new highrise buildings and tall structures within a 56km radius of Mysuru airport, located at Mandakalli on the Mysuru-Nanjangud national highway. The AAI has released a colour-coded zoning map for Mysuru airport, categorising areas into Green, Pink, Yellow, and Red zones. According to AAI notifications, these zones specify height limits for structures and natural features to prevent obstructions that could endanger aircraft operations. The zoning map provides clear guidelines for safe urban development around the airport, with the Red Zone indicating the most-restricted area near the runway, surrounded by Yellow, Pink, and Green zones extending outward. The authorities said AAI has instructed local bodies, including those in Mysuru city, newly formed urban local bodies on the city's outskirts, Nanjangud town, and parts of Chamarajanagar and Mandya districts, located within the 56km radius, to approve construction plans only after the applicants receive an NoC from AAI. Mysuru airport director JR Anoop said local authorities have been informed of this NoC requirement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Đây có thể là thời điểm tốt nhất để giao dịch vàng trong 5 năm qua IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo "We have advised them to grant plan approvals only after securing a NoC from AAI," Anoop said, adding that several mobile towers in the airport vicinity were removed during the regular safety inspections. AAI has introduced an online application system, NOCAS (No-Objection Certificate Application System), for obtaining height clearances for buildings and structures around airports. Developers and property owners within the 56km radius must apply for NoC through this platform to comply with regulations. Meanwhile, AAI has prohibited the operation of drones within a 5km radius of Mysuru airport to ensure passenger safety and secure operations.


NDTV
20 hours ago
- NDTV
'Not Irrational, Arbitrary': Jetty Near Gateway Of India Cleared By High Court
Mumbai: In a major boost for Mumbai's coastal infrastructure, the Bombay High Court on Tuesday dismissed a series of public interest litigations challenging the construction of a passenger jetty and terminal near the iconic Gateway of India. Affirming its legality and public necessity, the court gave its nod for the ambitious waterfront project, being carried out by the Maharashtra government and Mumbai Maritime Board (MMB), but also issued directives to ensure that public interest and statutory safeguards remain paramount. The verdict came after months of heated arguments between local residents' associations, environmentalists, and the State. The petitioners, including the Clean Heritage Colaba Residents Association and prominent citizens raised concerns about environmental degradation, flawed site selection, heritage violations, and a lack of public consultation. Project In Public Interest, Not Arbitrary: Court Delivering the judgment, Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep V Marne held that the project was a considered policy decision made in public interest and fell within the permissible framework of the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) 2019 Notification. "The decision to locate the project near Radio Club, despite historical preference for Ferry Wharf, does not render it irrational or arbitrary," the court observed, adding, "Policy decisions cannot be interfered with unless they are manifestly arbitrary, which is not the case here." The court also noted that all relevant regulatory approvals, including CRZ clearance from the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority (MCZMA), heritage no-objection certificate (NOC) from Mumbai Heritage Conservation Committee (MHCC), and permissions from the Archaeological Department and Mumbai Traffic Police had been duly obtained. Judicial Review Limited In Technical, Policy Matters Emphasising judicial restraint, the court cited past Supreme Court judgments that said courts must defer to expert bodies on infrastructure and environmental matters unless decisions are mala fide or ultra vires. The judges rejected the petitioners' argument that the proposed jetty could not be treated as a "standalone" facility. The project includes a 570-metre-long racquet-shaped jetty with 10 boarding platforms, a terminal with a VIP lounge, parking for 150 cars, cafes, a food court, and an amphitheatre. Despite these facilities, the court accepted the state's argument that these were ancillary to a passenger jetty, thus qualifying it for clearance by the state-level MCZMA rather than the central Ministry of Environment. Concerns Addressed A central plank of the petitioners' argument was a report submitted in 2000 by consulting engineers recommending Ferry Wharf as the most environmentally and operationally suitable site. However, the court found that the MMB was not bound by the two-decade-old report, especially in light of changing urban dynamics and expert inputs from subsequent Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) studies. "Even assuming Ferry Wharf was once preferable, the MMB's departure from it is not unjustified," the court ruled. "There is no obligation to follow prior expert recommendations in perpetuity, especially when alternate expert assessments have validated the current site." Critically Vulnerable Coastal Area? On the argument that the project falls within a "critically vulnerable coastal area," the bench held that the CRZ 2019 notification and subsequent amendments permitted construction of standalone passenger jetties in such zones, subject to safeguards. The petitioners' fear that the development would damage heritage views and marine ecology were also dismissed as speculative. The court also noted the extensive mitigation measures and the fact that similar projects in the vicinity had previously received clearances. Decongestion Benefits The court took note of the public benefit the project seeks to bring. It would "decongest the traffic and tourism load" at the Gateway of India and modernise the long-standing but outdated jetty infrastructure. The judgment emphasised that more than 3.5 million passengers currently use the makeshift jetties annually, often in unsafe and unsanitary conditions. The new terminal aims to provide secure boarding, emergency facilities, accessibility for the disabled, and structured traffic management. Safeguards While dismissing the petitions against the Colaba passenger jetty project, the court also issued a series of directions to ensure that the development does not violate environmental or heritage norms and remains within the regulatory framework. The directions are as follows: Mandatory compliance with approvals: The Mumbai Maritime Board and executing authorities must strictly adhere to all conditions imposed by the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority, Mumbai Heritage Conservation Committee, the Archaeological Department, and the Mumbai Traffic Police. Any violation will be treated as non-compliance with statutory approvals. Ancillary facilities to remain secondary: Facilities such as the amphitheatre, food court, cafe, and VIP lounge proposed as part of the terminal are to remain incidental to the jetty's primary purpose as a passenger terminal. They cannot be expanded or operated in a way that changes the nature of the project into a commercial or recreational venture. Periodic monitoring by MCZMA: The MCZMA is directed to carry out regular monitoring of the project's construction and operational phases to ensure there are no unauthorised modifications or breaches of the Coastal Regulation Zone clearance. Environmental safeguards for marine health: The disposal of sewage, effluents, and grey/black water from terminal facilities and berthed vessels must be managed through approved systems as per the EIA plan. No untreated discharge will be permitted into the sea. Preservation of Gateway of India: The court directed that the jetty project must not obstruct the visibility, physical access, or structural integrity of the Gateway of India. The heritage precinct must remain undisturbed in both construction and operational stages. Construction impact reporting: The project proponents must assess and report the ecological impact of piling and marine construction activities, especially during monsoon and marine breeding seasons. These reports must be submitted to the MCZMA for oversight. No precedent for other CRZ projects: The court clarified that its approval for this project is case-specific. It cannot be cited as a precedent or justification for similar developments in other ecologically sensitive CRZ-I or CRZ-IV areas without a full and independent regulatory assessment.