Importers finding gaps in India's 12% steel safeguard duty: JSW Steel's Jayant Acharya
One of the workarounds is the misuse of the Advance Authorization Scheme, which allows duty-free imports of raw materials for export-linked production. Importers get 18 months to export the finished product to prevent paying the safeguard duty.
Some non-automotive importers are using this scheme to buy cheaper steel from overseas and sell the finished goods in the domestic market, alleged Acharya. They are betting on the domestic prices softening during the 18-month window allowed under the scheme before eventually using local steel to make products for export, he said.
Other workarounds include buying semi-finished steel, which doesn't attract the safeguard duty, and then processing it further domestically, he said. Such imports have risen particularly from countries like Russia as well as the Asean bloc, he said.
'If there are any leakages which happen, we need to block (them)," Acharya said in an interview.
The JSW Steel executive's comments come as prices of steel in the domestic market continue to fall despite strong demand and decreasing imports. Prices of benchmark hot-rolled coils (HRC) of steel, which is used in cars and consumer durables among other things, fell to a four-month low to ₹50,700 for a tonne in June, as per data from BigMint, a market intelligence firm.
The price fall was in tandem with a fall in international steel prices, even as India's imports came down. The country imported 1.4 million tonnes of finished steel during the April-June quarter, a third less than the preceding quarter, as per an investor presentation from JSW Steel. During this period, India's steel consumption is estimated to have grown by about 7% compared with the preceding quarter at about 38.3 million tonnes.
Acharya argued that the headline trade figures do not convey the full picture. Considering steel imports arrive 1-2 months after an order is placed, the official import data fails to reflect real-time market sentiment around pricing, he said.
'Sentiment is determined by the booking of imports which happen in the month of operation. So if the booking of imports is at a lower level, that becomes a reference point for discussion with the domestic (steel producers)," he said.
Moreover, the import prices continue to influence the domestic market regardless of the quantities, he said. This means, even as import volumes narrow, the prices of domestic steel were likely to remain under pressure.
'There are other countries also which are now coming into India," he said, indicating a surge in imports from Russia and the 10-narion Asean bloc in recent months. This was because of the high tariffs in markets like the US and Europe, forcing these countries to export more to India, he said.
The steel industry contributes nearly 2% to India's GDP. JSW Steel is the largest domestic steelmaker by capacity, followed by Tata Steel, Steel Authority of India and Jindal Steel and Power.
During a post-earning interaction with analysts last week, JSW Steel's management said that it expects a favourable decision when the government reviews the safeguard duty on steel imports, both on the duration and rate. The government imposed a 12% safeguard duty on steel imports on 21 April for a period of 200 days.
Steel is a capital-intensive industry, Acharya said, pointing to the need for long-term stability in terms of tariffs to avoid exposure to global market uncertainties before making long-term investments in steel plants.
JSW Steel tripled its profits in June quarter of FY26, supported by higher production and sales volume along with easing coking coal costs, a key raw material. The steelmaker reported a profit of ₹2,209 crore compared to ₹867 crore in the same quarter a year ago. The consolidated revenue for the first quarter of FY26 was ₹43,147 crore, compared to ₹42,943 crore from the same period last year.
The Supreme Court's ruling on Bhushan Steel and Power Ltd (BPSL) won't impact their expansion plans, said Acharya. On 2 May, SC rejected JSW Steel's ₹19,700 crore acquisition of BPSL and ordered its liquidation.
The company is waiting for the apex court hearing on their review petition before undertaking a 0.5 million tonne expansion at BPSL. However, that has no bearing on their target and they are on track to achieving its 50-million-tonne-capacity by 2050.
Archarya also reaffirmed that steel demand in India is strong and is set to see an incremental growth of around 13 -14 million tonnes in FY26. This would be a rise from 144 million tonnes in FY25, as per BigMint estimates. With additional volumes kicking in from the ramp-up at JSW Vijayanagar Metallics Ltd (JVML) and the Blast Furnace 3 upgrade post-shutdown will aid the steel maker's ability to meet this growing demand.
JSW Steel is expanding its Vijayanagar plant in Karnataka by adding 5 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) through its subsidiary JVML, which will bring the total capacity of the plant to 18 mtpa.
JSW Steel has a consolidated capacity of 35.7 mtpa including domestic capacity of 34.2 mtpa and 1.5 mtpa in the US.
On the cost front, the steelmaker expects to see some benefit due to the strategic steps taken, particularly in areas like coking coal. In the current quarter coking coal prices were softer but they are stabilizing now, said Acharya.
Coking coal is a key ingredient used to make steel besides iron ore. It is heated without air and turned into coke, which is used in blast furnaces to help turn iron ore into liquid iron. This iron ore is then used to make steel.
On the raw material side, 'we continue to look at startup of the new mines which we have got in the captive in Karnataka and Goa," he said, adding that their domestic coking coal mines are expected to be operational in the next few years, which will further support cost efficiencies.
The company's overseas operations are expected to improve, driven by a more favourable international pricing environment.
The steelmaker has a 1.5 mtpa electric-arc-furnace-based steel manufacturing unit in Ohio, US and a 1.75 mtpa plate and pipe production mill in Texas. In Italy, it has a 0.32 mtpa rail manufacturing unit, which is undergoing an expansion in capacity to 0.6 mtpa.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
11 hours ago
- Mint
Centre scrambles to revamp export plan as US tariffs hit Indian goods, favour ASEAN rivals
New Delhi: Faced with steep tariffs imposed by the US government, the Centre is huddling with export promotion councils and manufacturers to find a way to rework the country's exports strategy, two government officials aware of the development said. The development comes on the back of a deadlock in bilateral trade agreement (BTA) negotiations between India and the US, which the two countries have been grappling with since June, as reported by Mint on 11 June. The new plan involves diversifying into markets such as the UK, with which India recently signed a free trade agreement (FTA), and the European Union (EU), where negotiations are in the final stage and a deal could be signed before the end of the year, the officials cited above said on the condition of anonymity. India's plan would also focus on sector-specific challenges and policy measures to support exports, including exploring new markets with the help of Indian missions overseas, the officials said. The government sees strong export potential in regions like Saudi Arabia, France, Vietnam, the Netherlands, Mexico, and Ethiopia, among other countries. The review will additionally focus on India's growing competitiveness gap with Bangladesh and with ASEAN countries such as Vietnam and Indonesia, which have received significant tariff relief under the latest US executive order. While India faces a 25% duty — just 1 percentage point down from 26% in the 2 April notification — Vietnam's tariffs have been reduced from 46% to 20%, Indonesia's from 32% to 19%, and Bangladesh's from 37% to 20%, giving these exporters a clear edge in the US market. 'Sectoral discussions will have special attention to cases like Vietnam, which imports Indian shrimp, processes it, and re-exports it to the US under a more favourable tariff, and Indonesia, which enjoys a lower duty on electronics exports," one of the officials said. 'Bangladesh, a major garments exporter, now benefits from a lower 20% rate compared to the 25% levied on Indian textiles." The meetings will also examine the implications of the new US rules on transshipment, which impose a 40% punitive duty on goods rerouted to evade tariffs, this person said. Queries sent to the commerce ministry, which is spearheading the consultations with industry, remained unanswered till press time. The tariffs explained On Thursday, the US imposed a 25% tariff on the value of all goods shipped from India that will come into effect on 7 August. To be sure, Indian goods will also attract existing MFN (most-favoured nation) duties, which average 3% but differ across sectors. Goods that are already on their way to the US and will reach ports there before 5 October will have to pay 10% duty. Further, certain sectors are exempted from the new 25% tariff, but they still have to pay the MFN duty. 'As of now, exports worth around $30 billion — comprising sectors like petrochemicals ($4 billion), pharmaceuticals ($15 billion), and electronic goods ($11 billion) — would not be impacted, as these are exempt from the additional duty," said the first among the two officials mentioned above. The first official added that sectors that are of concern are textiles (exports worth $10.91 billion), engineering goods ($19.16 billion), agriculture ($2.53 billion), gems and jewellery ($9.94 billion), leather ($948.47 million), marine products ($2.68 billion), and plastics ($1.92 billion). Notably, India exported goods worth $86.5 billion to the US in FY25, which is 20% of the country's total merchandise exports of $433.56 billion in FY25. Industry reactions According to the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), a Delhi-based think tank, India's goods exports to the US may decline by 30% to $60.6 billion in FY2026. 'This order is more than just a tariff measure — it's a pressure tactic," said Ajay Srivastava, founder of GTRI, adding that the US is using access to its markets through tariffs as leverage to advance its geopolitical goals and extract one-sided trade concessions. 'Countries like China have retained exemptions on critical goods such as pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and energy. But India has been singled out for harsher treatment, with no product-level exemptions whatsoever," Srivastava added. Tariffs on China have not been revised under the latest order and will continue at 30%. Vipul Shah, former chairman of the Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC), said the government should consider incentivising exporters, especially those heavily dependent on the US market, as the new tariffs are a significant blow to sectors like gems and jewellery. 'Immediate support is crucial to help these industries navigate the shock," he said. However, Ashwani Mahajan of the Swadeshi Jagran Manch, which opposes a one-sided trade deal, said India should not be overly worried about higher US tariffs, as the country is not as export-dependent as China. 'Work is already underway to diversify and explore new markets," he said. Mithileshwar Thakur, secretary general of the Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC), said the Indian apparel industry has an exposure of about 33% to the US market. He added that the FTA with the UK and ongoing FTA negotiations with the EU together can offer significant opportunities for the Indian apparel industry, and partly offset losses in US business. But, to tide over the current crisis, the government should offer incentive in the immediate term to the exporting community to stay afloat in the US market. 'It is unfortunate that India has been hit with the highest tariffs. This will definitely impact our competitiveness. We are in a wait-and-watch mode to see whether prices rise in the US market and if American buyers can absorb the increased costs or not," said Pankaj Chadha, chairman of Engineering Export Promotion Council (EEPC). Exploring newer markets For engineering goods, the government is focusing on expanding exports to new target markets such as Sao Tome, Macao, Georgia, Croatia, Guinea-Bissau, Belize, Azerbaijan, Myanmar, Lithuania, Norway, Somalia, and Greece. Currently, key export destinations for Indian engineering goods include the U.S., UAE, Saudi Arabia, Germany, and Italy. The Netherlands, South Korea, Belgium, Mexico, Japan, and Kuwait are also seen as promising markets. For pharmaceuticals, new destinations identified include Montenegro, South Sudan, Chad, Comoros, Brunei, Latvia, Ireland, Sweden, Haiti, and Ethiopia, while Greece is listed as a promising market. Traditional export markets for Indian drugs are— US, UK, Netherlands, South Africa, and Brazil. In electronics, the government has listed Sao Tome, Montenegro, Cayman Islands, St. Vincent, Mongolia, El Salvador, Turkmenistan, Honduras, Bahrain, Somalia, Puerto Rico, Vietnam, and Sweden as new export destinations. Russia, Mexico, and Turkey are marked as promising markets. For agricultural and processed food products, the focus will be on Nigeria, Switzerland, Lithuania, Slovenia, Mexico, Sweden, Portugal, Cameroon, Djibouti, Latvia, Egypt, Senegal, Canada, Argentina, and Brazil.
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
India, ASEAN, and the battle for influence in Southeast Asia
By Yanitha Meena Louis The recently concluded ASEAN Post-Ministerial Conference with India saw the adoption of the new ASEAN-India Plan of Action (2026–2030), which will guide both sides in realising the full potential of the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership over the next five years. This is in line with India's vision for its Act East Policy (AEP) in Southeast Asia. As the Act East Policy enters its second decade, the overarching question pertinent to Southeast Asia is how this policy framework can be made more effective to enhance engagement with ASEAN and its member states. The conceptions of India's redesignation of 'Look East' to 'Act East' in 2014 have been overwhelmingly attributed to India's strategic competition with China — against the backdrop of the latter's growing influence in Southeast Asia. But 10 years later, with India's growing profile in the Indo-Pacific, to make its engagement with Southeast Asia or the Act East Policy itself solely about China, ignores the fact that New Delhi has interest in the region independent of Beijing and vice-versa. This is severely reductionist and by and large, a grave misconception. However, there remain questions on India's evolving role as a rising power and its engagement with Southeast Asia, seeing how the emerging, dynamic Indo-Pacific order has given new strategic meaning to India. This reinforces the argument that there is a lack of understanding of India's aspiration and strategic positioning. That brings us to an important question, what role does India hope to play in the Indo-Pacific through the AEP vis-à-vis its relations with Southeast Asia? In the last decade, India has been touted to play the role of 'balancer' to a more assertive China. Against the backdrop of the South China Sea dispute, major power rivalry and trade and economic disruptions, perceptually, New Delhi's rise and the AEP makes it a natural balancer for Southeast Asia. Dhruva Jaishankar in his book Vishwa Shastra: India and the World argues that while New Delhi has the potential to play the role of 'balancer', more specifically an economic balancer, much work must be still done before this is realised. With Indian Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal recently slamming the nature of the India-ASEAN trade relationship, perhaps India is not ready to fully embrace this role of economic balancer. But this concept of balancer also means that the India-Southeast Asia relationship is viewed through a China lens or even US-China prism, and this does not give enough credit or currency to the value of India's ties with the region. In many ways, being a balancer reduces the India-Southeast Asia relationship to a product of, for and by China. Following Indian foreign policy, the semantics that come out of New Delhi, and the trajectory of India's relations with ASEAN and ASEAN member states in recent years, it is clear that this is not the role India envisions for itself, nor how Southeast Asia distinctly views India. Is India then a growing normative power? Does the AEP provide the necessary policy framework to support India for this role in the region? At the 2025 Raisina Dialogue, to a question on whether India has the appetite to be a normative power in the region with its growing role in the Global South, Minister of External Affairs S Jaishankar indicated that while New Delhi may not explicitly use the term to describe its role, as the most populous country in the world, India's Global South mobilisation efforts certainly cannot be ignored, as these will continue to set standards for cooperation. India's role as a normative power is, however, reliant on the extent to which ASEAN and its member states identify with and cooperate within India's Global South agenda and Indian-led initiatives. It also heavily depends on how consistent and creative India is with its initiatives. This means keeping the momentum on proposals announced at ASEAN summits and focusing on the public goods delivery aspects of mega initiatives like the MAHASAGAR. Underpinned by its AEP, India's active presence in mechanisms like IORA, BRICS, BIMSTEC which function on the basis of addressing shared regional challenges through niche area cooperation also serves as a key enabler to its budding role as a normative power. Moving forward, whichever role India envisions for itself with the hope that it resonates with Southeast Asia, India must focus on three main aspects of its ties with the region. First, a strong strategic partnership is indicative of a strengthened AEP. India has a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with ASEAN, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore, a Comprehensive Partnership with Thailand and Enhanced Partnership with Brunei. These partnerships can be seen as the structural and functional manifestation of India's outreach and engagement via its AEP and so it is crucial that they are fit for purpose and in tune with geopolitical realities. Secondly, there must be thoughtful continuity in the initiatives announced during ASEAN summits. For example, if India wishes to 'advocate for the Global South' as announced in the 12-point proposal during the 2023 ASEAN-India Summit in Indonesia, then it should have also been reaffirmed in the 10-point plan in a more detailed manner during the 2024 ASEAN-India Summit In Laos. Consistency in optics, semantics and the chosen 'lexicon' is essential for India's role-building in the region. Finally, there must be greater synergy between ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific and India's Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative. This must be clearly demonstrated, and one way to do this is active participation in the ASEAN Indo-Pacific Forum. Periodic assessment of the progress in cooperating within these frameworks and clearly highlighting successes will not only aid in shaping the trajectory of relations but help quantify the power and increasing relevance of the AEP over the years. The writer is analyst, Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS), Malaysia
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Rare Recall: SC will Again Hear JSW-BPSL Case
The Supreme Court Thursday recalled its May 2 judgment that scrapped JSW Steel 's acquisition of Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd (BPSL) and ordered its liquidation, giving interim relief to the Sajjan Jindal-led company that claims to have infused Rs 30,000 crore to turn around the bankrupt steelmaker. A bench led by Chief Justice BR Gavai allowed the review pleas filed by JSW Steel and BPSL's lenders, including State Bank of India and Punjab National Bank , and posted the petitions for a detailed hearing on August 7. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Data Analytics MCA Degree Operations Management Project Management Digital Marketing Finance Management Data Science PGDM Design Thinking Leadership Public Policy healthcare others MBA Data Science Cybersecurity Others Technology Product Management Healthcare CXO Artificial Intelligence Skills you'll gain: Data Analysis & Visualization Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making Analytics Strategy & Implementation Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Applied Business Analytics Starts on Jun 13, 2024 Get Details While it is rare for the top court to reconsider its orders, a bench that also includes Justice Satish Chandra Sharma said this 'is a fit case' where the judgment 'needs to be recalled and the matter is to be considered afresh'. 'Prima facie, we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not correctly consider the legal position as has been laid down in the catena of judgments,' the bench said. It also noted the contention of the petitioners that the previous judgment had considered various incorrect factual aspects. 'We are inclined to allow the review. We won't look into any documents, just the judgment itself,' Justice Gavai said. Another bench of Justices Bela M Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma had on May 2 scrapped JSW Steel's acquisition of BPSL, four years after the transaction was closed, holding that the steelmaker's Rs 19,700 crore resolution proposal was 'illegal' and 'in gross violation' of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code . It termed JSW's intention 'mala fide and dishonest', saying that the company took undue advantage of pending Enforcement Directorate proceedings and did not implement its plan for two years. Justice Trivedi has since retired. After JSW sought a review of the order, SC on May 26 ordered status quo on the liquidation proceedings till it decided the review petition . The lenders too approached the court with a similar review plea.
