EU and US on brink of tariff deal to avoid trade war
European Union
and the
United States
are believed to be on the brink of a deal that would stop the transatlantic
dispute over tariffs
escalating into a full blown trade war.
Negotiations between the two sides are near to concluding an 'agreement in principle', which sources say could be finalised imminently, if approved by US president
Donald Trump
.
The 'agreement in principle', if signed off on by Mr Trump, would buy time for technical negotiations to continue, to iron out the more complex details of the future EU-US trading relationship, without the threat of steeper tariffs hanging over the discussions.
The European Commission's trade negotiators, led by
Maroš Šefčovič
, are understood to be close to an agreement on the broad parameters of a deal on tariffs with US officials. Mr Šefčovič spoke to commerce secretary Howard Lutnick in the last 48 hours and had a further call scheduled with trade negotiator
Jamieson Greer
on Wednesday evening.
READ MORE
The high-level contact follows a telephone call on Sunday between Mr Trump and
European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen
, which she said helped 'move things forward'.
The outline of a draft agreement negotiated between the EU and US would see the 10 per cent tariff Mr Trump put on nearly all EU imports remain.
However, EU officials were hopeful of securing tariff exemptions for the aviation and spirits sectors in the deal, according to briefings given to diplomats in Brussels in recent days. The exact details of the agreement could be subject to change before it is finally signed off.
US tariffs charged on imports coming from the EU were due to increase to at least 20 per cent on July 9th, but the deadline was extended to August 1st by Mr Trump earlier this week. Negotiations between US and EU officials had intensified in recent weeks, as the initial deadline loomed.
[
EU working 'day and night' for tariff deal, Ursula von der Leyen says
Opens in new window
]
EU negotiators have been pushing back on a last-minute proposal tabled by the Trump administration, that would have seen tariffs on EU agricultural products set at a higher 17 per cent rate.
The text of any deal will likely only run to several pages. It is unclear whether it will include a reference to pharmaceuticals, a sector Mr Trump has promised to hit with huge import duties at a later date.
The negotiating teams have been exploring a quota scheme that would allow European car manufacturers to offset some portion of the tariffs they would be charged, based on the size of their manufacturing footprint in the US.
The commission had threatened to put counter-tariffs on imports of a range of US products, such as aircraft, medical devices, automobiles, bourbon and agricultural produce, in the event talks collapsed without agreement.
Government sources in Dublin said they were on standby for developments, but cautioned it was hard to be sure a deal would be concluded in the coming days, given the unpredictability of the Trump administration.
[
China warns countries on agreeing US tariff deal that would come at Beijing's expense
Opens in new window
]
While much of the substance of the agreement was believed to be very close to being settled, diplomatic sources in Brussels also warned that Mr Trump could decide to reopen large aspects of the negotiations unexpectedly.
An agreement that averts the prospect of cripplingly high US tariffs on European trade from the start of next month would be hugely welcomed in Government Buildings.
However, there is concern about the possibility Mr Trump could introduce separate tariffs on pharmaceutical products at a later date. Pharmaceuticals make up the bulk of the Republic's exports across the Atlantic, given the large concentration of US pharma firms with manufacturing sites in Ireland.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on racist attacks: no place for hate on our streets
In recent weeks there has been a disturbing uptick in reports of violent attacks targeting ethnic minorities, particularly affecting members of Ireland's Indian community. Members of that community have spoken of rising verbal abuse and assaults on Irish streets, leading them to feel unsafe. Many such incidents remain unreported to the Garda Síochána, though details have surfaced on local WhatsApp groups. The situation has left many people feeling increasingly vulnerable as they go about their daily lives in what was once seen as a welcoming environment. And last weekend the Indian embassy warned its citizens to take extra precautions for their own security. Indians have become Ireland's fastest-growing immigrant group, with thousands receiving residence permits in the past three years alone. In a relatively short period, the community has grown to become the largest non-white ethnic group in the country, contributing significantly to various sectors of the economy. Particularly notable is the valuable contribution of Indian professionals to the health service and technology industries, where their expertise is in high demand. But many now report feeling a sense of threat. The Garda has responded to the reports of violence with statements emphasising its commitment to addressing the problem. But some victims, especially those who have lived in Ireland for many years, believe that things are getting worse. They point to an increase in hostile, racially charged encounters on the streets, fuelled in part by poisonous rhetoric on social media. All of this forms part of a broader, worrying trend that has seen public spaces and public discourse become sites of escalating toxicity. READ MORE Reports suggest that many perpetrators are minors, complicating the issue of legal accountability. While recently passed hate crime legislation now makes it possible to treat racial animus as an aggravating factor when sentencing, the effectiveness of this as a deterrent remains to be seen. The debate on regulating hate speech remains contentious, as evidenced by last year's controversy over proposed legislation on the issue, which was ultimately abandoned. But alongside legislation and enforcement, civil society and individual citizens also have a role to play in rejecting those who carry out these reprehensible acts. It is concerning that in some cases, bystanders have witnessed assaults but failed to intervene or report them. However, there have also been instances where members of the public have come to the aid of victims and brought the assaults to public attention. Such solidarity sends an unequivocal signal that racist violence is unacceptable. It is everybody's shared responsibility to ensure that no one feels unsafe because of their ethnicity or the colour of their skin.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Fine Gael significantly outspent Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin on elections last year
Fine Gael spent significantly more than either Fianna Fáil or Sinn Féin on elections last year, according to party accounts provided to the Standards in Public Office Commission (Sipo). Fine Gael was the biggest spender overall on elections in 2024 and also the highest spender on the general election, according to the consolidated accounts of the parties. The accounts, published by Sipo, show Sinn Féin is the richest of the three big parties, with more income, stronger cash balances and an unmatched reserve of €8.7 million at the end of 2024. Sinn Féin, like the other parties, ran a significant deficit last year, in its case amounting to €1.6 million. However, it still finished the year with €4.6 million in cash, down from €5.3 million at the beginning of the year. READ MORE By contrast, Fianna Fáil had just €470,000 in cash at the end of the year. Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil appear to have funded some of their election expenditure through loans, which the two parties will pay back over the coming years as they prepare for the next election, though Fine Gael is in a significantly better financial position than Fianna Fáil. The days when Fianna Fáil outspent everyone at election time are long gone, the figures suggest. This time, the consolidated spending shows Fine Gael spent €3.22 million on elections last year, substantially ahead of Sinn Féin on €1.7 million and Fianna Fáil on €1.69 million. Fine Gael spent more than €2 million on the general election, more than twice as much as Fianna Fáil, which spent less than €950,000, according to the consolidated accounts of both parties. Despite being outspent, Fianna Fáil won 10 more seats than Fine Gael in the general election. Sinn Féin also beat Fine Gael by one seat. [ Three constituencies that show why Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin outperformed Fine Gael Opens in new window ] [ Expect the unexpected: What the 2024 local and European elections have taught us Opens in new window ] Sinn Féin and Fine Gael each spent about €600,000 on the European elections, according to the accounts, with Fianna Fáil's figure much lower at about €320,000. Fine Gael also outspent its rivals at the local elections, with the accounts showing expenditure of €512,000. Fianna Fáil reported spending of €289,000, while Sinn Féin's accounts show it spent just €77,000 on the local elections. All three parties received more than €5 million in State funding last year, while the accounts of all three parties show they are also reliant on fundraising among their members. Sinn Féin has the highest income from donations, with €182,000 raised from individual donations and €52,000 from corporate donations. The party's organisation in Northern Ireland is not governed by the strict rules on political donations that are in place in the South. [ Who is the American who left €535,000 to Sinn Féin's US fundraising group in her trust? Opens in new window ] But it is Sinn Féin's cash pile – likely linked to a mysterious bequest from a reclusive Englishman, William Hampton, who left more than €4 million to the party in 2019 – that sets it apart from its rivals. Along with a substantial property portfolio, it means the party can record 'reserves' of some €8.7 million in its accounts. This is the first year Sipo rules have required the parties to produce consolidated accounts that show the financial dealings of all units of the organisations above a certain size. In a statement, Fine Gael cautioned against comparing the election spend of the different parties in the accounts. [ William Hampton: The life and extraordinary times of Sinn Féin's million-euro donor Opens in new window ] 'It would be inaccurate to use the published annual accounts of political parties without context to compare election expenditure by political parties,' the party said in a statement. It said there 'appears to be significant divergence in the approach to Electoral Act compliance by different political parties ... The extent to which election expenditure is funded by the Party HQ, by party subsidiaries that are required to be reported under the Electoral Act, or by party subsidiaries that are not required to be reported under the Electoral Act, varies for each party and candidate. This also has a bearing on the figures reported.'
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Poland's new president: a thorn in the side of the government
There's presidencies, and there's presidencies. Irish parties mulling over their choices to succeed Michael D Higgins will be taking some comfort from the fact that their successful pick will not be assuming a Trump-like, seemingly omnipotent presidency, shaping their agenda, nor indeed, the half-way house that is Poland's top office. Karol Nawrocki, conservative historian, amateur boxer, and supporter of Donald Trump, who was sworn in on Wednesday, is neither a symbolic figurehead nor an agenda setter. However, his powers of veto and policy prerogatives ensure that he will be a major thorn in the side of Poland' s centrist Europhile government. Backed by nationalist opposition party Law and Justice (PiS), Nawrocki 's shock, wafer-thin, majority in June's election dealt a particular blow to prime minister Donald Tusk's hopes to undo the PiS's legacy of attacks on judicial independence and to improve the country's relationship with fellow EU member states and Ukraine, whose Nato membership the new president can block. Poland is now bracing for a continuation of the deadlock seen under nationalist outgoing president, Andrzej Duda. At his inauguration on Wednesday Nawrocki warned that he is ready to block appointments of judges he does not see as fit to perform their roles, and will create a council dedicated to repairing Poland's constitutional order. He concluded, shouting the Maga-like 'May God bless Poland, long live Poland.' READ MORE Like Trump, Nawrocki brings a rich vein of controversy to his new post. He is the subjects of ongoing criminal probes, and like Trump, will be protected during his presidential term from prosecution. Controversies he has been involved in range from his admitted part in a brawl between football hooligans in 2009, allegations of involvement with gangsters and claims he cheated an old man out of his apartment. He is a political newcomer little known to the public before PiS threw its weight behind him. A bumpy road ahead is likely.
