logo
'Help me find a new author with the same vibe as my old favorite'

'Help me find a new author with the same vibe as my old favorite'

Vox04-03-2025

Welcome to Ask a Book Critic, a members-only feature packed with personalized book recommendations from senior correspondent and resident book critic Constance Grady . To get your own recommendation, ask Constance here , and subscribe to the newsletter here .
I'm a person who wants to read more fiction, but I get regularly (not a bad thing I guess) sucked into the big nonfiction book for the policy/chronically online zeitgeist. For example, I am reading On the Edge by Nate Silver now, and I read Everyone Who Is Gone Is Here and Recoding America before that. But I was a big fan of I'm a Fan by Sheena Patel.
For we, the chronically online, I can only recommend Patricia Lockwood's No One Is Talking About This , the great novel of what pre-Musk Twitter looked like. Lockwood, a poet, was an early adopter of what we used to call Weird Twitter, and that's the mode in which she writes her novel: perverse, darkly funny, unnervingly sincere when you don't expect it to be.
No One Is Talking About This features an unnamed narrator who has become famous for having tweeted, 'Can a dog be twins?' Now, her project is to write a book about 'the stream-of-a-consciousness that is not entirely your own,' a consciousness 'that you participate in, but that also acts upon you,' which is to say, the hive consciousness of Twitter. But the narrator is forced off the internet when her niece is born with severe birth defects, and her entire life is shaken up with love.
This book is tender and beautiful, and it will have the side effect of not making you feel guilty for being online so much as aware of it — aware of how it feels, why it pulls to us, and how it molds our minds and bodies.
I love books with unconventional female narrators, whether they are morally compromised or socially awkward/strange. For example, I've recently read Yellowface , Convenience Store Woman , and Eleanor Oliphant Is Completely Fine . While these range in subject matter, I'd love recommendations for books that feature strong first-person narration (the stranger and believably unlikeable the better) and the kinds of critiques on societal expectations these had.
I keep having to rewrite this sentence because I am so excited that I can't stop myself from lapsing into capslock, but GET READY for Susan Choi's Trust Exercise . WHAT A BOOK!
It's a tricky one to talk about, though. Let's keep it as simple as we can. In part one, Trust Exercise is a lovely little bittersweet tale about a high school romance gone wrong between two theater kids in the 1980s, told by both lovers in alternating perspectives. In part two, we learn that much of what we read in part one is heavily fictionalized from the events that our new narrator assures us really happened, which were much darker. (You're going to love this narrator, by the way — incredibly spiky, incredibly angry, all the while constantly asserting that she is absolutely not mad.) In part three, we finally get to something that might resemble the truth, and it is devastating. (It is also infamously confusing, but rest assured, we've got an explainer for that. Don't read it until you've finished the book!)
I've really enjoyed a few Jennifer Egan books recently — Visit From the Goon Squad and its sequel Candy House and most recently her debut The Invisible Circus . I'm wondering if you could recommend another author or book worth exploring with similar vibes. I've been in a bit of a rut with reading until this trio of books and had been falling back on murder mysteries as a crutch. Don't get me wrong, I love a cozy murder mystery in the winter. But something that's literary and readable is more the mix I'm aiming for right now. Thank you!
When I think of Jennifer Egan books, I think of: formal experimentation, a deep interest in how technology shapes human connections, and a preoccupation with time and its ravages and redemptions. For two other perspectives on these issues, your best bet is probably either Gary Shteyngart or George Saunders.
Of the two, Shteyngart is the cynic. His protagonists tend to be losers, middle-aged men who are either beaten down by capitalism or have so internalized its logic that it has destroyed their minds. Shteyngart is never shy about making jokes at their expense. Their subsequent attempts to form connections forms the core of his witty, tricky novels. Start with Super Sad True Love Story , the 2010 dystopian novel that has only become more plausible with time.
Saunders is a more straightforwardly empathetic writer, particularly in his only novel, Lincoln in the Bardo . (The bulk of Saunders's work is in short stories.) Lincoln is about Abraham Lincoln's son, 11-year-old Willie, who died of typhus while the Civil War was raging and who has, in this novel, become trapped in the bardo, the in-between place straddling life and afterlife. Willie must pass on to the next stage of being or lose his soul. It is only the great empathy Lincoln feels for the dead — as the man whose decisions have meant death for so many — that rouses the other ghosts of the bardo to guide Willie onward. It's a beautiful, word-drunk novel. If you like it, go from there straight to Saunders's great short story collection The Tenth of December and then just keep going.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alyssa Milano says Nioxin 'helped tremendously' with hair loss — and this treatment's on sale
Alyssa Milano says Nioxin 'helped tremendously' with hair loss — and this treatment's on sale

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Alyssa Milano says Nioxin 'helped tremendously' with hair loss — and this treatment's on sale

Whether you're suffering from post-COVID hair loss (like Charmed star Alyssa Milano) or you've been dealing with bald spots for years, shedding is an uphill — and often discouraging — battle. You're certainly not alone, though. Hair loss affects millions of men and women, but you don't need to spend a fortune on doctor's office treatments to put up a good fight. There are plenty of at-home regimens you can try first, and, according to Milano, one brand is so effective that you may never need professional help: the Nioxin anti-thinning system, marked down to $62 (from $76) on Amazon We're fans of the celeb-approved Nioxin kit even when it's full price— so the fact that you're getting four products (a three-month supply) for just $62 is a pretty good deal in our opinion. Designed to give volume to hair and protect against breakage, the Nioxin hair-care system promotes thicker and fuller hair growth. This particular four-piece set, System 4 is formulated to help amplify hair texture and defend your locks against breakage, the latter of which can help reduce hair loss from damage while strengthening hair for the future. The other sets, Systems 1-3, are made to address additional concerns, like hair with progressed thinning and colored hair with light thinning. After publicly sharing her hair-loss story via video on Twitter, Milano finally found the help she needed in a few tress-strengthening bottles. She praises Nioxin products (and Nutrafol supplements, not currently on sale) for helping "tremendously" with hair loss. And she's not alone: These products have found fans in Amazon shoppers, too, who praise how effective the treatments are at helping curb lost locks and revitalizing their manes to their original health. Hundreds of shoppers have given Nioxin hair treatment sets a five-star review. "It actually works," said one user."This product actually does what is says it does. Easy system to use. Love the smell of the product." "This hair-care set does actually help slow down my hair falling out, when I stop using it, I can really see a big difference and how much hair I lose," raved a pleased customer. "After just one use of this product made a big difference with my hair. I battle excessive dry hair and tried so many products, including salon products and never got the results I wanted or needed. These will be my forever hair-care products," pledged another super fan. "My hair was thinning due to starting graduate school and getting used to traveling back and forth to school," said this stressed-out scholar. "I've always had thick hair so this shocked me. My hair stylist recommended this and I love it! It takes time for results, but within a few days, I saw less breakage and fall out. You definitely need to wash your hair every three days and use all three products to see a true difference. It has a menthol/minty smell and a cooling tingling sensation on the scalp that's comfortable and makes my hair feel clean. Love it!" This shopper has a caveat for their fellow emptors: "My hairdresser recommended this. I have used it for over a year with great results. She saw a change in my hair within three months. But beware, there are people selling fake versions in the same packaging. Look who you are buying from and if they are legitimate. The reviews quoted above reflect the most recent versions at the time of publication. If you have Amazon Prime, you'll get free shipping, of course. Not yet a member? No problem. You can sign up for your free 30-day trial here. (And by the way, those without Prime still get free shipping on orders of $35 or more.)

Musk and Trump's Social-Media Fight Reveals How Power Works Today
Musk and Trump's Social-Media Fight Reveals How Power Works Today

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Musk and Trump's Social-Media Fight Reveals How Power Works Today

The fact that Elon Musk kicked off last week's emo bloodbath with the words 'I'm sorry, but' has got to be the realest-housewives part of it. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk posted to X on Tuesday. Bless his heart — he sounded really contrite. Then he consulted a 'Downton Abbey' phrasebook and found 'disgusting abomination' to poshly trash Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill.' He kept huffing his own X fumes through Wednesday until, on Thursday at 2:30 p.m., Trump all-capped him on Truth Social: 'CRAZY!' Off to the races. Everyone has their favorite part of Thursday's cage match. I was instantly startled by the non-pettiness: Musk gunning for Trump's impeachment, Trump gunning for Musk's financial ruin. All amid a cacophonous peanut gallery that included Ye, MAGA billionaire Bill Ackman and Musk ex Ashley St. Clair. But the Trump-Musk feud is not just a clash of two madmen; it is a clash between the two fiercest social-media influencers of all time. Trump and Musk are human memes, forged on Twitter and its spinoffs, X and Truth Social. Their rise, their public personas, their marriage of convenience and their falling out took place in short-form posts and the freestyle cultivation of likes and engagement. Their feud is in many ways a story of our times: It reveals how online power struggles work now — with rivals leveraging online fanbases, battling for authority across platforms and aiming for the ultimate flex: starving the opponent of any attention at all. Long before most, both Trump and Musk understood that traditional PR handlers would sterilize their personas, blunt the trolling potential of their best material and interfere with their relationships with fans. Trump built his political identity on Twitter, beating his chest and savaging his foes with a rawness that used to make his every utterance on Twitter unmissable. Musk built his celebrity through it, too, with runic tweets, like 'laws are on one side, poets on the other.' In late 2021, he was so proud of his philosopher-king status that he considered going pro: 'thinking of quitting my jobs & becoming an influencer full-time wdyt,' he tweeted, to 371,000 likes. The Musk-Trump bond, but also the tension in it, has also been defined by these platforms. It heated up in the fall of 2022, when Trump was in exile from Twitter and out of the White House. Metabolizing pandemic redpills, Musk was still half-heartedly striking a neoliberal pose, only recently having supported Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Joe Biden in 2020. But he was also slagging Twitter for having banished groypers, conspiracy-mongers and especially Trump, its star, for insurrectioning. That's when Musk bought Twitter for $44 billion. He claims now he knew he was vastly overpaying — and in February he said X is worth 'like, eight cents' — but the expense was for a noble cause: to restore freedom of speech and welcome @realDonaldTrump back to the green pastures of his social-media homeland. In November of that year, Musk polled X, and a slight majority said Trump should be reinstated. 'The people have spoken,' Musk posted. 'Vox Populi, Vox Dei.' The voice of people is the voice of God. Right. But then, if we're just talking about the course of human events, something extremely cruel happened, a monumental act of Trumpian ingratitude. After his account was reinstated, Trump didn't come back. For nine long months, @realDonaldTrump met Musk's devastatingly expensive largesse with stony silence. Trump, of course, had built his own dopey Twitter dupe, Truth Social, and he probably liked no longer being someone else's tenant, vulnerable to eviction. He also probably liked looking down at the world's richest man from his own social-media castle. When asked when he'd go home to Musk-owned, Trump-friendly Twitter, Trump said, coldly, 'I don't see any reason for it.' Trump was betting that he had made Twitter powerful, not the other way around. If Musk had hoped to spend his days evading the fun police with Trump on Twitter, he might have been hurt that Trump didn't even bother to visit Musk's platform, which he renamed X in July 2023, until he had a mugshot to post in August of that year, after his indictment for a scheme to overturn election results in Georgia. The next summer, on July 13, 2024, Musk endorsed Trump, and soon started whooping and jumping and dancing like 2005 Tom Cruise. He tilted hard right for his hero, and he mostly did it on X, amplifying Dark MAGA posts, from Covid denial to QAnon praise. Tesla's stock tanked. Musk muted his environmentalist leanings. He lost his close friends, including Sam Harris and Philip Low. A month after the endorsement, Trump graced X with his presence with a campaign video. It was only the second time he'd posted to X since Musk rolled out the red carpet for him. In the last months of his campaign, while Musk's money and adulation surged his way, Trump finally managed to show Musk the occasional courtesy of using the platform Musk had bought, furnished and upholstered in part for him. Flash forward to last week. On Monday, June 2, three days before the Trump-Musk affair came utterly undone, @realDonaldTrump posted to X for what looks like the last time: a manly boast video about his steel tariffs. It was scored with what sounded like pounding Christian rock. These tariffs, which Trump increased to fully 50 percent last week, will raise the cost of imported car components, including at Tesla, and further imperil Musk's fortune. For Trump to crow about this insult to Tesla in Musk's own house when they were still acting like pals and Musk was mostly keeping mum about the 'big beautiful bill' (which if it passes will also injure Tesla) — this seems like the unkindest cut of the whole match made in hell. The end of last week's social-media spat reveals that the heavyweight champ of social-media influence is still Trump. At the news that Musk's net worth fell by $34 billion during the spat, while Tesla's market value sank by $153 billion, Musk waved a white flag. He deleted or retracted his incendiary X posts — the innuendo about Trump and the Epstein files and the threat to decommission a spacecraft. Trump, for his part, took back nothing. He now says he rejects a make-up call. He's selling the pretty red Tesla Musk presented to him. And most importantly, he's back to ghosting X. No posts there since Monday. By Friday he was on Truth Social praising Commerce Secretary Scott Bessent, one of Musk's most aggressive rivals for Trump's favor and the one whose April shouting match with Musk came to blows, according to Steve Bannon. On Sunday, Musk gave perhaps the clearest sign that he is tapping out: He screenshotted a Truth Social post by Trump in which the president called Gavin Newsom 'Governor Gavin Newscum' — and posted it admiringly to X. No commentary, no irony, no comeback. Just a tribute. In the posting wars, this is what bending the knee looks like: one man obsequiously signal-boosting the other, on the platform he couldn't lure him back to.

Musk and Trump's Social-Media Fight Reveals How Power Works Today
Musk and Trump's Social-Media Fight Reveals How Power Works Today

Politico

time4 hours ago

  • Politico

Musk and Trump's Social-Media Fight Reveals How Power Works Today

The fact that Elon Musk kicked off this week's emo bloodbath with the words 'I'm sorry, but' has got to be the realest-housewives part of it. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk posted to X on Tuesday. Bless his heart — he sounded really contrite. Then he consulted a 'Downton Abbey' phrasebook and found 'disgusting abomination' to poshly trash Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill.' He kept huffing his own X fumes through Wednesday until, on Thursday at 2:30 p.m., Trump all-capped him on Truth Social: 'CRAZY!' Off to the races. Everyone has their favorite part of Thursday's cage match. I was instantly startled by the non-pettiness: Musk gunning for Trump's impeachment, Trump gunning for Musk's financial ruin. All amid a cacophonous peanut gallery that included Ye, MAGA billionaire Bill Ackman and Musk ex Ashley St. Clair. But the Trump-Musk feud is not just a clash of two madmen; it is a clash between the two fiercest social-media influencers of all time. Trump and Musk are human memes, forged on Twitter and its spinoffs, X and Truth Social. Their rise, their public personas, their marriage of convenience and their falling out took place in short-form posts and the freestyle cultivation of likes and engagement. Their feud is in many ways a story of our times: It reveals how online power struggles work now — with rivals leveraging online fanbases, battling for authority across platforms and aiming for the ultimate flex: starving the opponent of any attention at all. Long before most, both Trump and Musk understood that traditional PR handlers would sterilize their personas, blunt the trolling potential of their best material and interfere with their relationships with fans. Trump built his political identity on Twitter, beating his chest and savaging his foes with a rawness that used to make his every utterance on Twitter unmissable. Musk built his celebrity through it, too, with runic tweets, like 'laws are on one side, poets on the other.' In late 2021, he was so proud of his philosopher-king status that he considered going pro: 'thinking of quitting my jobs & becoming an influencer full-time wdyt,' he tweeted, to 371,000 likes. The Musk-Trump bond, but also the tension in it, has also been defined by these platforms. It heated up in the fall of 2022, when Trump was in exile from Twitter and out of the White House. Metabolizing pandemic redpills, Musk was still half-heartedly striking a neoliberal pose, only recently having supported Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Joe Biden in 2020. But he was also slagging Twitter for having banished groypers, conspiracy-mongers and especially Trump, its star, for insurrectioning. That's when Musk bought Twitter for $44 billion. He claims now he knew he was vastly overpaying — and in February he said X is worth 'like, eight cents' — but the expense was for a noble cause: to restore freedom of speech and welcome @realDonaldTrump back to the green pastures of his social-media homeland. In November of that year, Musk polled X, and a slight majority said Trump should be reinstated. 'The people have spoken,' Musk posted. 'Vox Populi, Vox Dei.' The voice of people is the voice of God. Right. But then, if we're just talking about the course of human events, something extremely cruel happened, a monumental act of Trumpian ingratitude. After his account was reinstated, Trump didn't come back. For nine long months, @realDonaldTrump met Musk's devastatingly expensive largesse with stony silence. Trump, of course, had built his own dopey Twitter dupe, Truth Social, and he probably liked no longer being someone else's tenant, vulnerable to eviction. He also probably liked looking down at the world's richest man from his own social-media castle. When asked when he'd go home to Musk-owned, Trump-friendly Twitter, Trump said, coldly, 'I don't see any reason for it.' Trump was betting that he had made Twitter powerful, not the other way around. If Musk had hoped to spend his days evading the fun police with Trump on Twitter, he might have been hurt that Trump didn't even bother to visit Musk's platform, which he renamed X in July 2023, until he had a mugshot to post in August of that year, after his indictment for a scheme to overturn election results in Georgia. The next summer, on July 13, 2024, Musk endorsed Trump, and soon started whooping and jumping and dancing like 2005 Tom Cruise. He tilted hard right for his hero, and he mostly did it on X, amplifying Dark MAGA posts, from Covid denial to QAnon praise. Tesla's stock tanked. Musk muted his environmentalist leanings. He lost his close friends, including Sam Harris and Philip Low. A month after the endorsement, Trump graced X with his presence with a campaign video. It was only the second time he'd posted to X since Musk rolled out the red carpet for him. In the last months of his campaign, while Musk's money and adulation surged his way, Trump finally managed to show Musk the occasional courtesy of using the platform Musk had bought, furnished and upholstered in part for him. Flash forward to last week. On Monday, June 2, three days before the Trump-Musk affair came utterly undone, @realDonaldTrump posted to X for what looks like the last time: a manly boast video about his steel tariffs. It was scored with what sounded like pounding Christian rock. These tariffs, which Trump increased to fully 50 percent last week, will raise the cost of imported car components, including at Tesla, and further imperil Musk's fortune. For Trump to crow about this insult to Tesla in Musk's own house when they were still acting like pals and Musk was mostly keeping mum about the 'big beautiful bill' (which if it passes will also injure Tesla) — this seems like the unkindest cut of the whole match made in hell. The end of last week's social-media spat reveals that the heavyweight champ of social-media influence is still Trump. At the news that Musk's net worth fell by $34 billion during the spat, while Tesla's market value sank by $153 billion, Musk waved a white flag. He deleted or retracted his incendiary X posts — the innuendo about Trump and the Epstein files and the threat to decommission a spacecraft. Trump, for his part, took back nothing. He now says he rejects a make-up call. He's selling the pretty red Tesla Musk presented to him. And most importantly, he's back to ghosting X. No posts there since Monday. By Friday he was on Truth Social praising Commerce Secretary Scott Bessent, one of Musk's most aggressive rivals for Trump's favor and the one whose April shouting match with Musk came to blows, according to Steve Bannon. On Sunday, Musk gave perhaps the clearest sign that he is tapping out: He screenshotted a Truth Social post by Trump in which the president called Gavin Newsom 'Governor Gavin Newscum' — and posted it admiringly to X. No commentary, no irony, no comeback. Just a tribute. In the posting wars, this is what bending the knee looks like: one man obsequiously signal-boosting the other, on the platform he couldn't lure him back to.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store