logo
The Iran-Israel conflict calls for cool heads

The Iran-Israel conflict calls for cool heads

Telegraph17 hours ago

The last time world leaders gathered for an economic summit in Canada it collapsed in acrimony. In a famous photograph, Angela Merkel, then German chancellor, could be seen berating a seated and petulant-looking Donald Trump in an image that symbolised the breakdown in global harmony.
Suddenly, allies were pitched against one another on matters they once approached with a common purpose, whether it be trade or security.
Apart from Emmanuel Macron, the French president, every other leader in the photograph has gone. Mr Trump, of course, is back and the same divisions are apparent.
One of the disagreements at that G7 meeting was over his decision to scrap a deal brokered by Barack Obama and the UN security council to divert Iran from its efforts to develop a nuclear weapon capability. Mr Trump took the view that Iran could not be trusted, something seemingly confirmed by Tehran's continued enrichment programme.
Those who argue this would have been halted had the original deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), been carried through need to explain why they would have any confidence in the Iranian regime to abide by its terms.
Most critical of all were the Israelis, who feared the JCPOA was just a cover for Iran to continue work on a nuclear weapon with impunity. They were never going to let that happen whatever deal was reached by countries who did not face the same existential threat from the mullahs in Tehran.
The G7 in Canada, therefore, which had been expected to focus on Ukraine, Russia and tariffs, is now reaping the whirlwind of the failure to deal with Iran until it was almost too late. The regime has fomented conflict throughout the region, sponsoring groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas intent on seeing Israel destroyed.
Most of the problems in the Middle East can be laid at Iran's door, not that the idiots waving Iranian flags in London at the weekend understand that or care since their hatred of Israel – the only democracy in the region – is all-consuming.
The impact of a prolonged war hitting energy supplies just as the world economy is dealing with tariffs and falling output will be considerable, especially if Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz. The G7 leaders of democratic states need to have a clear eye on who the enemy is and to give Israel their full support in dealing with this evil menace.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Americans don't see US supreme court as politically neutral, poll finds
Americans don't see US supreme court as politically neutral, poll finds

The Guardian

time36 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Americans don't see US supreme court as politically neutral, poll finds

Americans are divided on major issues that the US supreme court is due to rule on in the coming weeks, but most agree on one thing: neither Republicans nor Democrats see the nation's top judicial body as politically neutral, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll. Just 20% of respondents to the poll agreed that the supreme court is politically neutral while 58% disagreed – and the rest either said they did not know or did not respond. Among people who described themselves as Democrats, only 10% agreed it was politically neutral and 74% disagreed, while among Republicans 29% agreed and 54% disagreed. The two-day poll, which closed on Thursday, was based on responses from 1,136 US adults. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. The court has issued major rulings in recent years including in cases rolling back abortion rights, expanding gun rights, recognizing presidential immunity from prosecution for official acts, rejecting race-conscious collegiate admissions and curbing the power of federal agencies. Its 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices appointed by Donald Trump during his first presidency. In the poll, a minority of respondents – 44% – expressed a favorable view of the court, including 67% of Republicans and 26% of Democrats. The supreme court's popularity has declined since its June 2022 decision to overturn the 1973 Roe v Wade ruling that had legalized abortion nationwide. Fifty-seven per cent of respondents in a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted at the end of 2021 expressed a favorable opinion of the court. By the end of June 2022, that figure had fallen to 43%. The justices are expected to issue rulings in major cases in the coming weeks as they near the end of their current term that began in October. Among these cases are one on the legality of Tennessee's Republican-backed law banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors and one involving Trump's executive order restricting automatic birthright citizenship, part of his hardline approach to immigration. Fifty-three per cent of respondents in the new poll said they supported 'laws that prevent transgender children under the age of 18 from getting medical treatment related to gender identity and gender transitioning'. Another 28% opposed such laws and the rest were unsure or did not answer the question. Among Republicans, support for such laws was at 57% and opposition at 28%, while among Democrats support was at 23% and opposition at 54%. During December arguments in the case, the court's conservative justices signaled their willingness to uphold the law. After Trump signed his birthright citizenship directive in January, 22 states as well as immigrant rights advocates and pregnant immigrants sued, arguing that it was a violation of citizenship language in the US constitution's 14th amendment. In the poll, only 24% of all respondents supported ending birthright citizenship and 52% – most – opposed Trump on the issue. Among Democrats, 5% supported ending it, with 84% opposed. Among Republicans, 43% supported ending it, with 24% opposed. The rest said they were unsure or did not respond to the question. The court also by the end of June is expected to issue a ruling on the legality of a Texas law that requires people to verify their age online before accessing pornographic websites. The poll found strong support for such laws. Among all respondents, 70% were in support and 14% opposed. Among Democrats, 65% supported and 18% opposed, while among Republicans 80% supported and 7% opposed. During January arguments in the case, the justices seemed to agree that states can try to keep adult material from minors but also voiced concern over burdens imposed on adults to view constitutionally protected material.

Warner Bros Discovery bondholders approve plan to split the company
Warner Bros Discovery bondholders approve plan to split the company

Reuters

time43 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Warner Bros Discovery bondholders approve plan to split the company

June 16 (Reuters) - Warner Bros Discovery (WBD.O), opens new tab bondholders overwhelmingly approved a plan to split the corporation and put in place a new capital structure related to the deal, the company said Monday. Bondholders voted to remove restrictions that could have prevented the company from carrying out its plan to cleave itself into two publicly traded entertainment companies, separating its studios and HBO Max streaming service from its fading cable networks. Credit investors also supported the company's plan to buy back nearly half of its $37 billion in debt resulting from the 2022 merger of WarnerMedia and Discovery. The bondholders had until Friday to approve changes to debt covenants that would leave the legacy cable business - and its bondholders - holding the lion's share of debt. The less indebted streaming and studio business, meanwhile, would have flexibility to better compete with rivals. But the details of the split, which analysts told Reuters were highly complex, left certain bondholders concerned they could be left empty-handed. They said it would leave some holding unsecured bonds tied to the declining cable business, meaning they would lack collateral protection and come second in priority of payment to the secured bondholders in the event of bankruptcy. The law firm Aiken Gump Strauss Hauer & Field failed in its effort last week to organize bondholders to negotiate better terms, according to published reports. Warner Bros Discovery said the consent solicitation received support from the majority of all bondholders, with up to 99% of certain groups voting their support. Credit investors have until June 23 to tender their bonds. Credit ratings agencies Fitch and Moody's downgraded Warner Bros Discovery to junk status last week, even as investors weighed the deal's likely impact on holders of its debt. S&P Global Ratings had downgraded Warner debt to junk status earlier this month, citing the challenges confronting its cable networks. The rating downgrades triggered forced selling by funds with investment-grade portfolio mandates, according to a person familiar with the matter. This in turn resulted in net selling of the company's bonds, the person familiar added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store