logo
Food fight: Industry group drops more than $19K to fight artificial food dye ban in WV, urges veto

Food fight: Industry group drops more than $19K to fight artificial food dye ban in WV, urges veto

Yahoo14-03-2025
In this photo illustration, Froot Loops are on display on Nov. 22, 2024 in Miami, Florida. If House Bill 2354 becomes law, Froot Loops and other foods that use certain artificial dyes, won't be sold in West Virginia starting in 2028. (Joe Raedle | Getty Images)
Lobbyists for the food and beverage industry are fighting a bill that would ban synthetic dyes in food, paying thousands of dollars for ads that say it will drive up food prices and result in empty grocery store shelves. Sixty percent of grocery products could be pulled, they say.
Republicans behind the legislation say the food industry is using scare tactics and 'choosing poison over profit.'
'If you can't make a product that doesn't poison children, then don't put it on our shelves. I think that's the message we're sending,' said Sen. Jason Barrett, R-Berkeley.
The measure, House Bill 2354, would ban a list of artificial colorful dyes in foods sold in West Virginia stores and in school meals by 2028. Bill supporters say the synthetic dyes, like Red No. 3, are unnecessary, dangerous and the cause of some behavioral issues in children.
The House of Delegates amended the measure Thursday, removing language that would have penalized anyone who was selling a food item under $5,000 that contained the banned dyes.
'I want to make sure that Toby and Edith aren't prosecuted for selling something at a bake sale,' said Del. Evan Worrell, R-Cabell.
The Senate has to sign off on the House's changes before it would head to Gov. Patrick Morrisey's desk for consideration. Barrett, who has spearheaded efforts on the bill in the Senate, expects his colleagues, then Morrisey to approve it. It would make West Virginia the first state in the nation to pass a sweeping ban on food dyes.
'I'm confident that he's going to sign the bill,' Barrett said.
Americans for Food & Beverage Choice is pushing for Morrisey to veto the bill should it reach his desk. The group has spent more than $19,000 in radio ads in the last week, according to filings with the Federal Communications Commission, and they're expected to spend more on ads in the coming days. A text message ad campaign is underway, as well.
The radio ads say that politicians go 'way too far' with this ban and that there are more sensible solutions.
'This is a law that would impact six in 10 grocery store items, effectively making them illegal. It will lead to higher prices, fewer choices and empty shelves,' said Stacie Rumenap, spokesperson for Americans for Food & Beverage Choice. 'The alternative ingredients simply don't exist to scale.'
The West Virginia Beverage Association also opposes the legislation, saying the supply of alternative colors simply does not exist and will take years to catch up.
'This bill will only succeed in one thing: emptying grocery store shelves over ingredients that are proven safe and approved worldwide … We ask Gov. Morrisey to veto this misinformed bill and protect our economy and West Virginians' freedom to decide what's best for their family. Let's work together on pragmatic solutions to address these concerns,' they group said in a statement.
A West Virginia nutrition director previously told lawmakers that the ban would affect only about 30 items currently offered in schools.
Rumenap said the bill also puts jobs at risk due to its potential major disruption to food suppliers.
Donnie Perdue, vice president of the Teamsters local 175 union, said the bill would result in layoffs at all Pepsi and Coca Cola facilities represented by Local 175.
'Both Pepsi and Coke have said the dye bill would cause a 50% decrease in their current inventory levels,' he said. 'There has been no economic analysis done to actually see what the impact would be if all these drinks and food is banned from West Virginia … The states that border West Virginia will be the only winners with this bill as West Virginians travel to their state to get their favorite drinks and food because we no longer have them.'
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told food executives this week that removing artificial food dyes is an urgent priority. As dozens of states are considering legislation to ban food dyes, Barrett said he is 'very confident that the 'no food on the shelves'' argument is a scare tactic. 'Some of these big manufacturers like the American Beverage Association are saying, 'We're gonna pull these products off the shelf.' Well, good. That's what we're trying to do,' Barrett said.
He notes that Aldi, which banned synthetic colors in its store-brand items, sells its own version of Pop-Tarts without dyes and product is cheaper than the Kellogg option. Watermelon juice can be used to color food instead of a synthetic dye.
Del. Marty Gearheart, R-Mercer, spoke against the measure, saying it removes his ability to choose a product that's been approved by the Federal Drug Administration. Products like Gatorade could be pulled from the shelves, he said. 'They're simply not going to ship that product to our state,' he said. 'It appears to me … that we want government to do for us and for our children what we won't do ourselves, and that is restrict consuming.'
Worrell, who prioritized the bill as House Health Chair, said it was unfortunate that lawmakers had to step in to regulate food.
'I don't want to run bills like this. I wish we could trust our manufacturers not to put poison in our food,' he said. 'They have chosen these poisonous chemicals to make a dollar because we allow this. They're allowed to do this cheaper.'
Morrisey's spokesperson didn't return a request for comment for this story.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump approval holds at 40%, lowest of his term, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
Trump approval holds at 40%, lowest of his term, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

USA Today

time24 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump approval holds at 40%, lowest of his term, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

WASHINGTON, Aug 18 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's approval rating held at 40% in recent weeks, matching the lowest level of his current term, amid weak ratings from Hispanic voters, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll that closed on Monday. The six-day poll was conducted as economic data showed signs the U.S. labor market is weakening and as Trump oversees a sweeping immigration crackdown, while at the same time the Republican has been engaged in intense diplomacy to end a war between Russia and Ukraine. Trump's approval rating was unchanged from a late July Reuters/Ipsos poll, but has dropped seven percentage points since his first days back in the White House in January, when 47% of Americans gave him a thumbs-up. The latest poll showed Hispanics, a group that swung toward Trump in last year's election, have also soured on the president. Some 32% approved of his performance in the White House, matching their lowest level of approval for Trump this year. More: Trump approval rating round-up: Where does president stand in recent polls? More than half of respondents -- 54%, including one in five Republicans -- said they thought Trump was too closely aligned with Russia, even as he ramped up a push to broker peace between Moscow and Kyiv. Trump has appeared to embrace Russia's claim that Ukraine must cede territory to Russia in order for the war to stop. Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, and the poll closed just ahead of the president's meeting on Monday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. Just 42% of respondents approved of Trump's performance on crime and 43% thought he was doing a good job on immigration policy. On all policies, Trump's support came overwhelmingly from Republicans. After returning to the White House in January, Trump ordered a sweeping crackdown on people living in the country illegally, deploying masked agents to arrest and deport migrants across the country. The policy has triggered mass protests in cities including Los Angeles, where about half the population identifies as Latino and many people have family members who are recent immigrants. More: What is Trump's approval rating? See states where he is most, least popular More recently, Trump ordered federal agents and National Guard troops to aid in law enforcement in Washington, D.C., arguing that crime was rampant there. Statistics show that violent crime shot up in 2023 but has been rapidly declining since. The Reuters/Ipsos poll surveyed 4,446 U.S. adults nationwide and online and had a margin of error of about 2 percentage points. (Reporting by Jason Lange; editing by Scott Malone and Deepa Babington)

Newsom's redistricting move isn't pretty. California GOP leaders are uglier
Newsom's redistricting move isn't pretty. California GOP leaders are uglier

Los Angeles Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Newsom's redistricting move isn't pretty. California GOP leaders are uglier

King Gavin is at it again! That's the cry coming from Republicans across California as Newsom pushes the state Legislature to approve a November special election like none this state has ever seen. Voters would have the chance to approve a congressional map drawn by Democrats hoping to wipe out GOP-held seats and counter Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's Trump-driven redistricting. The president 'doesn't play by a different set of rules — he doesn't believe in the rules,' the governor told a roaring crowd packed with Democratic heavyweights last week at the Japanese American National Museum in Little Tokyo. 'And as a consequence, we need to disabuse ourselves of the way things have been done. It's not good enough to just hold hands, have a candlelight vigil and talk about the way the world should be. ... We have got to meet fire with fire.' California Republicans are responding to this the way a kid reacts if you take away their Pikachu. 'An absolutely ridiculous gerrymander!' whined Rep. Doug LaMalfa, who represents the state's rural northeast corner, on social media. Under the Democratic plan, his district would swing all the way down to ultra-liberal Marin County. The California Republican Party deemed the new maps a 'MASTERCLASS IN CORRUPTION' (Trumpian caps in the original). National Republican Congressional Committee spokesperson Christian Martinez said 'Newscum' was giving 'a giant middle finger to every Californian.' Intelligent minds can disagree on whether countering an extreme political move with an extreme political move is the right thing. The new maps would supersede the ones devised just four years ago by an independent redistricting commission established to keep politics out of the process, which typically occurs once a decade after the latest census. Good government types, from the League of Women Voters to Charles Munger Jr. — the billionaire who bankrolled the 2010 proposition that created independent redistricting for California congressional races — have criticized Newsom's so-called Election Rigging Response Act. So has former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a fierce Trump critic who posted a photo of himself on social media working out in a T-shirt that read, 'F*** the Politicians / Terminate Gerrymandering.' I'm not fully convinced that Newsom's plan is the MAGA killer he thinks it is. If the economy somehow rebounds next year, Republicans would most likely keep Congress anyway, and Newsom would have upended California politics for nothing. I also don't discount the moderate streak in California voters that pops up from time to time to quash what seem like liberal gimmes, like the failed attempt via ballot measure to repeal affirmative action in 2020 and the passage last year of Proposition 36, which increased penalties for theft and drug crimes. Nearly two-thirds of California voters want to keep redistricting away from the Legislature, according to a POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll released last week. If Californians reject Newsom's plan, that would torpedo his presidential ambitions and leave egg on the face of state Democratic leaders for years, if not a generation. For now, though, I'm going to enjoy all the tears that California Republicans are shedding. As they face the prospect of even fewer congressional seats than the paltry nine they now hold, they suddenly care about rescuing American democracy? Where were they during Trump's fusillade of lawsuits and threats against California? When he sent the National Guard and Marines to occupy parts of Los Angeles this summer after protests against his deportation deluge? When his underlings spew hate about the Golden State on Fox News and social media? Now they care about political decency? What about when LaMalfa and fellow California GOP House members Ken Calvert and Darrell Issa — whose seats the Newsom maps would also eliminate — voted against certifying Joe Biden's 2020 victory? When the state Republican Party backed a ridiculous recall against Newsom that cost taxpayers $200 million? Or when the Republican congressional delegation unanimously voted to pass Trump's Big Bloated Bill, even though it's expected to gut healthcare and food programs for millions of Californians in red counties? Or even when Trump first pushed Abbott to pursue the very gerrymandering Newsom is now emulating? We're supposed to believe them when they proclaim Newsom is a pompadoured potentate who threatens all Californians, just because he wants to redo congressional maps? Pot, meet black hole. If these GOPers had even an iota of decency or genuine care for the Golden State, they would back a bill by one of their own that I actually support. Rep. Kevin Kiley, whose seat is also targeted for elimination by the Newsom maps, wants to ban all mid-decade congressional redistricting. He stated via a press release that this would 'stop a damaging redistricting war from breaking out across the country.' That's an effort that any believer in liberty can and should back. But Kiley's bill has no co-sponsors so far. And Kevin: Why can't you say that your man Trump created this fiasco in the first place? We live in scary times for our democracy. If you don't believe it, consider that a bunch of masked Border Patrol agents just happened to show up outside the Japanese American National Museum — situated on a historic site where citizens of Japanese ancestry boarded buses to incarceration camps during World War II — at the same time Newsom was delivering his redistricting remarks. Sector Chief Gregory Bovino was there, migra cameramen documenting his every smirk, including when he told a reporter that his agents were there to make 'Los Angeles a safer place, since we won't have politicians that'll do that, we do that ourselves.' The show of force was so obviously an authoritarian flex that Newsom filed a Freedom of Information Act request demanding to know who authorized what and why. Meanwhile, referring to Trump, he described the action on X as 'an attempt to advance a playbook from the despots he admires in Russia and North Korea.' Newsom is not everyone's cup of horchata, myself included. Whether you support it or not, watching him rip up the California Constitution's redistricting section and assuring us it's OK, because he's the one doing it, is discomfiting. But you know what's worse? Trump anything. And even worse? The California GOP leaders who have loudly cheered him on, damn the consequences to the state they supposedly love. History will castigate their cultish devotion to Trump far worse than any of Newsom's attempts to counter that scourge.

R.I. expecting competitive race for lieutenant governor
R.I. expecting competitive race for lieutenant governor

Boston Globe

time24 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

R.I. expecting competitive race for lieutenant governor

Advertisement While attention has focused on whether Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up Former state Senator Cynthia Coyne has already A number of other people are considering jumping into the race, including Providence City Council member Advertisement Joe Fleming, a veteran pollster and analyst for WPRI, said the latest polling and fundraising numbers indicate Matos 'could have a serious problem.' He said he's surprised she does not have more campaign cash at this point, 'knowing she would face serious competition.' Fleming said her high disapproval numbers likely reflect publicity about the 'I would think candidates are looking at that race seriously, believing she is a target,' he said. But her polling numbers among Democrats show 'that in a primary, she may not be quite as weak as people might think,' Fleming said. 'In a multi-candidate race, she is in a much better position, but she needs to raise money to get her message out.' Katie Langford Sonder, who crafted the Salve poll as associate director and fellow at the Pell Center for International Relations and Public Policy, said the latest poll showed lower approval ratings for most of Rhode Island's top elected Democrats, not just Matos. She said Democratic voters are looking for stronger responses to what they consider an 'onslaught of bad news' from the Trump administration. But Sonder said Matos' support among Democratic voters 'is actually very good' when compared to other top officials such as McKee, who had a minus-2 net approval rating among Democrats compared to her plus-23 net rating. Republicans have sharply different views, with just 7 percent approving of Matos' job performance and 76 disapproving (for a minus-70 net approval). And 13 percent of unaffiliated voters approve of the job she's doing, while 57 percent disapprove (for a minus-44 net approval). Advertisement Here's a closer look at the two candidates in the race: Sabina Matos , 51, a Providence Democrat, moved to the US from the Dominican Republic in 1994 and graduated from Rhode Island College. She was elected to the Providence City Council in 2010 and became Providence's first Latina City Council president. In 2021, When asked to name two specific accomplishments, Matos said she advocated for providing Matos' campaign account contains $14,611. Cindy Coyne , 63, a Barrington Democrat, was born in Pawtucket and attended the University of Rhode Island on an athletic scholarship for swimming. She was among the first women to graduate from the State Police Training Academy and served as a State Trooper for more than 20 years, becoming a lieutenant. Advertisement Former state Senator Cynthia "Cindy" Coyne, a Barrington Democrat, is running for lieutenant governor. Handout Coyne served as a Barrington Town Council member from 2010 to 2014. And she served in the Senate from 2015 to 2023 after becoming the first Democrat to win the seat representing Barrington in more than 100 years. She chaired the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee. In citing two accomplishments, Coyne noted she championed a law that now bans ' Campaign funds: $60,713. Here's a brief look at those who said they're considering entering the race: Sue AnderBois , 42, a Providence Democrat, was elected to the Providence City Council in 2024, representing Ward 3. She created and chairs the task force working to make North Main Street safer. She works as the Northeast division director of climate and energy at The Nature Conservancy. She was the state director of food strategy, or 'food czar,' under former Governor Gina M. Raimondo. Providence City Council member Sue AnderBois. Handout AnderBois said the lieutenant governor's post would offer the opportunity to have a larger impact on key issues such as climate change, transit, and high energy costs. Campaign funds: $19,445 Lou DiPalma , 64, a Middletown Democrat, was elected to the Senate in 2008 and now chairs Senate Finance Committee. He sponsored legislation that Advertisement Senate Finance Committee Chairman Louis P. DiPalma, a Middletown Democrat. Handout DiPalma said she is 'leaning toward' running for reelection to the Senate but 'still exploring the possibility' of running for lieutenant governor. Campaign funds: $113,907 Stephen Casey , 56, a Woonsocket Democrat, has represented House District 50 after being elected in 2012, and chairs the House Municipal Government and Housing Committee. He has been a Woonsocket firefighter for 20 years. He ran for the First Congressional District seat in 2023, finishing fifth in the Democratic primary, just behind Matos. Rhode Island state Representative Stephen M. Casey, a Woonsocket Democrat. Handout When asked about the lieutenant governor's race, Casey said, 'I would certainly consider it and keep all my options open.' Campaign funds: $17,134. Maria Rivera , 48, a Central Falls Democrat, Central Falls Mayor Maria Rivera. Jonathan Wiggs/Globe Staff Rivera said she has not ruled out running for lieutenant governor. 'It is still a possibility,' Campaign funds: $54,982. Kenneth J. Hopkins , 70, a Cranston Republican, Advertisement Cranston Mayor Kenneth J. Hopkins Handout Hopkins said he is 'keeping all options open at this point,' including the lieutenant governor's post. Campaign funds: $11,130. Aaron Guckian , 49, of East Greenwich, ran for lieutenant governor in 2022 and now works as executive director of the Rhode Island Dental Association. He previously worked as a development officer for the Rhode Island Foundation, and as special assistant to former Republican Governor Donald L. Carcieri. Aaron Guckian, a Republican candidate for lieutenant governor of Rhode Island in 2022. Handout Guckian said he is considering running for governor, lieutenant governor, or treasurer. He noted he won the cities of Warwick and Cranston in the 2022 race against Matos. 'I am definitely looking at running again,' he said. Campaign funds: $2,176. Bill Bartholomew , 41, of Providence, is a Bill Bartholomew, podcaster and radio host. Handout Bartholomew said he would run as a Democrat. He said he has not taken any formal steps to launch his campaign. But, he said, 'I'm definitely still considering it.' Campaign funds: None reported. Attorney General Peter F. Neronha and Pawtucket Mayor Donald R. Grebien have been mentioned as possible candidates, but they both said they are not planning to run for lieutenant governor. Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store