Man has '$60,000 watch stolen from his wrist' while sitting in $350,000 Lamborghini during Spanish rally
Simone Mariella, 28, said her partner, Scott, was taking part in a supercar rally in Barcelona, Spain, when two crooks on an electric scooter targeted him on June 23.
The 33-year-old was sitting stationary at traffic lights in the Lamborghini Aventador.
Scott had his expensive timepiece pinched before the thief and his accomplice zoomed off on the e-scooter.
He was unable to chase after them as he was stuck behind a similar supercar.
Scott, originally from Scotland who now lives in Dubai, was taking part in the Modball Rally in Barcelona when the theft took place.
Simone said her partner reported the theft to the police.
Simone, who originally comes from Germany, said: 'My partner went to all the nearby shops and cafes to ask for CCTV images on the same day. But nobody helped him.'
Luckily, they found an onlooker who filmed it. She added: 'He has emailed the police three times since.'
Simone said: 'We posted it on social media to put pressure on the Spanish police and maybe get some information. Unfortunately, there hasn't been any update.'
She posted the video on TikTok where it went viral. She captioned the clip: 'A [$60,000] watch stolen at a traffic light in Barcelona. Please share to help us find them.'
One local said: 'The thief was faster than the Lamborghini.'
Another claimed: 'Nobody should visit Barcelona, it's no longer a safe place.'
A third added: 'It's not good, but at least he's not stealing from people who are going to go hungry.'
Someone else chimed in: 'Ten years in Barcelona and I got robbed last week, they pulled the necklace from my neck in a few seconds.'
Another said: 'Barcelona has been a cesspool for a long time now, and the authorities don't do anything!'
The police have been approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
My Revolut card was stolen in Benidorm... and they took out £1,450 cash: CRANE ON THE CASE
In May, I was on holiday in Benidorm when my phone was stolen out of my pocket. It had my Revolut bank card, which I use for free spending abroad, in the case. Whoever took the phone then used Apple Pay to transfer money from my Santander current account to Revolut. In the space of less than an hour, between 10:30pm and 11:30pm, they attempted to withdraw £2,950 at three different cash machines. Of this, £1,450 went through. I wasn't able to get my Revolut account frozen until four days after the card was stolen, as I didn't have my mobile phone to sign in to the app. I disputed the cash withdrawals and lodged a chargeback request but Revolut declined it. I wasn't given the chance to provide evidence or to speak to anyone. It said I was 'responsible for the transaction' and it wasn't fraudulent. B.B Helen Crane, This is Money's consumer champion, replies: Just as on busy high streets at home, thieves target bustling bars and beaches in holiday resorts in their quest to snatch phones. As I've reported before, these thieves aren't interested in the resale value of your mobile. They want to access your money apps and transfer out cash. You told me you feel silly to have left your card inside your phone case, but it's something plenty of us do. You also only had a few hundred pounds on it, as it was a secondary account used for holiday spending money. However, the thieves were able to use Apple Pay on your phone to transfer money from your main Santander account over to the Revolut card. It's unclear why some of the cash withdrawal attempts were declined. You reported the theft to Spanish police, but unfortunately money taken from an ATM is hard to trace. I'm often asked how it's possible for thieves to get into someone's phone, given they are normally protected by a passcode and facial recognition - as yours was. The answer is usually that the phone has been taken from their hand already unlocked, or that they have been 'shoulder surfed'. This means the criminal will observe you from a distance, usually in busy place like a bar, until they see you open your phone using the passcode. Once inside, they can turn off any facial or fingerprint recognition features. I urge anyone to look into features such as Apple's stolen device protection, and Android's theft detection lock, which can prevent this. Once you realised your phone was gone, you tried cancel your Sim card and block your Santander and Revolut accounts, using friends' phones. At this point you weren't aware the cash had gone missing, as you couldn't access your apps. It was still possible you may have simply lost the phone. Santander blocked your account when it received a phone call from the thief impersonating you - but Revolut was much more difficult and you didn't manage to freeze it until you returned home. Revolut is an online bank, and the only way for customers to contact it is to send a message through the app. Customer service can make outbound calls, but the number where you can speak to a real person isn't made available to users. It seems the attitude is, 'Don't call us, we'll call you.' It has an automated phone line to block cards, but you couldn't get this to work on holiday without access to the app and your phone. This line also can't connect you to a human agent. When I called, it said: 'If you are looking to speak to a human, then head over to our chat within the app.' You'd tried messaging here, but you said you thought the responses were from AI, and they weren't helpful. When you did get home, you initiated a chargeback with Revolut for the £1,450 - though this was also through an automated online process. After three days you received the response: 'After careful review, we found that your account activity around the time the transaction was made suggests that you're familiar with the charge. 'As a result, we can't treat this transaction as unauthorised or proceed with this claim.' This was on the basis that the thieves had used your Pin. You told me you thought they got this because they had been watching when you used the card at a bar earlier. You argued the transactions should have been blocked at the cashpoint, because it was a much larger amount than you had ever withdrawn on the card before. In the three months you'd had the account, you'd only spent £878 in total, and hardly any of this was taken out in cash. I contacted Revolut to see if it would be willing to reconsider, given how difficult it was for you to speak to someone and to suspend your account after the phone was stolen. It decided to look at your case again in June, and escalated this to the fraud team. It agreed to pay you back the £1,450 and also paid you £250 in compensation for the delay. However, it also emerged in my conversation with the bank that you had previously admitted to having the Pin for your Revolut card saved in the notes app in your phone. This used the same passcode as the one to get into your phone, which the thieves had. Storing the Pin in this way can be deemed 'gross negligence' by banks, and can mean that they are within their rights to decline your request for a refund, even if you have been defrauded. I understand it can be hard to keep on top of multitudinous Pins and passcodes, but this is truly an awful idea. We urge our customers to take care, remain vigilant to "shoulder surfers" and not store passcodes in unsecured places, for example their notes app There are various apps and tools that claim they can store such information securely, but in my opinion it's still not a good idea. If you really can't memorise the Pin, keep it at home, for example in a locked drawer, and definitely not anywhere near your phone or wallet. A Revolut spokeswoman said: 'We are very sorry to hear about B.B's case, or any instance where our customers are targeted by ruthless and highly sophisticated criminals. 'On further investigation of his case we have issued a full reimbursement for the stolen funds, in addition to a goodwill payment in recognition of the distress experienced in this case. 'Revolut works hard and invests heavily to protect and support customers. We have observed an increase in networks of criminals attempting to steal devices from unsuspecting individuals and we continue to take action to identify and prevent unauthorised access. 'As with all emerging threats, we urge our customers to take care, remain vigilant to "shoulder surfers" and encourage users to regularly update their passcodes, not to use the same passcode across multiple applications and not store passcodes in unsecured places, for example their notes app. I'm glad you've got your money back, and hope this serves as a warning to you and others to keep your details under lock and key. Movers stored my stuff in Bedfordshire, not London I put some things in storage from March 2023 until March 2025 after moving house. I used the company Jamvans because its website suggested my things would be kept in its London storage depot in Acton, near where I now lived. But in January 2024, I needed to get a coat out of storage to attend a funeral and was told my things were 40 miles away in Houghton Regis, Bedfordshire. In the end, I didn't get a call back to confirm I could get access, even though I gave the required 48 hours, so I never got the coat. I also selected a 35sq ft storage unit when I booked, but when I collected my things the unit was split into two and the other half was locked, presumably containing someone else's things. A 20ft crate was a cheaper option, but I was told I should take the 35ft and JamVans would downgrade it if needed. I asked to be reimbursed for the difference in cost but Jamvans declined. After I threatened to go to the Furniture Ombudsman, Jamvans offered me £180 compensation and to move my things to Acton. I didn't accept as I think the real difference was more than £400. E.C, London Helen Crane replies: On its website Jamvans describes itself as a 'London moving and storage company' and has a list of nine areas it serves, all of which are in the capital. Its selling point is that it collects your belongings from your home, and takes them to the storage unit - ideal for people like you who don't have a car. It mentions the Houghton Regis location on its website, but this is described as the head office whereas Acton is the 'London storage depot'. I agree this strongly suggests your things will be stored within the M25. The Houghton Regis location was extremely inconvenient for you as you don't have a car, and it doesn't have a train station. While an hour drive from Acton, taking public transport would be a 2.5-hour mission requiring multiple tubes, trains and irregular buses. One route I checked on Google Maps required a 17-minute walk passing through some areas 'not suitable for walking'. Then there is the issue with the size of the unit you were given. At the time you booked, you told me Jamvans' website claimed that it would bring one of its storage 'pods' - essentially a large wooden box - to your home, so you could check the size you'd chosen was suitable. You opted for a larger size than you thought you needed, and say you were told that if it was too big, your unit could be downgraded and the bill adjusted accordingly. But you said there was no pod brought to your home, and your things went directly in the van. You therefore ended up paying for a 35ft unit which you only used half of. In the first year, you paid £949 and in the second this went up to £1,113. Based on your research a 20ft unit would have cost £770 and then £897, a difference of £395. However, you say you were also charged an extra £8.75 per week in January and February 2025 which you don't think was correct, meaning you could be owed more than £450. Sadly, I wasn't able to raise any of this with Jamvans because the company has completely ignored my attempts to get in touch. I contacted it via email and on the phone over a period of several months. I was able to speak to one person who said management would call me back, but they never did. While companies aren't always pleased to hear from me, this level of stonewalling is rare. When it does happen, I feel it raises concerns about how well the firm responds to its own customers. You are now planning to take the case to the Furniture Ombudsman, as well as exploring a dispute resolution service. Do let me know how it goes.
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Don't overlook crypto when splitting assets in divorce
As digital currencies such as bitcoin, ethereum and solana become common holdings among the wealthy, they are increasingly used to conceal assets in divorce cases. In many ways, crypto functions like a digital offshore account — decentralised, borderless and often anonymous. Its pseudonymous nature makes it uniquely difficult to trace, value, or even prove it exists. Unlike a share certificate or bank statement, a crypto wallet might exist on a USB stick in a drawer, or be locked behind a password and 12-word seed phrase known only to the holder. If someone claims they have lost access, that may be the end of the trail. Even when crypto is disclosed, it still poses difficulties. These assets can be highly volatile, particularly altcoins, so unless both parties agree to share that risk, valuing them fairly becomes problematic. It is also relatively easy for someone anticipating divorce to open a crypto exchange account on a phone and quietly move funds there, sometimes years in advance. Yet disclosure typically only covers the past 12 months unless there is a clear reason to investigate further. This murkiness creates a growing blind spot in divorce litigation. There is no consistent UK legal framework for disclosing crypto and limited case law to guide lawyers and judges. That opens the door to disputes and grey areas, particularly when disclosure is incomplete or suspected to be dishonest. For international cases, the complexity increases significantly. If digital assets are held on overseas exchanges, especially in jurisdictions that do not co-operate with UK courts, there may be no practical way to obtain information or enforce a financial settlement. Tracing crypto that has been moved, converted into privacy coins, or hidden through tumbling services — a process of mixing identifiable funds with nonidentifiable — can be incredibly difficult and sometimes impossible without specialist forensic expertise. Solicitors must look for tell-tale signs of concealment, undeclared exchange accounts or large unexplained transfers. And when red flags arise, lawyers increasingly rely on forensic investigators who understand blockchain analysis and can follow the money. But it is not just a technical problem, it is emotional too. When one party believes assets are being hidden in crypto, it fuels mistrust and escalates conflict. Relatively straightforward financial cases become emotionally charged battlegrounds once digital asset concealment is suspected. As more wealth is stored digitally, this will only grow as a challenge for the courts. Until the law catches up, crypto will continue to be a grey area that some exploit, others fear, and many don't fully understand. For divorcing couples, the message is clear: do not underestimate the role crypto may be playing in the financial Maguire is the managing director of Maguire Family Law
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE The unlikely suburban HQ of a cocaine smuggling kingpin: How friendly dog-walking pensioner was hiding secret life as an international drug baron who imported £120m of narcotics into UK
With its neatly tended lawn, solar panels on the roof and potted petunias lining the garden path, this suburban bungalow could hardly look any less like the HQ of an international drug smuggling operation. But it was here that Peter Lamb, 66, oversaw a vast criminal conspiracy to import £120million worth of cocaine into Britain - all without raising a flicker of suspicion from his trusting neighbours. The father of three was regularly seen pottering in the back garden of his modest home in Gateshead, and would often stop to pass the time of day by walking his dogs, a placid German shepherd and a springer spaniel puppy. However, unknown to locals on his quiet street of housing association homes occupied mostly by retirees, Lamb had become a major player in organised crime responsible for smuggling one-and-a-half tonnes of cocaine over just a year. In another suburban twist, his chosen method was to hide these drugs in rolls of artificial grass brought in by two garden supply companies that served as fronts for his operation. His downfall came in May 2024, when customs officers in Holland searched two consignments of fake turf and found £13m of cocaine hidden inside the empty plastic tubes at the centre of each roll. Lamb was then covertly photographed on a forklift truck carrying rolls of fake grass from a lorry into one of two warehouses he used to store the narcotics. Soon afterwards, raids on the depots in Stockton-on-Tees and Newcastle found abandoned turf rolls from 18 previous consignments and another kilo of cocaine that officers believe had been left behind accidentally. The NCA believe the total street value of all the drugs he imported was £120million. Lamb's underworld activities were a mystery to his neighbours, who were shocked when his home was raided by police. They remained equally stunned when MailOnline spoke to them this week after he was sentenced to 17 years in prison. 'It goes to show that you can have no idea who you're living next door to because if anyone had told me that Peter was mixed up in drug smuggling I would have laughed,' one said. 'He lived on his own apart from his two dogs and he liked to spend a bit of time in the back garden and he'd often be out walking the dogs. 'He would always stop to say hello and no one ever had a cross word with him, he was a nice bloke who had lived in the area for a while. 'He was a Cockney and his daughters seem to have Irish accents so he was clearly someone who had moved around. I wondered if he was ex forces or something like that. 'When the police turned up there was absolute shock when we discovered what they were investigating.' Lamb registered two garden supply companies on Companies House under the same name, Lomax. Neither filed any accounts and have both been dissolved. Another one of his neighbours recalled how he had previously mentioned his business in casual conversation. 'I knew he had a business of some kind, something to do with gardening, but he seemed as though he was semi-retired, he liked to be at home with the dogs and in his own back garden,' they said. 'It's hard to imagine that he was the leader of this thing, it must have been something he got caught up in. He's going to be inside for a long time, he'll be 83 when he gets out.' A third person living on Lamb's road said he had always considered him as nothing more than a 'nice old bloke'. 'He was friendly and said he'd set up a turf business,' they said. 'He even offered me a roll for my garden at home. I'm quite glad now that I didn't take him up on it.' When Lamb first started renting a unit on Sandy Lane Autoparc in Gosforth, Newcastle, no one batted an eyelid. But when, after a year of trading, no one had seen a single customer arrive or leave, people in neighbouring businesses began to wonder exactly what the nature of his import business was. One tradesman on the estate said: 'Foreign trucks would pull up on the business park and he would unload all the rolls of turf on his forklift and put them into his unit. 'There were loads of rolls of turf going in, but none of them ever seemed to come out. 'Someone else pointed out as well that when they were being carried over in the fork lift the rolls were stiff in the middle but flopping down at the ends. 'It seems obvious now with hindsight that they had something pushed into the centre of them but no one suspected a thing. 'Most of the businesses on here are well established and everybody knows each other, but he didn't mix. 'He'd arrive early to unload the turf from lorries and then he would be off, he didn't stop to chat.' Officers who analysed Lamb's phone learned that he had made several trips to the Netherlands to organise the drug shipments. Realising the game was up, he admitted drug smuggling and was handed his hefty jail term. Judge Gavin Doig told him: 'You played a crucial role in the importation into this country of nearly a tonne and a half of cocaine.' The judge added it was a 'significant conspiracy' involving people who were not as easily linked to the drugs as Lamb. The court heard Lamb has significant health problems and admitted he had been an 'idiot' to get involved in something he was unable to get out of. NCA senior investigating officer Al Mullen said: 'Artificial grass is one of the more unusual concealments I've seen used to smuggle cocaine but no matter what tactics criminals use, the NCA will find both the drugs and the importers. 'We caught Lamb red-handed and uncovered his year-long conspiracy to flood UK streets with one-and-a-half tonnes of the drug. 'Cocaine destroys communities and lives, but this joint operation with officers in the Netherlands has disrupted its supply in the UK.'
