
UK house prices increase by 0.6% month-on-month in July, says Nationwide
The annual rate of house price growth accelerated to 2.4% typically in July, from 2.1% in June, Nationwide Building Society said.
This took the average UK house price to £272,664.
Robert Gardner, Nationwide's chief economist, said: 'Looking through the volatility generated by the end of the stamp duty holiday, activity appears to be holding up well. Indeed, 64,200 mortgages for house purchase were approved in June, broadly in line with the pre-pandemic average, despite the changed interest rate environment.
'After deteriorating markedly in the wake of the pandemic, housing affordability has been steadily improving, thanks to a period of strong income growth alongside more subdued house price growth and a modest fallback in mortgage rates.
'While the price of a typical UK home is around 5.75 times average income, this ratio is well below the all-time high of 6.9 recorded in 2022 and is currently the lowest this ratio has been for over a decade.
'This is helping to ease deposit constraints for potential buyers, as has an improvement in the availability of higher loan to value mortgages.
'Similarly, the interest rate on a typical five-year fixed-rate mortgage is around 4.3% (for a borrower with a 25% deposit). This is still over three times the all-time lows prevailing in autumn 2021, but well below the highs of (around) 5.7% reached in late 2023.'
Mr Gardner said that despite wider economic uncertainties in the global economy, underlying conditions for potential home buyers in the UK remain supportive.
He said: 'Unemployment remains low, earnings are still rising at a healthy pace, household balance sheets are strong and borrowing costs are likely to moderate a little further if (the Bank of England base rate) is lowered further in the coming quarters as we, and most other analysts, expect.
'Providing the broader economic recovery is maintained, housing market activity is likely to continue to strengthen gradually in the quarters ahead.'
Matt Thompson, head of sales at London-based estate agent Chestertons, said: 'Last month alone, some of our branches have seen an evident uplift in the number of vendors wanting to sell which has motivated more buyers to resume their search and make an offer.'
Nathan Emerson, CEO at property professionals' body Propertymark, said: 'Many people are delaying paying off their mortgages until later in life via 35-year or 40-year mortgages. Therefore, a reduction in interest rates would be very welcome to help offset ongoing financial pressures and worries over the cost of living for many.'
Mark Harris, chief executive of mortgage broker SPF Private Clients, said: 'Lower mortgage rates, with the expectation of more reductions to come, are giving the market impetus and putting borrowers in a stronger position when it comes to negotiating their property purchase. This, in turn, is keeping prices in check.
'With the markets expecting a further rate reduction next week, we could be in for a busy autumn. Lenders continue to trim their mortgage rates, while easing of mortgage lending rules should also enable borrowers to take on bigger mortgages in coming months.'
Earlier this week, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) reported that house sales jumped by 13% month-on-month in June.
Across the UK, it estimated that 93,530 home sales took place during the month, which was 1% higher than in June 2024.
Bank of England figures have shown that mortgage approvals for house purchase have ticked upwards, with around 64,200 approvals made to home buyers in June – the highest figure since March this year.
Alice Haine, personal finance analyst at Bestinvest by Evelyn Partners, said: 'While some buyers are clearly pressing ahead with their purchase plans, as reflected in robust mortgage approval data for June, others may now be mulling their options more carefully as higher costs pose a fresh challenge.
'Lenders are offering solutions, however, not only with more relaxed affordability rules, but also by ramping up the number of low-deposit or 100% mortgages on offer to help more first-time buyers onto the property ladder. Longer-term mortgages, where the repayment period is stretched beyond the traditional 25-year term to 30, 35 or even 40 years are also becoming increasingly popular.'
Karen Noye, a mortgage expert at wealth manager Quilter, said: 'All eyes will be on the Bank of England next week and what it decides to do with interest rates. It was thought that a rate cut was fairly certain on Thursday, but recent inflation data coming in higher than expected may just temper things slightly and force buyers to wait.
'Should the Bank of England follow through with a rate cut, however, that will help support the buyers.'
Tom Bill, head of UK residential research at Knight Frank, said: 'Sticky inflation means a probable cut by the Bank of England next week may only be followed by one more this year. Despite a modest uptick in July, high levels of supply are keeping a lid on prices and means it is still very much a buyers' market.'
Iain McKenzie, CEO of the Guild of Property Professionals, said: 'For sellers, realistic pricing is crucial to capture buyers' attention in a more competitive landscape. For buyers, the combination of more choice and the likelihood of further mortgage rate improvements creates a compelling window of opportunity.'
Jonathan Handford, managing director at estate agent group Fine & Country, said: 'Properties purchased during the Covid-era 'race for space' – particularly in coastal and rural areas – are increasingly returning to the market as commuting patterns normalise and lifestyle priorities shift. This added supply is helping to moderate price pressures in some regions.'
Sarah Coles, head of personal finance, Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'A combination of pay rises ahead of inflation, falling mortgage rates and keenly-priced properties could start to reignite buyer enthusiasm in the coming months.'
Jonathan Hopper, CEO of Garrington Property Finders, said: 'Most buyers are still being prudent and pragmatic.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Chelsea have spent eye-watering £360MILLION on defenders in three years – but how many of them were worth it?
THE arrival of £37million Jorrel Hato takes Chelsea's spending on defenders under their new owners past a record-shattering £360m. Yet the Blues back four which lines up against Crystal Palace on the opening weekend of the new season may well include just one player who cost a fee. Marc Cucurella, who came in from Brighton three years ago in a deal worth up to £62m, is the biggest success of Chelsea 's hit-and-miss defensive recruitment. The signing of Hato is a major coup for the Blues, with Liverpool and Arsenal among the other major clubs who wanted the talented and versatile teenager. The young Dutchman is the 12th defender brought in since the consortium led by Clearlake Capital and Todd Boehly took over the club in May 2022. But Cucurella, a Euro 2024 winner with Spain, is the only member of the current Chelsea back four that you would describe as world class. And if Chelsea are to win domestic and European titles, they will need more defenders to reach that level. To be fair, Enzo Maresca 's side can already claim to be world champions. To beat a flair-filled Paris Saint-Germain side 3-0, just weeks after they had spanked Inter Milan 5-0 in the Champions League final, was an impressive achievement. The back four which started the Club World Cup final was left back Cucurella, homegrown centre backs Levi Colwill and Trevoh Chalobah, and right back Malo Gusto. The Frenchman, now 22, could end up costing Chelsea £30.7m after signing from Lyon in January 2023 and spending the rest of that season on loan back at the French club. Gusto has done a decent, sometimes very good, job at right back. He covered for the long injury-related absences of Reece James over the last two seasons and kept his place when James was employed in midfield - as he was against PSG. 8 8 But if you believe Moises Caicedo and Enzo Fernandez will start the biggest games in front of the defence, and James will mostly play as an inverted right back when he is fit, then Gusto will not be in Enzo Maresca's strongest 11. Chalobah did well after returning from half a season on loan at Crystal Palace, but could yet find himself being sold this summer. As a product of the Chelsea Academy, he would generate pure profit for financial rules purposes and there could be clubs willing to pay £40m for him. If Chalobah left, his replacement as right-sided centre back at the start of the season would almost certainly be Tosin Adarabioyo. The free transfer from Fulham last summer has carved a niche for himself off the pitch as well as on it. At just 27 he is one of the senior members of the squad, and plays an 'Uncle Tosin' role to the youngsters, enjoying a particularly close relationship with fellow Mancunian Cole Palmer. But no-one, not even Tosin himself, would claim that he is one of Europe's best defenders. If Wesley Fofana is able to put his injury hell behind him and rediscover his previous form, he could yet meet those standards and become a Chelsea stalwart for years to come. Fofana, still just 24, has made only 34 appearances for the Blues since arriving from Leicester in the summer of 2022 in a deal worth up to £75m. He is the most expensive of all Chelsea's defensive signings and that means, through no fault of his own, he has also been the biggest let down. But only just. The Blues really have had trouble finding a settled and satisfactory centre back pairing. Within weeks of the 2022 takeover, Kalidou Koulibaly became the new regime's first defensive signing. The Napoli star's £35m fee felt a little steep for a player about to turn 31, but the Senegal international was highly-rated and on the radar of other big clubs. Koulibaly failed to live up to his billing, although he could point to the chaos of playing under three different managers and a hamstring injury as decent explanations. He was offloaded after just one season to Saudi Pro League side Al-Hilal - and played for them in this year's Club World Cup. When Chelsea set a new record for winter window spending in early 2023, Benoit Badiashile 's £35m arrival from Monaco went a little under the radar in the wake of massive deals for Enzo Fernandez and Mykhailo Mudryk. The Frenchman did fine in a struggling team in the remainder of the 22/23 season, but not well enough to seal his spot. And when injury kept Badiashile out of the start of the following campaign, Colwill took his chance after returning from loan at Brighton. 8 8 8 Meanwhile the unfortunate Fofana had suffered the second major knee injury of his short Chelsea career in the summer of 2023. Within weeks, the Blues had gone back to Monaco to bring in Axel Disasi for another £38m. The France international was a first choice under Mauricio Pochettino for much of the 2023/4 season. But new boss Maresca did not fancy Disasi, and he was sent on loan to Aston Villa for the second half of last season. The signing of Hato, 19, fits Chelsea's current transfer philosophy of signing the best young players and trying to turn them into superstars. If they fail, they can usually be sold on for a profit, as is likely to be the case with Renato Veiga. The versatile Portuguese was signed only last summer, did well enough to earn a loan to Juventus for the second half of the season and could find himself joining Atletico Madrid for a chunky fee. In addition to Veiga, Chelsea signed two teenage defenders last summer in centre back Aaron Anselmino and left back Caleb Wiley. The latter has now returned to Watford for a second season on loan, while Anselmino may well also leave on a temporary deal after recovering from injury. Mamadou Sarr, 19, is likely to be loaned back to Strasbourg after the Blues paid £12m to their sister club. Hato is also 19 but at a fee of £37m, he will surely need to deliver for Chelsea this season. The Blues will probably ease him in, perhaps initially as cover for left back Cucurella. In the longer term, Hato should end up challenging Colwill for that left-sided centre back slot or forming a partnership with the England international. And finally, after spending more on defenders than any club, Chelsea could end up with a world-class back four to show for it. 8


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on car finance scandal redress: mis-sold loans demand action, not excuses or spin
With its ruling in the car finance case, the UK supreme court sent a clear message: some motorists purchased vehicles with deals that were indeed unfair, but it's not the judiciary's job to redraw the boundaries of consumer protection law. That burden, the justices suggested, rests with regulators and elected governments. This reasoning is in line with a major speech in June by the court's president, Lord Reed, who argued that judges aren't policymakers – and shouldn't be. He led a bench that nonetheless upheld a finding of unfairness in the case of the factory supervisor Marcus Johnson. The court flagged the danger, defined the threshold – but stopped short of imposing redress itself. Now, the baton has been passed. Millions could get payouts if the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) follows the court ruling with its proposed redress scheme, now out for consultation. The regulator admits what courts and campaigners have long suggested: that hidden commissions and opaque contracts were endemic, and that consumers were misled on a large scale. It may be 2025, but the roots of this scandal stretch back decades. More than 90% of new car purchases are financed, and for years, buyers weren't offered the best deal – just the one that earned the broker the biggest cut. Last October, the court of appeal saw hidden commissions as tantamount to bribes – secret incentives to push pricier loans. Banks had been on the hook for potentially £40bn in compensation had that view prevailed. But the supreme court disagreed. Dealers aren't fiduciaries, it said. They're not priests or doctors. They're salespeople and everyone knows it. The Treasury had tried, and failed, to intervene on behalf of banks that feared big payouts. The supreme court dismissed that petition with waspish brevity. Rachel Reeves may argue she was guarding financial stability, but it is not a good look to be siding with lenders over misled consumers, especially when there is a strong case to suggest regulators had been asleep at the wheel. The FCA now admits that many firms broke the rules. It plans a compensation scheme covering loans dating back to 2007, including both discretionary and some non-discretionary commission arrangements. The potential bill? At least £9bn, and possibly double that. Most individuals will probably receive less than £950 in compensation. The court's refusal to stretch the law to encompass issues of trust wasn't a shrug; it was a signal. The law allows unfairness to be addressed. But the heavy lifting must be done by the state. This episode lays bare a deeper malaise. Britain's credit system often runs on skewed incentives and asymmetric information. Brokers pose as advisers but act as commission-driven salespeople. In Mr Johnson's case a £1,650 hidden commission – a quarter of the car's price – went undisclosed. That's not a quirk; it's economics' classic lemons problem. In car finance, consumers didn't know how much brokers were pocketing or how that skewed the deal. Without trust or clarity, quality suffers – and everyone overpays for 'lemons' (duds). The court of appeal did focus minds; and failing to interpret the law robustly in the face of clear wrongdoing is itself a judicial choice. The supreme court smartly redirected the narrative. The regulator is stirring. Ministers must now support a consumer-facing system of redress and not shield the City from the consequences of its own mis‑selling. The public will be watching.


The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
The estate that could solve Scotland's problem with trees
The forests offer much needed shade in Greece and also allow a variety of species an environment where they can thrive. Here in Scotland it may feel like there are trees everywhere, but the exact opposite is true as it is one of the least forested countries on the planet. Just drive a small distance outside of the main population centres and you will be met with miles upon miles of bleak nothingness, apart from areas that are farmland. It comes as tree planting is seen as a key tranche in achieving net zero and with a projected housebuilding timber shortage on the horizon. But Scotland's forestry industry is facing a funding black hole of £24 million and national planting targets will not be met now for at least two years. A massive budget cut has knocked the forestry industry's confidence, potentially stalling planting projects and leading to trees being destroyed. Confor, the Confederation of Forest Industries representative body, signalled a wave of concern along the supply chain from tree nurseries to sawmills and wood-panel manufacturers. Scotland has consistently failed to meet its tree planting targets, aiming to plant amounts rising from 15,000 hectares, or 30 million trees, to now 18,000 ha each year, but the industry has faced harsh funding cuts. Rural Scots are right - maybe it is time to halt onshore windfarms Trump is right for once, it is time to drill, baby drill in the North Sea It is high time that irresponsible campervan users are taxed off the NC500 We're going to need a smaller boat: The large ferry dilemma for CalMac A 41% budget cut in 2023 was only partially restored last year by around 18% to £45m. Edinburgh-based Confor said a further £24m is needed for the target mathematics to work, but that low confidence is likely to impact new projects being brought forward. However, a 10,000-acre estate in the Highlands is a great example of what can be achieved with the proper ambition. Dundreggan rewilding centre in Glenmoriston has just been awarded special European status recognising its genetic diversity of tree species. Parts of the juniper and silver birch woodland at Trees for Life's site have been classed as Gene Conservation Units. A spokesperson for the conservation charity said the 'unusually wet location' of juniper and the 'extreme westerly location' of silver birch have helped make the tree populations unique. The classification has been awarded by the European Forest Genetic Resources Network (EUFORGEN) which is managed in the UK by nature agency Forest Research. The estate uses a 'dynamic conservation' technique to protect the trees' genetic diversity. The land is encouraged to regenerate naturally within its specific environment and weather conditions. Juniper is a slow-growing evergreen shrub or small tree, with small blue-green needles and berries that ripen to a dark, blue-purple colour. The species support biodiversity by providing shelter and food for wildlife. Juniper berries are also used to produce gin. Silver birch is a fast-growing species which spreads over open ground. The tree's roots draw up nutrients, and its leaves add richness to soil. The Gene Conservation Unit status means Dundreggan's juniper and silver birch will be monitored to ensure their survival and natural regeneration. The estate covers 10,000 acres and has so many rare species living within it that environmentalists have described it as a 'lost world'. Conservation charity Trees for Life bought the site for £1.65million which remains one of the UK's largest ever areas of land bought for forest regeneration. The former hunting estate was already home to ancient forest fragments, including outstanding areas of juniper and dwarf birch. The charity has since planted half a million trees at the site, ensuring natural regeneration of woodlands and encouraging the return of rare wildlife, plants and insects. A rare non-biting midge and several other species have since been discovered after surveys of the estate. In total, more than 3,300 species have now been recorded at the charity's forest restoration site with at least 68 of these are priority species for conservation. These include unusual species such as the strawberry spider with several never having been recorded in the UK before, or were feared extinct in Scotland. While it is relatively small in the grand scheme of things, it should be an inspiration for other land owners when it comes to rewilding land and planting forests. Scotland needs more native trees and it is baffling why such a large proportion of the country is entirely treeless. The timber industry is worth around £1billion a year to the economy but even commercial plantations barely scratch the surface of what is required. It is all well and good for ministers to set tree planting targets, but without proper funding these will never be met. Ministers should see what has been done elsewhere and replicate it at pace.