logo
Social Security Update: Senator Warns Agency Hiding 'Extent of the Problem'

Social Security Update: Senator Warns Agency Hiding 'Extent of the Problem'

Newsweek2 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, called for the Social Security Administration (SSA) to provide more accurate and detailed information about the agency's phone call wait times on Sunday, warning the agency may be hiding "the extent of the problem" from policymakers and the public.
In a letter sent to SSA Commissioner Frank Bisignano and obtained by The Hill, Warren asked for additional data, following up on a commitment she secured from Bisignano for a public audit regarding call wait time data and increased transparency in reporting.
Why It Matters
Social Security serves over 70 million Americans, including retirees, the disabled, and survivors, making the accessibility and responsiveness of its services crucial for millions who depend on timely benefits.
Persistent issues with customer service, especially prolonged call wait times, can directly impact vulnerable populations' ability to access critical support.
According to recent data and advocacy groups, ongoing administrative challenges and staffing concerns have already resulted in long delays and confusion for benefit recipients. Trust in the system's reliability is a growing public concern as the U.S. faces discussions over the program's long-term future and funding.
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) speaks during a rally opposing House Republicans Tax Proposal prior to the final House vote on Capitol Hill on May 21, 2025, in Washington, D.C.
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) speaks during a rally opposing House Republicans Tax Proposal prior to the final House vote on Capitol Hill on May 21, 2025, in Washington, D.C.for Families Over Billionaires
What To Know
Senator Warren's renewed inquiry stems from findings by her staff, most recently in June, that showed some SSA phone wait times averaged around one hour and 45 minutes, with some callers reporting delays of over three hours.
In her letter, Warren wrote, "The SSA is failing to provide policymakers and the public with accurate information about the extent of the problem, using convoluted calculations to obfuscate the real data, or withholding information entirely."
The senator called for an Inspector General-led public audit of the agency's reporting procedures for phone wait times. She thanked Bisignano for agreeing to such an audit but did not specify a timeline.
Warren's letter requested that by August 11, the SSA provide the total number of calls received; details on calls handled by an artificial intelligence tool, including the percentage dropped, transferred, or ended unresolved; and similar details for calls handled by human representatives.
Warren also criticized the SSA for what she called the distribution of an "inaccurate and overtly partisan email" regarding the so-called "Big Beautiful Bill," alleging that it included false information about eliminating federal taxes on Social Security benefits.
"Warren is absolutely right about one thing," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek.
"The email that went out claiming 90 percent of Social Security beneficiaries will no longer pay taxes on their benefits was flat-out false. It was political propaganda dressed up as government communication. The message even praised the OBBA and mentioned Trump by name, which is a direct politicization of a government agency. That's unacceptable."
The SSA has faced scrutiny for changes implemented under the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which was initially led by billionaire advisor Elon Musk before he parted ways with the Trump administration in late May. The SSA has faced staffing cuts and office closures that have contributed to service delays since then.
In one notable incident in April, a technical error on the SSA website incorrectly notified Supplement Security Income recipients their benefits had ended, compounding concerns among the vulnerable populations it serves.
Newsweek reached out to the SSA for comment via email.
What People Are Saying
Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "The SSA has started implementing new tech systems, which could eventually improve things, but that takes time. What doesn't help is letting go of experienced staff or forcing early exits, only to expect automation to solve every problem overnight."
Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "Senator Warren is concerned based on data she's received that release doesn't reflect the reality of what's actually happening, with internal reports saying wait times for call have actually increased in some situations, not decreased. It's important to have an accurate reflection of this information, too. With Social Security facing a shortfall in the coming years, legislators need to know if the administration can truly get by with a smaller staff or not."
What Happens Next
Commissioner Bisignano has committed to an Inspector General audit, though a date was not detailed by Warren or the SSA.
By August 11, the agency is expected to provide the requested call data to Warren's office.
The SSA's reported willingness to undergo greater independent scrutiny could lead to further reforms in customer service procedures and increased congressional oversight, depending on audit findings.
"Understaffing, especially after DOGE budget cuts, has left fewer hands to handle an aging and growing beneficiary population," Thompson said. "Until those gaps are filled and systems are modernized, people will continue to sit on hold for hours just trying to get basic help."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brazil's Lula on Trump criticism: ‘There's no reason to be afraid'
Brazil's Lula on Trump criticism: ‘There's no reason to be afraid'

The Hill

time3 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Brazil's Lula on Trump criticism: ‘There's no reason to be afraid'

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva said in a Tuesday interview that he's not afraid to criticize President Trump publicly — even if that means no deal can be reached to stave off the 50-percent tariff on Brazilian imports that Trump announced earlier this month and moved to put into action on Wednesday. In an interview with The New York Times published Wednesday, Lula was asked about his willingness to openly criticize Trump, including calling him an emperor, while other heads of state have been reluctant to do so. Asked if he thinks that approach 'could worsen things,' Lula said, 'I don't.' 'There's no reason to be afraid,' he continued. 'I am worried, obviously, because we have economic interests, political interests, technological interests. But at no point will Brazil negotiate as if it were a small country up against a big country. Brazil will negotiate as a sovereign country.' Lula stressed the importance of finding middle ground. 'In politics between two states, the will of neither should prevail. We always need to find the middle ground. This is achieved not by puffing out your chest and shouting about things you can't deliver, nor by bowing your head and simply saying 'amen' to whatever the United States wants,' Lula said. Trump, earlier this month, announced plans to impose a 50-percent tariff on all goods from Brazil, citing the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro, an ally of his, over an alleged plot to remain in power after losing an election. Trump originally warned the tariffs would go into effect on Aug. 1, but, on Wednesday, the president signed an executive order officially raising the tariffs on Brazil to 50 percent. The order goes into effect seven days after its signing: on Aug. 6. Trump, who has criticized Brazil's treatment of Bolsonaro, said in a letter to Lula earlier this month that the new tariffs are 'due in part to Brazil's insidious attacks on Free Elections and the fundamental Free Speech Rights of Americans,' and he also cited Brazil's 'Tariff, and Non-Tariff, Policies and Trade Barriers.' 'The way that Brazil has treated former President Bolsonaro, a Highly Respected Leader throughout the World during his Term, including by the United States, is an international disgrace. This Trial should not be taking place. It is a Witch Hunt that should end IMMEDIATELY!' Trump wrote in the letter, which was posted to the president's Truth Social platform earlier this month. Lula responded at the time by fiercely defending the independence of the government institutions and saying Brazil would not be threatened. He reiterated that sentiment in the Times interview this week but stressed his desire to work with the U.S. president on trade without involving politics. 'I want to tell Trump that Brazilians and Americans do not deserve to be victims of politics, if the reason President Trump is imposing this tax on Brazil is because of the case against former President Bolsonaro,' Lula said, when asked for his message to the U.S. president. 'The Brazilian people will pay more for some products, and the American people will pay more for other products. And I think the cause does not merit this,' Lula continued. 'Brazil has a Constitution, and the former president is being tried with a full right to a defense.' Trump and Lula had not spoken, as of the Tuesday interview. Lula said he had tried to reach out to arrange a conversation with Trump, but 'so far, it hasn't been possible.' Lula, a left-wing politician, urged Trump to give him a chance, saying, 'I honestly don't know what Trump has heard about me. But if he got to know me, he'd know that I'm 20 times better than [Bolsonaro].' But Lula brushed off the potential consequences of tariffs, saying Brazil will look to trade more with China going forward. 'If the United States doesn't want to buy something of ours, we are going to look for someone who will,' he said.

Trump administration rolls out new Social Security hurdles, then makes them optional
Trump administration rolls out new Social Security hurdles, then makes them optional

Axios

time3 minutes ago

  • Axios

Trump administration rolls out new Social Security hurdles, then makes them optional

The Trump administration quietly rushed through a major change to Social Security's phone service policy, but after advocates for the elderly expressed concerns, the agency that oversees the program now says the change is "optional." Why it matters: The policy would have forced millions more Americans to travel to the agency's already understaffed field offices to do routine things like change their address, obtain a tax form or generate a benefit verification letter. That would be a big obstacle, particularly for seniors, people struggling with mobility issues or those in rural areas who live far from a field office. The Social Security Administration's own filing says 3.4 million more people would be forced to go to the field offices, which are already understaffed, and hard to get to for many Americans. How it works: For decades, Social Security beneficiaries could phone the agency to do routine tasks. Under the policy, described in the filing to the Office of Management and Budget, beneficiaries would first have to go online to get a one-time "Security Authentication PIN," or SAP. This was set to begin Aug. 18. The intrigue: Earlier this week, AARP, the powerful advocacy group for older Americans, and other advocates for the elderly and disabled drew attention to the change. Now, the agency says that use of the SAP PIN is optional, and was always meant to be optional. "The intention of the expanded SAP feature in the filing was always to be optional," an agency spokesperson tells Axios in an email. "The purpose of the feature is to improve the customer experience by providing a convenient and secure method for callers to verify their identity." "If a caller does not have a 'my Social Security account' or chooses not to use the SAP feature, the customer experience will be no different than it is today, and they will continue to use the existing authentication methods to verify their identity," they said. Yes, but: The filing detailing the new policy has not yet been updated or changed. The big picture: This latest dustup comes months after the agency backed off a similar plan after widespread outcry. It's part of the Trump administration's effort to combat fraud — ongoing even as Elon Musk's DOGE efforts have receded into the background. The agency instituted the policy without any announcement — a departure from how it has operated under prior administrations — and critics say that it hasn't provided substantial evidence for the fraud it's trying to combat. Between the lines: In the past, including in the first Trump administration, a big policy change would be carefully tested and messaged to the public in blogs, the website and press releases. The agency would typically reach out to stakeholders, like AARP, advocates for the poor and disabled and other lawyers who work with Americans on their benefit claims. What to watch: The agency says it will amend its filing to make it clear that this policy is optional. Advocates are keeping an eye out for that.

Crow and Neguse sue Trump administration over detention center access
Crow and Neguse sue Trump administration over detention center access

Axios

time3 minutes ago

  • Axios

Crow and Neguse sue Trump administration over detention center access

Democratic U.S. Reps. Jason Crow and Joe Neguse on Wednesday filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after ICE blocked multiple members of Congress from entering detention centers. State of play: Neguse, the House Assistant Minority Leader, led the suit alongside 10 other federal lawmakers seeking access to detention facilities to evaluate treatment and conditions of detainees. Context: The lawsuit calls on the administration to comply with a federal law guaranteeing access to visit ICE or Department of Homeland Security sites where noncitizens are detained without prior notice, per a statement from Neguse. It names the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem and Immigration and Customs Enforcement acting director Todd Lyons. Zoom in: Crow was denied entry during a July 20 oversight visit that was purposefully unannounced, the Democrat told us, to ensure an unvarnished look at facility conditions. Between the lines: The Trump administration in June issued new guidance limiting congressional access to facilities, requiring 72 business hours' notice. What they're saying:"Blocking Members of Congress from oversight visits to ICE facilities … clearly violates Federal law — and the Trump administration knows it," Neguse said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store