Funding available to help Ohio farms still reeling from drought
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — The Ohio Department of Agriculture announced the sign-up period for Ohio farmers to apply for relief funding following last year's drought.
'We went to the different counties that were really impacted throughout this historic drought that we saw last summer and into the fall and we were meeting with farmers, meeting with local stormwater offices, and hearing their concerns,' Ohio Department of Agriculture director Brian Baldridge said.
Ohio lawmakers were part of these visits too. Baldridge said the initial place farmers can turn to for help is the U.S. Department of Agriculture. But they decided to add some additional assistance. Governor Mike Dewine signed Senate Bill 54 into law in 2024, which allocated $10 million worth of funding for the 28 counties hit the hardest by the drought.
Firefighter injured after falling down stairs in Columbus house fire
'We were hearing stories from farmers who had been seeding their winter storage of hay since the first part of July, hauling water because those streams, ponds, wells, springs were dried up on their farms,' Baldridge said.
One of those farms includes Harrison Farm in Groveport. The owner, Katherine Harrison, said the drought didn't just cause a rough spring and summer. It also led to the worst winter she's ever had on the farm.
'I struggled to give my animals the care that they needed and keep this farm operating. I gave up a lot of things that I needed so that funds were there for the farm,' Harrison said.
She is the fifth generation of her family to own the farm. It means a lot to her to keep all 700 of her animals healthy.
'Every day I am working and so typically I work seven days a week, ten to 14 hours a day because I believe in this farm,' she said.
Typically in the spring and summer months, the animals will graze the pastures, according to Harrison. But after the drought hit, the grass dried up. She was forced to use her hay supplies that are saved for winter. By late fall, she said the hay was gone too. Luckily, community donations came in.
'Frankly, we would not have made it through the winter. Having the Christmas trees and the pumpkins allowed us to be able to make it to today,' said Harrison.
While these donations kept the animals fed, Harrison said the different foods led to health issues. For example, it's lamb and kidding season but many of the mothers don't have enough milk.
'When a mother cannot provide the care that a baby needs, then it becomes my responsibility. So not only have we navigated health issues in the adult animals as well as in the newborns, but we've also had those situations where mama may not have enough milk from nutritional compromising,' she said.
Harrison said this funding would help get the animals healthy again and allow her to stock back up on depleted supplies.
'I am hopeful to soon be able to enjoy buying groceries without worrying about whether the farm is going to keep going,' she said.
Applications are open until April 1.
The eligible counties include: Athens, Belmont, Carroll, Fairfield, Fayette, Franklin, Gallia, Guernsey, Harrison, Highland, Hocking, Jackson, Jefferson, Lawrence, Licking, Madison, Meigs, Monroe, Morgan, Muskingum, Noble, Perry, Pickaway, Pike, Ross, Tuscarawas, Vinton and Washington.
The Ohio Department of Agriculture said the funding is available to any livestock producer participating in the USDA FSA Livestock Forage Disaster Program. Baldridge said farmers are encouraged to contact their local Soil and Water Conservation Districts to discuss eligibility and to apply.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
WEATHER AWARE: Another round of strong storms for Monday
COLUMBUS, Ga. (WRBL)- Following severe storms this morning, we have enjoyed a calmer afternoon. A few showers will continue to filter out this evening across our south. We are already tracking our next storm system moving out of the Plains. Monday: Another WEATHER AWARE day is in store on Monday. We are tracking two rounds of potential severe weather: one in the morning and another in the afternoon. The SPC has issued a level 2/5 (slight) risk for Monday. Primary threats are damaging winds and hail. Tuesday: A few storms are possible early Tuesday, but rain chances will likely taper off by the afternoon. Temperatures will reach into the upper 80s. Rest of the Week: We will remain unsettled through the extended forecast, with a chance for showers and storms each day. By next weekend, greater humidity will return to the southeast, causing our heat index temperatures to near the 100-degree mark again. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Los Angeles Times
a day ago
- Los Angeles Times
An earthquake just off California's coast poses dire tsunami risk for many communities
SAN FRANCISCO — California does not often experience dangerous tsunamis, but there is one type of ocean surge some experts are increasingly concerned about. Near-shore tsunamis — those triggered by earthquakes just offshore — could pose a particularly dire risk for California's heavily populated coastal communities, according to experts, disaster modeling and local hazard plans. Depending on the strength and location of the quake, life-threatening waves could approach the coastline in as few as 10 minutes, perhaps not even enough time for an emergency alert to be issued, much less arrive on your cellphone. And it's a potential threat all along California's 840-mile coast, from the dense cities in the south to more remote reaches in the north. Data published in both the city and county of Los Angeles' hazard mitigation plans show how locally generated tsunamis could reach heights of up to 5 feet above the mean sea level in Marina del Rey; 7 feet in Manhattan Beach and San Pedro; 8 feet in Long Beach and the Santa Monica Pier; 9 feet in Malibu; and 30 feet on Catalina Island — depending on the fault that ruptures or where an underwater landslide is triggered. In Orange County, a magnitude 6.8 quake just offshore could bring a local-source tsunami to the coast in as little as 15 minutes, county documents say. A quake-triggered submarine landslide could inundate areas in Newport Beach — including Balboa Island, Balboa Peninsula and Lido Isle — and potentially surge so far inland up San Diego Creek that water approaches the 405 Freeway in Irvine. And in the San Francisco Bay Area, near-shore tsunami could cause waves to surge 4 feet above mean sea level at San Francisco's Aquatic Park, Alcatraz Island, Redwood City and Richmond; 5 feet in Alameda; 6 feet at San Francisco's Ocean Beach; 7 feet in Sausalito; 8 feet in Pacifica in San Mateo County; and 9 feet in Bolinas in Marin County, according to the California Geological Survey. Reginald Harrison, director of disaster preparedness and emergency communications for the city of Long Beach, said 'tsunamis are a rare but real threat to our community.' 'Unlike earthquakes, however, tsunamis provide natural warnings before they arrive,' Harrison said in a statement released ahead of Tsunami Preparedness Week. 'If you are near the beach when this occurs, you should move to higher ground as quickly as possible.' California is home to a number of communities where evacuating quickly could be immensely challenging. A study published in 2020 identified nine densely populated and particularly problematic places. They include Naples island in Long Beach; Oxnard Shores and southern Channel Islands Beach in Ventura County; the islands in Huntington Harbour; Balboa Island; Balboa Peninsula/Lido Isle; San Diego's Mission Beach peninsula; the Coronado peninsula, and Bay Farm Island in Alameda. Alameda is particularly vulnerable to tsunami. More than half its about 75,000 residents live in a designated hazard zone, and there are few exits from the community — which is split between Bay Farm Island (actually a peninsula) and the main Alameda island. However, officials there contend 'there is minimal risk of any significant tsunami occurring' from a local fault. Instead, they say, the greatest risk is from distant areas, which could produce tsunami of as much as 18 feet above sea level in Alameda. In other places, though, a near-shore tsunami could produce the highest waves. In Redondo Beach, for instance, a near-shore tsunami could bring waves of up to 11 feet above mean sea level, compared to 9 feet possible coming from a distant earthquake. Katie Eing, the emergency services coordinator for Newport Beach, estimated 45,000 people live in the potential local inundation zone, about half of the entire city's population. However, she noted many more visitors and workers could also be present, especially during tourist season. Eing said a near-shore tsunami could be devastating. The city's hazard mitigation plan cites a study from USC that estimates 'a potential submarine landslide anywhere along the steep Southern California offshore escarpment could generate a tsunami' that reaches an elevation of 30 feet to 33 feet above sea level. 'The concern with these local tsunami sources is that travel time between the local source of an earthquake and the arrival of the first waves along the coastline is estimated at 10 to 20 minutes, which does not allow much time for broadcasting of warnings and evacuation,' the report said. 'Several wave crests are likely, with the second and third waves likely to be higher than the first.' Evacuating all areas of the inundation zone, by comparison, would take hours, Eing estimated. That timeline is backed up by a 2015 study, which concluded a full evacuation of Newport Beach's tsunami-vulnerable areas could take almost 5 hours. Depending on the scenario, Eing said officials may recommend some people shelter-in-place rather than chance getting stuck in evacuation traffic at or below sea level. 'If it was a local-sourced earthquake… it's probably safer for [residents] to go to the third story,' she said. 'It's important to know where you live, if you're in the inundation zone.' The potential for chaos and confusion in an evacuation became all-too-apparent last December, when a magnitude 7 earthquake struck about 30 miles off the Humboldt County coast. An expansive tsunami warning arrived minutes later — sending alarms blaring on the cellphones of Californians from the North Coast through the San Francisco Bay Area, including Oakland, Berkeley and Alameda. Fortunately, only a small tsunami ended up materializing, just 2 inches high in Mendocino County. But the response and reaction shows plenty of room for improvement. Some of those who chose to evacuate didn't do so promptly, and there was widespread confusion whether evacuation was necessary at all. 'Many people questioned how a tsunami could enter the Bay and stated it must only be people on the coast who need to evacuate,' one person told the city of Berkeley in a survey. 'There was just tons of confusion all around, lots of complacency and not taking it seriously.' Another person complained that the only warning they got was the broad 'emergency alert' sent to all cellphones, as they weren't signed up for Berkeley's alert systems. As a result, 'we had no information at all about who should evacuate and who should not, access to a map, how much time we had,' that person wrote. Hesitation can be deadly. The 2011 magnitude-9.1 earthquake that struck near Japan spawned a tsunami that rose as high as 45 feet and reached the coast within just 30 minutes. More than 18,000 people died in the disaster, a toll exacerbated by an initial warning that underestimated the size of the tsunami before communications systems cut out entirely. Another issue, as documented by seismologist Lucy Jones in her book 'The Big Ones,' was the reluctance of some people to evacuate. That reluctance, as the Berkeley survey found, could be fueled by a lack of timely information. California's tsunami hazard map website didn't work during the alert period, for instance. In response, San Mateo County, just south of San Francisco, built its own online tsunami dashboard that lets residents and visitors plug in their location to see if they're in a hazard zone, as well as search for nearby safe places. Last December, Highway 1 was clogged with motorists trying to flee Pacifica. What many didn't realize is that in some vulnerable areas, heading just a few blocks inland was enough to safely be out of a tsunami's reach. Some evacuees also went in the wrong direction, driving from higher ground into lower-lying areas in an attempt to flee. Shruti Dhapodkar, director of emergency management for San Mateo County, heard from someone who lives in the coastal community of Montara — which is high enough in elevation that no tsunami would be expected to ever hit it. Yet that resident fled on Highway 1, directly into a low-lying area. 'I want to make this point very, very clear ... avoiding low-lying areas and moving to higher ground' is the objective, 'not necessarily getting in your car and coming over the hill,' Dhapodkar said. Understanding what areas of a city are threatened by tsunami are crucial — as is knowing where the safe areas are. If you're at the Santa Monica Pier, just head up above the bluffs, which are at about 100 feet above sea level. You don't need to run to Mount Baldy. In many parts of San Francisco, heading a few blocks away from the coast is enough to get to safety. The general advice is to evacuate by foot or on bicycle if possible to avoid traffic jams. But some officials acknowledge that could be a tough ask in car-crazy California. For more distant tsunamis, where hours may be available for an evacuation, scenarios can vary. 'For most of L.A., a huge chunk of our evacuation zone really is the beach and a couple of blocks inland,' said Jennifer Lazo, division chief of the innovation and technology division at the city's Emergency Management Department. But there are a number of areas in which people may need to drive out. In distant-source tsunami scenarios, firefighters and police officers would be dispatched to direct people out, Lazo said. Additional, crucial planning remains in the works. San Francisco says it needs to establish an evacuation strategy for people with disabilities, which it plans to complete by 2027. 'In areas where high ground is not immediately available, vertically evacuating and seeking refuge in tall buildings might be the best option for life safety, especially for people with disabilities or access and functional needs,' the city's hazards plan says. San Francisco also needs to develop and install signs on sidewalks and streets in low-lying waterfront areas to help people know where to go in case of tsunami and other coastal flood hazards, such as king tides, the city says. Some coastal areas have installed tsunami warning signs, but they're not ubiquitous. 'There is a lack of signage just throughout the entire state. Marin County — I'll speak to us — we definitely have limited signage throughout the county identifying tsunami inundation zones,' said Steven Torrence, Marin County's director of emergency management. The county Board of Supervisors doesn't have jurisdiction everywhere, he noted, but 'we need to make sure that the jurisdictions are clearly identifying these inundation zones.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Tracking damaging storms and a chance for severe weather Sunday
COLUMBUS, Ga. (WRBL)- The First Alert Weather Team continues to monitor storms moving through the region this evening. Power outages and damages are reported across western and central Alabama. As these storms push through, a few will be strong to severe. Sunday: These storms will exit by 10PM ET tonight, giving us a few hours before the next round. Another chance for severe weather is possible early Sunday morning, making us WEATHER AWARE. This line will enter from the north, bringing a threat for damaging winds, small hail, and heavy rainfall. Most of the area is under a level 2/5 risk (or slight). A few strong storms will be possible again in the afternoon, depending on the behavior of the morning system. Monday: Another WEATHER AWARE day is in store Monday. A line of storms is set to develop Monday afternoon. The SPC has issued a level 2/5 (slight) risk for Monday. Primary threats are damaging winds and hail. Next Week: Multiple stalled fronts will keep the unsettled pattern in our forecast through next weekend. Every day will bring a chance for storms, and temperatures will sit in the upper 80s/ lower 90s. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
