Seeing yellow: Massive police presence highly visible ahead of Trump's visit to Scotland
The standard issue garb that is far removed from the traditional Turnberry tartan was highly visible on the dunes, the beaches and the grass as thousands of officers secured the course in advance of protests planned during the president's visit to two of his Scottish golf resorts .
Trump was expected to arrive Friday evening to a mix of respect and ridicule.
His visit requires a major police operation that will cost Scottish taxpayers millions of pounds as protests are planned over the weekend. The union representing officers is concerned they are already overworked and will be diverted from their normal duties.
Policing for Trump's four-day visit to the U.K. in 2018 cost more than 14 million pounds ($19 million), according to Freedom of Information figures. That included more than 3 million pounds ($4 million) spent for his two-day golf trip to Turnberry, the historic course and hotel in southwest Scotland that he bought in 2014.
Police Scotland would not discuss how many officers were being deployed for operational reasons and only said the costs would be 'considerable.'
'The visit will require a significant police operation using local, national and specialist resources from across Police Scotland, supported by colleagues from other U.K. police forces as part of mutual aid arrangements,' Assistant Chief Constable Emma Bond said.
Scottish First Minister John Swinney said the visit would not be detrimental to policing.
'It's nonsensical to say it won't impact it,' said David Kennedy, general secretary of the Scottish Police Federation, the officers' union.
Kennedy said he expects about 5,000 officers to take part in the operation.
He said a force reduction in recent years has police working 12-hour shifts. Communities that are understaffed will be left behind with even fewer officers during Trump's visit.
'We want the president of the United States to be able to come to Scotland. That's not what this is about,' Kennedy said. 'It's the current state of the police service and the numbers we have causes great difficulty.
The Stop Trump Scotland group has planned demonstrations Saturday in Edinburgh, Aberdeen and Dumfries. The group encouraged people to 'show Trump exactly what we think of him in Scotland.'
Trump should receive a much warmer welcome from U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer , who is expected to meet with him during the visit. Swinney, the left-leaning head of Scottish government and former Trump critic, also plans to meet with the president.
___
Melley reported from London.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
18 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump and Starmer to Meet in Scotland to Discuss Trade and Gaza
President Trump will host Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain at his two golf courses in Scotland on Monday, the day after announcing a deal with the European Union designed to avoid a costly economic war with America's biggest trading bloc. Mr. Trump announced on Sunday that Europe had agreed to tariffs of 15 percent on automobiles and most other E.U. goods, after meeting with Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the E.U.'s executive branch. The tariffs are higher than the 10 percent duty on most British goods that Britain, which is not in the European Union, agreed to in a deal that Mr. Starmer and Mr. Trump struck in May. The 27-nation bloc also agreed to buy $750 billion worth of U.S. energy and invest $600 billion in the United States, Mr. Trump said. Trade is among the topics that Mr. Trump and Mr. Starmer are expected to discuss when they meet first at Mr. Trump's Turnberry golf club on the west coast of Scotland and then travel to the other side of the country for dinner at the president's other club, in Aberdeen. The two leaders are expected to resume efforts to resolve a dispute about U.S. tariffs on British steel and aluminum, which remain at 25 percent. In June, Britain and the United States signed an agreement to resolve other trade issues, with both sides saying the deal would benefit both countries. British officials said they expect the all-day agenda to also include the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the grinding war in Ukraine. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
They were freed from a ‘torture prison' in El Salvador. This is their life now
Dozens of Venezuelan men, locked up in immigration detention centers in the United States, were abruptly flown to El Salvador in the middle of the night, shackled and gang-walked to a brutal maximum-security prison, heads shaved, and stuffed into jail cells where they lived for more than five months. They weren't allowed to speak with families or lawyers. They never stepped foot outside. Now, after finally being returned last week to Venezuela by Donald Trump's administration, they reveal traumatizing ordeals and adjust to the whiplash of arriving back in a country where many still face significant threats. In a remarkable change in the US position, Trump officials have 'obtained assurances' from Venezuela that the men will be returned to the US to continue their immigration proceedings — marking a chaotic full circle that could land them right back in the American detention centers from where they were deported. Last week's prisoner exchange appeared to mark the end of a months-long legal battle, challenging the president's use of the Alien Enemies Act to summarily deport dozens of alleged members of Venezuela's notorious Tren de Aragua gang. Trump officials had labelled these men 'worst of the worst' criminals, and 'alien enemies', who committed 'warfare' on U.S. soil. Yet the swap has set them free in Venezuela, where President Nicolas Maduro's regime is threatening to expose conditions inside El Salvador's notorious jail. And the Trump administration could be forced to return many of those men to the U.S., with Venezuela's help. The Department of Justice declined to comment. The administration is still seeking to use the Alien Enemies Act as a tool to rapidly deport immigrants as part of the president's anti-immigration agenda. It will likely be up to the U.S. Supreme Court to decide if Trump can, or if the dozens of Venezuelan deportees will get their day in court. On Monday, the Venezuelan attorney general's office said it has opened an investigation into Salvadoran president Nayib Bukele for alleged mistreatment and human rights violations against Venezuelans detained in his prison. Video produced by the Venezuelan government includes testimony of men claiming they were shot with pellet guns, beaten, deprived of food, and under constant threat of violence inside CECOT. In his proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act in March, Trump stated that 'all Venezuelan citizens 14 years of age or older who are members of [Tren de Aragua], are within the United States, and are not actually naturalized or lawful permanent residents of the United States are liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as Alien Enemies.' But government officials later admitted that 'many' of those men did not have criminal records, and many were in the country with legal permission and scheduled to appear in court on their asylum claims. A top judge in Washington D.C. had ordered the Trump administration to turn planes around on March 15 after learning in an emergency lawsuit that officials were flying men to El Salvador. The administration resisted, provoking an extraordinary legal battle in which Trump himself demanded the judge's impeachment. Now, after releasing those men back to Venezuela, administration officials have told federal courts handling Alien Enemies Act cases that they are prepared to return them. Last month, District Judge James Boasberg compared their ordeal to a Kafka-esque nightmare. 'Significant evidence has come to light indicating that many of those currently entombed in CECOT have no connection to the gang and thus languish in a foreign prison on flimsy, even frivolous, accusations,' Boasberg wrote. Among them was Andry Hernandez Romero, a gay makeup artist who sought asylum in the U.S. before he was arrested, placed in an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility, and accused of being a member of Tren de Aragua. He fled Venezuela for California in 2024, fearing persecution under Maduro's regime. He has no criminal history or gang ties, according to his family and attorneys. Romero lawfully entered California with an appointment through the CBP One app – a Joe Biden-era programme that allowed immigrants to make immigration appointments before reaching the U.S. – but was swiftly transferred to ICE custody, where officials labeled him a security risk because of his tattoos. A photojournalist captured some of the first images of deportees inside CECOT and witnessed a man identified as Romero crying out for help. In the months that followed, immigrant advocacy groups feared the worst. He is now in Venezuela. 'We have been fighting to free Andry, our other clients, and all the men from CECOT for more than four months,' according to Lindsay Toczylowski, president of Immigrant Defenders Law Center, which provided legal representation to his family. 'We are incredibly relieved that it appears most of them have been freed from the torture prison the U.S. government sent them to, and potentially may be reunited with family soon,' she said. 'But as an American, and as a lawyer who believes deeply in the rule of law and due process, my heart remains heavy.' Jerce Reyes Barrios, described by his attorneys as a professional soccer player and a youth soccer coach, fled Venezuela for the U.S. after he was arrested and 'tortured' by 'electric shocks and suffocation' for marching in demonstrations protesting Maduro, according to court documents. He registered with the CBP One app in Mexico for an appointment with an immigration officer last year, but was taken into ICE custody in San Diego, where he was accused of being a member of Tren de Aragua, largely based on his tattoos — which include a crown on a soccer ball, a tribute to his favorite club Real Madrid, according to a sworn statement from his attorney. Barrios is also expected to be among the Venezuelans freed from CECOT. Neri Alvarado was told by ICE officers that he was arrested in February for his tattoos — one of which is a rainbow-colored autism awareness ribbon with the name of his brother, who is autistic. His relatives watched him walk off a plane in Venezuela after his release from CECOT. An emotional video shows Ysqueibel Yonaiquer Penaloza Chirinos, another Venezuelan immigrant who entered the United States legally with the CBP One app, returning to his family after his release. 'We spent four months without any contact with the outside world,' Arturo Suarez told Venezuelan broadcaster teleSUR following his release. 'We were kidnapped … We got a beating for breakfast. We got a beating for lunch. We got a beating for dinner.' Court hearings in the coming weeks are expected to revisit those legal challenges now that the men are no longer in CECOT. In another Alien Enemies Act case, the Trump administration says it has 'obtained assurances' from Maduro's government that it will cooperate with court orders for Venezuelan citizens to return to the United States, if required. 'The Maduro regime will not impose obstacles to the individual's travel,' ICE official Mellissa Harper said in a sworn statement to Maryland District Judge Stephanie Gallagher on July 18. In that case, a wrongfully deported Venezuelan man identified in court documents as 'Cristian' will be returned to the United States to continue his immigration proceedings, 'should he wish to return.' The statement is a remarkable change in the government's position. In April, Gallagher ordered the government to 'facilitate' his release from El Salvador. But when ordered to cough up a status report about his condition, government attorneys essentially only told the court 'we haven't done anything and don't intend to,' Gallagher wrote in court documents. What happens next in potentially dozens of cases depends on dozens of individual and overlapping decisions after months of chaos. Some Venezuelans will file individual lawsuits or seek relief through the current legal cases winding their way through the courts, while 'others may have no desire or pathway to return to the United States, yet may still seek to pursue litigation to hold the Trump administration accountable for what they did,' according to American Immigration Council senior fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick. Others may fear reprisals from Maduro's regime. 'While the ultimate outcome of these cases is unknown, at least the men are free for now,' according to Reichlin-Melnick. 'As their stories of what happened in El Salvador become public, pressure will hopefully build for international accountability.' Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Voices: There won't be a wealth tax – but Rachel Reeves can't afford to rule it out just yet
Normally, when politicians decline to rule something out, a sceptical media and public believe they are about to do it. But there should be one exception to this rule. Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves and other ministers are refusing to rule out introducing a wealth tax in this autumn's Budget, when the chancellor is likely to raise taxes by at least £20bn to stick within her fiscal rules. I'm told Starmer and Reeves will not bring in a new wealth tax, such as the 2 per cent levy on assets of more than £10m advocated by a growing number of Labour MPs and Neil Kinnock, the party's former leader, to raise £10bn. A wealth tax is an easy slogan and fits on to a banner. It would do nicely for the Starmer allies hoping to nudge him in a more progressive direction as he seeks a long overdue 'story' for his government. But Reeves and Starmer are not convinced. The chancellor thinks wealth taxes don't work. Twelve developed nations had them in 1990s but only three remain; only one, in Switzerland, brings in lots of money. Reeves burnt her own fingers by targeting non-doms – a process begun by Jeremy Hunt, the outgoing Tory chancellor. I'm told Reeves privately dismissed fears the rich would respond by leaving the UK, saying: "They always say that, but it never happens." It is happening, and she is now considering changing her plan to make worldwide assets, including those in foreign trusts, liable to inheritance tax. One government insider told me: 'People can choose where to pay their taxes. It's very easy to move countries and they are doing it.' A new wealth tax would be complex, take years to introduce and probably not be worth the candle. Dan Neidle, founder of Tax Policy Associates, said its study found such a tax would 'lower long-run growth and employment, thanks to a decline in foreign and domestic investment. It would make UK businesses more fragile and less competitive, and create strong incentives for capital reallocation and migration.' Why not just say no to a wealth tax now? Reeves offered one explanation to her Tory predecessor Norman Lamont at a Lords committee hearing this week. He told her he found it 'a bit strange' the government has not ruled out the move. Reeves replied that if she ruled out one tax rise, the media would move on to the next option, and assume that one was going to happen if she failed to rule it out. A fair point – but not her only reason. Reeves and Starmer need to build bridges with the parliamentary Labour Party after it filleted their welfare legislation, so rejecting a wealth tax now would inflame tensions. I suspect that when the Budget comes, Reeves and her allies will whisper to Labour MPs they are introducing a form of wealth tax through other measures, while avoiding headlines about implementing a specific one. Another reason not to rule out a wealth tax is to help message discipline. Labour certainly needs more of that: ministers unwittingly fuelled speculation about tax rises in media interviews by giving different definitions of "working people'. Far easier to say taxes are a matter for the Budget and we don't comment in advance. Some senior Labour figures think Reeves's reticence is because she is considering proposals that are close to being a wealth tax – for example, increasing property-based taxes. I think she should bring in higher council tax bands for the most expensive properties. It's ludicrous that this tax is based on 1991 property values, and that in England, people in homes valued at more than £320,000 pay the same amount in their local authority. Reform could be sold as a genuine levelling up measure the Tories flunked as it would cut bills in the north and Midlands while raising them in the south. Alternatively, Reeves could increase capital gains tax for the second Budget running, perhaps by bringing it into line with income tax rates, which are higher. Some in government favour a rise in income tax with the money earmarked for defence, as I have suggested. Another option is to raise the top rate of income tax from 45 per cent to 50 per cent. But both ideas would leave Labour open to the charge of breaching its manifesto pledge not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT. Reeves could argue that circumstances had changed in a more dangerous world. But breaking its promise might be a step too far for an already deeply unpopular PM and party. I don't think there will be a wealth tax. However, the rich shouldn't celebrate. The Budget will increase existing taxes on the wealthy, in line with the government's mantra of protecting "working people", while ensuring 'those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest burden'. Health warning: creating losers is not pain-free for them or the government, as Reeves discovered when she brought in the 'family farms tax'. But reforming some taxes under a better banner – 'fair tax' – is her best shot.
