
Digital Euro: What is it and why do we need it?
For the European Central Bank (ECB), this digital shift poses a serious question: how do we preserve the role of public money in a world that's going cashless?
Their answer: the digital euro—a central bank digital currency designed to work like cash, but in digital form.
'The main reason for issuing a digital euro is to preserve the benefits of cash in the digital era,' said Piero Cipollone, member of the ECB Executive Board, in a speech in July.
'To do so, we need to complement physical cash with a digital form of cash.'
What makes cash different?
Cash is simple, private, and universally accepted. You don't need a bank account, there are no hidden fees, and your payment history stays with you—not with your bank, a tech firm or a retailer.
By contrast, most digital payments today involve private companies. Cards are easy to use, but they're part of a commercial system. Every time you pay, the transaction goes through private networks that track your data, charge merchants fees, and can exclude people who are unbanked or less tech-savvy.
Today, much of our everyday spending relies on systems run by non-European players—whether it's cards from US firms or payment apps owned by tech giants.
"What's particularly concerning in Europe is that the gap left by declining cash use is being filled by non-European payment solutions," Cipollone said.
Unlike cards or apps linked to private banks, the digital euro would guarantee full privacy for offline payments, and a high degree of privacy for online transactions.
A digital euro would be public infrastructure—free to use, widely accepted, and neutral.
Why do citizens need a digital form of cash?
Cipollone indicates that without a digital euro, the ECB risks losing its core role in people's everyday transactions.
Between 2019 and 2024, the share of cash in payments across the euro area dropped dramatically—from 68% to 40% in volume, and from 40% to just 24% in value.
'The inability to use physical cash in online transactions or for digital payments at the point of sale deprives us of a key payment option,' he said.
'It reduces resilience, competition, sovereignty, and ultimately, consumers' freedom to choose how to pay.'
He warned that if the ECB fails to issue a digital euro then the dependence on private and often non-European payment providers will increase.
Yet, there is even a bigger risk, and it has to do with monetary sovereignty.
As digital payments grow and cash fades, more and more of Europe's financial infrastructure is controlled by private companies and foreign platforms.
Sovereign money doesn't depend on any private institution.
Without a public digital payment option, the ECB fears losing control over how money flows through the economy.
A digital euro would ensure that central bank money remains relevant, not just in theory but in everyday life—whether you're shopping online, paying a friend, or buying groceries.
Cash is still king in Europe
Europeans have long had the right to use central bank money across the bloc. But if that right can't be exercised digitally, especially as physical cash use declines, that pillar begins to crack.
Economist Filippo Taddei, from Goldman Sachs, echoed this concerns in a note published last week.
Many small businesses and consumers still prefer cash, and in some countries, that preference is even growing.
According to Goldman Sachs, nearly 30% of small and medium-sized enterprises in the eurozone prefer cash as a form of payment—but that figure rises to over 50% in Austria and nearly 40% in Italy.
Taddei also points out that in today's fragmented payments landscape, without a public digital currency, the euro's liquidity could suffer.
'If the EU doesn't create a standardised platform using the digital euro,' he said, 'we risk private money and foreign systems dominating, which would make central bank money less relevant.'
A digital euro could help establish open standards for merchants and payment service providers, strengthening merchants' ability to negotiate fees and fostering greater competition and innovation across Europe.
Another potential strength? The digital euro would work even offline—offering a secure payment method in emergencies, like natural disasters or power outages.
How would a digital euro work?
According to the ECB's digital euro project, users would access the currency through a digital wallet, likely provided by their bank or a public authority.
Payments would be instant, free, and available both online and offline, making it as easy to use as tapping a card—even without an internet connection.
Funds could be loaded from a bank account or with physical cash, and holding limits would apply to prevent large-scale shifts from bank deposits. Importantly, the digital euro would protect user privacy—the ECB wouldn't be able to track purchases or personal data.
One digital euro would always equal one euro in cash, offering a public, risk-free alternative to commercial digital payments.
When will the digital euro be issued?
Don't expect to download a digital wallet just yet. The ECB is still in the preparation phase, which runs until October 2025.
After that, the Governing Council will decide whether to move forward—but only once the legislative process is complete.
'We hope to have all political and legal decisions in place very early next year,' Cipollone said in May.
Even if approved, the rollout will take time. The ECB expects the development phase to last between two and three years, meaning a realistic launch window is between 2027 and 2029.
Deutsche Bundesbank President Joachim Nagel suggested 2028 or 2029 is more likely.
Could a digital euro replace the dollar?
There has been much debate about whether digital currencies—whether central bank-issued or private—could challenge the dominance of the US dollar.
But the ECB has been clear: the digital euro is not about geopolitics or challenging the existing global financial order.
'It's a retail payment tool,' said Cipollone. 'It's meant for Europeans—not international reserve holders.'
That kind of shift would require deep changes—like creating a unified Eurobond market, a more integrated capital system, and the ECB acting as a true global lender of last resort. We're not there yet.
According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the euro accounted for 20.06% of allocated global reserves in the first quarter of 2025—up from 19.6% a year earlier, but still far behind the US dollar's dominant 53% share.
The dollar still dominates global trade, commodity pricing, and cross-border lending because of trust, size, and decades-old networks.
The US also has an unmatched safe asset market, with over $27 trillion (€23.1tn) in US Treasuries—something the eurozone lacks.
So while the digital euro could strengthen the single currency inside Europe, it's not designed to be a global reserve asset.
Bottom line
The digital euro isn't meant to shake up global finance—and it won't. What it aims to do is far more grounded: to give Europeans continued access to public money in a digital world, protect privacy, support financial inclusion, and future-proof the single currency.
'The role of cash will be significantly reduced if we do not provide a digital equivalent,' ECB board member Piero Cipollone said.
'If we fail to act, we will fail to fulfil our responsibility as a central bank towards the people we serve,' he warned.
In a world where tech giants and foreign platforms are shaping how we pay, the ECB wants to make sure that Europe still has a choice.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
10 hours ago
- Euronews
US government pushes for 10% Intel stake amid US-China chip war
The US government could become the largest shareholder in Intel, one of the most important US technology companies, marking the first time Washington has sought ownership in a Silicon Valley icon. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday confirmed the US government is vying for a 10% stake in Intel, part of an unusual deal that would deepen the Trump administration's financial ties with the major chipmaker. The move comes weeks after US President Donald Trump called for Intel's CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign due to what he claimed was a conflict of interest. This allegation was linked to Tan's previous role as a venture capitalist in China. Although rare, it is not unprecedented for the US government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the recession in 2008, when the government injected nearly $50 billion (€42.94bn) into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker when it was on the verge of bankruptcy. At the time, even that bailout was seen as controversial despite GM's hardships because it was perceived as blurring the lines between state control and US free market principles. Unlike many European companies, US ones have insisted on a complete separation between government and private ownership of enterprises. The government ended up with a roughly $10bn (€8.6bn) loss after it sold its stock in GM. A misreading of the CHIPS act? Intel historically led the world in semiconductor production, tied in particular to PC production and Microsoft. When the iPhone launched in 2007, Intel-dominated PC chips nonetheless failed to win a foothold in smartphones and tablets. ARM-based chips, which are used by Apple and Samsung, became the mobile standard, leaving Intel stuck in the declining PC market. Intel has also lagged in the AI race, with their traditional central processing units not being well-suited for AI workloads. On the other hand, competitors like Nvidia have surged ahead. The CHIPS and Science Act, often referred to as just the CHIPS Act, was a bill passed in August 2022 by former US President Joe Biden in order to boost the local US semiconductor industry. COVID-19 supply chain disruptions and US–China tech tensions highlighted how dependent the US had become on foreign-made chips, not just for consumer electronics, but also defence, cars, AI and infrastructure. In November 2024, the US Department of Commerce finalised an agreement to grant Intel up to $7.86bn (€6.75bn) in direct funding through the CHIPS Act to support their semiconductor manufacturing and advanced packaging operations across Arizona, New Mexico, Ohio and Oregon. Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the program, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the CHIPS program. The company has received about $2.2bn (€1.89bn) of the $7.8bn (€6.75bn) pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve US taxpayers if it is turned into Intel stock, which he said would be in the form of non-voting shares so the government wouldn't be able to use the stake to sway how the company is managed. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC as he explained why Trump is pushing for the deal. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.' The notion of the US government holding a huge stake in Intel would have seemed inconceivable back in the company's heyday when its processors were powering a personal computer boom that began in the mid-1970s. But Intel's ongoing struggles also means the US government is taking on a risky investment. US government as biggest shareholder The US government's negotiations to become a major Intel shareholder are coming on the heels of a $2 billion (€1.7bn) investment Japanese technology giant SoftBank Group, disclosed late on Monday. SoftBank is accumulating its 2% stake in Intel at $23 (€19.70) per share — a slight discount from the stock's price when its investment was announced. Intel's shares surged nearly 7% to close at $25.31 (€21.74) on the news of SoftBank's big bet on Intel, coupled with Trump's plans for the company. SoftBank invests in an array of companies that it sees as holding long-term potential. It has been stepping up investments in the United States since Trump returned to the White House. In February, its chairman Masayoshi Son joined Trump, Sam Altman of OpenAI and Larry Ellison of Oracle in announcing a major investment of up to $500bn (€429.38bn) in a project to develop specific artificial intelligence infrastructure for OpenAI called Stargate. 'Semiconductors are the foundation of every industry," Son said in a statement. 'This strategic investment reflects our belief that advanced semiconductor manufacturing and supply will further expand in the United States, with Intel playing a critical role.' Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the US, which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world since he returned to the White House earlier this year for his second term in office. 'We want Intel to be successful in America,' Lutnick said during his CNBC interview. Intel is valued at about $110bn (€94.4bn), meaning a 10% government stake would equate to roughly $11bn (€9.44bn) at current prices. Other major shareholders include Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street. A 10% US government stake would almost certainly vault Washington ahead of Vanguard as Intel's largest single shareholder, unless structured as non-voting shares outside the normal count.


Euronews
11 hours ago
- Euronews
ING bank probed for role in Didier Reynders money laundering case
ING Belgium has come under investigation for its role in the money laundering case that involves former European Commissioner Didier Reynders, Belgian newspaper Le Soir reports. The bank is being probed by the Brussels prosecutor's office for potential acts of "influence peddling". Last December, the prosecutor started investigating former EU Justice Commissioner Reynders for an alleged practice involving purchasing multiple lottery tickets through the National Lottery over several years, an organisation which he was in charge of as a Belgian finance minister between 2007 and 2011. It is alleged that Reynders deposited the resulting - and now-laundered -profits into his personal account. According to the report, the former Commissioner deposited some €700,000 in cash on his ING account between 2008 and 2018. The bank did not ask him questions until 2018, and only notified the Financial Intelligence Processing Unit in 2023. Under Belgian law, banks have the obligation to report suspicious transactions. Reynders previously denied the allegations, saying the funds were from his private estate. The investigation into ING Belgium came after the Belgian National Bank submitted its inspection report to the authorities. Current ING Belgium CEO, Peter Adams, and his predecessor, Erik Van Den Eynden, have already been summoned for questioning in the case. A spokesperson for ING Belgium told Euronews that it cannot comment on 'individual cases.' 'We take our role as guardian of the financial system very seriously. We comply with all applicable rules and regulations,' the spokesperson said. The prosecutor's office did not reply to a request for comment.


Euronews
13 hours ago
- Euronews
Pop Mart shares rise 12% as Labubu maker announces new mini doll
Shares in Pop Mart soared over 12.5% in daily trading in Hong Kong on Wednesday after the Chinese company released stellar earnings. The creator of the Labubu doll saw its revenue jump 204% year-on-year in the first half of 2025, coming in at 13.88 billion yuan (€1.66bn). Net profit soared 386% to 4.68bn yuan (€559.39 million), beating forecasts. Around 40% of sales were made up by purchases outside of mainland China thanks to the international appeal of the firm's Labubu brand, part of its 'The Monsters' range. "The Monsters" brought in 4.81bn yuan (€574.99mn) in the first half of the year, accounting for 34.7% of total revenue. The elf-like dolls have become a viral sensation, boosted by the endorsement of celebrities like Dua Lipa, Kim Kardashian and David Beckham. Part of the attraction is that the toys are sold in blind-box packaging. This means that customers don't know what they have purchased until they open the product. Although the firm was created back in 2010, Pop Mart launched its first blind-box series in 2016. The popularity of the range allowed the company to list in Hong Kong in December 2020, achieving a market capitalisation of around €6bn. Since the IPO, shares have risen by over 300%. Pop Mart opened its first European store in London in January 2022, hoping to expand in overseas markets. Today, the company operates around 2,600 vending machines and almost 600 stores across the globe, meaning Labubu dolls can be bought in more than 30 countries. Given the demand for dolls, Pop Mart is now considering expansion in the Middle East, Central Europe, and Central and South America. The firm operates around 40 stores in the US, with 10 more sites expected to open by the end of 2025. In an earnings call on Wednesday, CEO Wang Ning also said that Pop Mart would this week launch a new, mini version of Labubu that can be attached to phones. Wang added that his firm was on track to meet its 2025 revenue goal of 20bn yuan (€2.39bn), noting that '30bn this year should also be quite easy'. Some analysts have nonetheless raised doubts over the sustainability of the company's rise, driven by social media sites like TikTok. 'The craze for the elf-like Labubu dolls is translating into big profit and cash flow,' said AJ Bell head of financial analysis, Danni Hewson. ''Consumers can be capricious when it comes to this type of fad though and Pop Mart will have to work hard to build on this success if it is to avoid being a one-hit wonder.'