Australia's pension funds start questioning US strategies
SINGAPORE/SYDNEY - Funds in Australia's A$4.2 trillion ($2.7 trillion) pension sector are rethinking some of their long-held strategies of buying U.S. assets and the dollar, as confidence in American growth wanes.
Volatility around Sino-U.S. trade tensions this year has forced investors to reassess their U.S. exposure and the role of the dollar, which has lately failed to behave as a safe haven currency amid heightened uncertainty around Washington's economic policy.
While there have not yet been any major shifts in strategy, currency dealing desks in Australia have noticed modest changes in hedging demand from some pension funds.
Those hedging tweaks are under the spotlight globally and Australia's pension funds, known locally as superannuation funds, have long kept low FX hedging ratios on large and growing foreign stock portfolios.
When U.S. equities fell, funds allowed hedging ratios to rise by not keeping their currency positions exactly in step with asset prices, said Troy Fraser, head of foreign exchange sales for Australia and New Zealand at Citi in Sydney.
"You would expect the funds to be selling Aussie and buying U.S. to adjust or to rebalance their hedge ratio," he said.
"We've seen a little bit of that, but not a lot. I think funds are generally happy to be longer Aussie."
Fraser said funds were weighing their asset mix, hedging costs and the outright level of the Aussie.
Were it to extend it could move the currency, and in separate research Citi in February estimated that a 5% shift in hedging now could push the Australian dollar as much as 11% higher against the greenback.
At about $0.64, it's been falling on the dollar for nearly 15 years since touching $1.10 in 2011.
Along with a tendency to drop reliably whenever global stocks fell, cushioning losses in Aussie dollar terms, the Aussie's behaviour encouraged a low hedging ratio. Industry-wide hedging on foreign equities was roughly 22% in the December quarter, according to the most recent regulatory data.
"Unhedged has worked," said Ben McCaw, a senior portfolio manager at MLC Asset Management.
"It was lowering the volatility of the portfolio (and) providing a positive return to the portfolio ... so that was almost the ultimate asset," he said.
Now, however, long- and short-term factors are starting to shift how the Australian currency trades. He has been reducing U.S. dollar currency exposure for about three years.
Others are keeping a watching brief. CBUS, which manages more than A$100 billion, has kept currency exposure steady but the U.S. dollar, which fell through market turbulence in April, caught the attention of fund CIO Leigh Gavin.
"The USD is probably one of the few asset classes that hasn't rebounded from the early April lows, and we think that's interesting," he said. "It's certainly something we're monitoring, but it's still pretty early days."
'QUESTIONING OUR EXPOSURE'
Some fund chiefs say U.S. allocations are under review.
Australian super funds run a high allocation to equities, by global standards, at nearly 60%, according to regulatory data, with roughly half that abroad, as of December 2024.
According to Westpac, some A$555 billion is invested in U.S. stocks by Australian domiciled investors.
"That's been a very good place to be investing over the last couple of years," said John Pearce, chief investment officer of A$139 billion fund UniSuper on the fund's podcast in April.
"Like every other fund, we are questioning our exposure to the U.S. It would be fair to say that we've hit peak exposure and will be reducing over time," he said.
To be sure, no increase in the fund's hedging ratio, which typically swings between 30-40%, is being considered, a UniSuper spokesperson said in emailed remarks to Reuters. And there are very big funds that are not budging in their strategies.
"We have no view of changing our hedge position or any of our positions based on that event," said Michael Clavin, head of income and markets at Aware Super, referring to last month's tariff-driven drawdown and market volatility.
The chief investment officer of AustralianSuper, the largest super fund with more than A$365 billion under management, also told the Financial Times last month it would continue investing more than half its offshore flows into the U.S.
Still, the Aussie's 3% rise against the U.S. dollar this year has meant the year-to-date 0.6% drop in the S&P 500 translates to a near 3.5% fall in Australian dollar terms, which if it persists or extends could start to drive a response.
"Being underweight the Aussie dollar has been something which has typically rewarded Australian investors," said Cameron Systermans, head of multi-asset in the Asia-Pacific at fund manager and adviser Mercer.
"So if there were to be a durable uptrend in the Aussie dollar, that would be a bit of a pain trade, I think, for a lot of the asset owners in Australia. And it might force them to really reassess whether that still makes sense."
($1 = 1.5625 Australian dollars)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Business
9 hours ago
- Arabian Business
Australia
AED47 million recapitalisation secures over 700 jobs as Arada strengthens position in Australia; move lays groundwork for Roberts Co to eventually expand into the UAE
Zawya
9 hours ago
- Zawya
Foreign exposure to US assets may be lower than feared: McGeever
(Repeats article that first ran on June 3 with no changes to text) ORLANDO, Florida - It is widely believed that investors around the world have a disproportionately high exposure to U.S. assets, particularly stocks, an imbalance that could roil U.S. markets if corrected. But what if these fears are overblown? Several eye-popping statistics suggest that America's weight in world financial markets is even greater than its outsized economic might. Most strikingly, the U.S. net international investment position (NIIP), or foreign investors' holdings of U.S. assets less U.S. investors' holdings of overseas assets, at the end of 2024 was $26 trillion. That's nearly 24% of global GDP, up from 16% only two years earlier, a surge driven by foreigners' insatiable appetite for U.S. equities, mainly "Big Tech". Demand was so hot that, by some measures, the value of U.S.-listed stocks at the turn of the year represented 74% of total global market cap. That share was 60% six years ago, and less than half in 2011. But the attractiveness of dollar-denominated assets is now being questioned, as the often erratic policies of U.S. President Donald Trump have upset longstanding economic and geopolitical norms, making governments and investors question whether Washington is still a reliable partner on the global stage. The concern is that this eroding confidence triggers a reversal of the massive flows into Wall Street seen in recent years that has damaging spillover effects. Such a correction may not require outright selling. Given the scale of the flows involved, just less buying among foreign investors could be enough to cast a shadow over the world's most important stock market. And the running assumption is foreign investors don't have the capacity or willingness to increase their exposure to U.S. assets, creating a significant long-term downside risk for Wall Street, Treasuries and the dollar. "A structural shift is underway: the slow erosion of US economic dominance," analysts at Deutsche Bank wrote on Monday. SKEPTICAL But looked at another way, foreign exposure to U.S. assets may not be as high as initially meets the eye. That's the view of analysts at JP Morgan, who measure portfolio investment in U.S. bonds and equities as a share of countries' total household sector financial assets. They use a broad definition for a country's "household" sector, covering investments by institutions like insurance companies and pension funds that are ultimately made on behalf of households. Using a broad range of data, from central banks, U.S. Treasury and OECD household financial asset flows, they measure the ratio of U.S. equity and bond holdings relative to household financial assets in each country. They find that "relative to the total financial assets of households in the rest of the world, the allocations to U.S. assets typically stand at around 10-20%." As a result, they are "skeptical of the idea that foreign investors hold too much of U.S. assets." Given that U.S. equities account for more than 70% of the MSCI global market cap and dollar-denominated bonds represent around 50% of global bond indices, according to JP Morgan estimates, the 10-20% exposure of foreign investors to U.S. assets does appear surprisingly low. And the 10-20% figure would be even lower were it not for the outsized U.S. equity holdings at the Swiss National Bank and Norway's sovereign wealth fund. On the bond side, foreigners' footprint in the U.S. Treasury market is shrinking. Data shows that they owned 31% of the $28.55 trillion outstanding Treasury debt at the end of last year. That share has been declining steadily since the Global Financial Crisis. In 2008, the figure was approaching 60%. Overseas investors' share of the T-bill market has shrunk even more. In December, it was under 20%, near its lowest level on record and sharply down from 50% a decade before. Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou and his team at JP Morgan aren't arguing investors will or should ramp up their purchases of U.S. assets. And in cases where allocations are high - such as the Taiwanese exposure to U.S. bonds or Canadians' holdings of U.S. stocks - diversification would hardly be a surprise. But there is "little indication" of broad-based selling of U.S. assets by foreign investors so far this year, they note. And if that selling does materialize, it may be far lighter than many expect. (The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters) (By Jamie McGeever) Reuters
Zawya
10 hours ago
- Zawya
Asia could outstrip Europe as key beneficiary of U.S. capital flight: Raychaudhuri
(The views expressed here are those of the author, the founder and CEO of Emmer Capital Partners Ltd.) As global investors consider reducing their exposure to U.S. financial assets, the key question is where money flowing out of the U.S. will go. While Europe may be the obvious destination, relative value metrics may favour emerging Asia. Even though U.S. equities have recovered from the steep losses suffered in the week following U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of his 'Liberation Day' tariffs, the same cannot be said of the U.S. bond market. Since hitting a recent low on April 4, the 10-year Treasury yield has spiked by around 50 basis points, with bond investors demanding more compensation for the risk of holding longer-dated U.S. debt. Worryingly, the benchmark Treasury yield has surged higher than nominal U.S. GDP growth – a key risk measure. Additionally, the usual positive correlation between Treasury yields and the U.S. dollar has broken off, as rising yields are no longer attracting money to the 'safest' asset in the world. Broad-based depreciation of the greenback suggests that – despite the equity rebound – many U.S. assets are being sold and the funds are flowing into markets whose currencies are appreciating. EUROPEAN ALTERNATIVE The euro's almost 10% rise against the dollar this year suggests that a significant portion of the capital flowing out of the U.S. is going to Europe, likely driven both by concerns about U.S. policy as well as expectations of higher regional growth. Further monetary easing by the European Central Bank should promote economic activity, as should the expected surge in fiscal spending following Germany's recent constitutional reform, which approved partial removal of the 'debt brake' for infrastructure and defence spending. The fiscal splurge is already offering a boost to European equities – the surprise winner thus far in 2025 – especially defence, industrial and technology stocks. DEBT WOES But there are reasons to question the new 'European exceptionalism' narrative. One likely cause of investors' growing apprehension with U.S. assets is the Trump administration's apparent inability to narrow the country's gaping fiscal deficit or reduce its debt-to-GDP ratio, which has risen to more than 120%. But elevated debt metrics are also an issue across the pond, as they are found in Italy (135% of GDP), France (113%) and the UK (96%). Importantly, both Italy and France have seen their 10-year bond yields rise above their nominal GDP growth rates. While the latter metric is also true of Germany, the country's debt load is modest at only 62% of GDP, so the statistic mostly reflects a stagnating economy that's about to get a spending boost. Fiscal expansion in Europe will likely continue to benefit the region's equities, but whether it is good news for fixed income investment there is still an open question. ASIAN OPTION Meanwhile, in emerging Asia – another potential destination for U.S. capital outflows – the debt picture is better and the growth outlook is stronger. Government debt in many Asian countries is low, ranging from 37% of GDP in Indonesia to around 85% in China and India. Benchmark bond yields across the region have been declining since October 2023, speaking to fixed income investors' limited concerns about Asian countries' fiscal situations. In fact, yields in China, Thailand and Korea are all below those in the U.S., though those in Indonesia and India remain higher. Modest debt burdens mean there is also plenty of room for more fiscal stimulus in many countries, which could improve consumption, while the benign inflation environment should enable central banks in the region to continue cutting rates to stimulate growth. Emerging Asia also offers far more high-growth, technology companies than Europe. The release of the affordable Chinese artificial intelligence model, DeepSeek, Beijing's focus on semiconductors and advanced manufacturing and the country's electric vehicle dominance could all attract tech-focused investors looking for an alternative to the U.S.. RELATIVE VALUE Even though European equities have outperformed their U.S. counterparts significantly in 2025, the twelve-month forward price-to-earnings multiple of the major European index, the STOXX50, is considerably lower than that of the S&P 500, at 15.4x and 21.0x, respectively, as of May 23. But the major emerging Asia equity index, the MSCI Asia ex Japan, is even cheaper at 13.4x. Moreover, earnings growth forecasts are higher in Asia than in either the U.S. or Europe through 2026. Finally, reallocation of assets from the U.S. could potentially have a bigger positive impact on Asia than on Europe because of their relative sizes. Let's say 5% of the U.S. free floating market cap of around $58 trillion, or roughly $3 trillion, moves out. That would represent 36% of Asia's market cap, but only 22% of Europe's. NO SLAM DUNK Caution remains warranted, though. Asian nations' ongoing trade negotiations with the U.S. will likely still encounter numerous twists and turns, and increasing protectionism could hinder the region's more export-oriented economies. Moreover, Chinese economic growth remains tepid despite the monetary and fiscal stimulus delivered over the past eight months. Finally, the capital flowing into emerging Asia is a double-edged sword because of the impact on Asian currencies versus the U.S. dollar. If Asian currencies strengthen much more, the region's export engine could stutter. Investors, thus, have to keep a close eye on macroeconomics, geopolitics and policy statements, not just valuation metrics. But given emerging Asia's benign debt environment and positive growth outlook, both the region's equity and fixed income markets have the potential to benefit from the death of American exceptionalism. (The views expressed here are those of Manishi Raychaudhuri, the founder and CEO of Emmer Capital Partners Ltd and the former Head of Asia-Pacific Equity Research at BNP Paribas Securities). (Writing by Manishi Raychaudhuri; Editing by Anna Szymanski.)
