logo
Trump Finds a New Way to Attack Education: Cutting Aid for Students Who Are Parents

Trump Finds a New Way to Attack Education: Cutting Aid for Students Who Are Parents

The Intercept28-05-2025
President Donald Trump's war on higher education has been a central feature of his second term — with Trump targeting student protesters for deportation, revoking Harvard University's ability to enroll international students, and yanking billions in research funding. But while Trump reserves much of his more public rancor for university presidents, student activists, and faculty, his administration is also preparing to launch an assault on a largely invisible population on college campuses: parents.
Earlier this month, the Trump administration proposed eliminating Child Care Access Means Parents in School, also known as CCAMPIS: the only child care program exclusively for lower-income students who are parents. Tucked into Trump's proposed annual budget from earlier this month is a plan to eliminate all $75 million in funding for CCAMPIS. That's separate from the $1.6 billion in cuts to tuition assistance for lower-income students proposed by House Republicans in their 'Big, Beautiful, Bill,' which is predicted to be the largest wealth transfer, in the form of tax cuts, from the poor to the rich in the nation's history.
Despite the relatively low profile of parenting students on college campuses, over 22 percent of college students are parents, according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office. Of those roughly 3.8 million students, more than half have at least one child under the age of 5.
Experts argue that these cuts align with the Trump administration's efforts to lock lower-income students and parents out of higher education, which will have generational consequences for the thousands of families reliant on the already critically underfunded program.
'It's part of a broader agenda to make education less accessible, particularly for low-income students.'
'It's part of a broader agenda to make education less accessible, particularly for low-income students,' said Jennifer Turner, a senior research associate at the Institute for Women's Policy Research. 'We know that education is a pathway to economic mobility for [student parents] and for their children and then for future generations to come.'
Parents face a host of barriers to finishing their degree, but cost and accessibility of child care is high-up on the list. 'All parents of young children, of course, struggle to find child care, but I think it can be even more challenging for student parents,' said Casey Peeks, senior director of early childhood policy at the Center for American Progress.
Parenting students are much more likely to work part-time than non-parent students, so in addition to juggling child care and school, they're also balancing a work schedule, she explained.
'All of that makes it harder to find care and also afford care because they're unlikely to work full-time,' said Peeks.
Although pop culture might suggest that most college students are young adults studying living on campus at tiny liberal arts colleges or massive state schools, the reality is quite different for parenting students — and for the U.S. student body in general. Over half of parenting students attend community or technical colleges, compared to 40 percent of non-parenting students. Parenting students are also much more likely to attend for-profit institutions, with roughly 20 percent studying at such schools, according to a report from Student Parents Action.
Carrie Welton, senior director of policy and advocacy for anti-Poverty and basic needs at the Institute for College Access and Success, knows firsthand the challenges that low-income student parents face. At 17, she gave birth to her son; a month later, she graduated from high school. But the road to higher education was far more fraught.
'Pursuing a college education is … often a lifeline out of poverty.'
Although she had originally planned to join the National Guard, that was no longer on the table. Instead, she cobbled together a mix of part-time and full-time work, public benefits, and student loans to put herself through school, eventually completing her bachelor's degree after 12 grueling years.
Welton said she fought so hard to get her degree because she wanted a better life for herself and her young son.
'The thing that gets lost in these conversations is, for people who come from low-income backgrounds, and from marginalized and minoritized communities — pursuing a college education is not about just having a fulfilling career,' she said. 'It's often a lifeline out of poverty.'
Research has consistently shown that a college degree can help lift entire families out of poverty. In 2019, people with a bachelor's degree earned roughly $30,468 more than those without a high school diploma and $24,388 more than those with a high school diploma or its equivalent. People with a bachelor's degree are also less likely to utilize government assistance programs.
The effects of obtaining a degree are also generational. Children of college graduates are much more likely to earn a bachelor's degree themselves and have higher lifetime earnings.
For Turner, this isn't just an attack on access to higher education, it's an attack on reproductive rights. 'One of the tenets of reproductive justice is the right of parents to raise their children in a safe and healthy environment,' she said. 'The administration's proposed cuts to college student child care programs hinder parents' ability to do that. If parents don't have access to quality, affordable child care, it limits their access to education and the workforce, which impacts their well-being, the well-being of their families and communities, and the overall economy.'
Even without these cuts, Turner said that CCAMPIS is currently critically underfunded. A congressional analysis in 2018 found that only 11,000 students received CCAMPIS grants, despite the fact that roughly 3.1 million students are raising children.
'Under the Biden administration, it was still underfunded. It has been for a very long time, and so it's really important to fully fund the program so that it can actually meet the needs of student parents,' said Turner.
Not every student parent automatically qualifies for CCAMPIS. Universities can apply for CCAMPIS grant awards if they have a high percentage of federal Pell Grant recipients. Then lower-income students — defined by having or qualifying for a federal Pell Grant – can apply for CCAMPIS and receive on-campus child care through their schools.
In 2022, 399 schools were awarded CCAMPIS funding, according to a congressional report.
However, visibility is a major barrier to students entering the program. Katie Conte, who as a parenting student established the pilot program for Bergen Community College's student-parent fellowship, said the program isn't well advertised, even on campuses where it's available. Conte went back to school when her kids were past preschool age but said she wouldn't have waited had she known the program existed. 'I would have been able to go to college and start a career where I was actually making money being able to support myself and my kids,' said Conte, who was widowed when her youngest son was 4, suddenly leaving her the only provider.
To justify ending the program, the Trump administration claimed that it was made redundant by other child care grants.
Turner noted that the administration was trying to claim that CCAMPIS was made duplicative by the Child Care Development Block Grant program, a federally funded block grant program that provides low-strings funding to states for child care subsidies for low-income families. Because it's a block grant, states are able to add various eligibility requirements, including work requirements, that can make it complicated for parenting students to get access to it.
Without CCAMPIS, many students will have to drop out of school, warned Tanya Ang, executive director of Today's Student Coalition.
'They won't be able to finish a post-secondary credential, or they will never be able to start one,' said Ang. 'Many of these students are living day to day, paycheck to paycheck.'
Being forced to drop out without a degree could set these students back even further financially.
'Broadly, parenting students have lower completion rates than their non-parenting peers, and the risk of pursuing education and then dropping out without a credential means somebody doesn't have a credential, but they have student debt on top of it,' said Welton.
An analysis from the Center for American Progress found that almost half of student parents who borrowed a federal student loan defaulted within 12 years of enrolling. That's twice the rate of default for borrowers without children.
Women and people of color will bear the brunt of the impact. An analysis from the Institute for Women's Policy Research found that nearly three-quarters of parenting students are women, and the majority of undergraduate student parents are people of color.
Potential cuts to CCAMPIS are not the only current risk to students. Turner said that the proposed Trump budget would have a disastrous impact on lower-income college students, including parenting students. In addition to ending CCAMPIS, the proposed budget would eliminate $1.6 billion in spending on programs supporting low-income students and preparing them for college. Trump has also begun recollecting defaulted student loans.
Funding for CCAMPIS occurs during the annual appropriations process, which typically happens at the end of the year — so for now, the program is not imminently on the chopping block.
'Access to education is largely under assault,' said Turner. 'If I hadn't had things like the Pell Grant and student loans and things like that, then I wouldn't have been able to go to college. So it's really not just an access issue, it's an equity issue.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump Nixes Idea Of Larger White House Briefing Room, Tells Reporters 'I Don't Want You To Be Comfortable'
Donald Trump Nixes Idea Of Larger White House Briefing Room, Tells Reporters 'I Don't Want You To Be Comfortable'

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Donald Trump Nixes Idea Of Larger White House Briefing Room, Tells Reporters 'I Don't Want You To Be Comfortable'

Donald Trump has paved over the grass adjacent to the White House Rose Garden, and he plans to construct a huge ballroom on the East Wing. But on Monday, he nixed another idea for renovation: expanding the quarters for the White House press corps. Brian Glenn, the correspondent for the Trump-supporting Real America's Voice, asked Trump at today's press conference, 'You're building a big beautiful ballroom. Could we build a big beautiful briefing room?' More from Deadline Donald Trump Says He's Deploying National Guard In D.C., Placing Metropolitan Police Under Federal Control Construction To Start On New White House Ballroom, Long Desired By Donald Trump House Judiciary Committee Queries Major Sports Leagues On Whether They Still Should Get Antitrust Exemption For Broadcast TV Blackouts Trump responded, 'I don't want to do that.' He told the reporters gathered, 'I don't want you to be comfortable.' His comment elicited a lot of laughs in the crowd, gathered in the existing and very tight briefing room, which has 49 seats for reporters and can accommodate perhaps two dozen more standing. The James S. Brady Press Briefing Room, its official name, is cramped, but many reporters are fine with the discomfort as a tradeoff for its proximity. Built atop the White House swimming pool during Richard Nixon's presidency, the quarters are part of the West Wing, with the Oval Office just up the stairs and down the hall. Any option to move to larger spaces would likely mean moving away from the choice spot, perhaps over to the Old Executive Office Building, which is still part of the White House complex but across the street. That idea was floated before Trump took office in his first term but never implemented, with the White House Correspondents' Association opposing the idea of such a move. Before he took office this term, there was some concern that Trump could boot the press corps from the grounds altogether. Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation game plan for Trump's second term, actually called into question having the press corps at its current location, citing space constraints. At least publicly, Trump has not proposed any such action, and at his press conference today he took special note of the number of reporters crammed in the room. 'I have never seen this room so packed,' Trump said. 'In fact, I am sure it is a violation of every fire code ever.' Best of Deadline Sean 'Diddy' Combs Sex-Trafficking Trial Updates: Cassie Ventura's Testimony, $10M Hotel Settlement, Drugs, Violence, & The Feds A Full Timeline Of Blake Lively & Justin Baldoni's 'It Ends With Us' Feud In Court, Online & In The Media 'The Boys' Season 5: Everything We Know So Far

Newsom Warns Trump California Can 'Neutralize' His Texas Redistricting Efforts
Newsom Warns Trump California Can 'Neutralize' His Texas Redistricting Efforts

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Newsom Warns Trump California Can 'Neutralize' His Texas Redistricting Efforts

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a committed thorn in Donald Trump's side, told the president Monday that he's prepared to redraw California's districts in Democrats' favor if he doesn't call on Texas and other red states to halt their own GOP-friendly redistricting plans. Newsom made the threat in a letter to Trump, who's backing a GOP-led effort to redraw five Texas districts in Republicans' favor ― something the president has said his party is 'entitled' to ahead of the 2026 midterms. 'If you will not stand down, I will be forced to lead an effort to redraw the maps in California to offset the rigging of maps in red states,' Newsom vowed. 'But if the other states call off their redistricting efforts, we will happily do the same. And American democracy will be better for it.' It's not a step he takes lightly, continued Newsom, who said he believes legislative district maps should be drawn through 'independent, citizen-led efforts,' not via political maneuvering. 'You are playing with fire, risking the destabilization of our democracy, while knowing that California can neutralize any gains you hope to make,' he continued. 'This attempt to rig congressional maps to hold onto power before a single vote is cast in the 2026 election is an affront to American democracy.' The White House did not immediately return a request for comment on Newsom's threat. The letter comes after Democratic members of the Texas state House left the state to deny Republicans a quorum on the redistricting vote, outraging Gov. Greg Abbott (R), who sought to arrest them and remove at least one of them from office. Republicans are also leading redistricting efforts in multiple other states, including in Indiana, Missouri, Ohio and South Carolina. In a Fox News appearance Monday, Abbott claimed California and New York were both already gerrymandered and vowed to pursue even more GOP-friendly districts in Texas if Newsom proceeds with the plan he outlined to Trump. 'If California thinks they're going to move their needle to the extreme and eliminate five Republican numbers of the United States Congress there, Texas is not going to do five ― we will add 10 more Republican seats using the same procedure they're using in California,' he said. Related... Beto O'Rourke Trashes Texas Republicans: 'These Motherf**kers Are Panicking' Texas State Rep. Isn't Backing Down From Fighting 'Overtly Racist' Redistricting Map Greg Abbott Lobs New Threat At Democrats Who Fled Texas To Stop Gerrymandering

Trump's moves toward taking over Washington are unprecedented. Here's what the law says
Trump's moves toward taking over Washington are unprecedented. Here's what the law says

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's moves toward taking over Washington are unprecedented. Here's what the law says

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump took unprecedented steps toward federalizing Washington, D.C. on Monday, saying it's needed to fight crime even as city leaders pointed to data showing violence is down. He took command of the police department and deployed the National Guard under laws and Constitutional powers that give the federal government more sway over the nation's capital than other cities. Its historically majority Black population wasn't electing its own city council and mayor until 1973, when Republican President Richard Nixon signed the Home Rule Act. The measure still left significant power to the president and Congress, though no president has exercised the police powers before. He activated the National Guard The Constitution calls for the creation of the District of Columbia to serve as the federal seat of power under the jurisdiction of Congress rather than any state. While the Home Rule Act allowed for greater local control, the president can still call up the National Guard in Washington. His administration did it during Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, when members were later faulted for flying a helicopter too low over a crowd. The Guard was called out again during Trump's first term on Jan. 6, 2021, when his supporters overran the Capitol. Trump's second-term moves in Washington come as the legal battle continues over his deployment of the National Guard in another Democratic-led city, Los Angeles, despite the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom. His authority is less clear there, but an appeals court has so far refused to intervene. A lower-court judge was starting a trial Monday to determine whether the deployment violated another federal law. He took over the police Section 740 of the Home Rule Act allows for the president to take over Washington's Metropolitan Police Department for 48 hours, with possible extensions to 30 days, during times of emergencies. No president has done so before, said Monica Hopkins, executive director of the ACLU of Washington. Trump cited a number of recent high-profile incidents, including the killing of a 21-year-old congressional intern and the beating of a DOGE staffer during an attempted carjacking. 'This is liberation day in D.C. and we're going to take our Capitol back,' the president said. The Democratic mayor of D.C., Muriel Bowser, called the takeover 'unprecedented." She said that violent crime overall in Washington has decreased to a 30-year low, after a rise in 2023. Carjackings, for example, dropped about 50% in 2024, and are down again this year. More than half of those arrested, however, are juveniles, and the extent of those punishments is a point of contention for the Trump administration. He didn't specify how long it would last It wasn't immediately clear how long the takeover might last or exactly what it might mean. It could also face challenges in court. Congress still has power over things like the budget and laws passed by the city council, but would have to repeal the Home Rule Act to expand federal power in the district. It's something a few Republican lawmakers have pushed to do, but such an overhaul would almost certainly run into steep resistance from most Democrats, making it difficult to achieve. The law is specific to D.C., and doesn't affect other communities around the U.S. referred to as having their own 'home rule' powers in relationship to their state governments. Hopkins said Trump's moves in Washington could foreshadow similar tactics in other cities. 'That should alarm everyone," she said, 'not just in Washington.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store