logo
Opponents decry Mesa Public Schools transgender notification proposal

Opponents decry Mesa Public Schools transgender notification proposal

Yahoo14-04-2025

An overwhelming number of students, teachers, parents and community members sounded off last week against Mesa Public Schools' proposed 'Gender Dysphoria Policy,' contending that it targets and harms transgender students.
Governing board member and retired teacher Sharon Benson proposed the policy, which includes notifying parents if their students ask to go by a pronoun or name different from their biological sex and requiring students participate in activities or facility use, such as bathrooms, that align with their sex at birth.
After hearing from the public, the board directed the policy be sent to an outside counsel for review before taking action. Approximately 80 people spoke at the April 8 meeting, most on the proposed policy, and were limited to 45 seconds each.
'I'm a transgender man and have been out to my mother for several years now,' said Noah White, a high school junior. 'When I came out to my mother and I spoke to my then-principal, we were welcomed with open arms. My principal helped me to feel comfortable and safe.
'But the proposed policies today aim to make students like me feel unsafe, unwelcome and unsupported. Transgender students need to feel safe, respected and supported in their educational environments to thrive. School should be a place where students feel affirmed in their identities not a source of fear or shame.'
White said that the forced parental notifications put students at risk for rejection and even homelessness.
The district's current guidelines aim to ensure transgender and gender-nonconforming students are in a safe learning environment free from discrimination and harassment.
Guidelines include that students have the right to be addressed by the name or pronoun that corresponds to their gender identity and that school personnel use that name and appropriate pronoun.
Also, these students are allowed to participate in sports and use restrooms, locker rooms and shower facilities in accordance to their gender identity. The guidelines also prohibit the disclosure of a student's transgender or gender nonconforming status to other employees, students and parents.
Julia Gray, a Westwood High School senior, said the proposal would create distrust between students and teachers.
Cinthia Alaniz, who has five kids in district schools, said that outing students without their consent puts them at risk for abuse, homelessness and even suicide.
'I'm the stepparent of a transgender youth who graduated from Westwood High School in 2023,' said Jessica Gronberg. 'My son is transgender because that's who he is…And I'm extremely grateful that he was able to use his pronouns that he wanted to use and his name that he wanted to use and go into the bathrooms that he wanted to use while he was a student.'
District special education teacher Graham Corp called the policy 'garbage.'
He noted that state school chief Tom Horne called absenteeism the biggest crisis facing Arizona public schools 'and your idea is 'Oh, I'm going to invent a policy that ensures these students are never going to show up to school again.' That's insane. Do not feel bad about rejecting garbage policy.'
Mesa business owner Gabe Hage said, 'I was forcibly outed at 16 living in conservative Iowa. I came home to my family, who beat me in the basement. This is the reality you are trying to enact through policy.'
Sarah Hernandez Meaney said her daughter was a year away from graduating with a degree in education and would prefer to teach out of state than in Arizona because of policies such as the one being proposed.
'So we are currently driving away teachers with things like this,' she said. 'Nothing in this policy moves the board any closer to its stated 2020-2425 goals. It's an insult to students. it's a waste of everybody's time to be down here to speak against policies like this.'
Colton Cagle, who graduated from Westwood, said, 'People like Sharon Benson want you to believe that gender-nonconforming students are committing harm in schools.
'But in reality, these are fear-mongering tactics that use hateful rhetoric to spread lies. The reason I know this is because when I was in high school a few years ago, I had a classmate who was gender non-conforming. This student went by their preferred name and pronouns. And you want to know what happened? Nothing. We were all fine.'
State Rep. Lorena Austin, D-Mesa, who called herself the first non-binary legislator in the state, also lashed out against the proposal.
'From the mouths of our students, they love living here but they feel unsafe, unloved and unsupported by this policy that is being proposed,' Austin said.
'I have been to many of our schools in the district and I'm so proud that we currently do not have a trans student policy because Mesa Public Schools meets our students where they are at and I will always meet our students and families where they are at.'
A handful of speakers, like Jeff Thompson, however, supported the proposal.
'This pronoun stuff it's just senseless,' said Thompson, stressing he is not homophobic.
He said that the district has an anti-bullying policy to protect all students and that the district 'needs to get back to just teaching the kids.'
'You've already proved you can't do that at 32% proficiency rate,' Thompson said, adding his support for parents to be informed.
'Parents who are responsible for their children have the liberty to raise them in their beliefs, to care for them and to know what's going on with them,' Mary Baybeno said.
'The unit of society is not between teachers and a child. It's between parents and a child, which supersedes any relationship a teacher may have with a child. If parents want to accommodate a child's belief they are not a boy or girl, that's their choice.'
Ed Steele, who ran for the board last year, said that people opposed to the policy are saying that schools know better about how to raise a child than the child's parents.
'Folks who are opposing this policy are giving you a choice between hiding a student's mental health issues from their parents or kids dying,' Steele said. 'That's a ridiculous comparison. This policy is just trying to tell the parents when the child has emotional distress.'
Dr. Leigh Anne Castanzo said that gender dysphoria is a diagnosis that needs to be evaluated by a physician and if parents don't know their children are in distress, they are unable to get them the appropriate care.
And Jared Hieger called the opposition 'a three-ring circus sponsored by the teachers' union.'
'Ninety percent of the people that spoke out against it have no idea what's in it,' he claimed. 'Somebody came up here said a little while ago that trans students or queer students are 40% more likely to commit suicide. And that is correct. They are because they're miserable, because they're being taught a lie….It's not love to accept them as who they believe they are.'
'And if you are allowing your kid to believe this lie and condoning this lie, you are an agent of the devil.'
Benson said parents have the right to raise their children the way they see fit without government interference. She said that the courts have over time affirmed that parents are assumed to be the best caretakers for their children unless proven to be unfit and that she campaigned in support of parental rights. She won her seat in November.
'We heard this evening during public comment that there are homes which are unsafe for students who are outed to their parents,' Benson said. 'That is not our call to make as teachers. I am not advocating the mistreatment of anybody. Our bullying policy takes care of that.'
'My intent in this policy is not that any student on any of our campuses be harmed, belittled (or) berated,' she said. 'It is also to push the notion or establish the notion that one person's rights cannot infringe on the rights of another.'
She said she can appreciate a 'gender-confused student' who wants to be called by another name or pronoun and that there was no prohibition against that in her proposal.
'If you feel it's respectful to use pronouns, nothing in this policy says you can't do it as long as parents are informed and they know what's happening on our campuses,' Benson said.
Board member Marci Hutchinson, also a retired educator, voiced concerns with the policy.
She said that the legal definitions included in the proposal 'are not accurate or factual or even medically sound.'
'The policy was called gender dysphoria and that trans folks are confused,' Hutchinson said. 'As we have seen tonight, many people have embraced their identity and many love them for it.'
She also raised concerns with the provision that the district can't compel employees and students to use their preferred name or pronoun and that not doing so would not be considered discrimination or bullying, which she said conflicts with the district's policy on bullying.
'I believe our current policy is one of respect and clearly it is working,' Hutchinson. who got her colleagues to agree for an outside review prior to a vote.
'Having been a teacher and having known staff in Mesa Public Schools for 28 years, this district is about respect. And when we lose the respect for kids and their families I really worry about us being able to keep our promise to this community to know kids by their name and to serve them by strength and need.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Westwood High School debate team competes in international competition
Westwood High School debate team competes in international competition

Yahoo

time05-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Westwood High School debate team competes in international competition

AUSTIN (KXAN)– The Westwood High School debate team spent the weekend competing in the 24th annual International Public Policy Forum in New York City. The competition gives high school students from around the world the opportunity to engage in written and oral debates on issues of public policy. The Westwood High School team earned a spot among the final eight teams competing in finals. The team consists of students Chaaya Annamreddy, Sristi Guduru, Amrita Josyula and Saanvi Mittal. The team is coached by Dominic Henderson. The competition started in October 2024 with 283 teams from 26 countries and 30 U.S. states. This year teams discussed and debated the topic, 'Equitable access to pharmaceuticals should be prioritized over protecting intellectual property rights.' Westwood made it to the semi finals taking home a cash prize for their hard work. This international contest is open to all schools, both public and private and it's free. Teams compete for awards and scholarships. The IPPF World Champion wins a $10,000 grand prize! This year the winner was Carroll Senior High School out of Southlake, 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Opponents decry Mesa Public Schools transgender notification proposal
Opponents decry Mesa Public Schools transgender notification proposal

Yahoo

time14-04-2025

  • Yahoo

Opponents decry Mesa Public Schools transgender notification proposal

An overwhelming number of students, teachers, parents and community members sounded off last week against Mesa Public Schools' proposed 'Gender Dysphoria Policy,' contending that it targets and harms transgender students. Governing board member and retired teacher Sharon Benson proposed the policy, which includes notifying parents if their students ask to go by a pronoun or name different from their biological sex and requiring students participate in activities or facility use, such as bathrooms, that align with their sex at birth. After hearing from the public, the board directed the policy be sent to an outside counsel for review before taking action. Approximately 80 people spoke at the April 8 meeting, most on the proposed policy, and were limited to 45 seconds each. 'I'm a transgender man and have been out to my mother for several years now,' said Noah White, a high school junior. 'When I came out to my mother and I spoke to my then-principal, we were welcomed with open arms. My principal helped me to feel comfortable and safe. 'But the proposed policies today aim to make students like me feel unsafe, unwelcome and unsupported. Transgender students need to feel safe, respected and supported in their educational environments to thrive. School should be a place where students feel affirmed in their identities not a source of fear or shame.' White said that the forced parental notifications put students at risk for rejection and even homelessness. The district's current guidelines aim to ensure transgender and gender-nonconforming students are in a safe learning environment free from discrimination and harassment. Guidelines include that students have the right to be addressed by the name or pronoun that corresponds to their gender identity and that school personnel use that name and appropriate pronoun. Also, these students are allowed to participate in sports and use restrooms, locker rooms and shower facilities in accordance to their gender identity. The guidelines also prohibit the disclosure of a student's transgender or gender nonconforming status to other employees, students and parents. Julia Gray, a Westwood High School senior, said the proposal would create distrust between students and teachers. Cinthia Alaniz, who has five kids in district schools, said that outing students without their consent puts them at risk for abuse, homelessness and even suicide. 'I'm the stepparent of a transgender youth who graduated from Westwood High School in 2023,' said Jessica Gronberg. 'My son is transgender because that's who he is…And I'm extremely grateful that he was able to use his pronouns that he wanted to use and his name that he wanted to use and go into the bathrooms that he wanted to use while he was a student.' District special education teacher Graham Corp called the policy 'garbage.' He noted that state school chief Tom Horne called absenteeism the biggest crisis facing Arizona public schools 'and your idea is 'Oh, I'm going to invent a policy that ensures these students are never going to show up to school again.' That's insane. Do not feel bad about rejecting garbage policy.' Mesa business owner Gabe Hage said, 'I was forcibly outed at 16 living in conservative Iowa. I came home to my family, who beat me in the basement. This is the reality you are trying to enact through policy.' Sarah Hernandez Meaney said her daughter was a year away from graduating with a degree in education and would prefer to teach out of state than in Arizona because of policies such as the one being proposed. 'So we are currently driving away teachers with things like this,' she said. 'Nothing in this policy moves the board any closer to its stated 2020-2425 goals. It's an insult to students. it's a waste of everybody's time to be down here to speak against policies like this.' Colton Cagle, who graduated from Westwood, said, 'People like Sharon Benson want you to believe that gender-nonconforming students are committing harm in schools. 'But in reality, these are fear-mongering tactics that use hateful rhetoric to spread lies. The reason I know this is because when I was in high school a few years ago, I had a classmate who was gender non-conforming. This student went by their preferred name and pronouns. And you want to know what happened? Nothing. We were all fine.' State Rep. Lorena Austin, D-Mesa, who called herself the first non-binary legislator in the state, also lashed out against the proposal. 'From the mouths of our students, they love living here but they feel unsafe, unloved and unsupported by this policy that is being proposed,' Austin said. 'I have been to many of our schools in the district and I'm so proud that we currently do not have a trans student policy because Mesa Public Schools meets our students where they are at and I will always meet our students and families where they are at.' A handful of speakers, like Jeff Thompson, however, supported the proposal. 'This pronoun stuff it's just senseless,' said Thompson, stressing he is not homophobic. He said that the district has an anti-bullying policy to protect all students and that the district 'needs to get back to just teaching the kids.' 'You've already proved you can't do that at 32% proficiency rate,' Thompson said, adding his support for parents to be informed. 'Parents who are responsible for their children have the liberty to raise them in their beliefs, to care for them and to know what's going on with them,' Mary Baybeno said. 'The unit of society is not between teachers and a child. It's between parents and a child, which supersedes any relationship a teacher may have with a child. If parents want to accommodate a child's belief they are not a boy or girl, that's their choice.' Ed Steele, who ran for the board last year, said that people opposed to the policy are saying that schools know better about how to raise a child than the child's parents. 'Folks who are opposing this policy are giving you a choice between hiding a student's mental health issues from their parents or kids dying,' Steele said. 'That's a ridiculous comparison. This policy is just trying to tell the parents when the child has emotional distress.' Dr. Leigh Anne Castanzo said that gender dysphoria is a diagnosis that needs to be evaluated by a physician and if parents don't know their children are in distress, they are unable to get them the appropriate care. And Jared Hieger called the opposition 'a three-ring circus sponsored by the teachers' union.' 'Ninety percent of the people that spoke out against it have no idea what's in it,' he claimed. 'Somebody came up here said a little while ago that trans students or queer students are 40% more likely to commit suicide. And that is correct. They are because they're miserable, because they're being taught a lie….It's not love to accept them as who they believe they are.' 'And if you are allowing your kid to believe this lie and condoning this lie, you are an agent of the devil.' Benson said parents have the right to raise their children the way they see fit without government interference. She said that the courts have over time affirmed that parents are assumed to be the best caretakers for their children unless proven to be unfit and that she campaigned in support of parental rights. She won her seat in November. 'We heard this evening during public comment that there are homes which are unsafe for students who are outed to their parents,' Benson said. 'That is not our call to make as teachers. I am not advocating the mistreatment of anybody. Our bullying policy takes care of that.' 'My intent in this policy is not that any student on any of our campuses be harmed, belittled (or) berated,' she said. 'It is also to push the notion or establish the notion that one person's rights cannot infringe on the rights of another.' She said she can appreciate a 'gender-confused student' who wants to be called by another name or pronoun and that there was no prohibition against that in her proposal. 'If you feel it's respectful to use pronouns, nothing in this policy says you can't do it as long as parents are informed and they know what's happening on our campuses,' Benson said. Board member Marci Hutchinson, also a retired educator, voiced concerns with the policy. She said that the legal definitions included in the proposal 'are not accurate or factual or even medically sound.' 'The policy was called gender dysphoria and that trans folks are confused,' Hutchinson said. 'As we have seen tonight, many people have embraced their identity and many love them for it.' She also raised concerns with the provision that the district can't compel employees and students to use their preferred name or pronoun and that not doing so would not be considered discrimination or bullying, which she said conflicts with the district's policy on bullying. 'I believe our current policy is one of respect and clearly it is working,' Hutchinson. who got her colleagues to agree for an outside review prior to a vote. 'Having been a teacher and having known staff in Mesa Public Schools for 28 years, this district is about respect. And when we lose the respect for kids and their families I really worry about us being able to keep our promise to this community to know kids by their name and to serve them by strength and need.'

Arizona's "privatization scam" is starving public schools. Trump wants to take it national
Arizona's "privatization scam" is starving public schools. Trump wants to take it national

Yahoo

time09-04-2025

  • Yahoo

Arizona's "privatization scam" is starving public schools. Trump wants to take it national

In 2022, Arizona lawmakers made a state school voucher program universal, just four years after voters shot down the proposal by a two-to-one margin. Now, at least 42 educators, counselors and other support staff in Mesa Public Schools, Arizona's largest school district, are feeling the hurt, receiving notice that they're the victims of a reduction in force earlier this year. Kelly Berg, an educator at Dobson High School and local union leader who's spent nearly 30 years teaching in the state, told Salon that cuts like these will have dire consequences for public schools. 'Just slightly over half [of the 42 Mesa Public Schools employees] were counselors. So that's a big impact. We no longer are going to have full-time counselors in our elementary schools,' Berg told Salon. 'Having that extra layer of support for when a student needs some extra support is going to be detrimental because now that's gonna fall on the teachers.' Berg, who is also concerned about losing federal funding as the Trump administration dismantles the Department of Education, says the impacts on students and faculty will be sweeping. 'It might be that we have fewer instructional assistants for those [special education] classrooms… [or] instead of having a dedicated instructional assistant for the classroom, they now have to share that person,' Berg said. 'So it's gonna impact student behavior and the workload for the teacher. The students might not get one-on-one assistance like they used to get if we have to spread ourselves thinner and thinner.' Programs like Arizona's allow parents to claim more than $7,000 in vouchers for educational expenses – like private school tuition, homeschooling costs, even a piano or ski resort visit – if their kids exit the public school system. The purported goal is to give parents more flexibility over their students' education and enable working-class families to attend non-public schools. President Donald Trump signed an executive order in January prioritizing federal government support for 'educational choice' initiatives in the states, many of which have taken action to create voucher programs since. Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation's policy manifesto for the second Trump term, called for the Trump administration to follow in the footsteps of Arizona's education voucher program and pave a path for universal school choice, a policy the document calls 'a goal all conservatives and conservative Presidents must pursue.' But educators, advocates and officials in Arizona say the White House and other state governments should heed their warnings on the massive costs to taxpayers, students and public school employees that voucher programs can have. Marisol Garcia, the president of the Arizona Education Association, the state's labor union for public school teachers, told Salon in an interview that the state had become known as the 'chemistry lab of terrible ideas.' 'We hit a head last year when we got to spending almost $700 million out of the general fund to the universal voucher system,' she said. 'That's money that could be going to not just education – because our general fund provides for education – but healthcare, transportation, housing, a lot of the money that goes to state-funded wildfire protection. The impact is now broader than just education and students, and it keeps getting bigger.' In addition to the $900 million that the state paid out to support the voucher program in 2024, far surpassing the $64 million estimate from the state's budget committee, Economic Policy Institute economist Hilary Wething told Salon there was another indirect cost plaguing public school students. 'It's the cost to public schools from students who were previously attending public school and then take up the voucher and leave and go to private school,' Wething said. 'The cost of providing that same level of education to the remaining students in public school is this second indirect cost of vouchers.' Certain school expenses – physical real estate, equipment, desks, even some staff – are difficult or impossible to scale back on a year-to-year basis, so planning ahead requires accurate headcounts of students for years into the future. However, voucher programs have made estimating enrollment more difficult. 'What we have continued to find is that a lot of students who do go to a charter school using the voucher monies may or may not find what they're looking for and then they'll return to the public schools,' Berg told Salon, adding that students in need of special resources are especially likely to make the switch back into public schools. 'When there's a constant ebb and flow of students and parents moving in and out of the public school systems, it's incredibly challenging to come up with a budget.' Wething agrees, adding that schools 'can't effectively educate children if they can't plan.' 'In the long run, all of these costs are variable, right? In the long run, you can actually close a building down,' she told Salon. The problems really stem from the short-run unpredictability of enrollment due to voucher programs.' This uncertainty means that per-student variable expenses are often the first to get cut. For public school students, that means less equipment, fewer books and even larger class sizes as more districts are forced to make cuts to educator and support staffing and keep teacher pay stagnant. 'We're having to do more with the same amount of pay… if a position goes unfilled, someone has to pick up the work from that position,' Berg told Salon. 'It's not good for morale. It never is. As long as I've been teaching in Arizona – and next year, I'll reach my 30th year of teaching in Arizona. – we have always been underpaid compared to the rest of the nation,' Berg said. 'It's a labor of love that we do what we do, we would just like to be paid what we're worth.' And while cuts could mean bigger class sizes, experts also worry the impacts are disproportionately harmful to lower-income Arizonans. Studies conducted since the program went universal suggest that the vast majority of voucher beneficiaries are those who could already afford a private education. A Brookings Institute analysis last year found that those in the state's highest-income ZIP codes were the most frequent voucher users, while the lowest-income areas were approximately a fourth as likely to make use of the program. With COVID-era federal funds drying up and a 2016 voter-approved funding measure expiring this summer, the state's public schools face an impending crisis, despite already ranking near last place in per-pupil spending. 'Public schools should be public for every single student,' Garcia told Salon. 'Over 70% of the students that are utilizing the ESA voucher programs never attended a public school… We are now essentially giving these families a $7,000 almost tax break for sending their child to this private school.' And while just about one-third of the recipients of vouchers are leaving public schools, reducing headcounts by a small margin, the funds exiting the public system can have a dramatic effect on education quality. 'If I had a class size of 32, and it goes down to 29, I still have 29 kids in my classroom, so I still have to provide everything for those kids,' Garcia explained. 'If you're not investing in salaries, investing in upkeep, investing in resources, the strain on the workforce, the strain on the district becomes untenable.' While wealthier families can choose to opt out of a public school system with rapidly dwindling funding, not all students in the state can. Wething told Salon that 'school choice' is a 'false dichotomy' for many students in low-income neighborhoods or rural areas, who don't have access to charter or private school options anyway. 'Public school students who are not enrolling in voucher programs, they are bearing the brunt of the cost in terms of, one, fewer dollars to spend on their educational needs,' Wething said. 'Many students, particularly students in rural areas, public schools are the only option. So when a state invokes these voucher programs, they're getting stuck in terms of risking having fewer costs, fewer resources coming to their districts for a choice that doesn't exist for them.' As for the private schools that students are moving to, advocates say they're a black box. 'Private schools have very little accountability, standards or transparency in how they provide education, who they provide education for, and what that looks like,' Wething told Salon. That lack of transparency doesn't just hurt students, it makes long-term planning more difficult for public schools, too, she receiving vouchers frequently jump back into the public school system, either because of disappointment with instruction quality or unexpected disruptions to their students' enrollment. Wething says non-public schools in the state have 'very low accountability and transparency on how they select students, how they keep students and how they retain students.' Berg, too, worries that students outside of public schools are working with unvetted and unevaluated educators. "A lot of charter schools and private schools that can now use the voucher money aren't held to the same standards that public schools are held to in terms of funding in terms of state testing that they have to take, so it's just not equitable," she said. And there aren't many guidelines for who can take state dollars and work with kids outside the public school system, either. 'There is a huge concern for the safety of these students. There is no mandatory reporting [for private entities],' Garcia said, warning that there aren't any safety measures for voucher students. 'Anyone who is around children under 18 and any sort of educational capacity, so receiving an ESA voucher, even a karate class, a bouncy house or Catholic church, they should all be fingerprinted. That's not happening.' Garcia added that Governor Katie Hobbs' proposals to add fingerprint requirements and tighten the rules on what expenses funds could be put towards in the last budget session went nowhere in the GOP-controlled legislature.\ With momentum building in state legislatures across the country to implement their own voucher programs and an ongoing dismantling of the Department of Education, Garcia's advice to Americans is to keep schools public. 'At least once a week I'm on the phone with leaders, public school champions throughout the country on why not to be Arizona,' Garcia told Salon. 'This is a privatization scam. The intent of this is to help privatize public education.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store