NHS trust tells wheelchair user to go to Pets at Home to be weighed
An NHS trust has apologised after staff told a wheelchair user she would have to go to a pet shop to be weighed.
Sarah Rennie said that at first she laughed when health bosses in Shropshire advised her to go to Pets At Home because the suggestion was so absurd.
But she said: 'Then it dawned on me that's not acceptable and it shows services everyone else can access aren't possible for disabled people.'
Ms Rennie, 39, from Shrewsbury, who has muscle-wasting, needs to be weighed to monitor her medication and exercise and to ensure her weight remains stable.
Her difficulty began after she moved to Shropshire from Birmingham last year, and Shropshire Community Health NHS Trust told her it was no longer commissioned to run its weighing clinic, which closed after the Covid pandemic.
'The rehabilitation service has now been utilised by other services and clients can be weighed when attending a clinic appointment only,' an email reply to her from the trust read.
The Midlands Centre for Spinal Injuries later said it encouraged her to do the same as its patients on discharge – 'access community-based weighing options, including facilities such as Pets at Home, where they can roll onto the scales'.
But Ms Rennie, a freelance transport consultant, said she would not put herself through the dehumanising experience of going to Pets at Home and would continue to battle for disabled people who are 'invisible in the system'.
The trust was forced to apologise for offence caused by incident, but Ms Rennie called for it to be honest about its lack of facilities.
'I can't go to my GP surgery for a cervical smear because they don't have a hoist and I'm OK with that but I'm not OK with pretending services are there that don't exist,' she said.
'Weight is a key indicator of health for people who are immobile so to be able to access that information about our bodies is really important,' she told The Independent.
She cannot stand or walk so is unable to transfer to a different type of seat.
'I don't blame individuals, it demonstrates the institutional lack of regard for the quality of our lives. I blame the policymakers.'
Before moving, Ms Rennie bought a set of scales designed for weighing animals for about £50, but stopped using them because they were not designed for use with her equipment and her personal assistant would have to be insured to use them.
She says hospital wards may have weighing facilities, but she doubts whether they would allow the public to walk in and use them.
'I don't think any private facilities would be comfortable with that,' she said. 'There's a privacy issue, and insurance to consider.
'This is an example of wider institutional health inequalities for disabled people, particularly women.
'In hospital the number of older people unable to transfer is higher than you think. Families are helping them transfer so they're not a visible part of the community so we're just constantly being forgotten.'
In a TikTok video she said: 'A very nice lady connected to my surgery suggested I go on local radio and see if any factory owners could help me.'
She added: 'Do I look like a chipmunk?'
A spokesperson from NHS Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin, on behalf of the local health and care system, said: 'We would like to apologise to Ms Rennie for any upset or offence caused.
'We are unable to comment on individual cases however, we are continuing to look into her experience to fully understand the wider issues and identify what can be done for her, and others, in similar situations.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
I ate chips and pasta every day as part of new weight loss hack and shifted 7lbs in a month without fat jabs
CHIPS, chicken fried rice and piles of pasta are usually the first things on the banned list when I start yet another surely a new eating plan which lets you eat carbs, carbs and more carbs must be too good to be true? But with my weight nudging 14st and my gut hanging over my jeans, I'm willing to give anything a go - and four weeks later, boy am I glad I did. According to new research, carbs – traditionally the enemy of dieters – can be healthier if you cook, then cool them, 24 hours before eating. This simple process changes the structure, turning regular starch into resistant starch, which is harder to digest and results in a more gradual release of glucose into the bloodstream. The result is fewer blood sugar crashes – so fewer snack cravings – and feeling fuller for longer. You also burn more calories digesting food, while these starches are better for gut health, too. As a busy mum struggling to slim down, I was keen to give it the cold carbs diet a go. My weight has yo-yoed over the years, going between a size 8 and 20. But while I was able to fuel my gym sessions with carbs in my twenties to lose weight, it was a different story after having my daughter Mia, now three. Pregnancy aged 40 took a toll on my waistline and I hit 14st. At only 5ft 1ins, I was classed as morbidly obese, but couldn't shake off more than a couple of pounds here and there, no matter how hard I tried with calorie counting and exercise. It also led to implications for my health, causing cholesterolosis of the gallbladder, where cholesterol gathers, causing polyps, and a fatty liver. This Morning chef reveals incredible three stone weight loss as she shares simple transformation trick Worryingly, this means I have the metabolic age of a 58-year-old. If I could shift even a stone, it would mean living longer for my daughter. And if eating cold chips could help, then I'd be more than happy to try it. But could the cold carbs diet really work? I gave myself a month, eating either lunch or dinner with a cold carb component, to see if I could shift the scales down from my current 14st… DAY ONE LIFE with a full-time job and a three-year-old is busy. By the time I finish bath and bedtime, it's 8.30pm before I sit down for dinner. Since my daughter loves pasta, I spent the night before batch cooking spaghetti Bolognese with turkey mince for lower fat and more protein. I put a portion in a plastic container and popped it in the fridge, ready to eat 24 hours later. Sitting down to cold spag bol, I'm surprised at how tasty it was. I've never really minded cold food, either – morning-after pizza is a favourite. Technically you can reheat the carbs once they've had a day to cool and change structure, but scientists think that is not quite as effective. How does the cold carb diet work? Carbohydrates are one of the three main macronutrient groups that make up a healthy diet, with protein and fat. Our main source is starchy foods, like potatoes, bread, rice, pasta and cereals, which the NHS say should make up just over a third of what you eat, ideally in wholegrain or unrefined form to give you more fibre. But you can boost the health benefits of carbs by cooking and cooling them for 24 hours before eating. This simple process changes the structure, making the molecules more tightly packed and turning regular simple starch into resistant starch, a type of fibre found in many plant foods. This makes it harder to digest, passing through the small intestine into the large one instead and ensuring a more gradual release of glucose into the bloodstream. The result is less blood sugar crashes, that might see you reaching for snacks, and feeling fuller for longer. You also burn more calories digesting it and these starches are better for your gut health. DAY SEVEN I HAVE survived the first week, helped by the fact I'm only doing one cold carb meal per day. Having to pre-prep breakfast, lunch AND dinner would be a challenge. In my job as a publicist, my schedule isn't a typical 9-to-5, so sticking to strict meal times is tricky. But today I'm working in the office and have brought in lunch – a cold white fusilli pasta salad cooked the previous day with lettuce, cucumber and tomato, but no sauce or dressing, just a little seasoning. It was surprisingly satisfying. Normally I'd be snacking on Hula Hoops and roasted peanuts after having a Tesco meal deal. The scales haven't moved yet, but I'm sticking with it. DAY 14 HALFWAY through and I'm pleased to say it hasn't been too tough so far. I'm enjoying eating the cold carbs, but need to add some variety as I'm tired of pasta. Rice, potatoes and even pulses like chickpeas count, so there are lots of choices. But while I do enjoy cold new potatoes, I'm not sure I'm desperate to reach for cold chips just yet. My favourite takeaway, Chinese, has been off the menu since I've been trying to lose my post-baby weight, but I decide that chicken fried rice could fit the cold carb bill. I order some and save it to eat cold 24 hours later. It was the perfect treat to mark hitting the halfway point. I've lost 3lbs so far, which is spurring me on to be more active, so I hit the gym for an hour-long cardio session. DAY 21 My reliance on cold carbs to base a meal on is starting to wear thin. I'm finding it challenging to come up with interesting dishes using them and eating is becoming dull as a result. I'm at a catered event with work today, a time I would normally indulge. I'll admit I go for triple carbs – a bit of macaroni cheese with a few new potatoes and white rice, plus green beans on the side. But I pack up a portion of leftovers to put in the fridge for tomorrow's dinner. I weigh myself and I've lost another 1lb this week, motivation to keep going. DAY 28 My final week is difficult. I'm on a family holiday to Ibiza, booked before I knew about the challenge. It's tempting to give in and enjoy everything on offer, but I try to stay on track, having fruit and veg-packed smoothies for breakfast and ordering nutritious dinners like grilled chicken with a carb. However, instead of eating that carb, I just have the vegetables and ask the staff to box the carb up, storing it in my bedroom fridge for next day's lunch. Yes, that does include chips – and I'm not sorry about it. And it seems to be working, with another 2lbs shed. THE VERDICT I was sceptical about whether this tweak to my carb intake would make a difference. But I've lost more than half a stone in the last month, taking me down to 13st 6lbs. My size 20 clothes also feel less tight – I think I can fit into an 18 now. I've also noticed myself cut back on snacking, presumably because I feel fuller or am more aware of it. While I need a break from cold carbs for the time being, this experiment has helped kickstart my weight loss. More importantly, it's shown me that making small changes to my daily routine is easier than I thought – and I don't even mind eating cold chips to do it. The 5 best exercises to lose weight By Lucy Gornall, personal trainer and health journalist EXERCISE can be intimidating and hard to devote yourself to. So how do you find the right workout for you? As a PT and fitness journalist, I've tried everything. I've taken part in endless fitness competitions, marathons and I maintain a regime of runs, strength training and Pilates. Fitness is so entrenched in my life, I stick to it even at Christmas! The key is finding an activity you love that can become a habit. My top five forms of exercise, especially if you're trying to lose weight, are: Walking Running Pilates High-intensity interval training (HIIT) Strength training
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Kelsey Parker mum-shamed for admitting she doesn't put suncream on her kids and strongly argues ‘they don't burn'
KELSEY Parker has come under fire after admitting she doesn't apply sunscreen on her kids. Tom Parker's widow Kelsey, 34, made the shock confession in the latest episode of Mum's the Word! podcast with Georgia Jones. 2 After Georgia, 38, complained that putting SPF protection on her son Cooper was like torture, the actress shared her bizarre explanation. ''It's cause he knows, Georg. It's bad for you - that sunscreen.'' Kelsey, who is now expecting her first baby with boyfriend Will Lindsay, went on: ''My kids do not wear suncream. The only thing that I may put on them is an organic suncream.'' The 34-year-old, whose late husband Tom tragically passed away in 2022 at just 33, absurdly claimed that ''suncream is so bad''. ''We never used to wear suncream, suncream causes skin cancer.'' According to the TV personality and vlogger, suncream contains ''really harmful chemicals'' - and instead of using sunscreen, you should simply stay hydrated and stay out of the sun during the hottest time of the day. ''The Spanish do a siesta. Why do the Spanish do a siesta from like 12pm until 2pm? Because it's the hottest time to be out in the sun.'' When on holiday, Kelsey strongly argued that despite not covering her kids, daughter Aurelia and son Bodhi, in sunscreen ''they do not burn''. Skin cancer is the uncontrolled growth of abnormal skin cells, and it's the most prevalent form of all cancers in the world. "The good news is there are plenty of ways you can lower your risk of developing skin cancer," said Dr. Cheryl Peters, a senior scientist in cancer prevention at BC Cancer and BCCDC. "Unfortunately, there are quite a few misconceptions about sun protection that can confuse the issue." In particular, some media has reported concern with ingredients oxybenzone, a synthetic estrogen, and retinyl palmitate, a form of vitamin A stored by the skin, and other stories might talk about vitamin D and risk of sunscreen reducing the amount of this important hormone in the body. "This myth is very concerning to me," said Dr. Peters, reassuring that there ''is no evidence that approved sunscreens cause cancer or other health problems''. ''In fact, the opposite is true: not wearing sunscreen poses a significant cancer risk,'' the expert warned. Kids will complain about the lotion and say it is cold or pasty. However, children must get into a routine of applying sunscreen whenever the sun is out, experts insist. melanoma and premature ageing. 'Stop the madness' Online, Kelsey has since come under fire, with dozens of concerned social media users flooding to slam the pregnant mum-of-two. One person said: ''Sunscreen doesn't cause skin cancer. The sun does. Stop the madness FFS.'' Another Instagram user chimed in: ''Even if you're children have skin prone to tanning rather than burning they need UVA/B protection via sun cream to reduce skin cell damage. ''If you are reluctant to put suncream all over them then use UV suits and hats for sun protection but you should still be putting suncream on the exposed areas e.g face, arms and legs to minimise risk of skin cancer later in life. ''I appreciate there's anxiety around suncream especially with the noise on social media but as a paediatrician this is what I would recommend.'' A third commented: ''It's so important to clarify that even when skin 'tans', it is still sun damage. Our skin does not 'adjust' to the sun — that's misinformation.'' Someone else said: ''Such a strange strange flex not to protect your children from harmful UV rays. ''A simple scroll of your socials shows your don't apply a thick white cream to your children whilst in the sun. ''So you're either lying about your stance or going out of your way to harm your children. Either way incredibly strange!'
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Trump to force NHS to pay for wonder drugs
NHS patients have been given new hope of accessing wonder drugs previously blocked in Britain as Donald Trump pressures the health service to spend more with US suppliers. Ministers are understood to be reviewing the value-for-money rules that govern which drugs the NHS can buy, amid demands from the Trump administration for the UK to be more welcoming to US pharmaceutical companies. Under the trade agreement signed between the two nations earlier this year, the Government agreed to 'endeavour to improve the overall environment for pharmaceutical companies operating in the UK'. Earlier this week, The Telegraph revealed that this could result in the NHS paying more for US drugs to see off criticism of the differences in medicine prices between the two nations. However, it is understood that discussions include not only paying more for treatments already supplied on the NHS but also making it easier for US drug giants to sell their most cutting-edge treatments to the health service. It follows a wave of high-profile rejections of so-called 'wonder' drugs in recent years. The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (Nice), which approves new NHS drugs for purchase, has blocked treatments including one which stopped the progression of Alzheimer's disease and another that doubled the life expectancy for terminal breast cancer patients. Nice has rejected them based on assessments of how long they would extend a patient's lifespan and improve quality of life. To qualify under Nice rules a new treatment must deliver one extra year of perfect health, or longer for less perfect health, for no more than £30,000. This figure has not increased in line with inflation since 1999. If it had, it would be just over £53,000. Nice has maintained that, to get approval for use on the NHS, medicines 'must not only provide benefits to patients but also represent a good use of NHS resources and taxpayers' money'. However, critics say a failure to raise the threshold in-line with inflation meant life-changing drugs were being blocked. Richard Torbett, chief executive of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, said: 'There is growing evidence that it is becoming harder to bring new medicines to NHS patients. Increasingly, some new medicines may not be launched in the UK at all.' Companies including US giant Eli Lilly have said the regulator must rethink how 'value-for-money' is assessed. On Monday, a spokesman for the company said: 'The UK has historically focused on medicines as a cost to the NHS rather than evaluating their social and economic value.' Ministers are understood to be listening to demands from the industry for Nice to shake up its formula, with medicines such as AstraZeneca's breast cancer treatment Enhertu likely to be resubmitted for approval for NHS use if the formula is updated. Nice and AstraZeneca previously failed to reach an agreement over a price for the drug, which costs an estimated £118,000 per course of treatment. The NHS typically gets discounts, although the level is commercially sensitive. The Nice formula is being discussed after President Trump took a personal interest in the NHS issue. In trade documents between the US and UK, it said the NHS would review drug pricing to take into account the 'concerns of the president'. US officials are particularly concerned by an arrangement that sees companies pay revenue back to the NHS if costs rise faster than expected. Drug companies paid £3bn back to the NHS last year. In April, Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, said he was proud that the UK had kept prices of medicines low. However, he admitted that the UK had become too focused on cost rather than the benefits in some cases. Mr Streeting said: 'We've moved from quite rightly trying to drive a good bargain on the price of drugs and treatment to a position where sometimes people view medicine spend as a dead weight cost'.
