Senate sets budget revenue targets below Ayotte's, frustrating governor
As the Legislature crafts the next two-year budget, one question has driven a wedge between House Republicans and Gov. Kelly Ayotte: How much revenue will the state raise in taxes?
This week, Senate Republicans drew the governor's criticism, too.
The parties have dueling projections. In February, Ayotte presented an optimistic portrait, one that assumed state businesses would overcome a recent slump in earnings and rebound over the next two fiscal years. In April, the House took a less rosy approach, estimating far fewer business tax collections and passing a budget that slashed Ayotte's spending proposals by $643 million.
Now, as the budget moves to the Senate, the Senate Ways and Means Committee has recommended a middle ground. On Wednesday, the committee endorsed a series of revenue projections that would put estimated revenues somewhere between the governor's and the House's assumptions for the next two years.
Ayotte is not satisfied.
'I disagree with that vote,' she said at a press conference Wednesday, reacting to the Senate's projections. 'And I also will tell you this: I don't understand why Republicans are joining with Democrats who want to put us in a position to raise taxes instead of adopting, I think, what would be a more accurate revenue picture for the state.'
The Senate committee's overall revenue estimate for the next budget biennium is about $6.1 billion — $228.1 million higher than the House Ways and Means estimate, but $172.1 million lower than Ayotte's budget, according to numbers from the Legislative Budget Assistant. Much of that difference is driven by disagreements over business taxes.
The calculations could allow the Senate Finance Committee to restore some, though not all, of the budget cuts imposed by the House. But as businesses nationwide fret about the effects of President Donald Trump's evolving tariffs, some state Democrats are questioning whether the Senate's new projections are themselves too optimistic.
Sen. Tim Lang, a Sanbornton Republican and the chairman of the Senate Ways and Means Committee, acknowledged that New Hampshire businesses could be affected by the tariffs and other economic headwinds. But he said he believes those hurdles will merely dampen growth, not stop it, and that businesses will begin a path to recovery by the new year.
'When you look at what we heard from the industries across the board was that there's not a recession happening. No one's lowering their number,' Lang said in an interview Wednesday. He argued that because inflation has dropped, and interest rates are lower, companies and consumers are in decent financial shape.
Lang also said he is not worried about the tariffs long term. 'The general consensus of the committee was that'll play itself out by the end of this year. So it'll affect the first half of the first year (of the two year budget), but after that, we'll see the growth.'
But Sen. Cindy Rosenwald, a Nashua Democrat and ranking member of the Ways and Means Committee, is doubtful.
'Consumer confidence is down, GDP shrunk in the first quarter,' Rosenwald said in an interview. 'I'm not hearing businesses saying 'we're doing a great job.' April (state) revenues were off, pretty substantially.'
Speaking to reporters in her office at a regularly scheduled press availability, Ayotte did not hide her frustration with the projected numbers. She said the rosier numbers in her budget are still realistic, and urged the Senate to use those.
Ayotte's revenues were set in February, before Trump imposed an aggressive series of tariffs on China, which in some cases exceed 100%. But Ayotte said she met with Commissioner Lindsey Stepp of the Department of Revenue Administration and economist Brian Gottlob just after the House passed its budget, on April 25, and that they had said her revenue projections were still sound, even with the tariffs.
'They assured me they're still comfortable with my revenue estimates, and they believe that in the next biennium, we will see a rebound on our business revenue,' she said.
The Senate Ways and Means Committee's revenue recommendations will now guide the chamber's budget writing process. The Finance Committee, which heard nine hours of public testimony Tuesday, must make its recommended changes to the budget in time for the chamber to vote for the budget on June 5.
Members of Ways and Means set predictions for each category of state revenue Wednesday. In most cases, they predicted slightly more revenue than their House counterparts did in March.
Senators set the meals and rooms tax estimate higher than the House's, with Lang saying representatives of the hospitality industry said they are not seeing a decline in bookings.
They also quibbled over alcohol sales. Lang argued to the committee that liquor revenues would be higher than the House had predicted, in part due to increasing interest in mocktails.
'We see the (New Hampshire Liquor Commission) moving more towards providing those things in the store for people that are coming in and buying both alcohol for one part of the family, and the other thing,' he said.
Sen. Keith Murphy, a Manchester Republican who owns the bar Murphy's Taproom, disagreed, noting that liquor sales have dipped recently as fewer Americans drink.
'I have seen in the younger generation, it's just a catastrophic drop off,' Murphy said. 'It's hard to be upset with people for not drinking as much, right? It's good from a health perspective, but I am very concerned the revenues the state derives from alcohol consumption is going to not recover any time soon.'
The revenue projections could force the Senate Finance Committee to make tough decisions over which programs in Ayotte's budget they restore, and which they allow to be reduced or cut.
On Wednesday, Ayotte named a number of programs she hopes will stay.
'I can tell you one that's on the top of my list, which is restoring the 3% cut to providers of Medicaid,' Ayotte said. '… (For) the providers across the board, that's a very important core issue when we think about serving our most vulnerable population.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
a few seconds ago
- New York Post
NYC pol rips Jewish activist over photo op with anti-Israel mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani: ‘Don't even bother calling' for funding
A NYC councilwoman warned nonprofits to look elsewhere for funding if they support socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani or others 'Hamas sympathizers.' Brooklyn Republican and staunch Zionist Inna Vernikov made the vow Tuesday regarding her share of council members' annual discretionary funds – which this fiscal year total $810,000 – in response to video posted on X of Jewish activist Mark Meyer Appel shaking hands with the pro-Palestine Mamdani. 'I know it may not be much, but just a small PSA [Public Service Announcement] for the orgs who will be seeking discretionary funding from me for the next four years: In my discretion, I will NOT fund organizations whose leadership supports Hamas sympathizers and October 7th apologists,' Vernikov said on X. 4 NYC Councilwoman Inna Vernikov issued a stern declaration to nonprofits who support socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani or anyone else she believes is 'sympathetic' to Hamas terrorists – no political pork for you. Stephen Yang 'So if you want to be like @MarkMeyerAppel, and support or do photo ops with @Zohran Mamdani, don't even bother calling,' she added, accusing Appel of 'commie/jihadi a– kissing.' And she doubled down Friday, telling The Post 'If someone allows themselves to be in a photo with Mamdani, they're either supporting him or pandering to him.' 'Either way, I will defund them,' she said. 4 Vernikov's post on X ripped Jewish activist Mark Meyer Appel (left) for shaking hands with NYC mayoral candidate and staunch Israel critic Zohran Mamdani on Tuesday during a Brooklyn event. Inna Vernikov/ X Some Democratic Council sources contended Vernikov's remarks were over the top. 'How can you make a blanket statement that you're not giving a group money but because someone appears in a photo op?' a source said. Council Minority Leader Joann Ariola (R-Queens) wouldn't comment on Vernikov's rhetoric but said nonprofits should be apolitical. 'They should be focused on their goals of helping New York, not on illegal performative activism,' she said. 4 Vernikov doubled down on her remarks Friday, telling The Post, 'If someone allows themselves to be in a photo with Mamdani, they're either supporting him or pandering to him. Either way, I will defund them.' Stephen Yang 4 Mamdani (pictured, shaking the hand of a supporter) went to the Flatbush Gardens Community Center Tuesday to talk about ways he'll look to boost affordable housing if he's elected NYC mayor. Gregory P. Mango Appel's Flatbush-based group, The Bridge Multicultural and Advocacy Project, scored $60,000 in political pork from the Council in this fiscal year's budget, but none from Vernikov, records show. Messages left with Appel were not returned.


New York Post
a few seconds ago
- New York Post
Put pressure on Putin, Mr. President — it's the only way to end this war
President Trump said he wanted to meet Russian dictator Vladimir Putin to 'see what he has in mind.' 'Probably in the first two minutes,' he added, 'I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can get done.' Mr. President, you have your answer: Putin doesn't want peace, he simply wants conquest. Putin put on his best fake smile, waved for the cameras, then ominously pointed out how many parts of Alaska have Russian names. He rejected a ceasefire, and instead demanded long negotiations for a comprehensive treaty. This is the dictionary definition of 'tapping along.' While he says he wants more talks and ridiculously floats 'next time in Moscow' — an invitation to be dismissed out of hand — his bombardment of Ukraine continues. You're right, Mr. President, that the killing must end, and Alaska showed that the only way to do that is to squeeze Putin. Mr. President, you have your answer: Putin doesn't want peace, he simply wants conquest. AFP via Getty Images Trump said that he would not sanction Russia further after the summit. But he should increase sanctions on Russia immediately — particularly secondary sanctions on oil and other goods that are keeping Putin's war machine afloat. The president should make clear arms supplies will continue, particularly now that Europe is footing the bill, and our military industry is benefiting. Putin did not move on his demands. He must be forced to move — with cash and steel. Tariffs. Weapons. Strong security guarantees for Ukraine. Pressure is the only language Putin understands. According to reports, Putin said that 'if he wanted' he could take all the land he's fighting for in Ukraine. What lies. He's been battling over this territory for three years, and if he really had that kind of advantage, why would he be pushing for a 'land swap' that pole vaults him to the other side of the Ukrainian front lines? He's pretending his victory is a fait accompli, when the reality is he is, at best, grinding along at a pace that would take years for him to complete his 'special operation.' We cannot afford to wash our hands of Ukraine, even if it is true that it is 'Biden's War' and it would never have started during a Trump presidency. First, your voters believe in the fight — 51% of Republicans believe we should be supplying more arms and military support to Ukraine (up from 30% six months ago), and 84% of GOP voters have an unfavorable view of Putin. Second, while we understand you envision Russia as a strategic partner, a weakened Russia benefits your world vision. Consider what has happened already. Iran is providing drones to Russia, yet when you bombed Tehran's nuclear facilities, Putin could provide his ally no help. He has alienated Azerbaijan, and you were able to step up and negotiate a peace deal between that country and Armenia. Putin has less resources to put into the Arctic. Some advisers say this is a distraction from the real enemy, China. But standing up for Ukraine, showing strength for our allies, sends a message to Beijing. There is also a widening rift between China and Russia as Putin's moves become more destructive. In Alaska, Putin again floated the blackmail of nuclear war, the 'point of no return' as he said. President Xi already has bristled at such rhetoric, saying that China 'opposes . . . the threat to use nuclear weapons.' China should make it clear that it is still unacceptable. By rejecting a ceasefire, Putin wants to push a bad deal at the point of a gun. We fall for his flattery, his bluster and his threats at our peril.


The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Blumenthal says Putin spent summit ‘delaying' Trump peace negotiations, reups call for sanctions
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said he thinks President Trump was manipulated at the Friday Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'Putin doesn't want a deal. He doesn't want peace. And the only way to convince him to stop this diplomatic rope-a-dope, playing the President, delaying any kind of ceasefire, is through strength,' Blumenthal said during a Friday appearance on CNN's 'AC360.' 'Providing [Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelensky and Ukraine the kind of military arms they need, the interceptors for their patriot systems and more of them, the missiles they need, the long-range artillery, and scorching sanctions in the Graham-Blumenthal bill now on the floor,' he added, referencing his sanctions bill with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) Trump said Friday's bilateral meeting was 'productive' but said before any agreement is determined, peace points must be sorted out. Zelensky is also slated to visit the White House on Monday. Still, both Russia and Ukraine have pressed ahead with fatal strikes. On Thursday, Ukraine launched a drone attack on southern portions of Russia while the Kremlin overtook front lines in the eastern Donetsk region earlier this week. Blumenthal, who met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in May, said his 'stomach turned' when Trump referred to Putin as a friend on Friday. 'Nothing came out of this summit. It was a nothing burger. It was a shrug of the shoulders. But I will tell you, Anderson, my stomach turned when I heard the president of the United States characterize Vladimir Putin as his fabulously good friend,' Blumenthal told anchor Anderson Cooper. 'Vladimir Putin is a war criminal. He has directed soldiers to kill women and children and bury them in mass graves. He's kidnapping children as we speak,' the Connecticut Democrat said. Blumenthal introduced a bipartisan measure with Graham to punish Russia's trading partners, including China, Brazil and India for purchasing oil from Putin. The president has held off on financial rebukes on Russia, but did increase tariffs on India amid the turmoil in Eastern Europe. Meanwhile, Graham on Friday predicted that the war will end before Christmas if Trump and Putin meet with Zelensky. 'If in fact there is a trilateral meeting between President Trump, President Zelensky and Putin, then I am cautiously optimistic that this war will end well before Christmas,' the South Carolina Republican said.