Campaigners call on Donald Trump to save historic liner with links to Southampton
The New York Coalition to Save the SS United States has appealed to the federal courts and President Trump to try and stop the vessel being sunk off the coast of Florida.
Owner of the SS United States, Okaloosa County, plan to sink the vessel and create the world's largest artificial reef.
Campaign group, the New York Coalition was created last October - just two months after Okaloosa County bought the vessel.
The Coalition argues the SS United States has 'inestimable historic value to which the people of the United States have a sovereign interest from being sunk dismembered or destroyed."
In letters sent to the office of Attorney General, Pam Bondi and President Trump, the Coalition asked whether the ship should be taken for public use with just compensation paid to the county.
READ MORE: Pictures show inside SS United states before ship is sunk
Okaloosa County have dismissed the legal appeal launched by the Coalition and said that the organisation was only "involved itself for the sole purpose of preventing the county from following through on its plans."
It also added that so far, the Trump administration is yet to confirm it is aware of the action being taken by the New York Coalition to save the SS United States.
For 17 years the liner powered through the Atlantic making constant journeys between Southampton and New York, and was met crowds of almost 70,000 when she first came to Hampshire in 1952.
The SS United States was also the fastest ship in the world at the time.
Before being passed into the hands of Okaloosa County, the vessel's last owner, the SS United States Conservancy planned to turn the liner into a floating hotel venue - but these plans never got off the ground.
It is so far unclear if the legal motion by the New York Coalition will affect Okaloosa County's plans for the SS United States.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Brennan and Clapper: Let's Set the Record Straight on Russia and 2016
Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, and John Ratcliffe, the Central Intelligence Agency director, have over the past month claimed that senior officials of the Obama administration manufactured politicized intelligence, silenced intelligence professionals and engaged in a broad 'treasonous conspiracy' to undermine the presidency of Donald Trump. That is patently false. In making those allegations, they seek to rewrite history. We want to set the record straight and, in doing so, sound a warning. Let's recap. The Trump administration's claims focus on the intelligence community's findings about Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, which were published in January 2017. The assessment found that President Vladimir Putin of Russia had ordered an influence campaign to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process and harm the electability and potential presidency of the Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton. The assessment also found that the Russians had developed a 'clear preference' for Mr. Trump and aspired to help his election prospects. It further stated that the Russians employed a variety of tactics as part of this campaign, including hacking into the email accounts of Democratic Party organizations and officials and publicly releasing the stolen data through digital allies. Those covert activities were complemented by the overt but disguised efforts of Russian government intelligence agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries and paid social media users. As stated in the assessment, Mr. Putin himself ordered Russian intelligence to conduct the campaign. While some external critiques have noted that parts of the Russia investigation could have been handled better, multiple, thorough, yearslong reviews of the assessment have validated its findings and the rigor of its analysis. The most noteworthy was the unanimous, bipartisan, five-volume report issued by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, whose Republican members at the time included Marco Rubio, now the secretary of state, and Senator Tom Cotton, now the committee chairman. 'In all the interviews of those who drafted and prepared the [assessment], the Committee heard consistently that analysts were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions,' the Senate report said. 'All analysts expressed that they were free to debate, object to content and assess confidence levels, as is normal and proper for the analytic process.' The special counsel John Durham, who was appointed during Mr. Trump's first term to investigate how the Russia probe was conducted, similarly found no evidence of an Obama administration conspiracy against Mr. Trump. But he affirmed the findings of the special counsel Robert Mueller, who conducted a separate investigation into the allegations, which found ample evidence of Russian interference in the election. More recently, the C.I.A.'s Mr. Ratcliffe ordered yet another review of the 2017 assessment, which determined that its 'level of analytic rigor exceeded that of most [intelligence] assessments.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CNBC
a few seconds ago
- CNBC
U.S. sanctions Brazilian judge targeted by Trump over Bolsonaro case
The U.S. Treasury Department on Wednesday imposed sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Federal Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who has been a target of criticism by President Donald Trump for his handling of legal cases involving former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. The sanctions come five months after Trump's social media company, Trump Media, sued de Moraes for over an order by the justice to the video hosting company Rumble to suspend the accounts of a "well-known politically outspoken user" of Rumble, whose services Trump Media uses. They also come two days before Trump has said he will impose tariffs of 50% on imports from Brazil, which Trump says are partly in retaliation for the ongoing criminal prosecution of Bolsonaro, an ally of his. De Moraes last year drew the ire of mega-billionaire Elon Musk, who at the time was a close ally over Trump, by blocking Musk's X social media platform nationwide in Brazil for failing to comply with orders banning some user accounts and to remove certain content. "Alexandre de Moraes has taken it upon himself to be judge and jury in an unlawful witch hunt against U.S. and Brazilian citizens and companies," said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in a statement Wednesday announcing the sanctions, which would block any property de Moraes might have in the United States. "De Moraes is responsible for an oppressive campaign of censorship, arbitrary detentions that violate human rights, and politicized prosecutions — including against former President Jair Bolsonaro," Bessent said. "Today's action makes clear that Treasury will continue to hold accountable those who threaten U.S. interests and the freedoms of our citizens." The Washington Post on July 17 reported that Eduardo Bolsonaro, a son of Bolsonaro, was "working closely with the White House to impose sanctions on" de Moraes. Eduardo Bolsonaro is a federal congressman in Brazil.
CNBC
a few seconds ago
- CNBC
Bessent says 'not to panic' over tariff rate surges on Aug. 1
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday urged corporate America, investors and U.S. trade partners "not to panic" if tariff rates surge on Aug. 1 because deals have not been reached yet, saying that countries "can still do a deal" after President Donald Trump's deadline expires. "You're just going to go back to your April 2 reciprocal tariff level," Bessent said at a policy event with hardline conservative site Breitbart News, adding that a higher tariff rate may apply to any given country "for three days, it may be on for three weeks, it may be on for three months." "You can continue negotiating," Bessent said, addressing America's trade partners and suggesting that Trump's Aug. 1 tariff deadline was yet another negotiating tool for a White House seeking to pressure countries to accept higher tariff rates while granting U.S. products more access to their domestic markets. Bessent said that if a country's tariff rate lands on the level that was initially announced on Trump's "Liberation Day" in April, it is "going to get a lot of attention." Many of the April 2 rates are significantly higher than the 10% blanket baseline tariff rate currently in place. "I would expect that it's going to be a busy August," Bessent said, foreshadowing what could be an onslaught of trade negotiations after the Friday deadline expires. The Trump administration maintains that the Aug. 1 trade deadline is firm, even as scores of countries, including some top trading partners, have not yet inked any kind of trade deal. "THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE IS THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE – IT STANDS STRONG, AND WILL NOT BE EXTENDED," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post Wednesday. Bessent's remarks echo comments he made Tuesday, when he said that it was "not the end of the world if these snapback tariffs are on for anywhere from a few days to a few week," again underscoring that the reciprocal tariff rates could be temporary for countries negotiating in "good faith." Yet Bessent's remarks are unlikely to reassure investors and businesses bracing for Trump's tariffs to take effect, especially as companies are already struggling to keep pace with the evolving trade environment.
