Supreme Court to consider reviving Mississippi evangelist's challenge to protest ordinance
Gabriel Olivier, a self-described Christian called to evangelize, asked the justices to let his lawsuit challenging an ordinance barring him from demonstrating outside a Brandon, Miss., amphitheater move forward.
The city, in its opposition to Olivier's petition, said the ordinance was passed after Olivier, with a group, called passersby 'whores,' 'Jezebels,' 'sissies' and other derogatory names over a loudspeaker at the amphitheater's busiest intersection.
The ordinance redirects protests and demonstrations to a nearby designated area for three hours before an event and one hour after and bans the use of loudspeakers that are 'clearly audible' more than 100 feet from the protest area, the city says.
Olivier claimed in his petition to the court that the ordinance 'forbids him' from sharing his faith with fellow citizens outside the amphitheater. He filed suit after being charged with and pleading no contest to violating the ordinance, after he left the protest area because it was 'too isolated for attendees to hear his message.' He paid a $304 fine.
A federal judge threw out his case, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit affirmed, citing Supreme Court precedent that people convicted of a crime can't file civil lawsuits against police or other officials. The full appeals court declined to rehear the case by a one-vote margin, over several dissenting opinions.
'It sends an odd message to citizens who care about defending their constitutional rights,' Judge James Ho wrote in one dissent. 'On the one hand, we tell citizens that you can't sue if you're not injured. But on the other hand, we tell them that you can't sue if you are injured.'
Olivier asked the justices to clarify whether the high court's 1994 decision in Heck v. Humphrey bars lawsuits like his. A decision is expected by next summer.
'Every American has First Amendment rights to free speech; and every American has a right to their day in court,' said Kelly Shackelford, president, CEO and chief counsel for First Liberty Institute, which is representing Olivier. 'Both of these rights were violated for Gabe Olivier. The Supreme Court will now decide whether those rights will be protected for all Americans.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Marjorie Taylor Greene Rolls Out Gun Giveaway With Trigger-Happy Rant
Far-right, gun-loving Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Thursday marked the start of the year leading up to the 250th anniversary of the U.S. by launching a fundraising giveaway of 'one of my favorite' firearms, a combat-ready FN M249S PARA. 'America is the greatest country in the world and I fight the nasty 'America last' Democrats in Washington to keep it that way,' the Donald Trump acolyte, who last month briefly broke with the president over his now-passed 'Big, Beautiful Bil,' said in a video that she shared on social media that hit almost every MAGA talking point. 'I fight against gun control, open borders, the trans agenda coming for your kids and women's sports,' continued Greene. 'And I blow away the reckless government spending on my DOGE subcommittee,' she added, also slamming the policies of former President Joe Biden. After making each point, Greene appeared to fire a round. To celebrate 250 years of the red, white, and blue I'm giving away one of my favorite guns, the iconic FN M249S PARA. 🇺🇸Enter here for your chance to WIN: — Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 (@mtgreenee) July 3, 2025 'Why enter to win this gun? Because in America, you can,' she said. In the post, Greene pointed people to the WinRed conservative fundraising website, which detailed the weapon as 'designed for airborne, armored infantry and close quarters combat (CQC) operations with a shorter barrel and collapsible buttstock' with a retail value of $10,058. Hopefuls are asked to contribute donations in exchange for entering the contest, which closes on Sept. 15. In 2022, Greene hosted a competition for someone to join her in hunting feral hogs in Texas. In a video, she likened the wild animals to Democrats. Biden Casually Drops Bombshell About Who's Still Seeking His Advice, And Trump Will Hate It Big, Blundering Typo Kicked Off Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Meeting With GOP Rep Top Trump Official's POTUS Praise Goes Viral For Cringiest Reasons
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Karl Rove: Big, beautiful bill will have ‘huge impact on 2026'
Republican strategist Karl Rove said Thursday the Congress-approved spending package will heavily influence the midterm election cycle next year. 'I think it'll have a huge impact on 2026, because remember, as these changes, particularly the Medicaid changes come into effect, they're going to have, people are going to be losing their coverage,' Rove said during an appearance on Fox News's 'America's Newsroom.' Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) decided to forego a re-election bid after voting against his party while urging lawmakers to strike the language regarding Medicaid provisions from the big, beautiful bill, marking a first major impact on the midterms. Rove lauded the Republican-backed 'big, beautiful bill,' however, cheering its new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for certain Medicaid recipients. 'The able-bodied, think about it, there was an interesting study done of able-bodied people on Medicaid, and that you know what their number one activity was if they weren't working? It was watching television, and number two was playing online games,' Rove told Fox News. The legislation is set to push millions off of Medicaid coverage and require twice-yearly eligibility check-ins instead of the previous annual evaluation. Rove encouraged GOP members to continue to lobby in favor of the bill as citizens prepare for sweeping cuts to take effect. 'Medicaid was meant for poor seniors, for children in poor families, and for the disabled, and we should not be paying for health care for people who are able-bodied, and can work, and are refusing to work. This is why they got to go on the offense. But yeah, it's going to be a big impact,' the Republican pundit said. 'And the work is just beginning. There's going to be always a tendency to say, 'We got the bill passed, oh let's all take the time off and good, we got it done.' Uh-uh, that's the requirement that you then go to work,' he added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump to Send Tariff Letters on Friday, Floats 10%-70% Range
(Bloomberg) -- US President Donald Trump said that his administration will start sending out letters to trading partners on Friday setting unilateral tariff rates, which he said countries would have to begin paying on Aug. 1. Foreign Buyers Swoop on Cape Town Homes, Pricing Out Locals NYC Commutes Resume After Midtown Bus Terminal Crash Chaos Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds Massachusetts to Follow NYC in Making Landlords Pay Broker Fees What Gothenburg Got Out of Congestion Pricing Trump told reporters that about '10 or 12' letters would go out Friday, with additional letters coming 'over the next few days.' 'I think by the ninth they'll be fully covered,' Trump added, referring to a July 9 deadline he initially set for countries to reach deals with the US to avoid higher import duties he has threatened. 'They'll range in value from maybe 60 or 70% tariffs to 10 and 20% tariffs,' he added. The top tier of that range, if formalized, would be higher than any tariffs the president initially outlined during his 'Liberation Day' rollout in early April. Those ranged from a 10% baseline tariff on most economies up to a maximum of 50%. Trump didn't elaborate on which countries would get the tariffs or whether that meant certain goods would be taxed at a higher rate than others. Trump said that countries would 'start to pay on August 1. The money will start going to come into the United States on August 1.' Tariffs are typically paid by the importer, or an intermediary acting on the importer's behalf. But it's often the end consumer that ultimately shoulders much of the cost. Trump has long threatened that if countries fail to reach deals with the US before next week's deadline, he would simply impose rates on them, raising the stakes for trading partners who have rushed to secure agreements with his administration. The US president initially announced his higher so-called 'reciprocal' tariffs on April 2, but paused those for 90 days to allow countries time to negotiate, putting in place a 10% rate during that interval. So far, the Trump administration has announced deals with the UK and Vietnam and agreed to a truce with China that saw the world's two largest economies ease tit-for-tat tariffs. Asked Thursday if more deals were on the way, Trump responded that 'we have a couple of other deals, but you know, my inclination is to send a letter out and say what tariffs they are going to be paying.' 'It's much easier,' he said. Trump announced the Vietnam deal on Wednesday, saying that the US would place a 20% tariff on Vietnamese exports to the US and a 40% rate on goods deemed transshipped through the nation — a reference to the practice whereby components from China and possibly other nations are routed through third countries on their way to the US. While the rates are lower than the 46% duty Trump imposed on Vietnam initially, they are higher than the universal 10% level. And many of the particulars of the deal are still unclear, with the White House yet to release a term sheet or publish any proclamation codifying the agreement. Still, investors who have eagerly anticipated any deals between the US and trading partners were buoyed Wednesday by the Vietnam announcement, which saw share prices of American manufacturers with facilities in the country rise. Many major trading partners, however, such as Japan, South Korea and the European Union, are still working to finalize deals. The president has expressed optimism about reaching an agreement with India but has spoken harshly about the prospects of an accord with Japan, casting Tokyo as a difficult negotiating partner. He intensified his criticism this week, saying that Japan should be forced to 'pay 30%, 35% or whatever the number is that we determine.' The president on Tuesday also said he was not considering delaying next week's deadline. Asked about any potential extension of talks, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said earlier Thursday that Trump would make the final call. 'We're going to do what the president wants, and he'll be the one to determine whether they're negotiating in good faith,' Bessent said on CNBC when asked whether the deadline might be lengthened. --With assistance from Catherine Lucey and Ben Holland. (Adds caveat in fifth paragraph.) SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar Sperm Freezing Is a New Hot Market for Startups ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
