Trump dismisses reports of seeking summit with Xi Jinping: ‘I may go to China, but it would only be…'
He stated that he would only visit China at the invitation of Xi, which he claimed had already been extended.
Taking to his official Truth Social handle, the US president said, 'The Fake News is reporting that I am SEEKING a 'Summit' with President Xi of China. This is not correct, I am not SEEKING anything! I may go to China, but it would only be at the invitation of President Xi, which has been extended. Otherwise, no interest! Thank you for your attention to this matter.'
Trump's post comes amid trade tensions between the United States and China. The two countries have been engaged in a trade war, with the US raising the tariffs on Chinese imports to triple-digit levels.
The US president has repeatedly indicated that he is open to meeting his Chinese counterpart to discuss a potential resolution.
US, China officials to hold trade talks in Stockholm
Trump's remarks also come as the officials from his administration are set to meet their Chinese counterparts in Sweden to discuss trade and economic issues, in what both sides describe as a step toward easing tensions.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng will be meeting for the third time this year, nearly four months after Trump proposed sweeping tariffs, including an import tax of up to 145% on Chinese goods.
The meeting is also expected to lay the groundwork for a potential meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping later this year.
The move is part of broader efforts by both countries to stabilise a relationship that has been strained by trade disputes, technology competition, and geopolitical rivalry.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Illegal sale of fireworks, illicit import of Chinese fireworks caused loss of 40% to fireworks traders, says federation
Federation of Tamil Nadu Fireworks Traders have alleged that illegally functioning online sale of fireworks and illicit import of Chinese fireworks has caused a loss of ₹800 crore to the fireworks traders of the country during 2024 Deepavali season. Talking to reporters here on Tuesday, the federation president V. Raja Chandrasekaran said that despite the Supreme Court banning taking online orders and sale of fireworks in 2018, the illegal online sale continued. 'This has been more pronounced in Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh. Before it spreads to other States, the Government should ensure that no online sale of fireworks could be done,' he said. Besides, stealth import of Chinese goods continued, he charged. He pointed out that even recently, Chinese fireworks worth ₹35 crore were seized in Mumbai. 'The combination of online sales and Chinese imports had affected the business of traders to the extent of 40%, which is around ₹800 crore to ₹1000 crore, during Deepavali season 2024,' he said. The federation would proceed with a case of contempt of court for allowing online sale of fireworks besides initiating criminal case, he said. License for fireworks shops Mr. Chandrasekaran complained that applications submitted for permanent cracker shops in February and March 2025 were yet to be processed. 'The process should have been completed within two months,' he said. Besides, the license for permanent cracker shops is issued for five years under Explosives Act 2008. However, since the Department of Fireworks and Rescue gives no-objection certificate for only one year, the Revenue Department was giving license for only one year in many districts, he complained. Besides, he insisted that the inordinate delay in giving license for temporary cracker shops during Deepavali season was taking a huge toll on the traders. 'The applications should be invited 90 days before Deepavali and the 15-day license should be given one month ahead of Deepavali to help the traders plan their business,' he said. The federation secretary, N. Elangovan, was present.
Scroll.in
15 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Sri Lanka will have to navigate geo-political tides as it pivots from tourism to maritime trade
With its natural beauty, wildlife and culture, Sri Lanka is known as the ' pearl of the Indian Ocean ', and attracts millions of tourists every year. But my research suggests that the country might not be so reliant on tourism in the future, as it looks to become a major player in global maritime trade. The island's numerous harbours and enviable location along international sea routes have led to major investment from China and the US, as they seek to extend their strategic influence in the region. That investment is being welcomed after years of economic and political turmoil in Sri Lanka. The Easter bombings of 2019 targeted Catholic churches and hotels, killing 269 people and devastating tourism. The same year, significant tax cuts slashed government revenue before Covid did serious damage to the economy. In 2021, a ban on chemical fertilisers led to nationwide agricultural failure, while excessive borrowing and money printing triggered soaring inflation, which peaked at 70% in August 2022. The country ended up failing to pay its foreign debts. Following huge protests in 2022 and the resignation of the president, Sri Lanka began a major political and economic shift. It secured a bailout from the International Monetary Fund and implemented reforms aimed at stabilising the economy. So far, some of the effects have been positive. Inflation has eased, investor confidence has improved and more tea, clothing and rubber products are being exported up. Key to this has been improved logistics and port infrastructure. Business at the port of Colombo, the country's largest, is booming, aided in part by global shipping disruptions, including the Red Sea crisis, which rerouted vessels through the Indian Ocean. But international maritime ambitions can be a complex affair, and Sri Lanka needs to be wary of becoming just a well-positioned commodity for the world's economic superpowers. China for example, has secured a controversial 99-year lease of Hambantota port. India, wary of Chinese encroachment, has ramped up its own investments, including the development of a container terminal in Colombo. In 2023, the US announced a US$500 million plan to develop a deep-water shipping container terminal at the port of Colombo. And the potential US tariffs of 30% on imports from Sri Lanka have been interpreted by some as a pressure tactic to get greater access to its waters. Balancing these interests is a delicate act. While foreign investment is crucial for infrastructure development, Sri Lanka needs to protect its sovereignty and ensure that port operations serve national, not just international, interests. My research suggests that one way of building a resilient and diverse Sri Lankan economy would be to focus on its surrounding waters. Sri Lanka's vast 'exclusive economic zone', an area of sea where it controls marine resources, holds massive untapped potential. Blue economy This potential lies in traditional sectors like fisheries and tourism, but also emerging industries such as marine biotechnology. This growing field offers opportunities in things like bioengineering and marine-based pharmaceuticals. With other countries rapidly advancing in these sectors, Sri Lanka is well-positioned to follow suit and become a regional leader in the blue economy (economic activities associated with the sustainable use of ocean resources). But there is still a complex web of geopolitical interests and economic pressures to navigate, as well as environmental challenges. At the moment for example, the Sri Lankan government is making plans for the deep natural port at Trincomalee to become a major marine repair and refuelling centre between Dubai and Singapore. Other proposed projects include offshore wind farms and oil rig facilities. The country also needs to compete with the likes of Malaysia, which is investing heavily in AI-driven port operations. To stay competitive, Sri Lanka must modernise infrastructure and streamline processes. And despite the progress, challenges persist. Poverty in Sri Lanka has doubled since 2021, while youth unemployment remains high. Sri Lanka faces rising maritime threats like piracy and illegal fishing, requiring stronger maritime surveillance. Simultaneously, port expansion risks damaging marine ecosystems. Green technologies and stricter environmental regulations are essential for long-term security and sustainability. Sri Lanka's strategic location and maritime heritage offer a foundation for economic renewal. With wise governance, sustainability, and balanced geopolitics, its ports could once again become vital gateways to regional prosperity and global trade.
The Hindu
24 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Of Trump's mediation claims, and jets lost in Operation Sindoor
After a week of logjam, Parliament saw some business with Lok Sabha kicking off a discussion on Operation Sindoor-Pahalgam terrorist attack. Opening the discussion, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh held that India's retaliatory measures to the Pahalgam terror attack and the (later) violation of ceasefire were 'swift, proportionate and calculated' to not cause any provocation. He emphasised that, unlike Pakistan, India specifically targeted terrorist camps, and not civil establishments. He also rejected assertions about Operation Sindoor being paused following international mediation, i.e. by U.S. President Donald Trump. Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi questioned the government on Pahalgam attack asking - how did terrorists reach the meadow, why government was not releasing details on it, what's the update on nabbing the terrorists, and jets lost during Operation Sindoor. Union MEA S. Jaishankar too asserted that Mr Trump was not involved in the Indo-Pak ceasefire, adding that, on May 9, 2025, U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance called Prime Minister Narendra Modi, warning of a 'massive Pakistani attack' in the next few hours. PM Modi had responded that if such an attack happened, it would be met with an appropriate response. The House discussed the issue till 1 am during which AIMIM MP questioned why Jammu Kashmir L-G was not removed for law and order failure and why India-Pakistan cricket matches were being held in spite of the Pahalgam attack, CPI ML MP Raja Ram Singh questioned Mr. Modi's continued silence on Mr. Trump's attacks. Throughout the discussion, Centre kept mum on the jets lost during Operation Sindoor and the terrorists' entry way into the meadow. In Rajya Sabha, no business was held due to protests over Bihar Special Intensive revision. The discussion on Operation Sindoor will continue in Lok Sabha today with Prime Minister Narendra Modi expected to make concluding remarks. You can follow today's live updates here. Until next time
