‘Inappropriate for work?': Worker's outfit question completely divides
A woman has kicked off a major debate after asking if her outfit was 'inappropriate' for work.
The US employee, who goes by the name faithxfe online, claimed in a now-viral TikTok that someone at her work had complained after she turned up to her job in shorts.
The woman, who later said she works for a non-profit organisation, showed the outfit in question, which consisted of a black, long-sleeve button up shirt, denim shorts and heels.
In the caption, she said she was told by her work that her pants were 'considered short shorts'.
Since being shared a few days ago, the video has exploded, being viewed more than 9.6 million times and attracting more than 17,300 comments.
In the comment section, people were divided, with some agreeing the shorts were inappropriate, some defending her outfit choice and others taking a more nuanced approach.
There were many users who were adamant that there was no situation in which shorts would be appropriate to wear in an office setting.
'As an HR Manager.. if you're in corporate America I cannot think of an instance where shorts are appropriate,' one person said.
'That's not a work outfit at all. Sorry,' another wrote, with another claiming that young people 'really don't understand business casual'.
There were also those who noted that there were situations in which shorts are appropriate to wear in an office, but it was the style of short that made it inappropriate.
'Work shorts can be appropriate depending on the material and the length. This is a no on both accounts,' one said.
Another claimed if she had chosen shorts that were more tailored with 'slick, clean lines' then it wouldn't be an issue.
Others said whether the outfit was appropriate depended on the job, with people stating denim shorts would be OK at settings such as a gym, daycare or in a bar.
However, there were still many people who came to the TikToker's defence, arguing people should be allowed to wear shorts into the office in 2025.
'I'm sorry, but am I the only one that think these are appropriate?? Like guys let's be real, we are in the year 2025 where shorts should not be an issue,' one said.
'These comments are crazy, how exactly do shorts prevent anyone from doing their job in an office?' another asked.
One added: 'I don't see why business dress can't include shorts, especially if there's no interaction with customers/clients. Why do we have to dress like damn president to sit at a desk for eight hours.'
After reading the comments, the employee conceded that she wouldn't be rocking shorts into work again anytime soon.
'I fear I let other peoples outfit decisions influence this horrible decision. I'll be sticking to jeans and pants from now on. Maybe a maxi dress or skirt.. never again shorts,' she said.
In a follow-up video, she showed herself heading off to work in jeans and a white cardigan.
However, there were even people who thought this outfit still wasn't appropriate, prompting the worker to explain that all her colleagues dressed casually.
She claimed wearing jeans in her workplace was the norm, stating she had even seen people turn up in yoga pants and leggings.
The worker said that some commenters were just being 'dramatic' but she had decided to take the situation on board as a 'learning experience'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
28 minutes ago
- News.com.au
WSJ Finance Editor Explains the Musk-Trump Financial Fallout
Elon Musk suffered one of his worst financial days after the public fallout with President Trump. WSJ's Quentin Webb explains what's at stake for the Tesla CEO and investors after the breakup.

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Trump has no plans to call Musk, White House says after feud
The White House squashed speculation that Donald Trump and Elon Musk would patch up their stunning public feud, saying the US president had no plans to call his billionaire former aide Friday. Trump lobbed fresh insults at the South African-born Musk a day after the fiery implosion of their unlikely political marriage, saying the tech tycoon had "lost his mind." In a telling symbol of how their relationship had deteriorated, the president was even considering selling or giving away a Tesla he had bought to show support for Musk amid protests against the company. The row exploded on Thursday when Trump said he was "very disappointed" by Musk and threatened to end his government contracts, after his ex-aide criticized the president's flagship budget bill as an "abomination." Reports had emerged that Musk and Trump would speak by phone on Friday in a bid to patch up the damaging public row, but the White House scotched such speculation. "The president does not intend to speak to Musk today," a senior White House official told AFP on condition of anonymity when asked if the feuding pair planned to speak. Trump told broadcaster ABC in a phone call earlier Friday that he was "not particularly interested" in talking to Musk. "You mean the man who has lost his mind?" ABC quoted Trump as saying. Trump, who once called Musk a "genius", branded him "crazy" on social media on Thursday. - Fallout - The row could have major political and economic fallout, as shares in Musk's Tesla car company seesaw and the SpaceX boss vowed that he would end a critical US spaceship program. The White House called a special meeting on Thursday to discuss how to handle the crisis with Musk, a government source told AFP on condition of anonymity. Trump meanwhile may ditch the red Tesla that he bought from Musk's firm at the height of their relationship. The electric vehicle was still parked on the White House grounds on Friday. "He's thinking about it, yes," the senior White House official told AFP when asked if Trump would sell or give away the Tesla. Trump and Musk had posed inside the car at a bizarre event in March, when the US president turned the White House into a pop-up Tesla showroom after protests against Musk's government role tanked the firm shares. Speculation had long swirled that a relationship between two big egos like the president and the tycoon could not last long -- but the speed of the meltdown took Washington by surprise. Trump said in a televised Oval Office diatribe on Thursday that he was "very disappointed" after his former top donor criticized his "big, beautiful" spending bill before Congress. The pair then hurled insults at each other on social media -- with Musk even posting, without proof, that Trump was referenced in government documents on disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
30-year-old Lucy Guo usurps Taylor Swift as youngest self-made female billionaire
Taylor Swift has been dethroned as the world's youngest self-made female billionaire, according to Forbes — by a 30-year-old, hard-partying college dropout who has reaped a windfall from the artificial intelligence boom. Lucy Guo — a self-professed workaholic who rides an electric skateboard to work when she's not being chauffeured by an assistant — has a net worth of $1.3 billion, according to Forbes' list of America's Richest Self-Made Women released Wednesday. Guo took Swift's title of world's youngest self-made woman billionaire in April, when it was reported that Scale AI — the firm she co-founded with Alexandr Wang in 2016 when she was just 21 and he was 19 — had been valued at $25 billion in a deal set to close by June 1. The tender offer has not been finalised yet, but it is expected to close at that valuation in a few weeks, a source familiar with the matter told The Post. The daughter of Chinese immigrants, Guo was raised in the San Francisco Bay Area, where she quickly picked up coding in middle school. She dropped out of Carnegie Mellon University as she clinched a $100,000 entrepreneurial scholarship bankrolled by billionaire investor Peter Thiel. She took a job in 2015 at Quora, where she met Wang, and later worked at Snapchat for a brief period as the company's first female designer. At Scale AI, Guo ran the operations and production design teams — until Wang, who took the chief executive position, reportedly fired her after the two sparred over how the company should be run. 'We had a difference of opinion but I am proud of what Scale AI has accomplished,' Guo told the tech news site the Information last year. Still, Guo kept most of her 5 per cent stake in Scale AI, which is worth approximately $1.2 billion, according to Forbes. The firm labels data used by tech giants like OpenAI and Alphabet to train their chatbots. With 'a swanky apartment in Miami' and a house in Los Angeles, Guo has admitted she never buys groceries or cooks, instead ordering all her meals from Uber Eats. She says she works at least eight hours a day when on vacation and has boasted about taking two Barry's bootcamp fitness classes a day. She frequently attends techno raves. 'A lot of people don't like me because, honestly, I seem like an a – hole online. I would not like me on the internet,' she told The Post in 2022. 'But I've made a lot of friends because I think people appreciate my savage personality.' The Post previously reported on her massive collection of Pokemon paraphernalia — including slippers, stuffed animals, artwork and a Swarovski crystal necklace. She now runs Passes, a content creation platform that has been dubbed the family-friendly version of OnlyFans, and Patreon, claiming to 'make millionaires' by allowing creators to hold onto 90 per cent of their earnings. Passes reaped $40 million last year in a Series A funding round, according to Fortune — allowing Guo to fund her lavish party-girl lifestyle. But now Passes and Guo are facing allegations, in a class-action suit filed in February, that the platform allowed child pornography. The bombshell suit accuses Alec Celestin, the plaintiff's agent, and Lani Ginoza, the site's director of talent, of knowingly allowing sexually explicit content featuring OnlyFans model Alice Rosenblum — who was underage at the time — to circulate on Passes. Ginoza was not employed by Passes at the time of the alleged events, according to Passes and the site's legal representation. 'Guo personally intervened to override Passes' strict internal safety controls tailored for creators of social media content aged between 15 and 17 years old to strip and deprive Plaintiff of any protections offered by Passes against the exploitation of a minor,' the complaint alleged. Just before the suit was filed, Passes banned all underage creators and wiped the site of their content, according to Forbes. Lawyers for Guo filed a motion in April to dismiss the suit, which they slammed as a defamatory attempt to 'pursue the 'deep pockets' of Passes, a successful start-up, and its wealthy founder.' 'This lawsuit is part of an orchestrated attempt to defame Passes and Ms. Guo, and these claims have no basis in reality,' Rollo Baker of Elsberg Baker & Maruri told The Post. 'Ms. Guo and Passes categorically reject the baseless allegations made against them in the lawsuit, which was only filed against them after they rejected a $15 million payment demand.' In between founding Scale AI and Passes, Guo started a small investment firm known as Backend Capital. Guo landed at No. 26 on Forbes' list of America's Richest Self-Made Women, while Swift came in at spot 21. Swift still holds the title of world's richest female musician with a net worth of $1.6 billion, after her blowout-success international Eras Tour pushed her into billionaire status in October 2023. Diane Hendricks took the top spot, with a $22.3 billion net worth thanks to her company ABC Supply, one of the largest distributors of roofing, siding and windows in the country.