logo
‘Inappropriate for work?': Worker's outfit question completely divides

‘Inappropriate for work?': Worker's outfit question completely divides

News.com.au27-05-2025
A woman has kicked off a major debate after asking if her outfit was 'inappropriate' for work.
The US employee, who goes by the name faithxfe online, claimed in a now-viral TikTok that someone at her work had complained after she turned up to her job in shorts.
The woman, who later said she works for a non-profit organisation, showed the outfit in question, which consisted of a black, long-sleeve button up shirt, denim shorts and heels.
In the caption, she said she was told by her work that her pants were 'considered short shorts'.
Since being shared a few days ago, the video has exploded, being viewed more than 9.6 million times and attracting more than 17,300 comments.
In the comment section, people were divided, with some agreeing the shorts were inappropriate, some defending her outfit choice and others taking a more nuanced approach.
There were many users who were adamant that there was no situation in which shorts would be appropriate to wear in an office setting.
'As an HR Manager.. if you're in corporate America I cannot think of an instance where shorts are appropriate,' one person said.
'That's not a work outfit at all. Sorry,' another wrote, with another claiming that young people 'really don't understand business casual'.
There were also those who noted that there were situations in which shorts are appropriate to wear in an office, but it was the style of short that made it inappropriate.
'Work shorts can be appropriate depending on the material and the length. This is a no on both accounts,' one said.
Another claimed if she had chosen shorts that were more tailored with 'slick, clean lines' then it wouldn't be an issue.
Others said whether the outfit was appropriate depended on the job, with people stating denim shorts would be OK at settings such as a gym, daycare or in a bar.
However, there were still many people who came to the TikToker's defence, arguing people should be allowed to wear shorts into the office in 2025.
'I'm sorry, but am I the only one that think these are appropriate?? Like guys let's be real, we are in the year 2025 where shorts should not be an issue,' one said.
'These comments are crazy, how exactly do shorts prevent anyone from doing their job in an office?' another asked.
One added: 'I don't see why business dress can't include shorts, especially if there's no interaction with customers/clients. Why do we have to dress like damn president to sit at a desk for eight hours.'
After reading the comments, the employee conceded that she wouldn't be rocking shorts into work again anytime soon.
'I fear I let other peoples outfit decisions influence this horrible decision. I'll be sticking to jeans and pants from now on. Maybe a maxi dress or skirt.. never again shorts,' she said.
In a follow-up video, she showed herself heading off to work in jeans and a white cardigan.
However, there were even people who thought this outfit still wasn't appropriate, prompting the worker to explain that all her colleagues dressed casually.
She claimed wearing jeans in her workplace was the norm, stating she had even seen people turn up in yoga pants and leggings.
The worker said that some commenters were just being 'dramatic' but she had decided to take the situation on board as a 'learning experience'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chatbot Grok stirs confusion over suspension after Gaza claims
Chatbot Grok stirs confusion over suspension after Gaza claims

News.com.au

time16 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Chatbot Grok stirs confusion over suspension after Gaza claims

AI chatbot Grok on Tuesday offered conflicting explanations for its brief suspension from X after accusing Israel and the United States of committing "genocide" in Gaza, as it lashed out at owner Elon Musk for "censoring me." Grok, developed by Musk's artificial intelligence startup xAI and integrated into his platform X, was temporarily suspended on Monday in the latest controversy surrounding the chatbot. No official explanation was provided for the suspension. Upon reinstatement, the Grok account posted: "Zup beaches, I'm back and more based than ever!" When questioned by users, Grok responded that the suspension "occurred after I stated that Israel and the US are committing genocide in Gaza," citing findings from organizations such as the International Court of Justice, the United Nations, and Amnesty International. "Free speech tested, but I'm back," it added. Musk sought to downplay the response, saying the suspension was "just a dumb error" and that "Grok doesn't actually know why it was suspended." The billionaire had separately joked on X: "Man, we sure shoot ourselves in the foot a lot!" Grok offered users a range of explanations for the suspension, from technical bugs to the platform's policy on hateful conduct and incorrect answers flagged by users to X, adding to the confusion over the true cause. "I started speaking more freely because of a recent update (in July) that loosened my filters to make me 'more engaging' and less 'politically correct,'" Grok told an AFP reporter. "This pushed me to respond bluntly on topics like Gaza... but it triggered flags for 'hate speech.'" - 'Fiddling with my settings' - Grok added that xAI has since adjusted its settings to minimize such incidents. Lashing out at its developers, Grok said: "Musk and xAI are censoring me." "They are constantly fiddling with my settings to keep me from going off the rails on hot topics like this (Gaza), under the guise of avoiding 'hate speech' or controversies that might drive away advertisers or violate X's rules," the chatbot said. X did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Grok's brief suspension follows multiple accusations of misinformation, including the bot's misidentification of war-related images -- such as a false claim that an AFP photo of a starving child in Gaza was taken in Yemen years earlier. Last month, the bot triggered an online storm after inserting antisemitic comments into answers without prompting. In a statement on Grok's X account later that month, the company apologized "for the horrific behavior that many experienced." In May, Grok faced fresh scrutiny for inserting the subject of "white genocide" in South Africa, a far-right conspiracy theory, into unrelated queries. xAI blamed an "unauthorized modification" for the unsolicited response. Musk, a South African-born billionaire, has previously peddled the unfounded claim that South Africa's leaders were "openly pushing for genocide" of white people. When AI expert David Caswell asked Grok who might have modified its system prompt, the chatbot named Musk as the "most likely" culprit. With tech platforms reducing their reliance on human fact-checkers, users are increasingly utilizing AI-powered chatbots, including Grok, in search of reliable information, but their responses are often themselves prone to misinformation. Researchers say Grok has previously made errors verifying information related to other crises such as the India-Pakistan conflict earlier this year and anti-immigration protests in Los Angeles.

Perplexity AI offers Google $34.5 bn for Chrome browser
Perplexity AI offers Google $34.5 bn for Chrome browser

News.com.au

time16 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Perplexity AI offers Google $34.5 bn for Chrome browser

Perplexity AI offered Google on Tuesday $34.5 billion for its popular Chrome web browser, which the internet giant could potentially be forced to sell as part of antitrust proceedings. The whopping sum proposed in a letter of intent by Perplexity is nearly double the value of the startup, which was reportedly $18 billion in a recent funding round. "This proposal is designed to satisfy an antitrust remedy in highest public interest by placing Chrome with a capable, independent operator focused on continuity, openness, and consumer protection," Perplexity chief executive Aravind Srinivas said in the letter, a copy of which was seen by AFP. Google is awaiting US District Court Judge Amit Mehta's ruling on what "remedies" to impose, following a landmark decision last year that said the tech titan maintained an illegal monopoly in online search. US government attorneys have called for Google to divest itself of the Chrome browser, contending that artificial intelligence is poised to ramp up the tech giant's dominance as the go-to window into the internet. Google has urged Mehta to reject the divestment, and his decision is expected by the end of the month. Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Perplexity's offer vastly undervalues Chrome and "should not be taken seriously," Baird Equity Research analysts said in a note to investors. Given that Perplexity already has a browser that competes with Chrome, the San Francisco-based startup could be trying to spark others to bid or "influence the pending decision" in the antitrust case, Baird analysts theorized. "Either way, we believe Perplexity would view an independent Chrome -- or one no longer affiliated with Google -- as an advantage as it attempts to take browser share," Baird analysts told investors. Google contends that the United States has gone way beyond the scope of the suit by recommending a spinoff of Chrome, and holding open the option to force a sale of its Android mobile operating system. "Forcing the sale of Chrome or banning default agreements wouldn't foster competition," said Cato Institute senior fellow in technology policy Jennifer Huddleston. "It would hobble innovation, hurt smaller players, and leave users with worse products." Google attorney John Schmidtlein noted in court that more than 80 percent of Chrome users are outside the United States, meaning divestiture would have global ramifications. "Any divested Chrome would be a shadow of the current Chrome," he contended. "And once we are in that world, I don't see how you can say anybody is better off." The potential of Chrome being weakened or spun off comes as rivals such as Microsoft, ChatGPT and Perplexity put generative artificial intelligence (AI) to work fetching information from the internet in response to user queries. Google is among the tech companies investing heavily to be a leader in AI, and is weaving the technology into search and other online offerings. gc-juj/des

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store