Perplexity AI offers Google $34.5 bn for Chrome browser
The whopping sum proposed in a letter of intent by Perplexity is nearly double the value of the startup, which was reportedly $18 billion in a recent funding round.
"This proposal is designed to satisfy an antitrust remedy in highest public interest by placing Chrome with a capable, independent operator focused on continuity, openness, and consumer protection," Perplexity chief executive Aravind Srinivas said in the letter, a copy of which was seen by AFP.
Google is awaiting US District Court Judge Amit Mehta's ruling on what "remedies" to impose, following a landmark decision last year that said the tech titan maintained an illegal monopoly in online search.
US government attorneys have called for Google to divest itself of the Chrome browser, contending that artificial intelligence is poised to ramp up the tech giant's dominance as the go-to window into the internet.
Google has urged Mehta to reject the divestment, and his decision is expected by the end of the month.
Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Perplexity's offer vastly undervalues Chrome and "should not be taken seriously," Baird Equity Research analysts said in a note to investors.
Given that Perplexity already has a browser that competes with Chrome, the San Francisco-based startup could be trying to spark others to bid or "influence the pending decision" in the antitrust case, Baird analysts theorized.
"Either way, we believe Perplexity would view an independent Chrome -- or one no longer affiliated with Google -- as an advantage as it attempts to take browser share," Baird analysts told investors.
Google contends that the United States has gone way beyond the scope of the suit by recommending a spinoff of Chrome, and holding open the option to force a sale of its Android mobile operating system.
"Forcing the sale of Chrome or banning default agreements wouldn't foster competition," said Cato Institute senior fellow in technology policy Jennifer Huddleston.
"It would hobble innovation, hurt smaller players, and leave users with worse products."
Google attorney John Schmidtlein noted in court that more than 80 percent of Chrome users are outside the United States, meaning divestiture would have global ramifications.
"Any divested Chrome would be a shadow of the current Chrome," he contended.
"And once we are in that world, I don't see how you can say anybody is better off."
The potential of Chrome being weakened or spun off comes as rivals such as Microsoft, ChatGPT and Perplexity put generative artificial intelligence (AI) to work fetching information from the internet in response to user queries.
Google is among the tech companies investing heavily to be a leader in AI, and is weaving the technology into search and other online offerings.
gc-juj/des
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Telegraph
13 hours ago
- Daily Telegraph
Tesla backflips on $30k battery repair after Musk steps in
Don't miss out on the headlines from Motoring News. Followed categories will be added to My News. Elon Musk has personally intervened after his company initially failed to assist a loyal Tesla customer in dealing with a costly recall fault. The drama began when X user Jessica Tetreau posted a tweet asking for a contact at Tesla management after her Tesla's battery seal failed. Jessica claimed that Tesla's warranty and insurance would not cover the issue, and Tesla Service indicated it was not their responsibility, despite her vehicle being under warranty at the time. MORE: Musk threat to leave Tesla, gets $42 billion Jessica claimed that Tesla's warranty and insurance would not cover the issue/AFP 'Does anyone here have a contact with Tesla management?' she wrote. 'My car has a recall on the battery seal and mine failed. Tesla Insurance won't cover it, and Tesla Service says it's not their problem either. 'They want $30k by the end of the week. I'm literally heartbroken and in tears. My car was $150k and this is an enormous stress for me.' Three days later, Elon Musk responded to her post from his personal X account, promising to 'investigate.' MORE: China unveils plan to smash Tesla in Aus Elon Musk responded to Jessica's tweet. Picture: Jessica's Tesla is reportedly worth US$150,000 ($231,000), and from the images shared online, it appears to be a Tesla Model S, a high-end electric sedan. The Model S, along with the Model X, is currently subject to a recall notice in the US for battery seal issues that could allow water to enter the high-voltage battery pack, potentially causing electrical failure. Jessica had a battery fault issue in her Tesla Model S. Picture: X/@JessicaTetreau Tesla wanted to charge Jessica $24,000 to repair her Tesla Model S. Picture: X/@JessicaTetreau MORE: Musk signs $25bn AI deal with tech giant According to Jessica, Tesla initially wanted to charge her US$24,200.98 to repair the battery fault, and before Musk's intervention, social media users criticised Tesla's customer service. 'That's criminal … I'm so sorry, Jessica. Tesla has fallen victim to the same greed they once criticised legacy automakers for,' one wrote. 'As a TSLA shareholder, service problems are a big reason I'm holding and not buying more,' another added. 'They're only going to get worse — they're not even a luxury car,' a third person claimed. After Musk's post, Tesla employees swarmed Jessica's thread, promising to have the car ready by the end of the week. Three days after Musk's promised investigation, Jessica confirmed that the Tesla was returned to working order. The swift resolution after Musk's public reply has ignited fresh debate about Tesla's customer service and whether a high-profile intervention from the billionaire CEO should be the only means for customers to receive adequate assistance. It has become increasingly common for frustrated Tesla owners to post complaints on X in hopes that Musk will see them. Many believe it's the only way to solve major problems related to their Teslas. Jessica with her repaired Tesla Model S. Picture: X/@JessicaTetreau One user on X said, 'It turns out you have a contact through X. Directly to the motha f***ing god of Tesla.' 'Would be nice if there was a way for people who get stuck in these binds to be able to escalate for resolution without requiring X,' another said. This isn't the first time Tesla owners have expressed dissatisfaction with the company's customer service, and it's certainly not the first time Elon Musk has personally intervened to address Tesla matters. Earlier in May, Elon Musk was forced to intervene again after a Tesla customer posted on X criticising Tesla's customer service as a 'failure.' That matter was resolved in just a few hours after Musk's involvement. Originally published as Elon Musk response sparks fury among Tesla community
News.com.au
14 hours ago
- News.com.au
Elon Musk response sparks fury among Tesla community
Elon Musk has personally intervened after his company initially failed to assist a loyal Tesla customer in dealing with a costly recall fault. The drama began when X user Jessica Tetreau posted a tweet asking for a contact at Tesla management after her Tesla's battery seal failed. Jessica claimed that Tesla's warranty and insurance would not cover the issue, and Tesla Service indicated it was not their responsibility, despite her vehicle being under warranty at the time. 'Does anyone here have a contact with Tesla management?' she wrote. 'My car has a recall on the battery seal and mine failed. Tesla Insurance won't cover it, and Tesla Service says it's not their problem either. 'They want $30k by the end of the week. I'm literally heartbroken and in tears. My car was $150k and this is an enormous stress for me.' Three days later, Elon Musk responded to her post from his personal X account, promising to 'investigate.' Does anyone here have a contact with Telsa management? My car has a recall on the battery seal and mine failed. Tesla Insurance won’t cover it and Tesla Service says it’s not their problem either. They want 30k by the end of the week despite all of the warranty and insurance on… — Jessica (@JessicaTetreau) August 4, 2025 Jessica's Tesla is reportedly worth US$150,000 ($231,000), and from the images shared online, it appears to be a Tesla Model S, a high-end electric sedan. The Model S, along with the Model X, is currently subject to a recall notice in the US for battery seal issues that could allow water to enter the high-voltage battery pack, potentially causing electrical failure. According to Jessica, Tesla initially wanted to charge her US$24,200.98 to repair the battery fault, and before Musk's intervention, social media users criticised Tesla's customer service. 'That's criminal … I'm so sorry, Jessica. Tesla has fallen victim to the same greed they once criticised legacy automakers for,' one wrote. 'As a TSLA shareholder, service problems are a big reason I'm holding and not buying more,' another added. 'They're only going to get worse — they're not even a luxury car,' a third person claimed. After Musk's post, Tesla employees swarmed Jessica's thread, promising to have the car ready by the end of the week. Three days after Musk's promised investigation, Jessica confirmed that the Tesla was returned to working order. My Tesla is back home. Thank you for stepping in and saving my car, Elon. â�¤ï¸� âš¡ï¸� — Jessica (@JessicaTetreau) August 11, 2025 The swift resolution after Musk's public reply has ignited fresh debate about Tesla's customer service and whether a high-profile intervention from the billionaire CEO should be the only means for customers to receive adequate assistance. It has become increasingly common for frustrated Tesla owners to post complaints on X in hopes that Musk will see them. Many believe it's the only way to solve major problems related to their Teslas. One user on X said, 'It turns out you have a contact through X. Directly to the motha f***ing god of Tesla.' 'Would be nice if there was a way for people who get stuck in these binds to be able to escalate for resolution without requiring X,' another said. This isn't the first time Tesla owners have expressed dissatisfaction with the company's customer service, and it's certainly not the first time Elon Musk has personally intervened to address Tesla matters. Earlier in May, Elon Musk was forced to intervene again after a Tesla customer posted on X criticising Tesla's customer service as a 'failure.'
News.com.au
16 hours ago
- News.com.au
YouTube turns to AI to spot children posing as adults
YouTube has started using artificial intelligence (AI) to figure out when users are children pretending to be adults on the popular video-sharing platform amid pressure to protect minors from sensitive content. The new safeguard is being rolled out in the United States as Google-owned YouTube and social media platforms such as Instagram and TikTok are under scrutiny to shield children from content geared for grown-ups. A version of AI referred to as machine learning will be used to estimate the age of users based on a variety of factors, including the kinds of videos watched and account longevity, according to YouTube Youth director of product management James Beser. "This technology will allow us to infer a user's age and then use that signal, regardless of the birthday in the account, to deliver our age-appropriate product experiences and protections," Beser said. "We've used this approach in other markets for some time, where it is working well." The age-estimation model enhances technology already in place to deduce user age, according to YouTube. Users will be notified if YouTube believes them to be minors, giving them the option to verify their age with a credit card, selfie, or government ID, according to the tech firm. Social media platforms are regularly accused of failing to protect the well-being of children. Australia will soon use its landmark social media laws to ban children under 16 from YouTube, a top minister said late last month, stressing a need to shield them from "predatory algorithms." Communications Minister Anika Wells said four-in-ten Australian children had reported viewing harmful content on YouTube, one of the most visited websites in the world. Australia announced last year it was drafting laws that will ban children from social media sites such as Facebook, TikTok and Instagram until they turn 16. "Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens," the company said in a statement at the time. "It's not social media." On paper, the ban is one of the strictest in the world. It is due to come into effect on December 10. The legislation has been closely monitored by other countries, with many weighing whether to implement similar bans. gc-juj/jgc
