
Pay now, or pay forever
EDITORIAL: The UN's latest report on disaster risk couldn't be clearer: the world is haemorrhaging money, lives, and futures to disasters, and doing next to nothing to stop it. The price tag has now ballooned to US$2.3 trillion a year — when cascading and ecosystem effects are counted — and yet just two percent of development aid is spent on reducing disaster risk. That's not a blind spot. That's willful neglect.
Pakistan, like many climate-vulnerable nations, is caught in the crosshairs. The 2022 floods alone inflicted US$30 billion in damages, killed over 1,700 people, and triggered a sovereign credit downgrade that continues to shape investor sentiment. And that was just one event, in one year. With floods rising by 134 percent since 2000 and over one-third of the world's children now exposed to water scarcity, this is no longer about disaster management — it's about survival strategy.
The report lays out the scope with terrifying precision. Earthquakes, storms, heat waves, droughts, and floods caused US$180 to US$200 billion in annual losses from 2001 to 2020. In 2023 alone, these 'big five' disasters triggered over US$195 billion in direct losses — just shy of 0.015 percent of global GDP. But for low- and middle-income countries like Pakistan, that slice represents a far bigger bite out of development and fiscal capacity.
The global funding gap remains the single biggest obstacle. Time and again, donors show up for photo-ops, make pledges at high-profile summits, then quietly walk away when it comes time to pay up. Even where commitments are honoured, disbursements are slow, conditional, and riddled with red tape. Meanwhile, exposure to climate disasters grows more lethal with each delay.
This is particularly damaging for countries that depend on capital markets to bridge fiscal deficits. Climate-induced disasters aren't just humanitarian tragedies — they're balance-sheet shocks. Credit ratings nosedive. Risk premiums surge. Market access dries up. As the report warns, climate shocks are increasingly being priced into sovereign debt. The implications for already-indebted nations are brutal: no money for prevention, no resilience when disaster hits, and no fiscal space to rebuild.
For Pakistan, whose schools shut down due to extreme weather and whose agriculture sector remains deeply exposed to drought and flood cycles, the window to act is closing fast. Already, the country has faced over eight major agricultural drought events since the 1980s — part of a larger regional pattern stretching from Central Asia to northwest India. The link to El Niño and La Niña cycles is well established, but policy alignment remains patchy and underfunded.
There's a myth that resilience is expensive. The truth is that inaction is ruinous. Risk reduction spending remains stuck at two percent of aid because disaster prevention doesn't cut the same political ribbon as emergency relief. But underestimating disaster risk — as the report states — means under-valuing the immense economic and human cost of doing nothing.
It's time for a reality check. Countries like Pakistan cannot keep absorbing billion-dollar losses without structural financing to reduce exposure. It's not just about building back better — it's about building forward safer, with real capital, not empty promises. That requires both international pressure and domestic resolve: pressure on donors to pay what they pledge, and domestic discipline to channel funds toward future-proofing the economy.
Without that, we're not bracing for disaster — we're budgeting for collapse.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
US vetoes UN call for immediate ceasefire, aid access in Gaza
US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield casts a veto vote, at UN headquarters in New York, US, February 20, 2024. PHOTO: REUTERS Listen to article The United States vetoed a UN Security Council demand on Wednesday for an "immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire" between Israel and Palestinian militants Hamas in Gaza and unhindered aid access across the enclave. "The United States has been clear we would not support any measure that fails to condemn Hamas and does not call for Hamas to disarm and leave Gaza," Acting US Ambassador to the UN Dorothy Shea told the council before the vote. "This resolution would undermine diplomatic efforts to reach a ceasefire that reflects the realities on the ground, and embolden Hamas," she said of the text that was put forward by 10 countries on the 15-member council. The remaining 14 council members voted in favor of the draft resolution. Israel has rejected calls for an unconditional or permanent ceasefire, saying Hamas cannot stay in Gaza. It has renewed its military offensive in Gaza - also seeking to free hostages held by Hamas - since ending a two-month ceasefire in March. Gaza health officials said Israeli strikes killed 45 Palestinians on Wednesday and Israel said a soldier died in fighting. A humanitarian crisis also grips the enclave of more than 2 million people: Famine looms and aid has only trickled in since Israel lifted an 11-week blockade on May 19. No aid was distributed by the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation on Wednesday as it pressed Israel to boost civilian safety beyond the perimeter of its so-called secure distribution sites after a deadly incident. The GHF said it has asked the Israeli military to "guide foot traffic in a way that minimizes confusion or escalation risks" near military positions; develop clearer guidance for civilians; and enhance training to support civilian safety. Hospital officials have said more than 80 people were shot dead and hundreds wounded near distribution points in a three-day period from Sunday, including at least 27 killed on Tuesday. Locals said Israeli soldiers opened fire on the crowd on Tuesday that massed before dawn to seek food. The military has denied this, but acknowledged that troops fired at "suspects" who ignored warning shots and were approaching their lines. "Our top priority remains ensuring the safety and dignity of civilians receiving aid," said a GHF spokesperson. 'DELAYS AND DENIALS' The new aid distribution process - currently from just three sites - was launched last week. The UN and other aid groups say the model, which uses private US security and logistics workers, militarises aid. Ahead of the UN Security Council vote, UN aid chief Tom Fletcher again appealed for the UN and aid groups to be allowed to assist people in Gaza, stressing that they have a plan, supplies and experience. "Open the crossings – all of them. Let in lifesaving aid at scale, from all directions. Lift the restrictions on what and how much aid we can bring in. Ensure our convoys aren't held up by delays and denials," Fletcher said in a statement. The UN has long-blamed Israel and lawlessness in the enclave for hindering the delivery of aid into Gaza and its distribution throughout the war zone. Israel accuses Hamas of stealing aid, which the group denies. The newly created GHF said on Tuesday that it distributed more than seven million meals since it started operations a week ago. GHF Interim Executive Director John Acree urged humanitarians in Gaza: "Work with us and we will get your aid delivered to those who are depending on it."


Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Khawaja Asif declares Simla agreement a 'dead document'
Listen to article Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has declared the 1972 Simla Agreement 'dead' in the current geopolitical context, stating that Pakistan has effectively returned to the 1948 position regarding Kashmir, and the Line of Control (LoC) should now be viewed as a ceasefire line. In an interview with a private television channel on Wednesday, the minister said that while the Simla Agreement had initially committed both India and Pakistan to resolving disputes bilaterally, that framework had collapsed due to unilateral Indian actions in recent years. 'The Simla Agreement is now a dead document. We are back to the 1948 position, when the United Nations declared the LoC a ceasefire line following the ceasefire and resolutions,' he said, referring to the UN-mediated cessation of hostilities in the first India-Pakistan war. 'Going forward, these disputes will be dealt with multilaterally or internationally.' He also cast doubt over the status of other bilateral arrangements, stating that "whether the Indus Waters Treaty is suspended or not, Simla is already over." Commenting on regional tensions, Asif said the threat of war with India remains present. 'Pakistan does not desire war, but if it is imposed on us, the response will be even stronger than before,' he warned. The minister touched upon post-conflict developments, stating that Pakistan had emerged as a strengthened defensive power after its past wars with India. "We have become a defensive force. Orders for our JF-17 Thunder fighter jets are coming in," he said, highlighting Pakistan's growing defence capabilities. Also Read: 'Ready but not desperate' for talks with India: Dar On the issue of Afghan refugees, Asif reiterated that Afghans should now return to their homeland. 'Afghans must settle in their own country. They have no loyalty to our soil,' he remarked, adding that the time had come to address this issue firmly. The defence minister also highlighted the issue of tax evasion in the country, stressing that billions of rupees are lost to tax theft annually. 'We must plug this leakage and divert these funds towards national defence,' he concluded.


Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Trump says Putin plans to retaliate after Ukraine drone strikes
WASHINGTON: Donald Trump says Vladimir Putin warned him 'very strongly' in a call Wednesday that he would respond to Ukraine's stunning attack on Russian airfields, adding that any immediate prospect of peace remained far off. Kyiv's daring mass drone strikes on Sunday destroyed several nuclear-capable bombers worth billions of dollars, and dominated the third call between the Russian and US presidents since Trump returned to power. Earlier, Putin had appeared to rule out a ceasefire or any direct talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Turkey has suggested it could host such negotiations and invited Trump, too. Trump says he has had good discussions on Russia and Ukraine 'It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace,' said Trump in a social media post. 'President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.' The US leader added that during his call with Putin, whose forces invaded Ukraine in 2022, launching a grinding war, they had 'discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes' as well as other attacks 'by both sides.' The Kremlin described the call, which also focused on negotiations over Iran's nuclear program, as 'positive' and 'productive.' Trump has repeatedly alarmed Kyiv and its allies in Europe and elsewhere by pivoting towards Putin over the war, and he had a blazing Oval Office row with Zelensky in February. The US president has, however, also shown growing frustration with Putin – last week calling him 'crazy' – as Russia has continued attacks and derailed Trump's campaign pledge to end the war within 24 hours. Putin's call with Trump appeared to be part of a diplomatic offensive by the Russian leader, who discussed the Ukraine war with Pope Leo XIV in a telephone conversation on Wednesday. The Kremlin said Putin told the US-born pope he wanted peace through diplomacy but added that 'the regime in Kyiv is betting on an escalation of the conflict and carrying out of acts of sabotage against civil infrastructure on Russian territory.' Putin earlier accused Ukraine of being behind 'terrorist' attacks on bridges in its border regions over the weekend, including one that caused a train to derail, killing seven people. He said any full ceasefire would just give Kyiv a chance to rearm. 'Why reward them by giving them a break from the combat, which will be used to pump the regime with Western arms, to continue their forced mobilization and to prepare different terrorist acts,' Putin said in a televised government meeting. Ukraine has been pushing for an unconditional and immediate 30-day truce, issuing its latest proposal to Moscow at peace talks in Istanbul on Monday. Zelensky said earlier Wednesday that Russia had handed Ukraine an 'ultimatum' and recycled old demands in Turkey, where the only concrete agreement was on a series of large-scale prisoner exchanges. Moscow's demands included Ukraine fully pulling out of four regions – Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia – that Russia claims to have annexed but does not have full control over. Zelensky said Ukraine was ready 'any day' for a meeting proposed by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan that would also include the US and Russian leaders. The White House says Trump is 'open' to such a meeting. More than three years into Russia's invasion, which has cost tens of thousands of lives, the two sides have opened direct talks searching for a way to end what has become Europe's largest conflict since World War II. Ukrainian troops have been suffering months of setbacks on the battlefield as Russian forces steadily advance across key sectors of the sprawling front line. Russia's army said it had captured another village in Ukraine's Sumy border region as it seeks to establish what it calls a 'buffer zone' inside Ukrainian territory. Kyiv has sought to gain assurances of continued support from Washington. On Wednesday, senior Zelensky aide Andriy Yermak met US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington.