[Editorial] Timely action needed
South Korea has seen this cycle before. Global demand lifts an industry, firms expand capacity, China builds even more and margins collapse. Then comes the painful stage: state-led restructuring, with mergers, closures and political fallout. Shipbuilders endured it in the late 2010s. Now, petrochemicals are at the center of the storm.
The warning signs have long been visible. China has nearly tripled its ethylene output over the past decade, colliding with soft global demand and pushing South Korean plants into crisis mode.
Naphtha crackers are running at barely two-thirds of capacity, well below the threshold for profitability. Yeochun NCC, once a dependable cash generator, narrowly avoided default this month with emergency shareholder loans. LG Chem and Lotte Chemical have been shuttering weaker facilities and selling assets, while others report steep quarterly losses.
A recent study by the Boston Consulting Group suggested that without drastic cuts, half of Korea's petrochemical firms may not survive the next three years. The 'golden time' for voluntary restructuring has already passed.
This is not a marginal industry. Petrochemicals make up roughly 7 percent of South Korea's exports and form a critical layer of supply chains in autos, electronics, construction and textiles. They also anchor the vast complexes of Yeosu, Ulsan and Daesan, where refineries, steel plants and power generators interconnect. If one pillar weakens, the others tremble.
Already, distress is spreading: Posco has slipped into losses, strained by US tariffs on steel imports, while solar and secondary battery divisions are reporting lower utilization. Taken together, petrochemicals are less an isolated casualty than a signal of strain across the country's heavy industry.
President Lee Jae Myung on Thursday ordered a comprehensive response, calling for sharp capacity adjustments, business integration and a pivot toward higher-value products.
The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy is drafting measures reminiscent of earlier shipbuilding rescues and of Japan's rationalization drive in the 2010s: loosening antitrust rules, granting tax incentives for mergers and closures, and excluding firms that refuse to participate.
Behind the scenes, officials are pressing conglomerates to engineer 'big deals' among rivals. Such state direction sits uneasily with Korea's free-market rhetoric, but the alternative is worse: disorderly bankruptcies and cascading damage to the industrial base.
The obstacles, however, are formidable. Unlike shipbuilding, where strategy could be focused on LNG carriers and other niches, petrochemicals sprawl across dozens of bulk products and ten large companies. Merging will be messy, fraught with politics, and slow to deliver returns.
Moreover, because South Korea is the world's largest importer of naphtha, any significant cut in its output could reverberate through global oil markets. Policymakers must trim excess while preserving strategic leverage, a balance that is easier to prescribe than to execute.
What is beyond dispute is that incremental fixes will not suffice. Competing in commodity-grade chemicals against Chinese and Middle Eastern giants is unwinnable. The industry must shift decisively toward fine chemicals, specialty products and eco-friendly materials where margins can be sustained.
The painful change means pruning noncore businesses, consolidating overlapping assets and absorbing the political costs of job losses. The government, for its part, must provide credible retraining and employment policies, lest overhaul become another synonym for unemployment.
This industrial drama unfolds in harsher conditions than in past crises. China's expansion remains relentless, US protectionism is rising and South Korea's demographics weigh heavily on its labor force. The costs of delay are visible already: 13 straight months of manufacturing job losses, eroding margins and an unmistakable sense of industrial fatigue.
Shipbuilders, after wrenching restructuring, eventually clawed back to profit and relevance. Whether petrochemicals can do the same hinges on how quickly South Korea confronts its excess capacity. Delay itself is a choice — and perhaps the most damaging one.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul shares open sharply lower on woes over AI bubble, Fed policy direction
South Korean stocks opened sharply lower Wednesday on concerns over a bubble in the artificial intelligence sector and heightened uncertainties ahead of the upcoming Jackson Hole meeting. The benchmark Korea Composite Stock Price Index lost 51.01 points, or 1.62 percent, to 3,100.55 in the first 15 minutes of trading. Overnight, the tech-heavy Nasdaq composite closed 1.46 percent lower and the S&P 500 shed 0.59 percent amid heightened caution ahead of the Jackson Hole economic policy symposium, slated for Friday (US time), where Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell will make a speech on his outlook for the economy. Investors' sentiment was also dampened after OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warned that the AI market may be in a bubble like the dot-com bubble during the late 1990s, which led to a stock market crash in the early 2000s. In Seoul, top-cap shares started weak. Tech giant Samsung Electronics edged down 0.14 percent, and its rival SK hynix slid 3.61 percent. Leading battery maker LG Energy Solution lost 1.56 percent and major bio firm Samsung Biologics went down 0.78 percent. Leading nuclear power plant builder Doosan Enerbility shot down 8.4 percent and shipbuilding giant Hanwha Ocean pulled back 2.64 percent. IT was also sluggish, with internet portal operator Naver retreating 2 percent and Kakao, the operator of the country's top mobile messenger, dipping 3.37 percent. The local currency was trading at 1,396.0 won against the greenback at 9:15 a.m., down 5.1 won from the previous session. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
5 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] Timely action needed
Petrochemicals confront a brutal cycle; delay in restructuring could prove costlier South Korea has seen this cycle before. Global demand lifts an industry, firms expand capacity, China builds even more and margins collapse. Then comes the painful stage: state-led restructuring, with mergers, closures and political fallout. Shipbuilders endured it in the late 2010s. Now, petrochemicals are at the center of the storm. The warning signs have long been visible. China has nearly tripled its ethylene output over the past decade, colliding with soft global demand and pushing South Korean plants into crisis mode. Naphtha crackers are running at barely two-thirds of capacity, well below the threshold for profitability. Yeochun NCC, once a dependable cash generator, narrowly avoided default this month with emergency shareholder loans. LG Chem and Lotte Chemical have been shuttering weaker facilities and selling assets, while others report steep quarterly losses. A recent study by the Boston Consulting Group suggested that without drastic cuts, half of Korea's petrochemical firms may not survive the next three years. The 'golden time' for voluntary restructuring has already passed. This is not a marginal industry. Petrochemicals make up roughly 7 percent of South Korea's exports and form a critical layer of supply chains in autos, electronics, construction and textiles. They also anchor the vast complexes of Yeosu, Ulsan and Daesan, where refineries, steel plants and power generators interconnect. If one pillar weakens, the others tremble. Already, distress is spreading: Posco has slipped into losses, strained by US tariffs on steel imports, while solar and secondary battery divisions are reporting lower utilization. Taken together, petrochemicals are less an isolated casualty than a signal of strain across the country's heavy industry. President Lee Jae Myung on Thursday ordered a comprehensive response, calling for sharp capacity adjustments, business integration and a pivot toward higher-value products. The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy is drafting measures reminiscent of earlier shipbuilding rescues and of Japan's rationalization drive in the 2010s: loosening antitrust rules, granting tax incentives for mergers and closures, and excluding firms that refuse to participate. Behind the scenes, officials are pressing conglomerates to engineer 'big deals' among rivals. Such state direction sits uneasily with Korea's free-market rhetoric, but the alternative is worse: disorderly bankruptcies and cascading damage to the industrial base. The obstacles, however, are formidable. Unlike shipbuilding, where strategy could be focused on LNG carriers and other niches, petrochemicals sprawl across dozens of bulk products and ten large companies. Merging will be messy, fraught with politics, and slow to deliver returns. Moreover, because South Korea is the world's largest importer of naphtha, any significant cut in its output could reverberate through global oil markets. Policymakers must trim excess while preserving strategic leverage, a balance that is easier to prescribe than to execute. What is beyond dispute is that incremental fixes will not suffice. Competing in commodity-grade chemicals against Chinese and Middle Eastern giants is unwinnable. The industry must shift decisively toward fine chemicals, specialty products and eco-friendly materials where margins can be sustained. The painful change means pruning noncore businesses, consolidating overlapping assets and absorbing the political costs of job losses. The government, for its part, must provide credible retraining and employment policies, lest overhaul become another synonym for unemployment. This industrial drama unfolds in harsher conditions than in past crises. China's expansion remains relentless, US protectionism is rising and South Korea's demographics weigh heavily on its labor force. The costs of delay are visible already: 13 straight months of manufacturing job losses, eroding margins and an unmistakable sense of industrial fatigue. Shipbuilders, after wrenching restructuring, eventually clawed back to profit and relevance. Whether petrochemicals can do the same hinges on how quickly South Korea confronts its excess capacity. Delay itself is a choice — and perhaps the most damaging one.

Korea Herald
17 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Upstage teams up with AWS for global AI expansion
South Korean AI startup Upstage said it is teaming up with Amazon Web Services to expand into Asia-Pacific and US markets, while enhancing its Solar large language model to make high-performance, low-cost generative AI more accessible. Under the agreement, Upstage designated AWS as its preferred cloud provider and will use its infrastructure to build, train and deploy foundation models, the company said. It will leverage AWS' machine learning stack — including Amazon SageMaker as well as Trainium and Inferentia chips — to power Solar, and its AI-based document processing suite, Upstage added. As part of their expanded strategic partnership, Upstage also received a minority equity investment from Amazon, marking the first time the company has attracted direct funding from the US tech giant. The size of the investment was not disclosed. "We are pleased to support the next stage of Upstage's growth as it expands its Solar foundation model and document intelligence solutions," said Abhijeet Muzumdar, vice president of corporate development at Amazon. "By backing visionary companies like Upstage, we aim to foster continued innovation in generative AI." Upstage has long collaborated with AWS, training its Solar model on SageMaker and implementing the proprietary Depth-Up Scaling method on AWS infrastructure to improve performance. Its Solar lineup is currently offered via Amazon Bedrock Marketplace, SageMaker JumpStart and AWS Marketplace, the company explained. "Upstage and AWS have built a strong foundation through years of collaboration, and this agreement marks a new chapter in our shared vision to accelerate global AI innovation," said Upstage CEO Kim Sung-hoon. "Through this strategic partnership, we will expand our reach and deliver safe, intelligent and high-performance AI solutions to more public institutions." The company also said its "AI Initiative," launched in April, is also part of the collaboration with AWS. The program is designed to accelerate the adoption of generative AI by educational institutions and non-profit organizations, with more than 200 institutions, including Seoul National University and Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology.



