logo
When does the time change? Texas lawmakers hope to get rid of daylight saving time in 2025

When does the time change? Texas lawmakers hope to get rid of daylight saving time in 2025

Yahoo11-02-2025
The practice of daylight saving time has made its way back to debates among Texas lawmakers. After failing in the 2023 legislative session, Sen. Judith Zaffirini, D-Laredo, has proposed a bill that would allow the state to remain in standard time all year as allowed by the Uniform Time Act of 1966. This differs from previous attempts, which have generally suggested states remain in daylight saving time — an act barred by federal law.
"The twice-a-year clock change is disruptive and unnecessary," Zaffirini said in a statement to The Texas Tribune. "Studies have linked these shifts to increased traffic accidents, negative health effects, and decreased productivity."
In 2022, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, R-Florida, made such a proposal with the Sunshine Protection Act of 2023. Although the Senate passed it, the bill stalled in the House.
"It's time to lock the clock and stop enduring the ridiculous and antiquated practice of switching our clocks back and forth," Rubio said toward the end of last year.
The opposite happened in the 2023 Texas legislative session, in which Zaffirini and Rep. Will Metcalf, R-Conroe, proposed the state's permanent shift to daylight saving time. House Bill 1422 earned bipartisan support in the House but stalled in the Senate. Metcalf has filed a similar bill this year.
"Texas doesn't need to wait for Washington," Metcalf said in a news release. "By passing HB 1393, we'll demonstrate leadership and send a strong message that Texans are ready to move forward."
If Zaffirini's Senate Bill 64 is passed and Congress reverses previous rulings against the permanent adoption of daylight saving time, Texas voters could decide which time zone they would prefer to implement year-round.
All but two U.S. states observe daylight saving time. Some states want to make it permanent, while others have moved to make standard time permanent.
Experts say that time changes are detrimental to health and safety, but they agree that the answer isn't permanent DST.
"The medical and scientific communities are unified... that permanent standard time is better for human health," said Erik Herzog, a professor of biology and neuroscience at Washington University in St. Louis and the former president of the Society for Research on Biological Rhythms.
Most Americans would prefer to do away with time changes. About 43% want year-round standard time, 32% want permanent daylight saving time and 25% want to stick with the status quo, an October 2021 Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll found. For now and in the near future, most Americans will keep going through the jarring time changes that come around twice a year.
Hawaii and Arizona (with the exception of the Navajo Nation) remain in standard time and never experience time changes.
Read more: Could daylight saving time ever be permanent? Where it stands in the states
Daylight saving time is set to begin on Sunday, March 9, 2025. In the early hours, time will jump forward by one hour from 2 a.m. to 3 a.m. This marks the shift to local Daylight Saving Time (DST).
Many devices, such as phones and computers, will automatically change to DST, but non-smart devices, such as microwaves and some car radios, as well as any clock with hands, will likely need to be changed manually.
The end of daylight saving time means there will be more light in the morning and it will get dark earlier in the evening. Sunrise and sunset will be about one hour earlier on Sunday, Nov. 3, than they were on Saturday, Nov. 2.
For most Americans, except those in Arizona, Hawaii, and a handful of other places, the end of daylight saving time means an extra hour of sleep on Nov. 5. It also helps the country accommodate for more daylight in the mornings in preparation for winter.
Daylight saving time (DST) claims a variety of other names: daylight savings time, daylight time, summer time (not to be confused with summertime). It refers to the practice of setting clocks forward by one hour during the warmer months of the year and then setting them back one hour in the fall.
One way to remember the pattern: "spring forward, fall back."
The idea dates back to World War I, although some credit Benjamin Franklin for daylight saving time due to a satirical letter he wrote in 1784 stating: "Every morning, as soon as the sun rises, let all the bells in every church be set ringing: and if that is not sufficient, let cannon be fired in every street to wake the sluggards effectually."
To maximize resources for the war, Germany and Austria implemented the first daylight saving time in 1916. The U.S. did the same in 1918. An outdated idea, some argue.
The general idea of daylight saving time is to maximize the use of natural daylight, according to the Almanac. This always occurs around the summer months. As the earth moves around the sun and is tilted on its axis, certain parts of the world experience longer days during certain months. For those in the northern hemisphere, like the U.S., these longer days run from March to November, with June to August seeing the longest days.
For those in the southern hemisphere, such as Australia, the seasons are reversed: June through August mark winter months and are, therefore, the shortest of the year.
Full moon calendar: When every full moon shines in 2025 in Texas
In recent years, Congress has faced the opportunity to stop changing clocks. In 2022, the U.S. Senate unanimously approved the Sunshine Protection Act, which would make daylight saving time permanent, however the U.S. House of Representatives did not pass it and President Joe Biden did not sign it.
In December, then-President-elect Donald Trump said he aims to put an end to daylight saving time and make standard time year-round.
"The Republican Party will use its best efforts to eliminate Daylight Saving Time, which has a small but strong constituency, but shouldn't!" Trump wrote on social media site Truth Social. "Daylight Saving Time is inconvenient, and very costly to our Nation."
Winter officially ends with the first day of spring on Thursday, March 20, 2025.
The longest day of 2025, also known as the summer solstice, is Friday, June 20. Central Texas will get around 14 hours of daylight.
On the flip side, 2025's winter solstice — the shortest day of the year — is Sunday, Dec. 21. Austin will see just over 10 hours of daylight.
The Earth is tilted approximately 23.5 degrees on its axis, and each solstice is dictated by the amount of solar declination, or "the latitude of Earth where the sun is directly overhead at noon," according to National Geographic.
— USA TODAY reporter Jeanine Santucci contributed to this report.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Daylight saving time 2025 may be the last in Texas, lawmakers debate
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Karoline Leavitt rips ‘mealymouthed' NY Times White House correspondent in flap over restaurant reservations
Karoline Leavitt rips ‘mealymouthed' NY Times White House correspondent in flap over restaurant reservations

New York Post

time8 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Karoline Leavitt rips ‘mealymouthed' NY Times White House correspondent in flap over restaurant reservations

White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt ripped a New York Times reporter for linking to a news story claiming that President Trump's DC takeover hammered restaurants – even after the misleading report was corrected by the news outlet. Peter Baker, chief White House correspondent at the New York Times, linked to a WUSA9 story on Tuesday in a post on X as he blasted Trump's 'militarized takeover' of the US capital. WUSA9, a local DC news outlet, had reported that restaurant reservations plunged over 25% after Trump sent the National Guard into DC. Advertisement 3 White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt during a briefing earlier this week. AP But it turns out the outlet was comparing data from last week to year-ago figures from Restaurant Week, when big promotions and discounts typically draw in more diners. The White House said it contacted WUSA9 about the error, and the news site later updated its story — to instead report that restaurant reservations rallied nearly 30% at the start of Restaurant Week, which coincided with Trump's DC takeover. Advertisement 'Peter was so excited to criticize President Trump that he didn't even realize the article he shared was updated, because it dishonestly compared last year's DC 'restaurant week' data to non-restaurant week data this year,' Leavitt wrote in a post on X. 3 Members of the National Guard outside the Foggy Bottom-GWU metro station on Wednesday. AP She added that Baker 'is indistinguishable from a junior Democrat comms staffer — except he's even worse at his job.' On Wednesday, Baker made another social media post informing his more than 550,000 followers that WUSA9 had 'updated it with numbers showing that reservations rose again.' Advertisement 'I shared the original WUSA story and after they updated it I shared the updated story too. Obviously it's not my own reporting, so I'll leave it to them to explain their thinking,' Baker told The Post. WUSA9 did not immediately respond to The Post's request for comment. 3 Karoline Leavitt blasted the New York Times reporter on X. Baker, meanwhile, kept his original post online – prompting backlash from the White House press secretary. Advertisement 'This is the problem with activist reporters and why Americans' trust in the mass media is at the lowest point in more than five decades,' Leavitt wrote in a post on X on Wednesday. 'Instead of fully retracting his original post that received nearly a million views, Peter posted a mealymouthed reply trying to excuse why he got it completely wrong to begin with.' It's unclear whether there is any causal link between the federal takeover and the impact on restaurant reservations. WUSA9 also reported that local bar and restaurant owners blamed the federal takeover for a dip in business, claiming National Guard members on District streets acted as a deterrent to diners.

Shrimp Recall Map Shows 9 States With New Warning
Shrimp Recall Map Shows 9 States With New Warning

Newsweek

time9 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Shrimp Recall Map Shows 9 States With New Warning

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Southwind Foods, LLC, is recalling numerous brand names of frozen shrimp due to fears of possible radionuclide (Cesium-137) contamination. Newsweek reached out to the company via phone on Thursday and left a voicemail. Why It Matters Numerous recalls have been initiated this year due to the potential for damaged products, foodborne illness, contamination and undeclared food allergens. Millions of Americans experience food sensitivities or allergies every year. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the nine "major" food allergens in the U.S. are eggs, milk, fish, wheat, soybeans, Crustacean shellfish, sesame, tree nuts and peanuts. Cesium-137 is a man-made radioisotope of cesium, and the primary risk of repeat low-dose exposure is "an elevated risk of cancer, resulting from damage to DNA within living cells of the body," per the agency. What To Know In the alert, the FDA warns that the recalled frozen shrimp were distributed from July 17 to August 8, 2025, at wholesalers, retailers and distributors in Alabama, Arizona, Massachusetts, California, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Virginia, Utah and Washington state. Below is a map of the affected states: The FDA alert has a chart with corresponding item numbers, product descriptions, as well as UPC and lot numbers for customers to cross-reference. No illnesses have been reported related to this recall as of Tuesday, the agency notes. The brands impacted by the recall include Sand Bar, Arctic Shores, Best Yet, Great American and First Street, according to the alert. What People Are Saying The FDA alert, in part: "The FDA is actively investigating reports of Cesium-137 (Cs-137) contamination in shipping containers and frozen shrimp products processed by PT. Bahari Makmur Sejati (doing business as BMS Foods) of Indonesia." In an email to Newsweek in January, the FDA said: "Most recalls in the U.S. are carried out voluntarily by the product manufacturer and when a company issues a public warning, typically via news release, to inform the public of a voluntary product recall; the FDA shares that release on our website as a public service. "The FDA's role during a voluntary, firm-initiated, recall is to review the recall strategy, evaluate the health hazard presented by the product, monitor the recall, and as appropriate alert the public and other companies in the supply chain about the recall. "The FDA provides public access to information on recalls by posting a listing of recalls according to their classification in the FDA Enforcement Report, including the specific action taken by the recalling company. The FDA Enforcement Report is designed to provide a public listing of products in the marketplace that are being recalled." Additional information on recalls can be found via the agency's Recalls, Market Withdrawals, & Safety Alerts. What Happens Next Consumers who have purchased the recalled shrimp are advised not to consume it, dispose of the product or return it to the place of purchase for a full refund, the FDA says. People with additional questions can contact the company at 1-323-262-8222 from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. PT weekdays.

Trump's plan to win the House just took a big step forward
Trump's plan to win the House just took a big step forward

Vox

time9 minutes ago

  • Vox

Trump's plan to win the House just took a big step forward

This story appeared in The Logoff, a daily newsletter that helps you stay informed about the Trump administration without letting political news take over your life. Subscribe here. Welcome to The Logoff: Texas is forging ahead with its plan to add five Republican seats to its congressional map at the behest of President Donald Trump, in preparation for what is likely to be a difficult midterm election for the party next year. What just happened? On Wednesday, the Texas House approved a mid-decade redistricting plan that will even more aggressively gerrymander the state, creating five new congressional districts that are likely to elect Republicans. The plan still needs to pass the state Senate before Texas Gov. Greg Abbott can sign it into law, but is expected to advance without difficulty. Why is this so abnormal? Every decade, states redraw their congressional maps in accordance with the results of the decennial US Census; Texas's current effort would see the state break that pattern and do so five years early, and for clearly partisan purposes. How are other states reacting? California Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to advance a retaliatory redistricting measure in California if Texas moves forward with its plan, with the goal of creating five new Democratic seats. On Wednesday night, he tweeted, 'It's on, Texas.' However, the California process will be more difficult — voters will first need to approve an amendment to the state constitution. On the flip side, a number of Republican states are following Texas's lead in redistricting at Trump's urging, including Missouri, Ohio, Indiana, and possibly Florida. Together, they could help the GOP net even more seats. The Logoff The email you need to stay informed about Trump — without letting the news take over your life. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. What's the big picture? Gerrymandering is inherently partisan (and done by both parties), but Texas's plan represents a particularly aggressive, cynical power play ahead of the 2026 midterm elections (and one that's bad for Texans). Republicans' current margin of control in the House of Representatives is just three seats, which means Texas alone could conceivably decide power in the chamber — and with it, the course of Trump's final two years in office. And with that, it's time to log off… I'm willing to concede that 'Nightmare at the end of the universe' doesn't sound like a cheerful topic to sign off with. But the latest episode from Vox's Unexplainable podcast is actually a fascinating, not-at-all-nightmarish look at 'the biggest mystery ever': understanding dark energy, which makes up something like 70 percent of the universe and has implications for its eventual end — if it exists at all. You can listen to the episode here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store