logo
I have a £900,000 pension pot, how much income will I be able to get in retirement?

I have a £900,000 pension pot, how much income will I be able to get in retirement?

Daily Mail​3 days ago
I have a defined contribution pension that I built up through my working life and apart from a few years at the start of my career, I've never had a final salary scheme.
My pot is worth £900,000 and I am 59 and hope to retire in two years.
How much retirement income can I safely expect to get from my pension pot - and if I died would my wife face inheritance tax on it?
Rob Morgan, of Charles Stanley Direct, replies: When you decide to retire you'll have two main options for your pension pot. Keep investing and draw a regular or flexible income out or buy an annuity – guaranteed income for life from an insurance company.
An annuity is the safer but less flexible option. Once you have bought it you can't reverse the decision, and for lots of people 61 is too soon for an annuity purchase unless they are especially risk averse.
Annuity rates are lower when purchased at a younger age meaning you lock in a less favourable income for life, and you lose flexibility.
However, to give you an idea, a 61-year-old today could secure an annuity income of 6.82 per cent on a level basis and 4.44 per cent on an inflation linked basis assuming a 5-year guarantee period and 50 per cent per cent spouse's pension.
So that's £46,021 a year or £29,961 a year, respectively, on a £900,000 pot after taking the maximum tax-free cash of £225,000 which could also be used to generate an income on top.
Drawdown is a riskier alternative, but it can keep your pot growing further than inflation levels and therefore give you a better outcome, especially if you plan on leaving the pension pot to your wife should she outlive you.
Although you can build in a spouse's pension and other guarantees into an annuity, the flexibility of leaving all the remaining pot to her is potentially good financial planning. Plus, should you unfortunately die before 75 she can also take all the money out tax-free.
The good news is there would be no inheritance tax (IHT) consequences of passing the pot to your wife. There is no IHT on assets left to spouses, so she can inherit the pot and enjoy the same retirement options with it.
How much can you safely take out of your pension?
That then leaves the question of how have much can you safely withdraw from the pension pot in drawdown.
The 'classic' answer to this is about 4 per cent, which I would also extend to any tax-free cash you invest – ideally most of it in Isas to grow your money and pay income tax free.
Using the '4 per cent rule' means you could 'safely' generate £36,000 a year before tax, rising with inflation.
Why 4 per cent? It's a level thought be 'safe' enough for your money to last 30 years, based on historical stock and bond returns – even through relatively poor periods.
However, arguably there is no such thing as a 'safe' rate. Asset class returns significantly lower than historical averages could present difficulties, especially in the event of a market crash in the early years of retirement – a concept known as 'sequence of returns risk'.
This is why some advisers suggest 3-3.5 per cent as a more conservative level, or suggest dynamic strategies where withdrawals are based partly on market performance. It's also possible that you may be able to increase the rate of withdrawals if your investments do well.
You will also need to consider your pattern of spending. Expenditure in retirement is often described as 'smile' shaped. Typically, the earlier years are more active, and costly, and later years less so, before spending rises again in the case of care needs.
> Read Charles Stanley Direct's guide: How to combat drawdown risk
It's not an all or nothing affair?
It's also worth noting that you can mix and match an annuity and drawdown and you don't have to choose one or the other.
Many people like to use an annuity to match their essential spending and use drawdown for top up or more discretionary spending – and accept that they may need to be flexible about withdrawals to help preserve the pot in the event of poor investment performance.
Also factor in that your State Pension will begin at 67, which serves as a guaranteed income stream increasing at present by the triple lock, which is the higher of 2.5 per cent, inflation or average wage increase, in which case you can potentially take a bit more from your pension in the early years of retirement in the knowledge you can dial back once that comes on stream.
> Is it worth deferring state pension? Read Charles Stanley Direct's guide
Don't forget tax
There's tax to consider too. Many people automatically take their maximum tax-free pension lump sum in one go, and in many circumstances this can be a good strategy. You can use the cash in the early years of retirement, pay off any mortgage or use it to make Isa contributions to maximise tax efficiency.
However, there are alternative ways of drawing on the pot to consider, notably the UFPLS – or 'uncrystallised funds pension lump sum'. This involves slicing off part of your pension and leaving the rest untouched.
Every time you take money from your pension pot as an UFPLS, 25 per cent of the amount is tax-free with tax payable at your highest marginal rate of income tax on the other 75 per cent, and this can sometimes be more tax efficient and therefore offer more income.
How Charles Stanley Direct can help
With lots of moving parts it is hard to decide which is the right course of action, so I would encourage you to speak to a financial professional to help weigh up your options and decide what is right in your circumstances.
Charles Stanley Direct offers a free, no commitment, 15-minute call with a qualified professional to discuss your needs. You can then decide whether further financial coaching or more in-depth and specific financial advice would be useful.
An adviser can look at all your assets, model different scenarios and help you understand the risks and opportunities around different courses of action, as well as potentially add significant value from a tax perspective.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Drive-through plan for former Brighouse ballroom
Drive-through plan for former Brighouse ballroom

BBC News

time8 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Drive-through plan for former Brighouse ballroom

A former ballroom could be demolished and replaced with a drive-through coffee want to knock down the Venue 73 nightclub in Bradford Road, Brighouse, in order to build a new opened in 1937 the building has been used as a cinema, bingo hall and was home to The Ritz Ballroom from 1981 to to an application from EG on the Move Ltd the site has been empty for five years, suffers from damp and is in need of a complete change. Supporting statements on behalf of the applicants claim the premises has been subjected to anti-social behaviour and the police "regularly" had to attend as a agent said some public consultation had been held and overall well supported, though some people had raised concerns over road safety. According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, a report showed a number of letters of support had welcomed the applicant said, if approved, the new building would include some art deco stylings as a nod to the building's past, with limited hours vehicle charging included on building previously hit the headlines in 2017 when lawyers from the Ritz Hotel ordered its owner to change its name or face legal building closed as a ballroom later that same year and as a live music space in February 2020. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.

Grade II-listed ex-GP building in Wolverhampton set for new flats
Grade II-listed ex-GP building in Wolverhampton set for new flats

BBC News

time8 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Grade II-listed ex-GP building in Wolverhampton set for new flats

A 180-year-old Grade II-listed building that used to be a GP surgery will be converted into offices and consultancy rooms at the site in Wolverhampton have been empty since last year when private healthcare company Summerfield Heath went into administration.A new two-storey rear extension and a single-storey side extension would be added to the building as part of the work on Summerfield Road, Chapel one and two-bed flats feature in the plans approved by City of Wolverhampton Council. The building, which dates back to the 1840s, lies on the edge of West Park.A council planner report said the principle of residential development was "considered acceptable in this predominantly residential area". The development would contribute "to the vitality and mix of uses and much needed regeneration of this part of the city", it offices on the opposite side of Summerfield Road, last used by Marston's brewery, will also be converted into flats, after plans were approved by the council last former Marston's training centre will be turned into 18 one and two-bed pub giant announced last summer it was selling its 40% stake in Carlsberg Marston's Brewing Company to Carlsberg for £206m. This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations. Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

Why will Heathrow's third runway be such a long haul?
Why will Heathrow's third runway be such a long haul?

The Independent

time10 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Why will Heathrow's third runway be such a long haul?

Q On Heathrow: why will it take 10 years to build what is basically a small road? Aaron M A Heathrow airport has just published its long-awaited plans for a third runway. They are basically the same as those recommended by the Davies Commission a decade ago after years of consultation: a 3,500m runway to the northwest of the present airport. In one sense, this is a road a couple of miles long. So why indeed should it take 10 years to build and cost £21bn (plus an additional £12bn for terminal capacity)? First, because even after years of discussion that have led to these 'shovel-ready' proposals, the planning process will drag on for several more years. The Department for Transport is now considering Heathrow's proposals as well as cheaper competing options. When the choice is made, the next process involves work on a Development Consent Order (DCO). That will involve yet another public consultation on Heathrow's expansion and is likely to take around 18 months. The Planning Inspectorate will consider the application and make a recommendation to the transport secretary, who will decide whether to grant the DCO. Assuming the scheme is approved, in line with Labour's commitment to growth, opponents of expansion are certain to launch legal challenges to the minister's decision. Heathrow cannot begin construction until that process is completed. At present, the best hope among proponents of the third runway is that work will begin by July 2029, ie within the lifetime of the present parliament. That leaves six years before the 2035 vow for planes to be taking off and landing. It still looks like a long time for this strip of concrete. But it is rather more complicated than the average road. Hundreds of homes must be demolished first. The third runway is intended to stretch across the current route of the M25, which will be relocated into a tunnel. Vast amounts of work will need to be carried out to connect the new facility to the existing airport, which itself will be extensively remodelled – all the while remaining open to air traffic for 19 hours a day. Accordingly, 2035 begins to look optimistic. Ryanair's chief executive, Michael O'Leary, says the new runway will not open until 2040 at the earliest – not that he has any intention of using the expanded Heathrow, unlike rival easyJet. Q Have you ever been to a destination that you'd never go back to? Lou Gray A Plenty. In almost every case, though, I will not return even though I greatly enjoyed the place on one or more previous visits. It's just because there are so many more places to see. For example, I regard Orkney and Shetland, the Northern Isles of Scotland, as among the most beautiful, intriguing and rewarding destinations in the world. But I have visited each archipelago twice, explored thoroughly, met some lovely people and enjoyed some superb food. With other Scottish islands unvisited, such as Jura and Colonsay in the west, I have no plans to return to the north. The same applies to many other destinations I have been fortunate enough to visit: I thoroughly enjoyed a week in Missouri last year, but don't feel the US state has many secrets left to reveal. And just last week I was in the Greek island of Paros; I don't expect ever to return to its simplicity and beauty since there are dozens of other islands in the Aegean I want to see. If, though, you meant where have I found underwhelming, thankfully, there are very few. On a cruise taking in Greenland and Arctic Canada, I found the ports of call mostly sad places, reflecting the deep social problems faced by these locations – though my view may have been coloured by the shambolic running of the operation by the Canadian travel firm. Conversely, there are some locations to which I will return repeatedly. They are mainly 'world cities' with many dimensions and are constantly reinventing themselves. These include Paris, Istanbul, Mumbai, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Singapore, Sydney, Buenos Aires, Mexico City, Chicago and New York. (In different times, I would add Moscow and St Petersburg to that list.) And also great mountain ranges: the Alps, Pyrenees and Himalayas have so many facets and endless beauty. Q I am travelling to New Zealand in December with my partner. We have an eight-hour stop at Hong Kong. Is it straightforward to leave the airport and see the place for a few hours before returning for our next flight? Degsy M A Yes. Your baggage will be checked through to New Zealand, allowing you to explore unencumbered, and you will have your boarding pass for the onward flight. Thankfully, immigration into Hong Kong is invariably swift, and the Airport Express train takes only 24 minutes to reach Hong Kong Island, for a fare of HK$130 (about £10) each way. The final stop locates you perfectly for exploring Hong Kong Central – probably the most exciting part of this hyperactive territory. Head for Man Mo Temple, a Taoist place of worship dedicated to the gods of literature (Man) and war (Mo). Wander through the interior as colourful as it is reverential, with smouldering coils of incense providing a heavenly aroma. A short walk away, explore PMQ: the 'Police Married Quarters' dormitory complex built in 1951. The police officers and their spouses have moved out to cosier accommodation. Bright young sparks have moved in, filling the mid-century architectural masterpiece with workshops, galleries and boutiques. And along at Tai Kwun, you find evidence of the British colonial one-stop shop of crime prevention, comprising Central Police Station, the Central Magistracy (now a restaurant) and Victoria Prison – where, once upon a time, Vietnamese leader Ho Chi Minh was on trial. Today, the complex is a venue for enlightenment. Begin your journey back to the airport by taking the iconic Star Ferry across the harbour to Kowloon, on the mainland. Make your way to West Kowloon Cultural District, a creative hub appropriately created on reclaimed land. The key attraction: M+, a vast new museum that celebrates Hong Kong's visual culture of the 20th and 21st centuries. Like Tate Modern in London and the Guggenheim in Bilbao, the structure itself is as compelling as the contents. Kowloon station is a five-minute walk away – and in just 22 minutes the Airport Express will whisk you back to the space-age terminal for your onward flight. Security is swift, so plan to be back at the airport just an hour or so before departure.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store