After Agartala, Air India Discontinues Full-Service Operations At Imphal
Imphal/Agartala: After Agartala, Air India has discontinued the operation of its full-service carrier from the Imphal International Airport, but the Tata group-owned airline's low-cost subsidiary Air India Express would continue services from the Manipur capital, the Airport Authority of India (AAI) said on Monday.
A senior AAI official said that after the auto-to-steel conglomerate Tata group took over the control of Air India in January 2022, it gradually discontinued the operation of its full-service carrier in the domestic airports of the country, especially in the small airports.
However, they continued the operations of the airline's low-cost subsidiary Air India Express services in most of the domestic airports in the country, the official, who did not want to be identified, said.
Air India has discontinued the operation of its full-service carrier from the Bir Tikendrajit International Airport in Imphal on Sunday onwards.
The discontinuation decision was part of the airline's pre-planned strategy, the official said.
According to the official, the airline authority has discontinued its full-fledged service carrier three months ago from the Agartala's Maharaja Bir Bikram (MBB) Airport, the second busiest airport in the northeastern region after the Lokpriya Gopinath Bordoloi International (LGBI) Airport in Guwahati.
"The Air India Express, the airliner company's low-cost subsidiary, would continue its operations at Imphal with Boeing 737 aircraft to ensure continued air connectivity," said the AAI official.
Along with the LGBI Airport in Guwahati, the Imphal airport enjoys international status in the northeastern region. Currently, there are 17 operational airports in the northeast region -- Guwahati, Silchar, Dibrugarh, Jorhat, Tezpur, Lilabari and Rupsi (Assam), Tezu, Pasighat, Ziro, and Donyi Polo Airport (Arunachal Pradesh), Agartala (Tripura), Imphal (Manipur), Shillong (Meghalaya), Dimapur (Nagaland), Lengpui (Mizoram), and Pakyong (Sikkim).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Turbulence in the skies: Air India diverts two flights due to tech glitches
Problems for Air India don't seem to be ending, as India's oldest airline had to divert two flights on Monday due to technical issues. The incidents occurred just four days after flight AI 171 crashed in Ahmedabad, killing 270 people, including former Chief Minister of Gujarat Vijay Rupani. Two aircraft diverted on June 16 On June 16, Air India flight AI 315 from Hong Kong to Delhi turned back approximately 90 minutes after takeoff. Pilots detected a fault onboard and chose to return to Hong Kong International Airport. The aircraft was a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner — the same model that crashed on June 12. A few hours later, Delhi–Ranchi flight AI 9695 returned to the national capital after experiencing a mid-air technical issue. The aircraft had taken off from Indira Gandhi International Airport at 4:25 pm and was scheduled to land at Birsa Munda Airport at 6:20 pm. According to NDTV, the decision to return was made purely as a safety precaution. Earlier, on June 13, Air India flight AI 379 from Phuket to Delhi carrying 156 passengers was forced to return during its cruise phase due to a bomb threat. The aircraft landed safely, and security checks were conducted before passengers were cleared. These incidents are unfolding under increased technical scrutiny mandated by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). The regulator has enforced fleet-wide safety checks, particularly on Dreamliners, as a precautionary measure following the Ahmedabad crash. Geopolitical tensions impacting air routes In addition to technical setbacks, flight operations across several carriers — including Air India — have been impacted by the temporary closure of Iranian airspace. The move followed Israeli airstrikes on Iran beginning June 13, 2025. 'Due to the emerging situation in Iran and parts of the Middle East, the subsequent closure of airspace, and in view of the safety of our passengers, some of our flights are operating on alternative extended routes,' Air India stated on X. Long-haul services between India and North America or Europe — such as those bound for New York, London, Toronto, and Frankfurt — were either rerouted via cities like Vienna, Jeddah, Sharjah, or returned mid-air to their origin. Passengers have been advised to regularly monitor flight status amid ongoing disruptions. DGCA mandates Boeing 787 inspections Following the AI 171 crash, the DGCA has ordered a fleet-wide inspection of all Boeing 787-8 and 787-9 aircraft operated by Air India. These checks are being conducted proactively to ensure airworthiness and are not linked to confirmed mechanical failures. On June 15, a Delhi–Zurich flight was delayed to accommodate a mandatory inspection, even though no specific fault was identified. The move reflects heightened regulatory vigilance following the recent tragedy. Monsoon rains add to delays Heavy rainfall and waterlogging in Mumbai have caused additional delays in domestic and international flight operations. Several passengers took to X to report postponements and congestion at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport. 'Heavy rainfall may impact flight operations to and from Mumbai,' Air India posted on X, advising travellers to check their flight status in advance.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
France shuts Israeli weapons booths at Paris Air Show; Israel calls move ‘outrageous'
Geopolitical tensions roiled the opening of the Paris Air Show on Monday as French authorities sealed off Israeli weapons industry booths amid the conflicts in Iran and Gaza, a move that Israel condemned as 'outrageous' read more US soldiers soldiers stand by a F-35 A jet fighter on display at the Paris Air Show, in Le Bourget, north of Paris, on Monday. AP Geopolitical tensions roiled the opening of the Paris Air Show on Monday as French authorities sealed off Israeli weapons industry booths amid the conflicts in Iran and Gaza, a move that Israel condemned as 'outrageous'. The decision added drama to the major aerospace industry event, which was already under the shadow of last week's deadly crash of Air India's Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Black walls were installed around the stands of five Israeli defence firms at the trade fair in Le Bourget, an airfield on the outskirts of Paris. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The booths displayed 'offensive weapons' that could be used in Gaza – in violation of agreements with Israeli authorities, a French government source told AFP. The French government has not given its exact definition of 'offensive' or attack weapons. The companies – Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), Rafael, Uvision, Elbit and Aeronautics – make drones and guided bombs and missiles. An Israeli exhibitor wrote a message in yellow chalk on one of the walls, saying the hidden defence systems 'are protecting the state of Israel these days. The French government, in the name of discrimination is trying to hide them from you!' French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou defended the decision during a press conference at the air show. 'The French government's position was very simple: no offensive weapons at the arms exposition,' he said. 'Defensive weapons were perfectly acceptable.' Conflicts loom large Bayrou cited the ongoing conflict in Gaza as the rationale behind the ban. 'Given the situation in Gaza… which is extremely serious from a humanitarian and security point of view, France was keen to make it clear that offensive weapons should not be present at this exposition,' Bayrou said. Israeli President Isaac Herzog said he was shocked by the 'outrageous' closure of the pavilions and said the situation should be 'immediately corrected'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Israeli companies have signed contracts with the organisers… it's like creating an Israeli ghetto,' he said on French television channel LCI. The Israeli defence ministry said in a statement that the 'outrageous and unprecedented decision reeks of policy-driven and commercial considerations'. 'The French are hiding behind supposedly political considerations to exclude Israeli offensive weapons from an international exhibition – weapons that compete with French industries,' it said. 'This is particularly striking given Israeli technologies' impressive and precise performance in Iran.' Israel launched surprise strikes on Iranian military and nuclear sites on Friday, killing top commanders and scientists, prompting Tehran to hit back with a barrage of missiles. The presence of Israeli firms at Le Bourget, though smaller than in the past, was already a source of tension before the start of the Paris Air Show, because of the conflict in Gaza. A French court last week rejected a bid by NGOs to ban Israeli companies from Le Bourget over concerns about 'international crimes'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Local lawmakers from the Seine-Saint-Denis department hosting the event were absent during Bayrou's visit to the opening of the air show in protest over the Israeli presence. Amir Baram, a general in the Israeli defence ministry, called the French decision 'anti-Semitic', adding that Israel would challenge the move in French courts. French far-right leader Marine Le Pen also criticised the decision, calling it 'unacceptable discrimination, particularly in the current geopolitical context', in a post on X, adding that it 'damages once again our country's international image'. The show's organisers said that dialogue was underway 'to find a positive resolution'. Boeing 'focus on supporting customers' The row over Israel cast a shadow over a trade fair that is usually dominated by displays of the aerospace industry's latest flying wonders, and big orders for plane makers Airbus and Boeing. Airbus announced an order of 30 single-aisle A320neo jets and 10 A350F freighters by Saudi aircraft leasing firm AviLease. The European manufacturer also said that Riyadh Air was buying 25 long-range, wide-body A350-1000 jets. But Boeing chief executive Kelly Ortberg last week cancelled plans to attend the biennial event, to focus on the investigation of the Air India crash. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Our focus is on supporting our customers, rather than announcing orders at this air show,' a Boeing spokeswoman told AFP on Monday. The London-bound Dreamliner crashed shortly after take-off in the western Indian city of Ahmedabad, killing 241 passengers and crew and another 38 people on the ground. One passenger survived.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Air India faces Rs 1,000 cr liability as legal claims mount after AI171 crash
Reuters Aircraft accidents, though rare, leave a devastating impact that extends far beyond the wreckage of lives. Compensation becomes not only a matter of monetary redress, but a crucial step toward accountability, closure and rebuilding the aftermath of last week's AI 171 tragedy, Air India offered ₹1 cr as compensation per deceased person to his or her next of kin. While this announcement was prompt and appears generous, the airline could be on the hook for a much higher amount. Families may have significant claims, depending on how the investigation unfolds. India has ratified the 'Montreal Convention' - Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air - by incorporating it into the Carriage by Air Act 1972. This provides for a 2-tier compensation system defined in terms of special drawing rights (SDR), an international reserve asset created by IMF to supplement official reserves of its member countries. Accordingly: The airline must compensate the kin of the deceased passengers up to SDR 128,821 (₹1.6 cr), regardless of any fault or wrongdoing by the airline. This compensation is the absolute minimum, without exception. Some media reports have indicated that the ₹1 cr offered by AI is separate, and in addition to the SDR amount required under the convention. Kin of the deceased may seek compensation over and above this SDR amount, based on actual loss. This would be calculated on lost income, and companionship of victims who sustained their families and dependents. AI could avoid higher compensation only if it proves there was no negligence, wrongful act or omission by the airline (including its servants or agents, which include various third parties engaged by the airline to service the aircraft or assist with the flight).Alternatively, the airline could defend itself if the accident occurred solely due to wrongful acts, or omissions of a third party, such as in the case of terrorism. The legal burden is on the airline to prove that the mishap did not occur due to its conduct, or that it occurred due to the conduct of a third such cases, families of Indian victims could also approach consumer fora under the Consumer Protection Act 2019. The consumer protection law is in addition to remedies available under the Montreal Convention as read with the Carriage by Air families of foreign passengers, legal options extend beyond India. Since the convention applies almost globally, they could file lawsuits in their home countries, where compensation standards may be India has also offered ₹1 cr to the families of the deceased medical college students and staff, and people on the ground. Securing higher compensation is more challenging for families of victims on the ground. Both Carriage by Air Act and Consumer Protection Act are meant for passengers on the ill-fated aircraft. The next of kin of ground fatalities would have to approach a civil court in India seeking compensation under Fatal Accidents Act 1855, which provides compensation to the family of a person who dies in the case of wrongful option is a tort law claim, where damages for negligence could be sought. In both these options, Air India would be liable if it's at fault - that is, if the accident was a result of its act, omission or oversight. The total compensation payout to victims could well exceed ₹1,000 cr. Beyond victim compensation, Air India also faces significant costs for property damage, aircraft loss, emergency response and disrupted the compensation payout in cases of similar incidents has touched ₹4,500 cr ($500 mn). Air India likely maintains adequate insurance coverage that would cover these costs, or at least a substantial part. But if claims exceed coverage, the financial hit could be severe. Vaidyanathan is managing partner, and Sarvankar is senior associate, BTG Advaya (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Worrying cracks hiding behind MG Motor's own 'house of Windsor' Is India ready to hit the aspirational 8% growth mark? INR1,300 crore loans for INR100? Stamp duty notice to ArcelorMittal, banks. Why failed small businessmen die by suicide when those behind big blow-ups bounce back? Stock Radar: Falling trendline breakout on daily and weekly charts likely to push stock to record highs; check target & stop loss Handle volatility in conventional & unconventional ways: Capital gains & dividend yield. 6 stocks with dividend yield of 4-8%; return of over 22% Keys to wealth creation: Strong balance sheet & patience. 5 large-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential of up to 38% Defence stocks: Black & white, and many shades of grey. 10 stocks with an upside potential of up to 30%
