Protester shot and killed at ‘No Kings' rally in Utah, police say
Fashion and beautyFacebookTweetLink
Follow
A man who was believed to be part of a peacekeeping team for the 'No Kings' protest in Salt Lake City shot at a person who was brandishing a rifle at demonstrators, striking both the rifleman and a bystander who later died at the hospital, authorities said Sunday.
Police took the alleged rifleman, Arturo Gamboa, 24, into custody Saturday evening on a murder charge, Salt Lake City Police Chief Brian Redd said at a Sunday news conference. The bystander was Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, 39, a fashion designer from Samoa.
Detectives don't yet know why Gamboa pulled out a rifle or ran from the peacekeepers, but they accused him of creating the dangerous situation that led to Ah Loo's death. The Associated Press did not immediately find an attorney listed for Gamboa or contact information for his family in public records.
Redd said the man believed to be part of the peacekeeping team, dressed in a neon green vest, fired three shots from a handgun at Gamboa, inflicting a relatively minor injury but fatally shooting Ah Loo. Redd did not share the man's name.
Volunteer peacekeeping teams are common for protests, said Sarah Parker, a national coordinator for 50501 Movement, which was a partner in the 'No Kings' protest. But the organizers ask attendees, including the peacekeepers, not to bring weapons, she said. Still, Parker said they stopped what could've been a larger mass casualty event.
'Our safety team did as best as they could in a situation that is extremely sad and extremely scary,' said Parker.
Ah Loo, known as Afa, was a husband and father to two children and a fashion designer who leaned into his Samoan heritage, according to a GoFundMe page organized to support his family. Ah Loo founded Creative Pacific, an event celebrating the diversity of the Pacific Islands, with workshops, artists and a fashion runway. He was on Season 17 of the fashion design reality TV show 'Project Runway.'
The gunshots sent hundreds of protesters running, some hiding behind barriers and fleeing into parking garages and nearby businesses, police said in a statement. 'That's a gun. Come on, come on, get out,' someone can be heard saying in a video posted to social media that appears to show the events.
'No Kings' protests swept across the country on Saturday, and organizers said millions rallied against what they described as President Donald Trump's authoritarian tendencies.
Confrontations were largely isolated. In Riverside, California, authorities said a driver of an SUV struck a woman who was participating in a demonstration and sped away. The woman had 'significant injuries' but was stable, police said, adding that they were still searching for the driver.
Outside the Arizona statehouse, a social media video showed protesters Saturday jeering at and then skirmishing with a masked man, who eventually pulled out a handgun, causing the crowd to scatter. Another video showed Arizona Department of Public Safety officers taking the man into custody.
The shooter and another person in a neon vest allegedly saw Gamboa separate from the crowd of marchers in downtown Salt Lake City, move behind a wall and withdraw a rifle around 8 p.m., Redd said.
When the two men in vests confronted Gamboa with their handguns drawn, witnesses said Gamboa raised his rifle into a firing position and ran toward the crowd, said Redd.
That's when one of the men dressed in the vests shot three rounds, hitting Gamboa and Ah Loo, said Redd. Gamboa, who police said didn't have a criminal history, was wounded and treated before being booked into jail.
Redd said that the peacekeepers' actions are also part of the investigation.
Police said they recovered an AR-15 style rifle, a gas mask and a backpack at the scene.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Teen killed, 6 others injured in in East Hampton drunk driving crash, police say
A young woman is dead and six other people are in the hospital after a car crash in East Hampton on Sunday. It happened just after 7:30 p.m. on Old Stone Highway near Deep Six Drive. Young woman killed in crash Police say that a Toyota Camry was driving southbound on the highway when it left the road, overturned, and struck a tree. There were eight people in the car at the time, including the driver, and two of them had to be extricated by the fire department, according to the press release. One of the passengers, 19-year-old Scarleth Urgiles of East Hampton, died in the crash. Jennifer Amon-Barrers, 18, of East Hampton was rushed to Stony Brook University Hospital with serious injuries, but remains in stable condition, according to police. The five other passengers were taken to Stony Brook Southampton Hospital. They range in age from 15-19. There was no update on their condition. East Hampton Police arrested the driver, 18-year-old Luis Gonzalo Barrionuevo-Fuertes, on scene. He is charged with driving while intoxicated, aggravated driving while intoxicated with a child passenger less than 16, and endangering the welfare of the child. He will be arraigned in East Hampton Town Justice Court. Police are investigating what led to the crash. Anyone with information is asked to call East Hampton Police at 631-537-7575.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Navy veteran who defeated CNN fights Associated Press over 'smuggle' claim in defamation lawsuit
FIRST ON FOX - U.S. Navy veteran Zachary Young and the Associated Press continue to battle through court filings ahead of a critical July 3 hearing in the high-stakes defamation lawsuit. Young successfully sued CNN for defamation earlier this year after saying the network smeared him by implying he illegally profited from helping people flee Afghanistan on the "black market" during the Biden administration's disastrous 2021 military withdrawal. When covering the trial in January, Associated Press media reporter David Bauder wrote that "Young's business helped smuggle people out of Afghanistan." Young's legal team took issue with the term "smuggle," and said that the Associated Press article "went even further than CNN's falsehoods" by using a term that "implies criminality." The veteran is seeking nearly $500 million in a defamation suit against the AP. The AP last week filed a reply in further support of its motion to dismiss, citing Florida's Anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute and calling Young's claim "meritless." "Young concedes that the basic premise of his lawsuit—that the word 'smuggle' necessarily, and in all contexts, conveys criminal wrongdoing—is incorrect," the AP's legal team wrote. "This lawsuit should end here." Young's legal team fired back on Monday with a scathing response. "Notably, AP's reply brief in support of its Motion to Dismiss inaccurately asserts that Plaintiff 'concedes' the word 'smuggle' does not necessarily imply criminal wrongdoing. That is false. Plaintiff does not concede and has never conceded that the term 'smuggle' or 'human Smuggling' is ambiguous or context-dependent. To the contrary, Plaintiff's position is that the term is facially defamatory in modern journalistic and legal contexts, and universally understood to imply criminal conduct," Young's legal team wrote. "That conclusion does not require a jury to resolve disputed meanings. It is a matter of law, supported by AP's own Stylebook, its consistent usage in criminal reporting, and the legal consequences the term carries under federal and international law," they added. "In fact, the AP Stylebook's definition of 'human smuggling' and 'people smuggling' is telling. It shows that the Associated Press knew exactly what it was doing when it chose to use those specific terms to escalate the false accusations against Plaintiffs," the reply brief continued. "Instead of reporting the actual news, which was that a jury found CNN liable for defaming Plaintiff and that Plaintiff had been cleared of any wrongdoing, AP chose to focus its story on a false insinuation of criminality. This was not a lapse in judgment. It was a deliberate distortion of the facts that strongly supports an inference of actual malice," it added. The reply brief states the AP "framed it as 'news,' but it was really 'litigation by byline.'" "Instead of reporting honestly on the outcome of the CNN case, they tried to repackage the same false accusation under the guise of covering a lawsuit. It wasn't journalism. It was retaliation," Young's legal team wrote. The reply brief also lays out Young's claim that an average reader would believe "someone financed this illegal operation," which "tracks exactly with AP's own definition of smuggling." "The Associated Press didn't just ignore the jury's decision; they tried to overrule it. They saw the verdict, saw the ruling, and chose to escalate the same accusation that had already been proven false. That wasn't journalism. It was retaliation," attorney Daniel Lustig told Fox News Digital. Judge William S. Henry scheduled the next hearing for July 3. He is expected to rule on both the AP's motion to dismiss and Young's amended complaint. The AP has referred to the lawsuit as "frivolous" in statements to the press. "The Associated Press thought they could hide behind privilege and the First Amendment while repeating a knowingly false claim. They were wrong. Mr. Young held CNN accountable, and he will do the same with the AP and with others who made the same choice," Michael Pike, another attorney from Young's team, told Fox News Digital.
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
New Jersey can have a grand jury investigate clergy sex abuse allegations, state high court rules
TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — New Jersey can have a grand jury examine allegations of clergy sexually abusing children, the state's Supreme Court ruled Monday, after a Catholic diocese that had tried for years to block such proceedings recently reversed course. The Diocese of Camden previously had argued that a court rule prevents the state attorney general from impaneling a grand jury to issue findings in the state's investigation into decades of allegations against church officials. But the diocese notified the court in early May that it would no longer oppose that. Camden Bishop Joseph Williams, who took over the diocese in March, said he'd met with stakeholders in the diocese and there was unanimous consent to end the church's opposition to the grand jury. The seven-member Supreme Court concluded such a grand jury inquiry is allowed. A Pennsylvania grand jury report in 2018 found more than 1,000 children had been abused in that state since the 1940s, prompting the New Jersey attorney general to announce a similar investigation. The results of New Jersey's inquiry never became public partly because the legal battle with the Camden diocese was unfolding amid sealed proceedings. Then this year, the Bergen Record obtained documents disclosing that the diocese had tried to preempt a grand jury and a lower court agreed with the diocese. The core disagreement was whether a court rule permits grand juries in New Jersey to issue findings in cases involving private individuals. Trial and appellate courts found that isn't allowed. Hearing arguments on April 28, members of the high court repeatedly questioned whether challenging the state was premature, since lower court proceedings prevented New Jersey from seating a grand jury that would investigate any allegations or issue findings, called a presentment. 'We don't know what a grand jury would say, am I right?' Justice Anne Patterson asked the attorney for the diocese. Lloyd Levenson, the church's attorney, answered that 'you'd have to be Rip Van Winkle' not to know what the grand jury would say. 'The goal here is obviously to condemn the Catholic Church and priests and bishops,' he said. He noted the state could still pursue criminal investigations and abuse victims could seek civil penalties. Mark Crawford, state director of the Survivors Network for those Abused by Priests, said 'victims want their story heard.' 'They want to get in front of the grand jury and tell that story,' Crawford said. 'They want some level of accountability and acknowledgement.' In 2023, a trial court judge sided with the diocese, finding that a grand jury would lack authority because it would be focused on 'private conduct,' rather than a government agency's actions. An appeals court affirmed that judgment last year, and the attorney general's office appealed to the state Supreme Court. Documents the high court unsealed in March sketched out some of what the state's task force has found so far, without specific allegations. They show 550 phone calls alleging abuse from the 1940s to the 'recent past' came into a state-established hotline. The diocese argued a grand jury isn't needed, largely because of a 2002 memorandum of understanding between New Jersey Catholic dioceses and prosecutors. The memorandum required church officials to report abuse and said authorities would be provided with all relevant information about the allegations. But the Pennsylvania report led to reexamining the statute of limitations in New Jersey, where the time limits on childhood sex abuse claims were overhauled in 2019. The new law allows child victims to sue until they turn 55 or within seven years of their first realization that the abuse caused them harm. The previous statute of limitations was age 20, or two years after realizing abuse caused harm. Also in 2019, New Jersey's five Catholic dioceses listed more than 180 priests who have been credibly accused of sexually abusing minors over several decades. Many listed were deceased and others removed from ministry. The Camden diocese, like others nationwide, filed for bankruptcy amid a torrent of lawsuits — up to 55, according to court records — after the statute of limitations was relaxed. In 2022, the diocese agreed to pay $87.5 million to settle claims involving clergy sex abuse against some 300 accusers, one of the largest cash settlements involving the Catholic church in the U.S. The agreement, covering six southern New Jersey counties outside Philadelphia, exceeded the nearly $85 million settlement in 2003 in the clergy abuse scandal in Boston, but was less than settlements in California and Oregon.
