logo
Why women deserve to be treated seriously when they are in pain

Why women deserve to be treated seriously when they are in pain

'First, do no harm' has long been a guiding principle of medicine. What if instead it was, 'first, listen to the patient'?
For Lilli Staff, it might have saved years of pain. When she was 17, she was told her debilitating pelvic pain was normal by several gynaecologists on the NSW South Coast. Two years later, a Sydney gynaecologist diagnosed her with the most severe form of endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome.
It is yet another example of a woman who has been dismissed, belittled, misdiagnosed or gas-lit to come to light since The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age launched an investigation into medical misogyny.
As health editor Kate Aubusson reveals today, there are promising signs of a treatment for Pelvic Congestion Syndrome, which is among the many under-researched potential contributors to chronic pelvic pain. There are studies that suggest the syndrome, characterised by damage to the major veins that run through the pelvis, may contribute to as many as 30 or 40 per cent of cases where no other cause, such as endometriosis, can be identified.
The promising treatment in question is stenting, a technique more commonly associated with repairing the arteries of cardiovascular patients. In a recent study, vascular surgeon associate professor Laurencia Villalba followed 113 women (aged 17 to 88) with blocked pelvic veins who underwent stenting after suffering severe pelvic pain, some for up to 25 years.
Villalba and her co-author, associate professor Theresa Larkin, found that after the procedure, almost every woman (all but two patients) reported that her pain had lessened significantly six to 12 months later, and most (73 per cent) reported that their pain had disappeared completely. This is an encouraging outcome, although it must be said much more study is needed. In the words of associate professor Sarah Aitken, the deputy chair of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons' (RACS) Vascular Board, 'this is still a big area of unprioritised research'.
Loading
Earlier in the week, Aubusson also reported that a world-first endometriosis institute will be established at the University of NSW. It has come about courtesy of the largest known donation in the world towards researching the condition whereby tissue similar to the lining of the uterus, the endometrium, grows in other parts of the body. The Ainsworth family, NSW pokies billionaires, committed the funds to establish the Ainsworth Endometriosis Research Institute (AERI), which has been heralded as a game-changer after a 30-year lag in science investment.
The two stories highlight how important it is for doctors, other medical professionals and researchers to take women seriously when they say they are in pain. The advances being made are welcome, of course, and it is important not to rush into adopting treatments for poorly understood conditions without careful ongoing study. But there is a glaring lack of knowledge and research in an area that has been neglected for far too long.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Patient care must not be compromised by bureaucratic benchmarks
Patient care must not be compromised by bureaucratic benchmarks

Sydney Morning Herald

time5 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Patient care must not be compromised by bureaucratic benchmarks

Every three months, the residents of NSW are given a status update on the performance of their state's public health system. The quarterly Bureau of Health Information report paints a picture of how the system is functioning, from the number of ambulance call-outs to wait times in emergency and how long the average patient stays at hospital. Of particular interest since the pandemic – and covered exhaustively by the Herald – has been the elective surgery waitlist, which rose to record lengths when COVID-19 precautions caused the postponement of thousands of non-urgent operations. In the 2023 state election, NSW Labor ran on a platform of reducing the elective surgery waitlist, announcing a surgical taskforce to investigate ways to clear the list, sparing patients from the poor health outcomes that can come from waiting longer than recommended for life-changing operations, including hip and knee replacements, eye surgery, and cardiothoracic procedures. By the end of that year, the number of patients overdue for surgery had declined to pre-pandemic levels. But, as the Herald reported following the release of the latest BHI quarterly data in March, the number of patients overdue for elective surgery in NSW public hospitals tripled between the end of 2023 and the end of 2024. Loading While nowhere near the 18,000-person waitlist left after NSW's Delta lockdown in late 2021, such a sharp upward trend in the number of people waiting too long for operations has not been seen outside of periods of pandemic restrictions. Eye surgeries, joint replacements and tonsillectomies were the procedures with the largest backlogs. Doctors speaking about the release of those figures put the increase down to staff shortages and budget cuts. But, as Herald health editor Kate Aubusson reports today, doubts have been cast over whether the pressure to meet KPIs at some hospitals had led to surgeries being strategically categorised, so they did not appear as overdue on the books. Among the allegations made by doctors at Sydney's RPA and Westmead hospitals, which follow an ABC investigation into similar behaviour at Orange Hospital last month, are that hospitals have been effectively refusing patients because they will not be able to perform their surgery within the recommended timeframe, or changing the categories of patients.

Patient care must not be compromised by bureaucratic benchmarks
Patient care must not be compromised by bureaucratic benchmarks

The Age

time5 hours ago

  • The Age

Patient care must not be compromised by bureaucratic benchmarks

Every three months, the residents of NSW are given a status update on the performance of their state's public health system. The quarterly Bureau of Health Information report paints a picture of how the system is functioning, from the number of ambulance call-outs to wait times in emergency and how long the average patient stays at hospital. Of particular interest since the pandemic – and covered exhaustively by the Herald – has been the elective surgery waitlist, which rose to record lengths when COVID-19 precautions caused the postponement of thousands of non-urgent operations. In the 2023 state election, NSW Labor ran on a platform of reducing the elective surgery waitlist, announcing a surgical taskforce to investigate ways to clear the list, sparing patients from the poor health outcomes that can come from waiting longer than recommended for life-changing operations, including hip and knee replacements, eye surgery, and cardiothoracic procedures. By the end of that year, the number of patients overdue for surgery had declined to pre-pandemic levels. But, as the Herald reported following the release of the latest BHI quarterly data in March, the number of patients overdue for elective surgery in NSW public hospitals tripled between the end of 2023 and the end of 2024. Loading While nowhere near the 18,000-person waitlist left after NSW's Delta lockdown in late 2021, such a sharp upward trend in the number of people waiting too long for operations has not been seen outside of periods of pandemic restrictions. Eye surgeries, joint replacements and tonsillectomies were the procedures with the largest backlogs. Doctors speaking about the release of those figures put the increase down to staff shortages and budget cuts. But, as Herald health editor Kate Aubusson reports today, doubts have been cast over whether the pressure to meet KPIs at some hospitals had led to surgeries being strategically categorised, so they did not appear as overdue on the books. Among the allegations made by doctors at Sydney's RPA and Westmead hospitals, which follow an ABC investigation into similar behaviour at Orange Hospital last month, are that hospitals have been effectively refusing patients because they will not be able to perform their surgery within the recommended timeframe, or changing the categories of patients.

Botched hospital stays caused more than 100 deaths
Botched hospital stays caused more than 100 deaths

The Age

time2 days ago

  • The Age

Botched hospital stays caused more than 100 deaths

Three Victorian patients died or were seriously harmed after receiving surgery on the wrong part of their body last financial year. Two others were left with life-threatening complications because foreign objects – such as surgical sponges, cotton swabs or clamps – were unintentionally left inside them at the end of an invasive procedure. Thirteen people died or were seriously harmed because they were either given the wrong medication or incorrect dosage. And six died by suspected suicide in an acute psychiatric unit or ward. The revelations are contained in Victoria's latest annual review of hospital errors resulting in serious harm or death, otherwise known as 'sentinel events'. The report – compiled by government agency Safer Care Victoria and obtained by The Age before it was published – found there were 193 such incidents during the 2023-24 financial year, resulting in approximately 112 deaths. While the overall number of sentinel events and subsequent deaths are down compared to last year's record high of 245 incidents and 167 patient deaths, there has been a year-on-year spike in the number of suspected suicides in acute psychiatric settings and the proportion of sentinel events involving babies less than seven days old. The six Victorians who died by suspected suicide in an acute psychiatric setting last financial year represent a threefold increase compared to 2022-23 when two individuals died in similar circumstances. The proportion of self-harm incidents among uncategorised sentinel events also grew year-on-year, from 7 per cent to 10 per cent. The Age can confirm Safer Care Victoria will conduct a review of the way health services report these so-called 'category 11' cases, which make up the vast majority of incidents.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store