
GST rejig: Group of Ministers accepts Centre's rate rationalisation proposal to scrap 12% and 28% slabs
(With inputs from Agencies)
(This is a breaking story, more updates coming…)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
18 minutes ago
- Hans India
FHRAI seeks 5 pc GST with input tax credit for tourism sector
New Delhi: As the Centre prepares to revamp GST rates, the Federation of Hotel & Restaurant Associations of India (FHRAI) has urged Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman to implement a uniform 5 per cent GST rate with input tax credit to make tourism affordable. The FHRAI argued that India's GST rates are higher than Asian peers like Thailand and Singapore, where rates are as low as 6 to 10 per cent. India's higher GST structure reduces affordability and weakens its appeal for international travellers, it said. "The appeal to cut rates seeks to position Indian tourism as a driver of economic growth while enhancing its global competitiveness in alignment with India's Vision 2047," the industry body said in a release. A uniform GST rate of five per cent with input tax credit across all hospitality and tourism services would ease compliance and reduce the cost burden for both domestic and international travellers, it said. The association has also called for doing away with the linking of GST on food and beverage services from hotel room tariffs, pointing out that the current linkage creates operational inefficiencies and revenue losses for hotels. Further, it requested that past GST payments be regularised on an "as is" basis to address demand notices arising from earlier ambiguities in the interpretation of tariff values and service classifications. FHRAI claimed that the ratification of GST could double tourism's current contribution of 5 per cent to India's GDP and create immense jobs. The tourism sector remains one of the largest employment generators, offering extensive opportunities for youth and women, with its high multiplier effect, where every rupee invested in hospitality generates a return of Rs 3.5 in output, while one direct job in the sector creates an additional 3.2 indirect jobs, the release said.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
18 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Need GST Council-like bodies for infra growth: Tata Power CEO Praveer Sinha
India needs Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council-like common platforms between states and the Centre in areas such as land clearances, power, and water to fast-track infrastructure projects to achieve double-digit growth going ahead, said Praveer Sinha, chief executive officer and managing director of The Tata Power Company. There is also a need for several policy interventions to overcome procedural and regulatory bottlenecks, Sinha said at the Business Standard Infrastructure Summit 2025 here on Thursday. He said the country's power sector alone requires around ₹3 trillion over the next five years. From the current gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate of 6–7 per cent, he said, the country has the capability to grow up at around 8–10 per cent with a further push in the infrastructure sector. This, Sinha believed, is required while India will still be the fastest-growing economy for the next 10–20 years. 'I think there is so much more that needs to be done -- the speed at which legislations have to come and the speed at which the enforcement of those legislations have to happen,' Sinha said. 'One great example that we have is the common GST Council. Possibly, you need a similar council for land clearances, power, water, and then only we will be able to see great speed at which we can transform and make a difference in the country,' he added. According to Sinha, India has done well in the power sector, from having an installed capacity of around 100 gigawatts (Gw) in 2000 to around 490 Gw now. He opined that a similar improvement is visible in the solar sector, which has a total renewable target of 500 Gw by 2030. The sector grew to 115 Gw in 2025 from 5 Gw in 2015 and is poised to touch 290 Gw by 2030. The share of renewables now stands at 50 per cent. 'That is a huge improvement,' he said. However, the growth is minimal compared to China, he added. Last year, when India added 30 Gw of renewable capacity, China did 400 Gw. 'This year, in the first six months, China added 212 Gw. That is the type of capacity addition that is happening. That is the type of change and transformation. We are talking about 490 Gw and they are talking about 2,500 Gw. In terms of population, we are virtually the same. There is no reason why we should not do it,' Sinha added. Further highlighting regulatory bottlenecks, he said: 'I think there is a huge necessity to de-bottleneck some of these things. We cannot have an economy that is flourishing and growing at a fast pace with the legislature and regulatory framework not supporting it.' Highlighting the funding requirement, Sinha batted for lower cost of funding, as the country has one of the highest rates in the world. He also advocated opening up restrictions on the insurance sector for funding, equity holding or financing. 'You have the Canadians and others from Europe and the UK who come into funding over here. Our insurers are not allowed to do it, and they are sitting on a huge pile of cash with them. I think there is a necessity to open up some of the channels,' he suggested. Putting a case for green energy, Sinha said one major issue with India's power ecosystem is its dependence still on diesel for around 90 Gw of power, along with the agriculture sector's reliance on diesel generators. 'I think that is a waste. There is no reason why we should have diesel power,' he added. He said the next 10–20 years are likely to be the golden period for India, as the country needs a lot of work to do in the infrastructure sector. 'India consumes around 1,400 units of power annually, of which the consumption is around 100 units in villages. Around 100 units means we consume only around 8–9 units a month. That is not what we expect as nearly 40 per cent of our population is staying in villages,' Sinha noted.


Mint
33 minutes ago
- Mint
What are risks of investing in bonds? Use these strategies to manage volatility, inflation, and interest rate challenges
Bond investors are navigating heightened market volatility due to the rapidly evolving geopolitical situation. Issues such as the Russia-Ukraine war, US tariff action on Indian exports, and ongoing GST rate rationalisation are influencing bonds and equities alike. In the given environment, it is prudent to efficiently plan both short-term and long-term investments. The country's 10-year government bond yield hovers in the range of 6.52-6.54%. This comes amid broader conversations on economic reforms, tax changes, and a shift in monetary policy priorities — all intended to support sustainable growth and financial stability. One of the key dynamics investors must watch is the relationship between interest rates and bond prices — a core element of bond market risk. As a rule, bond prices decline when interest rates rise. It is generally observed when central banks signal further tightening to manage the ever-evolving economic conditions. That is why efficient risk management is crucial. Adding to the same, Navy Vijay Ramavat, MD, Indira Group, cautions, 'Bond risks are driven mainly from interest rate movements & economic cycles. For government or corporate bonds, conservative investors can rely on coupons for stable income. While active traders must track yields, inflation, and monetary policy closely to manage risks and safeguard returns.' Managing bond risks requires devoted tracking of RBI policies, global and domestic economic conditions, inflation trends, and credit ratings. Proper diversification across maturities and issuers further defends portfolios from volatility and unexpected market swings. Track Reserve Bank announcements and market updates to anticipate policy-driven changes that may impact bond yields and prices. Evaluate bond yield trends with current and forecasted inflation. Aim to safeguard real returns. Verify creditworthiness and bond safety by checking ratings from CRISIL, ICRA, or CARE, especially before investing in corporate bonds. Diversify holdings by investing across a range of maturities. Focus on different issuers to reduce concentration risk. Prioritise more liquid bonds to ensure you can quickly exit positions if market conditions deteriorate. This will help you in protecting your portfolio. Government bonds are backed by a sovereign assurance, i.e., a guarantee. This minimises default risk. Still, these bonds can face real-return pressure when inflation outpaces yields. On the other hand, corporate bonds carry credit risk, making proper background checks, bond assessment extremely vital. In case inflation continues to trend higher in the range of 4 to 5% such a development threatens to erode the purchasing power for all fixed-income products. Government bonds provide higher liquidity. This permits investors to exit large positions with minimal slippage. Corporate bonds, on the other hand, can be less liquid, especially in turbulent conditions or market downturns. The market is now focused on continuing to adopt centralised clearing and advanced risk management to minimise losses and bring more stability and accountability to the system. Transparent data, readiness for market volatility are now crucial elements that are mandatory for all bond market participants. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not financial advice. Bond investments carry risks, and investors should consult a financial advisor before making decisions.