logo
Why Did Indira Gandhi Offer To Share India's Nuclear Technology With Pakistan In 1974?

Why Did Indira Gandhi Offer To Share India's Nuclear Technology With Pakistan In 1974?

News1819-05-2025

Last Updated:
US Embassy cables leaked by Wikileaks in 2013 reveal the offer came months after India's 1974 nuclear test, with Indira Gandhi's Parliament statement cited from July 22, 1974
Did Indira Gandhi once offered to share India's nuclear technology with Pakistan? According to US Embassy cables released by Wikileaks in 2013, this offer was made just months after India's first nuclear test, codenamed Smiling Buddha, in 1974. The cables mentioned Indira Gandhi's statement in Parliament on July 22, 1974.
According to WikiLeaks, Indira Gandhi stated, 'I explained the peaceful and economic objectives of this test in a letter to (Zulfikar Ali) Bhutto and said that India is ready to share its nuclear technology with Pakistan, just as it does with other countries."
The declassified US Embassy cables released by Wikileaks stated that after conducting the first nuclear tests in 1974, Indira Gandhi later extended a hand of cooperation by reportedly offering to share nuclear technology with the neighbouring country.
According to the Wikileaks cables, Indira Gandhi made this offer in a letter to Pakistan's then-prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, explaining that India's nuclear ambitions were peaceful and economically driven, aimed at boosting oil and gas reserves.
In her letter dated July 22, 1974, Gandhi dismissed Bhutto's concerns about radioactive leakage, asserting that the wind was not blowing towards Pakistan at the time of the test.
This proposal reportedly came at a time of heightened tensions following the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War, during which India had captured around 93,000 Pakistani soldiers. According to various accounts, many have since debated whether Indira Gandhi's decision to return these prisoners without securing a concrete agreement was a diplomatic misstep.
Nevertheless, her reported offer three years later, to share nuclear technology with Pakistan was viewed by some as a significant peace initiative. However, according to sources, the offer was ultimately rejected by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto.
Indira Gandhi's confidence in pursuing peaceful nuclear advancement was met with international scepticism and led to the imposition of strict technical sanctions on India. According to several reports, the formation of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) was a direct response, aimed at preventing countries outside the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), like India, from further developing their nuclear capabilities.
Pakistan, meanwhile, went on to conduct its first nuclear test in 1998 just two weeks after India's second round of nuclear tests, signalling the start of a new phase in the regional arms race.
The Wikileaks revelations have reignited debate on social media around this historic episode, with opinions divided on whether Indira Gandhi's offer to share nuclear technology was a genuine peace initiative or a politically naive move.
Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
First Published:

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lashkar's renewed blossoming shows war hasn't coerced Pakistan Army into giving up on Kashmir
Lashkar's renewed blossoming shows war hasn't coerced Pakistan Army into giving up on Kashmir

The Print

time28 minutes ago

  • The Print

Lashkar's renewed blossoming shows war hasn't coerced Pakistan Army into giving up on Kashmir

Then, on 28 May, just two weeks after the 100-hour India-Pakistan war set off by that carnage, Saifullah was on stage vowing jihad without end against India—a warning that India's cruise missile attacks haven't coerced Pakistan into ending its covert war in Kashmir. Even though New Delhi believes the punishment it delivered has drawn new red lines, deterrence cannot be inferred from conjectures. The harms one adversary considers unacceptable might not be so for another. To conclude that some degree of deterrence has been secured, evidence has to be sought in the real-world actions of the adversary. Eighteen years ago this summer, then-Lashkar-e-Taiba commander in charge of operations in southern Kashmir's Kulgam, Saifullah had dramatically escaped across the Line of Control, together with his new bride, Shabbira Kucchay. From his home near Kasur in Pakistan, the National Investigation Agency alleges , he led forces which harried Indian troops, executed dozens of civilians, and conducted the communal massacre in Pahalgam. Tu paani band karega, to hum saans band kar dengey ': The crowd swayed listlessly in the Lahore heat, perhaps to keep off the flies, as the anthem threatening to choke India's breath blared out through low-grade loudspeakers. 'Light up your phones to welcome this man of courage, the hero of Kashmir, the conqueror India,' the sweat-drenched compere shouted over the music, a miserable remix of an ageing disco-era Bollywood hit. Finally, making his way through a swarm of selfie-seeking fanboys, Sajid Saifullah Jatt emerged on the stage in Lahore: The appearance of the jihadist icon, a carefully-crafted message from the Pakistan Army. For now, there's no evidence at all that ought give India comfort. Far from hiding their links with terrorists, as Pakistani officials were compelled to do after 26/11, high officials have given slain Lashkar personnel state funerals, joined their functions, and allowed the organisation to hold processions across the country. Even before the Pahalgam attack, Pakistan-based journalist Kunwar Khuldune Shahid reports, Lashkar leader Naseer Ahmad told a gathering in Muridke that 'the ideological offspring of Hafiz Mohammed Saeed will continue his jihad.' Earlier, Lashkar co-founder Amir Hamza, internationally-sanctioned for his role in raising terrorism funding, delivered a sermon in Murdike urging 'jihad against the infidels.' Local Lashkar leader Rizwan Hanif, speaking in Bazaar Khaigala of Rawalakot, urged followers to prepare for 'our jihad against the cow-worshippers.' The speaker of Punjab's Legislative Assembly, Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan, shared a stage with members of the Lashkar's political front this week, praising its jailed chief, Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, and promising future support. Little doubt exists that these public declarations of support would not take place without permission from the Pakistan Army. Two years ago, facing the risk of sanctions from the multinational Financial Action Task Force (FATF) on terror finance, Pakistan had jailed several key Lashkar terrorists, and pushed its activities underground. Today, jihadist groups—not just the Lashkar, but also the Jaish-e-Muhammad—have been freed from their cages. There's no knowing, just yet, what ends Field Marshal Asim Munir—who served as Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) chief during the 2019 Pulwama attack—is seeking through this escalation. The commander might see it as retaliation for Indian support for secessionists in Baluchistan, or be securing his credentials as a hawk among other Generals displeased by the decision to hold power for five entire years. The guardians of the Islamic state Located at the peripheries of Pakistan's national project, Islamism was to have a profound effect on its evolution. The state, Jamaat-e-Islami leader Abul 'Ala Maududi argued, 'and all that it contains belongs to God, who alone is its sovereign.' This language was appropriated by the country's military. The 1962 constitution of Field Marshal Ayub Khan's regime established a council to enforce legal compliance with religious ideology. The war of 1965 saw fallen soldiers for the first time being hailed as religious martyrs. Following the liberation of Bangladesh in 1971, the tensions over Pakistan's identity grew deeper. The new prime minister, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, increasingly relied on religious polemic, and his 1973 constitution made Islam the state religion. These organisations would flourish in the regime of General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, who recruited Islamist groups to support his campaign against the Soviet Union. The Ahl-e-Hadith, the religious order from which the Lashkar flowered, was not among them. Founded in the mid-19th century, by Nawab Siddiq Hasan Khan of Bhopal and Nazir Hussain Dehlavi, the Ahl-e-Hadith claimed lineage from the ideas of the anti-colonial cleric Shah Wali Allah. The sect's members, largely landed elites who had experienced downward mobility during colonial rule, blamed their plight on the decadence of Islam. Elements of the Ahl-e-Hadith, known as the Tehreek-ul-Mujahideen, participated in the anti-colonial jihadist operations in the North-West Frontier Province, historian Lal Baha records. Their strength rarely exceeded a few dozen men, and their base at Chamarkand was largely ignored by colonial forces. The organisation may have also played a marginal role in supporting Pakistan Army-backed irregulars who attacked Kashmir in 1947. The Ahl-e-Hadith split into several factions soon after, each focussed on building seminaries and mosques across Sindh and Punjab. Also read: Asim Munir just stole his 5th star & has nothing to show for it. It'll make him desperate, dangerous The Afghan jihadists From the work of Lashkar propagandist Amir Hamza, we know some young Ahl-e-Hadith seminarians began pushing to join the jihad in Afghanistan soon after the Soviet invasion, even though they had no armed group. Led by Abdul Qahar from Sargodha, a small group travelled in 1977, followed by students from seminaries in Gujaranwala and Faisalabad. Then, in 1983, to-be Lashkar deputy Zaki-ur-Rahman Lakhvi took another group of volunteers from Gujaranwala to the Nuristan region in Afghanistan, where there was an old Ahl-e-Hadith presence. The push to form the Lashkar, though, came from Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, an ethnic-Gujjar who had moved to Lahore during Partition, from what is now Haryana. Teaching at the International Islamic University in Islamabad, Saeed came into contact with Afghan jihadist circles through Abdullah Azzam, also a teacher at the university, who was Osama Bin Laden's mentor. Later, during a two-year stint at Saudi Arabia's King Saud University, Saeed was introduced to the powerful cleric Sheikh Abd al-Aziz ibn Baz, and tapped jihad donors around him. A one-time convert from the syncretic Barelvi sect, Zafar Iqbal, together with Amir Hamza and Lakhvi, formed the core of a new jihadist organisation, the Markaz ud Dawat wal'Irshad, or Centre for Proselytisation. The organisation's rise wasn't predestined. Two influential Ahl-e-Hadith figures, political scientist Sameena Yasmin has written in her authoritative work on the Lashkar, held out. Sajid Mir—not to be confused with the Sajid Mir involved in the 26/11 attacks—continued to dominate the religious infrastructure of the Ahl-e-Hadith. Eminent Ahl-e-Hadith scholars like Hafiz Abdullah Bahawalpuri and Hafiz Mohammad Yahya Aziz also chose not to participate in the new group. Following the founding of its first training camp at Karair, near Tangu in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, in February 1990, the MDI's armed wing, the Lashkar, began funnelling small numbers of fighters across the Line of Control. It focussed, though, on recruitment. Giant rallies were held in 1995, 1996, and 1997 at its new campus near Lahore, which were addressed by Bin Laden himself. The group used the deaths of cadre to draw more volunteers. As historian Mariam Abou Zahab has written, the funerals were treated as celebratory occasions, akin to marriages, where the slain terrorist was identified as a divine groom joining the houris in paradise. Literature produced by the Lashkar claimed the killed terrorist would be able to intercede for his loved ones at the gates of heaven. Also read: Pakistan has no natural tendency to be democratic. Rule of Islam is the priority Annihilation of India From the outset, the Lashkar made no secret of the fact that its objective was the annihilation of India, not just the capture of Kashmir. 'Through the jihad waged by mujahideen people of Pakistan, and particularly those from Lahore, [we] would soon be able to [visit and enjoy] the real Chamba and Shimla,' Amir Hamza cheerily asserted in 1999. Later that year, cleric Sheikh Hafiz Ahmad wrote that 'Hindustan is the worst infidel in the world. These idolaters are even worse than the infidels of Mecca as they have millions of gods. This language has increasingly infiltrated Pakistan's official discourse. Inter-Services Public Relations Director General Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhury has spoken of a Fitna al-Hindustan, suggesting the country is a legitimate target of an existential religious war. Field Marshal Munir, journalist Ailia Zahra points out, has also used similar motifs. In one speech made in April, he proclaimed being 'different from Hindus in every possible aspect of life. Our religion is different. Our customs are different. Our traditions are different. Our thoughts are different.' To this, he added the proposition that the Islamic Kalima, or profession of faith, was the foundation of the state of Pakistan itself. Ideological wars are unlike all other wars, because they seek no strategic or political ends. Islamabad has known since at least 1965 that it cannot take Kashmir by force, and yet it persists in waging a war without an end. To give up the conflict would mean giving up the idea on which the project of Pakistan rests. To prevail in this conflict, India needs weapons, but also a powerful idea it is increasingly at risk of losing sight of: The idea that nationhood can be built on something other than irreducible religious hatred. Praveen Swami is contributing editor at ThePrint. His X handle is @praveenswami. Views are personal. (Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)

Cop, teacher among 3 govt staffers sacked over terror links
Cop, teacher among 3 govt staffers sacked over terror links

Hans India

time38 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Cop, teacher among 3 govt staffers sacked over terror links

Jammu: Jammu and Kashmir Lt Governor Manoj Sinha on Tuesday dismissed three government employees for their alleged involvement with proscribed terror outfits Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Hizb-ul-Mujahideen, officials said. A police constable, a school teacher and a junior assistant in a government medical college were terminated under Article 311(2)(c) of the Constitution, which allows dismissal without an inquiry 'in the interest of national security'. All three are currently lodged in jail, they said. Over 75 government employees with terror links have been dismissed so far by the LG administration. Officials said the action is part of the administration's continued crackdown on terror infrastructure, including overground workers (OGWs) and sympathisers embedded within government institutions. The dismissed employees were identified as Malik Ishfaq Naseer, a police constable, Ajaz Ahmed, a teacher in the school education department and Waseem Ahmad Khan, a junior assistant in Government Medical College, Srinagar. The sacked employees were 'active terror collaborators,' involved in logistics, arms smuggling, and aiding terror operations against security forces and civilians, a senior security official said. Constable Malik Ishfaq Naseer, recruited in 2007, came under suspicion during an investigation into arms smuggling in 2021. His brother Malik Asif was a Pakistan-trained LeT militant and was killed in 2018, but he allegedly continued to support the outfit while serving in the police, he said. 'He used his position to identify safe drop locations for arms, explosives, and narcotics, and shared GPS coordinates with Pakistani handlers,' the official said. Malik also allegedly distributed these consignments to active terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir. His LeT link was exposed in September, 2021 when J&K police was investigating a case related to smuggling of arms and explosives in Jammu region. 'He was not only identifying the safe location, sharing the coordinates with LeT handlers in Pakistan but he was also collecting and distributing arms and ammunition to terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir region enabling them to carry out terrorist attacks on security forces and civilians,' a senior security official. He said that instead of helping the police department in fighting the terror which he was mandated for, he chose to be a mole and a collaborator and betrayed his oath and uniform. 'His betrayal of the oath and uniform has caused grave damage to the department, society and the nation,' the official added. Ajaz Ahmed, who joined the Education Department in 2011, was found smuggling arms, ammunition, and Hizb-ul-Mujahideen propaganda material. He was arrested during a routine police check in November 2023. According to the probe, the arms were meant for militants operating in Kashmir, sent by his handler Abid Ramzan Sheikh, a Hizb-ul-Mujahideen operative based in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Ajaz Ahmed was allegedly involved in such activities for several years and he became a trusted terror associate of Hizb-ul-Mujahideen in the Poonch region. He was actively helping the terror outfit in smuggling arms, ammunition and narcotics, the officer said. The terror link with Hizb-ul-Mujahideen was exposed in November 2023 when police arrested Ajaz Ahmed and his friend during a routine check. Both were carrying arms, ammunition and posters of Hizb-ul-Mujahideen in his car. Waseem Ahmad Khan, a junior assistant at Government Medical College, Srinagar, appointed in 2007, was allegedly found to be part of a terror plot that led to the assassination of journalist Shujaat Bukhari and his security personnel in June 2018, the officer said.

UK MP Bob Blackman Calls Pakistan a ‘Failed State', Urges End To Illegal Occupation Of Kashmir
UK MP Bob Blackman Calls Pakistan a ‘Failed State', Urges End To Illegal Occupation Of Kashmir

News18

time41 minutes ago

  • News18

UK MP Bob Blackman Calls Pakistan a ‘Failed State', Urges End To Illegal Occupation Of Kashmir

Last Updated: Blackman also raised pointed questions about Pakistan's use of international aid, suggesting that funds intended for development were being misused to procure Chinese weapons Branding Pakistan a 'failed state", UK Member of Parliament Bob Blackman launched a sharp critique of the neighbouring country on Tuesday, questioning whether 'democracy or generals" were in charge in Islamabad. The remarks came amid growing global scrutiny of Pakistan's military dominance and support for cross-border terrorism. In a conversation with ANI after a meeting with the all-party Indian parliamentary delegation led by BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad in London, Blackman called on the international community to stand with India in its fight against terror. He accused Pakistan of encouraging terrorism in Indian territory and condemned its continued illegal occupation of parts of Jammu and Kashmir. 'Pakistan is a failed state. We don't have democracy in Pakistan. We have the people of parts of Pakistan, who are suffering under Pakistani military rule. So who's in charge? Is it the democracy or the Generals? And it's quite clear that terrorism is encouraged from Pakistan into sovereign India," Blackman told ANI. He continued, 'And so we've got to make sure we have to call out the message that the illegal occupation of part of India in Jammu and Kashmir by Pakistan should end. Those troops should leave, and the whole of Jammu and Kashmir should be united as one principal state, as was intended back in 1947. And then we can lead to the eradication of terrorism and make sure that the people of that great state can celebrate the beauty of the valley." Blackman also raised pointed questions about Pakistan's use of international aid, suggesting that funds intended for development were being misused to procure Chinese weapons for terror activities against India. He stressed that aid should instead support healthcare efforts like polio eradication. 'We had a meeting and it's great to see the delegation from all parts of India… Everyone from the United Kingdom expresses their condolences and support for the people of India who've suffered this terrorist outrage… India wants peace and tranquillity between the two," he said, as quoted by ANI. 'The money that's sent to Pakistan, what is it used for? What it shouldn't be used for is buying Chinese weapons that would then enable terrorists to attack India, and I take a very strong view that our international aid money that should go to Pakistan should be going for the eradication of polio and other infectious diseases that benefit the people of Pakistan rather than it being used illicitly for military purposes," Blackman added. Earlier, the Indian delegation met with the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG)-India, of which Blackman is a member. UK MPs expressed solidarity with India, backing its efforts to isolate Pakistan diplomatically. Other UK leaders, including Lord Karan Bilimoria and former MP Shailesh Vara, extended cross-party support for India's stance post the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, and discussed stronger bilateral cooperation in trade, security, and education. First Published: June 04, 2025, 08:53 IST

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store