LA DA Hochman touts Prop 36 success for deterring retail theft
LA County DA Hochman hailed Prop 36 for deterring retail theft.
The announcement was made outside a 7-Eleven that has been victimized 12 times in recent weeks.
He said since December, over a thousand arrests have been made for theft.
LOS ANGELES - Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman hailed the success of Proposition 36 for deterring retail theft.
What we know
Hochman held a press conference Wednesday outside a 7-Eleven store on Olympic Blvd. that has been repeatedly targeted by flash-mobs and other robberies.
He also announced a campaign to distribute thousands of bright yellow stickers to be posted at businesses, warning potential thieves of the stepped-up criminal penalties for robberies.
Prop 36, which California voters passed in November, increased some shoplifting offenses from misdemeanors to felonies in an effort to crack down on robberies and burglaries. Hochman said the increased penalties serve as a warning to potential offenders.
What they're saying
"Is it working? Has Proposition 36 actually resulted in more felony arrests? The answer is yes. Since Dec. 18, we have had over a thousand Proposition 36 arrests for thieves alone," Hochman said during the press conference.
"Our goal is not to fill our prisons with these thieves. That would be the failure of efforts. Our goal is to deter these criminals from committing these crimes in the first place," he added. "And when I say victims, I don't mean just the stores and the store owners -- the quality of our life is degrading."
SUGGESTED:
California Prop 36 explained: Increasing penalties for theft and drug trafficking
Target pulls the plug on self-checkout amid shoplifting surge
$300,000 in stolen merchandise recovered during LA retail theft bust
The owner of the 7-Eleven store in the 8500 block of West Olympic Boulevard where Hochman made his remarks, echoed his sentiments saying retailers have been targeted by repeat offenders with no fear of reprisal.
"Communities have been targeted repeatedly by shoplifters -- not one- time offenders, but the same individuals coming back over and over knowing that there were no real consequences," Jawad Ursani told reporters. "My store was targeted not once but twice by a smash-and-grab by about over 50 teenagers and a repeat shoplifter who is now detained and will be held accountable by this D.A.'s Office as we speak."
One of the flash-mob robberies at Ursani's store occurred in September of last year, when dozens of teens on bicycles swarmed the location and ransacked the store.
The Source
Information for this story is from the office of LA County District Attorney Nathan Hochman. City News Service contributed to this report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
14 hours ago
- CBS News
Target fires hundreds of Little Village warehouse employees apparently for medical loan scheme
Hundreds of Target workers in Chicago appear to be out of a job after a scheme to not pay back medical loans offered by the company. An internal investigation found team members violated the company's ethics at the Little Village warehouse. A Block Club Chicago report says the firings all stem from the company's medical loan program, which gave out loans of more than $3,00 to cover expenses. But a loophole let some workers pay back just $50 of the loan and get the remaining balance erased. Up to 700 employees may have been fired; the scheme cost the company $1 million. Target told CBS News Chicago there are now measures in place to prevent this from happening again.
New York Post
17 hours ago
- New York Post
Target, Ulta partnership allegedly doomed by out-of-control shoplifting— including $10k a month at one store
The shop-in-shop partnership between Target and Ulta Beauty was allegedly doomed by rampant theft of the cosmetics company's pricey products — including at least $10,000 a month at one store. The retail giants last week announced that they've 'mutually agreed' to terminate their union — where Ulta's popular makeup items were sold at 610 Target locations around the country. Execs from both companies lauded the 'synergy' they enjoyed after joining forces in 2021, but many claiming to be current and former Target workers flooded Reddit to allege that shoplifting was the real culprit behind the partnership's demise. 4 The image above from 2018 shows a Target department store in San Antonio. AP 'The amount of theft is f–king insane. I could be wrong but at least 10k a month in theft,' one purported Target worker in the unnamed store posted on Reddit earlier this year. The complaint echoed those made by others in the r/Target and r/Ulta threads that blamed brazen bandits for snatching Ulta's high-end cosmetics at understaffed Target stores. Organzied retail theft surged after the pandemic, resulting in major retailers, including Target, being forced to put items under lock and key. Nevertheless, the security precautions seemingly did little to prevent shoplifting at some locations. One Target worker claimed 40% of all Ulta products received throughout the year had vanished after checking inventory reports. Charlie Gasparino has his finger on the pulse of where business, politics and finance meet Sign up to receive On The Money by Charlie Gasparino in your inbox every Thursday. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters 'Thousands of dollars just in that tiny little beauty section,' the alleged employee wrote under the handle Efficient_Raise. 'At my store, it's the one area with the highest theft.' 4 Self-identified Target employees took to Reddit and wrote of high incidences of shoplifting that weighed down the partnership with Ulta. MelissaMN – Another claimed a group of thieves hauled off $8,000 in Ulta merchandise after walking in with trash bags. Target and Ulta did not respond to requests for comment about the shoplifting allegations. They also offered few details behind their decision to pull the plug on the partnership, which will end next August. 4 Products are locked behind glass as a person shops at a Target store in the Harlem neighborhood in Manhattan in 2023. Getty Images A note by analysts at TD Cowen pointed to 'shrink' – the industry term for lost or stolen merchandise – as one of the reasons for the 'conscious uncoupling,' according to trade publication Retail Dive. Another industry insider suggested Ulta wanted to distance itself from Target's toxic reputation after the chain was hit by repeated boycotts over Pride merchandise and its decision to scale back controversial DEI policies, Fortune reported. The partnership's unraveling became public in April when Ulta CEO Kecia Steelman revealed the company would 'pause' expanding the mini-stores to 'leverage the learnings.' 4 One Target employee took to Reddit and described thieves walking in with trash bags to fill with Ulta merchandise — a single heist totaling $8,000 in losses. MKPhoto – Rick Gomez, Target's executive vice president and chief commercial officer, said the retailer is 'proud of our shared success' with Ulta. Target 'remains committed to offering the beauty experience consumers have come to expect,' he added. The retailer launched 2,000 new beauty products and 50 brands in February. It also added cosmetics to its Bullseye's Playground discount section.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
HelloFresh to pay $7.5M in California subscription case—how to claim settlement
Meal kit delivery company HelloFresh has agreed to pay $7.5 million to settle allegations of what prosecutors called "deceptive subscription practices" in California. The settlement was announced Monday by district attorneys in both Los Angeles and Santa Clara counties, which jointly filed the lawsuit that led to the settlement. The plaintiff argues that HelloFresh's policies violated the state's Automatic Renewal Law by "deceptively enrolling consumers into auto-renewing subscription plans without proper disclosure or consent," according to a statement from Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman's office. "No company, no matter how big or well-known, is exempt from California's consumer protection laws," Hochman said. "We will aggressively pursue enforcement when businesses take advantage of consumers by failing to clearly disclose subscription terms, obtain proper consent, or provide a fair way to cancel. Consumers have a right to know what they're signing up for, and they deserve better. Digital deception is still deception under the law." HelloFresh admitted no liability in the settlement. What were the allegations leveled against HelloFresh in California? Prosecutors alleged HelloFresh placed customers into ongoing subscriptions without proper notice or authorization. The Santa Clara District Attorney's Office also accused the company of making it difficult for customers to cancel subscriptions. "The meal kit delivery company, the largest in the U.S., also failed to disclose the material terms and conditions of advertised free meals, surprise gifts, and free shipping offers, among other false and misleading advertising allegations," Santa Clara D.A.'s officials said in a written statement. "These actions are violations of California's Automatic Renewal Law and False Advertising Law." The civil complaint alleged that HelloFresh failed to clearly disclose subscription terms prior to collecting payment; was unable to obtain customers' affirmative consent before charging their credit or debit cards; failed to provide post-transaction acknowledgments of subscriptions; and failed to offer an easy mechanism to cancel subscriptions. 'Misleading automatic renewal subscriptions and false advertising practices don't sell products – they sell deception,' according to Santa Clara County D.A. Jeff Rosen. 'Stop means stop.' HelloFresh denies wrongdoing HelloFresh representatives told CBS News that the company's policies were fair. "We take our commitment to customer transparency very seriously, and our subscription model and cancellation policies have been consistently clear to customers throughout the whole customer journey," according to a statement from the company. "While we deny any wrongdoing, we have cooperated fully with the coalition of California District Attorneys and have entered into a settlement agreement with them to resolve the matter amicably." Where will the settlement money go? Of the $7.5 million settlement, $6.38 million will be divided between the prosecuting agencies in the form of civil penalties, according to the L.A. County D.A.'s Office. $1 million of the settlement will be paid as restitution to eligible California consumers, officials added. $120,000 will be used to cover investigative costs. HelloFresh makes up roughly 75% of the meal kit delivery market in the U.S., officials said. The case was investigated by the California Automatic Renewal Task Force, or CART, Hochman said. The program was started in 2015 to address consumer complaints about improper subscription practices and comprises prosecutors from Los Angeles, Santa Clara, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz, and San Diego counties, as well as the city of Santa Monica. Who is eligible for restitution from Hello Fresh? According to the settlement, eligible consumers are those who: Were enrolled in automatic renewal product subscriptions between Jan. 1, 2019, and Aug. 18, 2025. Were charged for the first shipment without their knowledge or consent. Canceled their automatic renewal subscription after the first shipment. Never received a refund from HelloFresh. These individuals will receive notices from the third-party administrator detailing how to submit a claim. This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: HelloFresh to pay $7.5M in California subscription settlement Solve the daily Crossword
