Distinction between state of Pakistan, terrorism has withered away: Ravi Shankar Prasad tells French journalists
Paris [France], May 27 (ANI): Head of the Indian all-party delegation to European countries, BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad on Tuesday highlighted the complex relationship between Pakistan and terrorism. He emphasised that the distinction between the state of Pakistan and terrorism has effectively disappeared.
While briefing French journalists in Paris, he said that there are 52 designated terrorists by the UN, and terrorism is an instrument of state policy in Pakistan, with the military establishment supporting terrorist groups.
'Today, there are 52 designated terrorists by the UN. The distinction between the state of Pakistan and terrorism has withered away. Terrorism as an instrument of state policy is a part of the military state of Pakistan. You know that there is no democracy there,' said the BJP MP.
He emphasised that terrorism is not just an India-centric issue but a global phenomenon, with Pakistan-based terrorist groups and patrons involved in the majority of cases.
'Terrorism is not just India-centric, terrorism is now a global phenomenon. In the majority of the cases, terrorists, their patrons, and the groups, terror groups based in Pakistan have direct or indirect involvement,' said Prasad.
While narrating the background of the India-Pakistan conflict, Prasad highlighted that both countries have fought four wars and India has never been the aggressor in conflicts with Pakistan, but has responded conclusively to protect its sovereignty, including the recent Operation Sindoor.
'The most hilarious aspect was that the general whose forces were defeated at the hands of India decisively was promoted to Field Marshal. This is this state of denial,' Prasad also said.
The delegation leader noted that all major world powers supported India's stance, and India has conveyed clearly that any actions will be handled bilaterally, with the Director General of Military Operation (DGMO) of Pakistan engaging directly with the DGMO of India.
On the Indus Water Treaty, Prasad stated it remains in abeyance until Pakistan provides evidence of stopping terrorism.
Member of the delegation, Rajya Sabha MP Priyanka Chaturvedi, said, 'We are also looking at your European Union, also looking at other important nations to address the terrorism emanating out of Pakistan, because we are all equal sufferers, we in India are more so, because we share the neighbourhood with them. We can't change our neighbours. We can only hold them accountable.'
On the nuclear threat between the two countries, former Minister of State for External Affairs MJ Akbar highlighted India's clear doctrine of no-first-use policy, contrasting it with Pakistan's lack of such a doctrine.
'PM Vajpayee was the PM who clarified indian position on nuclear capabilities, he also established a doctrine of no first use. India has clear doctrine of no first use and this doctrine is thought thorough, including thinking about the irrational behaviour of our of our neighbourhood. Pakistan has no such doctrine,' Akbar said.
After the meeting, Prasad emphasized that Operation Sindoor is only paused, and Pakistan must provide a good account of itself by stopping terrorism and cross-border terrorism.
He underscored India's call for global unity against terrorism, seeking support from major world powers and international organizations.
During the interaction, the performance of military platforms in the conflict was raised. Operational details have been shared by the Ministry of Defence, with multiple briefings conducted in India.
'We also conveyed in very unmistakable terms, in the last nearly four open wars, and so many other countless terrorist attacks, India has never been the aggressor. We have responded. This time we have responded very conclusively, with lethal power, attacking the terrorist camps and their Air Force installations. Thereafter, Pakistan asked for peace, cessation of hostilities. 'Sindoor' is only paused. Pakistan will have to give a good account of itself whereby they must stop terrorism and cross-border terrorism because the entire military establishment blesses the terrorists in Pakistan. They understand and we are conveying that precision,' said the BJP MP while addressing the media in Paris.
The Ravi Shankar Prasad led delegation is visiting the UK, France, Germany, the EU, Italy, and Denmark to brief international partners on India's response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack and its broader fight against cross-border terrorism.
The delegation members also include Daggubati Purandeswari (BJP), Priyanka Chaturvedi (Shiv Sena (UBT)), Ghulam Ali Khatana, Amar Singh (Congress), Samik Bhattacharya (BJP), M J Akbar, and Pankaj Saran.
Operation Sindoor, launched on May 7, was India's response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 civilians. The operation targeted terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, resulting in over 100 deaths of terrorists affiliated with Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen.
The Modi government has deployed seven multi-party delegations globally to highlight Pakistan's role in supporting terrorism and reinforce India's stance of zero tolerance. (ANI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Madras Day 2025: On Madras dealing with the Chinese
Towards the end of July this year, at the AGM of the Madras Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the country's second oldest trade body and founded in 1836, Vellayan Subbiah of Murugappa Group addressed the audience. He spoke on how China has developed in the last few decades and how much India has to catch up if it intended to be serious competition. Also Read: Tamil Nadu's oldest and India's second trade body still puts up a fight for industry Listening to it brought to mind the decades of unease that has existed in the relationship between the two countries. But far older to that, of course, is China's interaction with south India. When a few years ago Prime Minister Narendra Modi made Mamallapuram his location of choice for his summit with Xi Jinping, the paramount leader of China, he was perhaps trying to re-establish a relationship of healthy exchange that had once existed. The accounts invariably begin with Bodhidharma, the 6th Century CE south Indian (as per one version), who travelled to China, met the Emperor Wudi, counselled him, and then stayed on in that country. The legend of Bodhidharma, and it has to be qualified as that, if correct in terms of date and location, makes him a contemporary of the Pallavas. Since then, and especially after the release of the film 7am Arivu, Bodhidharma has grown in stature and has been passed off as fact. The problem there is lack of documentation. But we do have better records of another who made the journey in reverse order —Xuanzang. He travelled to India in the 7th century CE and, incredibly, made it back safely to China as well. During his sojourn in India, he came to Kanchi too. Trade with China was another matter altogether. It had probably existed from time immemorial and, certainly, we do know that trade relations existed during Pallava and Chola times. Rajaraja and later Kulothunga I sent trade delegations to that country with a view to boost business. During colonial times, the East India Company, while it made over most Asian trade to its servants, jealously guarded its rights over China. Madras was the point of entry for most Chinese goods, which included copper, quicksilver, sugar (still known as Chini), and zinc. The last named was known then as tutenag in Europe, and even today, the word thuthanagam is prevalent as a term for anodising in Tamil. Circulation of fake currency Once in a while, the Chinese would show their true colours — a famed incident in the 18th Century CE was their dumping on us fake pagodas, the currency then in use in Madras, with a far lower gold content. It gave the Company quite a headache to sort that out. But an indicator of a future history of conflict was the Opium War, fought between the British and the Chinese in the 1840s, which ended in the ceding of Hong Kong. Soldiers from Madras, comprising infantry regiments, sappers, and miners, were employed by the British in Canton, Nanking, and other places. China Bazaar in Madras is still an abiding name. And though it may have derived from porcelain alias 'china' being sold here, it is intriguing that Chinese dentists settled here from the 1930s onwards and some continue their practice. They have very little to do with China itself and a point to ponder is that during the Chinese aggression of 1962, they contributed to the Indian War Fund! In more recent years, Sino-Indian border conflicts have dominated the news. But a Chennai-based engineering company did the unthinkable — it became the first such entity from India to set up a manufacturing plant in China! Sundram Fasteners (Zhejiang) Limited began operations in 2004 and continues to flourish. It just goes to show that conflicts will happen, kingdoms and governments will rise and fall, but trade is eternal.
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Address concerns of farmers, workers on priority, demands CPI(M)
The CPI(M) Andhra Pradesh State Committee has urged the Central and State governments to act immediately to address the hardships being faced by the farmers, workers, and citizens in the wake of floods, soaring power tariffs, and privatisation. Addressing the media in Vijayawada on Thursday, CPI(M) State secretary V. Srinivasa Rao, along with Central Committee member K. Lokanatham and State Secretariat member K. Prabhakara Reddy, outlined the resolutions passed at the State Secretariat meeting. Polit Bureau members B.V. Raghavulu and U. Vasuki participated. Mr. Srinivasa Rao said the party demanded ₹10,000 per acre compensation for crop losses in the Godavari region, urgent repairs to the tanks, canals, and roads, and a farmer-friendly crop insurance scheme fully funded by the Central and State governments. He said the party opposed land allocation to the LuLu Group malls in Visakhapatnam and Vijayawada, calling it harmful to small retailers, and urged use of lands for public and RTC development. He condemned the alleged forcible installation of smart meters and an additional ₹12,000 crore tariff burden. He said the party would observe August 28 as 'Pratijna Dinam' to commemorate the Basheerbagh firing incident. Mr. Srinivasa Rao appealed to the political parties to back the INDIA bloc's Vice-Presidential nominee Justice Sudarshan Reddy, and criticised the YSRCP, TDP, and JSP for siding with the BJP-led NDA on the issue. He further said that the party opposed the alleged privatisation of Visakhapatnam Steel Plant and forced land acquisitions, and demanded priority to tribal rights and Polavaram oustees' rehabilitation.
India.com
26 minutes ago
- India.com
Not Aadhaar, PAN Or Voter ID: So What Really Makes You An Indian Citizen?
New Delhi: Citizenship has become a topic of intense discussion after the Bombay High Court clarified that having an Aadhaar card, PAN card or voter ID does not automatically make someone an Indian citizen. These documents serve only as proof of identity, the court said. This raises an important question: if PAN, voter ID or Aadhaar are not proof of citizenship, what officially establishes Indian nationality? Legally, India does not mandate a single document to prove citizenship. The Constitution lays down specific conditions. Anyone meeting these conditions qualifies as an Indian citizen. Add Zee News as a Preferred Source Citizenship matters because it defines the legal bond between an individual and the nation. It grants rights and privileges. These include fundamental rights, voting rights, legal protections, employment rights and a sense of belonging. Laws determine who qualifies as a citizen. The Constitution of India, in Articles 5 to 11, outlines the rules. On January 26, 1950, all individuals living in India qualified as citizens if they were born in India, had at least one parent born in India or had resided in India for the preceding five years. Certain groups who migrated from Pakistan also qualifies. They include those whose parents or grandparents were born in undivided India, individuals who returned to India after moving to Pakistan and persons born abroad to Indian parents or grandparents. The Citizenship Act of 1955 expanded these provisions. It defines the circumstances under which citizenship can be granted or revoked. Citizenship can be acquired through birth, descent, registration, naturalization or integration of new territories into India. Birth-Based Citizenship Section 3 grants citizenship to individuals born in India between January 26, 1950 and July 1, 1986 or those born later with at least one Indian parent. The Citizenship Amendment Act of 2003 further refined the rules, covering children born after its enactment. Descent-Based Citizenship Section 4 allows individuals born outside India to claim citizenship if one parent is an Indian citizen. Registration within a year of birth at an Indian mission is required for those born abroad after December 3, 2004. Registration And Naturalisation Foreign nationals meeting specific criteria can apply for citizenship under Section 5. They must renounce previous citizenship once approved. Section 6 allows long-term residents to apply through naturalisation, following a set procedure. Citizenship Through New Territories Section 7 covers cases where foreign territories become part of India. Legal procedures confirm citizenship, and an official government notification lists eligible residents. Proof Of Citizenship India does not issue a single, universal document as proof of citizenship. Birth certificates serve as evidence for individuals born in India, issued by local municipal or panchayat authorities. Applications can be made online or offline, and approved certificates record the place of birth, confirming eligibility for citizenship. Those granted citizenship through registration or naturalisation receive a certificate signed by an Indian government official of under-secretary rank or higher. This certificate serves as official proof of Indian citizenship. Documents such as passports, Aadhaar, PAN, voter ID or ration cards are not legal proof of citizenship. They serve as identity documents or residency proof and cannot confer citizenship. Lack of these documents does not strip a person of Indian nationality.
