Philippines will be pulled into any war over Taiwan — Marcos – DW – 08/11/2025
Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. said Monday his country would inevitably be drawn into any war over Taiwan due to its proximity to the island and the fact that are large numbers of Filipino workers there.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry then said that "'geographic location' and a 'large volume of Filipinos' in Taiwan should not be used as pretexts to interfere in the internal and sovereign affairs of other countries," urging the Philippines "to earnestly abide by the One China principle" and "refrain from playing fire on issues bearing on China's core interests."
When asked to respond to Beijing's outcry, Marcos said: "I don't know what they're talking about, playing with fire? I was just stating facts. We do not want to go to war, but I think if there is a war over Taiwan, we will be drawn, we will be pulled in whether we like it or not, kicking and screaming."
"We will be drawn and dragged into that mess. I hope it doesn't happen, but, if it does, we have to plan for it already."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Also on Monday, a Chinese navy vessel collided with one from its own coast guard while pursuing a Philippines patrol boat in the South China Sea.
President Marcos told a news conference that the Philippines' coast guard, navy and other vessels defending its territorial interests in the South China Sea would never back down in the disputed waters.
"The (China Coast Guard vessel) CCG 3104, which was chasing the (Filipino coast guard vessel) BRP Suluan at high speed, performed a risky maneuver from the (Philippine) vessel's starboard quarter, leading to the impact with the PLA (People's Liberation Army) Navy warship," Philippine Coast Guard Spokesperson Jay Tarriela said in a statement. The PLA is the official term for the Chinese military.
"This resulted in substantial damage to the CCG vessel's forecastle, rendering it unseaworthy," he said.
Gan Yu, a Chinese coast guard spokesperson, confirmed that a Monday confrontation had occurred while not specifically mentioning the collision.
"The China Coast Guard took necessary measures in accordance with the law, including monitoring, pressing from the outside, blocking and controlling the Philippine vessels to drive them away," he said in a statement.
It's the latest incident in a long-simmering dispute in the waterway, a key global trade route, where territorial claims between China and the Philippines have intensified in recent years.
Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan also lay claims to parts of the waters.
Relations between China and the Philippines have been strained after President Marcos, who assumed office in mid-2022, and his administration emerged as vocal critics of China's actions in the South China Sea.
The Marcos administration deepened its treaty alliance engagements with the United States and began bolstering security alliances with other Western and Asian countries like Japan, Australia, India and some EU member states.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
12 hours ago
- DW
Why is Trump being so generous to China? – DW – 08/12/2025
Donald Trump slashed tariffs and softened his stance on China, while imposing steep duties on India and Brazil. What leverage does Beijing hold that others don't? After months as a trade pariah, China is now at the heart of US President Donald Trump's efforts to reset relations and avoid another tariff spiral. Back in April, Trump labeled China "the greatest threat to America," saying it had "cheated" the world's largest economy for decades. He then slapped massive tariffs of 145% on Chinese goods. Just months later, the tone has shifted. Trump has extended the tariff pause on China, praised President Xi Jinping as "a strong leader," and floated the idea of a US-China summit this fall. Meanwhile, countries like India and Brazil now face the steepest penalties — up to 50% tariffs — while China's rate is capped at a more manageable 30%. Trump has several reasons for giving China an easier ride. He wants to avoid a tariff spike just as US retailers stock up on Chinese imports for the crucial holiday season. Trump is also buying time to allow negotiations on a broader trade deal that could include technology, energy and rare earth minerals. As China is the only country to firmly confront Washington's aggressive policy stance, Antonio Fatas, economics professor at INSEAD Business School, thinks Beijing's strategy may have left Trump scrambling for leverage. "From the beginning, it was clear that China was more willing than the US to have a full-blown trade war," Fatas told DW, which would bring "economic consequences that the Trump administration cannot afford." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video China's dominance in rare earths — needed to produce everything from electric vehicles to missile guidance systems — is arguably Beijing's strongest card. With US industries heavily reliant on Chinese supply, these minerals have become a decisive factor in the trade standoff. After Trump announced sky-high tariffs in April, China, which controls about 60% of global rare earth production and nearly 90% of refining, imposed export controls on seven rare earth elements and permanent magnets, hitting US industries hard, including carmakers. Washington is also pushing for tighter restrictions on China's access to advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chips, while pressuring Beijing to cut imports of Russian oil, warning of secondary sanctions — including steep tariffs — if volumes continue to rise. Further down the list of priorities, Trump is urging China to quadruple its purchases of US soybeans — a boost to American farmers and last year's $295.5 billion (€254.5 billion) trade deficit between the world powers. China is by far the world's largest soybean importer, accounting for over 60% of global demand, mostly for livestock feed and cooking oil. China, on the other hand, is seeking a lasting rollback in US tariffs, especially around technology and manufacturing. Beijing also wants safeguards for Chinese firms from US sanctions and assurances over access to cutting-edge US chips. At the same time, the Chinese government is now actively discouraging the use of Nvidia's H20 processor, the most advanced US chip currently allowed for export to China. Analysts say this move is a public show that the country is becoming less reliant on the US for high-end technology. Economist Alicia Garcia-Herrero, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel, noted Trump's many trade, domestic and geopolitical challenges — like Friday's peace talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska — as other reasons he's giving China more leeway. "Trump has enough on his plate ... and has no choice but to offer China more [time] than other countries," she told DW. Now that the tariff truce has been extended until early November, negotiators can zero in on the most contentious issues. Chief among them is avoiding a return to triple-digit tariffs — 145% on Chinese goods and 125% on US exports. Both sides agree such a move would be economically damaging. China's current 30% average tariff rate remains significantly above most other countries. Chinese copper and steel exports to the US are subject to a 50% levy. While China enjoys extra time, India's fall from favored partner at the start of Trump's second term to trade villain has been swift. The country now faces a punishing tariff of up to 50% — 25% on general goods and an additional 25% on Russian oil purchases that's expected to kick in on August 27. INSEAD's Fatas noted that "India has neither the economic size of China, exports crucial for US industry, nor the power to inflict damage on the US economy," calling on New Delhi to work with allies to show collective strength and secure a better tariff. While China may appear to have the upper hand in negotiations, Han Shen Lin, China Managing Director of strategic advisory firm The Asia Group, warned against complacency from the Chinese side. After all, Trump's flair for chaos leaves room for unexpected moves. "We can't underestimate the US's ability to add more shock value [to negotiations]," Han told Reuters news agency. "I suspect the type of leverage the US has, as the largest consumer market in the world, will be a factor that will cause other countries to think cautiously." Despite softening his tone, Trump is keeping up the pressure on China in other ways. Chinese exporters have been rerouting goods meant for the US through Southeast Asian countries, especially Vietnam, Malaysia, and Thailand. The objective is to obscure their origin and avoid direct US tariffs. In response, Trump has imposed a sweeping 40% transshipment tariff on all nations suspected of facilitating Chinese rerouting, which took effect last week. With US-China negotiations expected to stretch until the deadline, Garcia-Herrero, who is also chief economist for Asia-Pacific at French investment bank Natixis, foresees a partial trade thaw that benefits US firms while sidelining key allies. "We'll likely get movement on both export controls on high-end chips from the US side and rare-earth from Beijing," Garcia-Herrero told DW. " China will likely see a slightly lower [base] tariff and US companies will get better access to the Chinese market, to the detriment of the European Union, South Korea and Japan."
DW
12 hours ago
- DW
Germany: Chancellor Friedrich Merz marks 100 days in office – DW – 08/12/2025
Friedrich Merz has begun curbing irregular immigration and shaping foreign policy, while cracks are appearing in his government. Germany's largest-circulation tabloid, , has passed judgment on Chancellor Friedrich Merz (CDU): "The solitary chancellor explains his biggest mistake," the paper wrote this week. They were referring to the German head of government's latest surprising decision: To immediately stop supplying weapons to Israel that could also be used in the war in the Gaza Strip. Merz made this decision without prior comprehensive debate in his own center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party and, according to , its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU), was not even informed. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video This was the latest in a series of turnabouts and surprise decisions Merz had made since coming to office. His chancellorship got off to a bungled start: When following the February 23 general election, the new Bundestag, convened to elect a new head of government, observers had high hopes for a new stability. The previous center-left government of Social Democrats (SPD), environmentalist Greens and neoliberal Free Democrats (FDP) had collapsed after only three years, which were marred by continual infighting mainly over budget issues. The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) doubled its share of the vote in the February 2025 federal election, to 20.8%. A survey by pollster Forsa in early August, put the AfD ahead of the CDU/CSU at 26% compared to 24%. However, on May 6, Friedrich Merz initially failed to gain the required number of votes to become chancellor. He lacked six votes from his own camp, and managed to secure the necessary majority only in an unprecedented second vote. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The new government started with a bang even before taking office: Together with the Greens, now in opposition, it organized a two-thirds majority in the Bundestag to lift the strict German rules around state borrowing, despite having made election promises to safeguard the so-called debt brake, enshrined in the constitution. The new government will have a gigantic additional €500 billion ($583 billion) in theory unlimited means to upgrade the Bundeswehr armed forces and more than a further €500 billion for the renewal of infrastructure, new roads, railway tracks and schools, and for climate protection initiatives. The new Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil of the SPD said: "The OECD, the International Monetary Fund, the European Commission or the G7 — in recent years all have encouraged and advised Germany to invest more and make our debt rules more flexible. That was not possible until now. But here in Parliament, we have finally loosened these chains, and we are investing more strongly than ever in the future viability of our country." Another election promise was seen to be broken in June: Electricity prices had widely been expected to be lowered for everyone. Then, the government announced a reduction in electricity tax only for the industrial, agricultural and forestry sectors, arguing there was no budget for a comprehensive electricity price break. In the 100 days since taking office, Merz was primarily occupied with foreign policy. Shortly after he was voted in, he made a high-profile trip to Kyiv with French President Emmanuel Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer to assure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of European solidarity. In early June, he visited US President Donald Trump at the White House and, in contrast to some other visitors, was treated well. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Merz seemed at ease at EU and NATO summits. Merz has been so outspoken on foreign policy that his Foreign Minister, Johann Wadephul, often faded into the background. Occasionally, the chancellor's undiplomatic choice of words has sparked outrage, such as following Israel's June 13 attack on Iran: "This is the dirty work that Israel is doing for all of us. We are also victims of this regime. This mullah-regime has brought death and destruction to the world. With attacks, with blood and thunder. With Hezbollah, with Hamas." In domestic matters, the issue of curbing irregular immigration has been key. The new Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt (CSU) moved quickly to tighten controls at Germany's border. This also included rejections of asylum seekers, which critics argue breaches EU law. Germany's eastern neighbor Poland, responded in kind to Dobrindt's measures, introducing controls that led to long traffic jams on both sides of the border. Dobrindt repeatedly defended his decisions: "The EU is a cosmopolitan region. We remain a cosmopolitan region. But we do not want it so that illegal smugglers, traffickers and criminal gangs get to decide who comes to our region. We want political decisions to specify the legal ways to come to Europe; we will not surrender that to criminal gangs," he said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The last session of the Bundestag before its summer break ended with a bang: The confirmation of three new judges to the Federal Constitutional Court was on the agenda. In the past, coalition partners had always managed to fill such important roles as amicably and smoothly as possible to preserve the reputation of the highest German court. But not this time: Dozens of conservative lawmakers refused to vote in the candidate put forward by the SPD, Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, who had been approved for nomination by a bipartisan committee. There had been pushback against her appointment, especially on right-wing social media channels misrepresenting her liberal views on abortion. On the day of the vote, dubious plagiarism charges were leveled at the candidate and the vote was canceled. The SPD spoke of a serious breach of trust. Although the party continued to back her, Brosius-Gersdorf later withdrew her candidacy. The issue of the judges' appointments will continue beyond the summer recess and represents the first major crisis within the coalition, casting a shadow over the government's record after 100 days in you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
DW
12 hours ago
- DW
Sri Lanka: Tamils hope for foreign help as mass graves open – DW – 08/12/2025
The excavation of a mass grave in Chemmani is forcing Sri Lanka to face its history of bloodshed, with the country's Tamil community calling for the international community to get involved. Every time a mass grave is excavated in Sri Lanka, Thambirasa Selvarani can't sleep. "We don't know what happened to our relatives, and when they start digging, I feel panicked," Selvarani told DW. The 54-year-old has been searching for her husband Muthulingam Gnanaselvam since he disappeared in May 2009 after he surrendered to government forces at the end of the Sri Lankan civil war. After decades of fighting, the conflict ended with the defeat of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE),also known as the Tamil Tigers. Multiple mass graves have been uncovered since then. For the last three months, archaeologists have been excavating a mass grave in Chemmani, on the outskirts of Jaffna, the capital of Sri Lanka's Northern Province. The excavation has unearthed 140 skeletons so far, including children. Chemmani has been suspected as a mass grave site since at least 1998. A former army corporal, who at the time was on trial for the rape and murder of schoolgirl Krishanthi Kumaraswamy, said there were hundreds of other bodies buried in the area alongside the young girl. Lawyer Niranchan told DW he was working with families whose relatives had disappeared from the area surrounding Chemmani in the 1990s. So far, the excavations had shown that bodies had been buried "haphazardly, without any legal barriers, heaped together in a shallow, unmarked" fashion. "We think some of them could have been buried alive," he said, adding, "if they were already dead, the bodies wouldn't be bent," with some of them displaying twisted limbs. Several artifacts have been discovered at the site along with the skeletons, including slippers, a baby's milk bottle, and a child's school bag. Anushani Alagarajah, executive director of the Jaffna-based Adayaalam Centre for Policy Research, said Chemmani had a "very painful, very traumatic history, particularly with people in Jaffna." "A lot of our friends' brothers and fathers and sisters disappeared at the time," Alagarajah told DW. "It's been over 25 years. It's opening up very old, deep wounds, not just for the families, but for the whole community, the whole of Jaffna. And it's a reminder that you can't really forget." The Chemmani excavation has become the most high-profile instance of a mass grave investigation in Sri Lanka to date. It has also triggered numerous calls for international oversight, especially from the country's Tamil community. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Visiting the site in June, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk noted that "Sri Lanka has struggled to move forward with domestic accountability mechanisms that are credible and have the trust and confidence of victims. This is why Sri Lankans have looked outside for justice, through assistance at the international level." Tamil activists held a protest to coincide with Türk's visit. Thambirasa Selvarani attended the event and met Türk personally, telling him she had no faith in Sri Lankan justice mechanisms. Selvarani is the chairperson for the Association of Relatives of Enforced Disappearances (ARED) in Ampara District. She wants mass graves in her district to also be excavated. "We feel scared. We don't know who they're going to find next, who they're going to identify next," Selvarani told DW. "I keep thinking about it day and night and I can't sleep, I can't eat. I feel so disturbed." "For the last 17 years, as presidents keep changing, we've been asking them to tell us the truth about what happened to our children and loved ones," Selvarani said. The progress, however, has been slow. Selvarani says she still faces intimidation by officers from Sri Lanka's Criminal Investigation Department (CID) when attending protests. "They say, 'You shouldn't go there, your relatives are dead, why are you still going here and there?'" Selvarani told DW. In a break from Sri Lanka's usual dynasty politics, the country elected leftist president Anura Kumara Dissanayakein September 2024. But lawyer Niranchan remains suspicious, saying "history has shown" that governments could not be trusted and would object to international oversight. "This government doesn't understand ethnic problems," he told DW. "They think that the country will be peaceful if we stop corruption. But they don't understand that ethnic problems are also a reason that this country has fallen into debt." Ambika Satkunanathan, a human rights lawyer and former commissioner of the National Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka, shares his distrust. "Historically, pretty much nearly every Sri Lankan government has been extremely reluctant to obtain international assistance in different accountability processes," she said. Before coming to power, President Dissanayake said he would not seek to prosecute those responsible for war crimes. Talking to DW, Satkunanathan highlighted the lack of trust that victims have that the state is committed to pursuing justice. Last month, human rights NGO International Committee of Jurists (ICJ) urged in a statement last month for "international oversight and victim-centred investigation" to take place "in compliance with international law and standards" in Sri Lanka. But Alagarajah from the Adayaalam Centre for Policy Research says she does not believe Dissanayake's government would request international oversight. She also said she did not see "anything different" regarding Chemmani when compared to previous excavations. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Alagarajah said she had met with families who believed they would find their children in Chemmani and who "want to believe that this process is going to give them some answers," but that the hope for answers was also "dangerous." "Hope is not always the best thing to have, because it can also deeply disappoint you and hurt you, particularly in this country," Alagarajah said.
