Assault case camogie star gets ‘dream' prison officer job after almost being jailed herself
A GAA All-Star has achieved her life-long dream of enrolling as a prison officer recruit – six years after her goal was almost shattered by a court case in which she pleaded guilty to two counts of assault.
Seven times All-Ireland-winning inter-county camogie star Ashling Thompson took up duties as a recruit prison officer earlier this month – just a month after she openly discussed the case on a podcast in which she described the incident as the second time in her life she had hit 'rock bottom.'
Sources said, as Thompson (35) was allowed escape a conviction for the assaults on condition she paid €6,000 to her victims and to charity, this meant she avoided a conviction and was able to pass the Irish Prison Service's stringent Garda vetting and security clearance checks.
Speaking on the 'The Comeback' podcast with Brenda Dennehy last May, Thompson said her goal had always been to gain employment in justice system.
Ashling won four All-Irelands with Cork
'I went to college and I first wanted to do something in sport but then I went away from that and armed response and the guards was the next thing.
'I don't think armed response was a thing at the time but it was always the Guards or something around special forces, a prison officer. It was always around that kind of work that I really wanted to do.
'So I ended up going to the college and doing an entrance course for the Guards and then unfortunately around that time I had a serious enough car accident.'
The accident Thompson spoke of occurred when she was 22 years of age.
During the podcast, Thompson spoke openly of her mental health difficulties, issues with substance abuse, her experience of coercive control, the suicide of a boyfriend and of how sport and camogie helped get her through her difficulties.
She clocked up numerous honours, including four All-Irelands with Cork, three club All-Irelands with Milford, and two All Stars, and became an advocate for mental health.
However, in February 2018, Thompson assaulted two women in a pub, an incident she described as her 'second rock bottom.'
The incidents at the Secret Garden, Rearden's, Washington Street, Cork occurred after a day when the 29-year-old left her home in Charleville, County Cork, at 8am played a match in Offaly, returned to Cork and drank alcohol that night without having had food during the day.
Thompson entered pleas of guilty to charges of assaulting Aoife O'Flaherty and Jennifer Coakley on February 25, 2018, at Secret Garden, Rearden's, Washington Street, Cork.
All-Star Ashling Thompson
Imposing sentence, Judge Con O'Leary said
he would allow Thompson avoid a criminal on her undertaking to pay €6,000 to family refuge charities and to cover witness expenses.
Speaking of the assaults and court case, she told 'The Comeback' podcast: 'I was up in court in an assault case … It was after a game … there was a lot of drink involved...Luckily, I wasn't convicted or anything … It was definitely a rock bottom for me. My understanding now of why I lost control is going back to that previous time with the car crash and the boyfriend and … those moments in my life.
'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
16 hours ago
- Irish Times
Sex abuse in schools: State accused of ignoring its liability for redress
The Government has been accused of refusing to acknowledge the O'Keeffe judgment, by claiming the State does not bear liability for historical child sex abuse in schools . The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (IHREC) and Louise O'Keeffe have both questioned Government guidance which appears to suggest it may not be the responsibility of the State to pay for redress. Ms O'Keeffe successfully took the State to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in 2014 for failing to protect her from sexual abuse in Dunderrow national school in Cork in the 1970s. The ECHR found that the State had an obligation to protect her from the abuse she had suffered from her then school principal Leo Hickey. Ms O'Keeffe was awarded redress, and since then has been campaigning for the same redress to be made available to other abuse survivors. READ MORE The Government has agreed to set up a commission of investigation into the handling of sexual abuse in schools, but officials are still considering the issues around the setting up of a redress scheme for survivors of such abuse. It is understood there are concerns within the Government about the demand for and costs of such a scheme, which would be likely to be the largest in the history of the State. [ Q&A: Will survivors of historical abuse in schools be compensated? And who will be liable? Opens in new window ] An interdepartmental report prepared by officials from the departments of the Taoiseach, education, justice, children and public expenditure and reform warned that setting up such a redress scheme was 'as complex' as setting up a commission of investigation. It said that guidance from the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform had warned against 'rushed approaches to redress, including the assumption of risk by the State when liability should more appropriately be borne by third parties'. The report also considered the question of who bears liability for the actions of school employees. 'It has been concluded in case law, at Supreme Court level, that the State does not have such liability,' it said. Liam Herrick, chair of IHREC, said that as recently as January 2024 the State had told the ECHR it was working to meet its legal obligation 'to abide by the final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights'. 'The report of the IDG indicates that Government departments adopt a different position in refusing to acknowledge the primacy of the O'Keeffe judgment,' Mr Herrick said. 'So, it must be asked, what is the State really saying to the victims and survivors who have been waiting so many years for the redress they are legally entitled to? Can the Government confirm that it does accept the ruling of the European court which found that the State does bear responsibility for abuse that occurred in schools?' Ms O'Keeffe told The Irish Times the Government was 'basically trying to avoid looking at the ECHR judgment'. 'They are particularly dwelling on the religious organisations as being responsible for paying redress, and seem to be avoiding their own responsibility,' she said. Prof Conor O'Mahony, director of the child law clinic at UCC, said the claim that the State does not bear liability in such cases was 'staggering'. He said the O'Keeffe judgment applied to 'every case of abuse that occurred in any Irish school prior to the adoption of State guidelines on the reporting of abuse in schools in 1992' . A spokesman for the Department of Education said 'domestic courts have ruled that the State is not vicariously liable for the acts of a teacher appointed by the manager of a national school'. 'The 2014 ECHR judgement in O'Keeffe v Ireland indicated that the State bore partial responsibility where a complaint had been made against an alleged abuser and no system was in place to act upon that complaint. Since that ruling, extensive measures have been put in place to improve child protection in schools, including detection and reporting mechanisms as well as vetting and greater overall awareness,' the spokesman said.
Irish Examiner
21 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
A Tipperary All-Ireland final day tradition like no other
Almost 102 years ago, Tipperary captain Johnny Leahy stepped off the train in Heuston Station and led his team to the GPO. They had the delayed 1922 All-Ireland senior hurling final against Kilkenny to play that September day in 1923 but it was a pilgrimage for other reasons too. On O'Connell Street, they paid their silent respects to the fallen of the Easter Rising before making the short stroll to Talbot Street. There, where their fellow countyman, GAA member and Tipperary IRA leader Seán Treacy perished two years earlier, they recited prayers before walking to Croke Park for the job in hand although Kilkenny won out. Ever since, Tipperary people have marked their appearance in an All-Ireland final with a commemoration of Treacy's death. Sunday is the 28th since Leahy commenced a tradition like no other. Without it, All-Ireland final day wouldn't be the same for many Tipperary supporters. 'I can tell you one thing, if it wasn't done, there would be an outcry,' says former county chairman and co-organiser Seán Nugent. 'It's a sort of an unofficial event but I received several phone-calls to know if it was going ahead. If it wasn't, some of us would be getting plenty of stick!' It's as much now a gathering to hold up a custom started by the county team and a poignant means of starting the build-up on the day as a remembrance of how intertwined the GAA was with the republican cause. Soloheadbeg man Treacy would have been known to many of the 1922 Tipperary team, especially Leahy. A protagonist in the first shots of the War of Independence at his homeplace in 1919, the 25-year-old was later a member of Michael Collins's 'Squad' with his great friend Dan Breen. He died on October 14 1920, a month before Bloody Sunday, killed by the British Secret Service while himself fatally shooting one of them. Two bystanders also died in that flurry of bullets outside Peadar Clancy's drapery shop at 94 Talbot Street. For Nugent, this will be his 19th commemoration. He's been attending since the 1961 All-Ireland final when Toomevara's Matt Hassett, who passed away earlier this year, was the winning captain. For many years, Nugent and Liam Ó Donnchú, who will be master of ceremonies at Sunday's event beginning at noon, had been assisting historian John Hassett who had been vital to keeping the flaming lit. After Hassett's passing in late 2019, the duty now falls to them. Songs including 'Tipperary So Far Away', which was composed by Tommy Makem and The Clancy Brothers in Treacy's honour, and 'Amhrán na bhFiann' will be sung. 'The Proclamation of the Irish Republic' will too be read. 'For many people, the oration sends them up the road to Croke Park in great spirits,' says Nugent. 'In 2016, Seamus Leahy (Johnny's nephew) led the commemoration. At the end of it, he said, 'And the very best of luck to both teams today. May the best team win and may that team be wearing blue and gold jerseys.'' This weekend's commemoration is significant for a few reasons: it is obviously the first since John Hassett passed away but his daughter Niamh will be giving a decade of The Rosary at it. GAA president Jarlath Burns will be part of the ceremony too along with Tipperary band Rebel Hearts. 'John took the whole thing fairly seriously,' Nugent says. 'And it wasn't the easiest thing in the world to organise either because you had to get a public address system set up there in Talbot Street. Parking cars and traffic can be difficult around there on that day. 'John had a huge grá for remembering our patriotic dead and not for him it may not have continued. We're following his example now and hopefully we can keep it going.' In a first-ever Tipperary-Cork All-Ireland final, the indelible connection between Treacy and Collins will not be lost either and a large Cork representation will be among the couple of thousand people expected to attend. Treacy's death also came 11 days before Lord Mayor of Cork Terence MacSwiney's following his hunger strike in Brixton Jail in London. Treacy now lies in the cemetry in Churchquarter, Kilfeacle between Golden and Tipperary town. The Kilcommon club in West Tipperary is named after him as is Arravale Rovers's grounds in Tipperary town. His memory is enshrined by those institutions but for many he is the start of a Tipperary All-Ireland final day.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Commissioner wins Supreme Court appeal over dismissal of garda who engaged in sex act in station
The Garda Commissioner has won a Supreme Court appeal over efforts to dismiss a garda who engaged in a sexual act with a woman while on duty in a Garda station. The court overturned decisions by both the High Court and the Court of Appeal (CoA) which found the decision by the commissioner that Garda Raymond Hegarty of Lismore Garda station should either resign or be dismissed because of conduct likely to undermine public confidence in the force. Both lower courts found his suspension, pending either resignation or dismissal, was unlawful because the officer had already gone through a disciplinary process in which a recommendation that he resign was overturned and instead a reduction in wages was imposed. The commissioner brought an appeals over both the High Court and Court of Appeal decisions. READ MORE In a four-to-one majority decision on Thursday, the Supreme Court allowed the commissioner's appeal and refused the relief which had been sought by Garda Hegarty. The courts heard Garda Hegarty had admitted discreditable conduct by engaging in the act with a woman who had come into the station to give a statement relating to the arrest of her sister in March 2017. Following a Garda disciplinary process, his resignation/retirement was recommended. This was later overturned as disproportionate. The Garda Commissioner decided that, notwithstanding the finding, he was to be suspended pending his resignation as an alternative to dismissal. Garda Hegarty, in his legal challenge, claimed the decision effectively flew in the face of the determination. The commissioner denied his claims. After admitting to an internal inquiry in September 2018 to engaging in the sexual act and failing to take a statement from the woman, it was recommended he be required to retire or resign and be subject to a two-week reduction in pay over the failure to take her statement. The commissioner adopted the recommendation and told him if he failed to resign by November 16th, 2018, he would be dismissed. He appealed the decision and an appeal board which decided in January 2020 the penalty in relation to the sexual act was disproportionate and it imposed a penalty for that of a four-week reduction in pay. The two-week pay reduction previously recommended in relation to the statement breach remained unchanged. In a judgment on behalf of the majority Supreme Court, Mr Justice Brian Murray said there was nothing unconstitutional in a state of affairs where the garda was the subject of a disciplinary process and sanctioned accordingly and in which the commissioner, at the conclusion of that process, decided that he would invoke a separate statutory procedure. This, he said, was a separate procedure which enabled him for a different purpose and by reference to different criteria to dismiss the garda if his conduct was such that his continued presence as a member of the force would impair public confidence in the force. While processes under section 14.2 of the Garda Síochána Act 2005 and under the Garda Síochána (Discipline) Regulations 2007 have as an objective the assurance of public confidence in the force, the regulations envisage a disciplinary power which takes account of a range of considerations and is intended to achieve a number of objectives, he said. It was not enough for the commissioner to decide the conduct was wrongful or even disgraceful or the public might lose confidence in the force or that the public might be incensed by the conduct and demand dismissal, he said. The commissioner must take a broader view, and he must be satisfied in taking that view, that the dismissal is necessary to maintain public confidence, he said. Section 14.2 of the 2005 Act confers an extreme power to be resorted to only in the wholly exceptional situation in which the conduct is such that their continued membership of the force would undermine public confidence and the dismissal of that person is 'necessary to maintain that confidence', he said. In a dissenting judgment, Mr Justice Séamus Woulfe said the power under section 14.2 to dismiss a garda for specified conduct could not be invoked where he had already suffered a prior sanction in a prior disciplinary process based on precisely the same conduct. The commissioner may not overrule or not follow a decision of an appeal board when exercising his powers under section 14.2 insofar as the dismissal of the member would be for the very same conduct in respect of which a member had already been sanctioned, he said. 'In my opinion the alternative answers urged upon this court by the commissioner cast a dark shadow of unfairness over the overall Garda disciplinary code and are not consistent with constitutional justice,' he said.
