Hiscox profits fall after £128m claims hit from LA wildfires
The wildfires, which raged in California during the first half of January, have been estimated by some to be the costliest natural disaster in US history.
Aki Hussain, group chief executive at Hiscox, branded it the 'largest wildfire insurance event in history', estimating earlier this year the loss to the sector could be as high as 40 billion dollars (£30.1 billion).
More than 16,200 structures were destroyed as flames ripped through Pacific Palisades, Malibu, Pasadena and Altadena areas of Los Angeles.
Estimates of the total economic loss from the firestorm have been estimated to surpass 250 billion dollars (£188 billion).
The wildfire claims saw half-year profits at Hiscox fall 2% to 276.6 million dollars (£208 million) in the six months to June 30.
On an underlying basis, pre-tax operating profits were 9% lower at 262 million dollars (£197 million).
Hiscox said despite the profit drop, it would increase its share buybacks by 100 million dollars (£75.2 million) and hike its interim dividend payout by 9.1%.
Mr Hussain said: 'Our balance sheet remains strong and we are achieving sustained and strong capital formation which underpins our increased return of capital to shareholders, through step-ups in ordinary dividends and buybacks, over the last two years.'
Shares jumped 8% after the half-year results.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
This company is eyeing lucrative expansion, but its shares don't come cheap
Questor is The Telegraph's stock-picking column, helping you decode the markets and offering insights on where to invest. Do you stream? Even if you don't use one of the big internet-based platforms to listen to music or watch films, the chances are most people in your orbit do. Listening to music through our mobile phones, tablets or PCs has become embedded in the way we consume entertainment. It accounted for an extraordinary 69pc of the global revenues of $29bn from recorded music last year, according to the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI). That share is almost two percentage points higher than the previous year. If that growth doesn't sound particularly rapid, bear in mind that a decade ago streaming had only a 14pc share of the recorded music industry, which at the time was in decline – in stark contrast to the healthy 4.8pc growth experienced in 2024. Adding to the attractiveness of this growing industry, just over half of revenues come in the form of subscriptions, which deliver reliable and predictable income that are much prized by investors. The dominant player in this area is Spotify Technology, which claims a market share of almost 32pc, which puts it ahead of its nearest competitors, Apple, Amazon and China's Tencent Music Entertainment. The group was founded in Sweden in 2006 by two entrepreneurs – Daniel Ek and Martin Lorentzon – who launched the service in 2008. It listed on the New York Stock Exchange in 2018, since which time its shares have increased in value more than fivefold. Ek remains chief executive while Lorentson sits on the board. Shares in the company are owned by some of the world's most successful fund managers. Some 15 of them have a holding, and these managers rank among the top 3pc of the more than 10,000 equity managers tracked by financial publisher Citywire. The company has been assigned a top AAA rating by Citywire Elite Companies based on the high level of smart-money backing and it is also currently among the 10 most favoured American stocks based on backing from the world's best managers. Ashim Mehra holds Spotify shares in the Baron Technology Fund. He invested in the company partly because of its competitive advantage, exhibited in part by its free accounts, which mean acquiring customers is cheap. He said this, combined with innovations including moving into audiobooks, podcasts and videos, are driving exceptional growth. Mehra said: 'Looking ahead, we remain optimistic about Spotify's potential. With only 3pc of the global population as paid subscribers, we see room for this to exceed 10pc in the future. 'Additionally, we expect the company's advertising focus to yield significant profit growth over the next six to 18 months, further enhancing its financial outlook.' The US-listed shares are available through the UK's main stockbrokers, though prospective buyers should be sure to fill in the necessary forms to minimise withholding taxes and check with their provider for additional charges. Spotify's growth has been frenetic. The group has turned the 96 million fee-paying users it had at the end of 2018 into 263 million as at the end of last year. Likewise, it has transformed 2018's net loss of €78m (£67.3m) on revenues of €5.3bn into pre-tax profits last year of €1.3bn on €15.7bn. Last year's net profits, its first over a full 12 months, arguably marked a turning point, for both its viability and that of the overall sector. Analysts reckon Spotify's rampant growth will continue. Over the next three years, consensus forecasts are for annual earnings per share growth of over 40pc. The benefit from rapid growth in the subscriber base is expected to be amplified by fast increases in revenue per user driven by increased advertising and new services. The business's relatively low capital requirements means Spotify's growth has the potential to create a lot of value for shareholders. Last year's return on equity was 29pc. None of this comes cheap. Spotify's shares trade on a multiple of just 69 times next year's forecast earnings. However, the potential of the business to compound value by reinvesting profits into lucrative expansion means many of the world's smartest investors are betting the company's seemingly high valuation does not reflect the full promise the future holds. A recent bout of share price weakness after disappointing second quarter results represents an opportunity.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Bolivia set to elect first non-left wing president in two decades
Bolivia is set to elect a non-left wing president after nearly two decades of near-continuous rule by the incumbent socialist party, according to official preliminary Rodrigo Paz Pereira and former president Jorge Quiroga came in first and second place respectively in Sunday's presidential received a high enough share of the vote to secure an outright win, so the vote will go to a run-off between these two candidates, due in Pereira, of the Christian Democratic Party, was a surprise vote leader, after opinion polls had suggested Samuel Doria Medina, a businessman, was the frontrunner. The electoral authorities said it can take up to three days to finalise the Pereira's campaign focused on redistributing more funds away from central government towards regional entities, and fighting corruption - with his slogan "capitalism for all, not just a few". He has suggested a programme of accessible credit, tax breaks to boost the formal economy, and eliminating import barriers for products that Bolivia doesn't briefly acted as interim president from 2001-2002 after serving as Vice President to Hugo Banzer, a military dictator until he was later elected. The election of a president from outside the left camp will likely see sharp changes in the Latin American country's foreign terms of trade, both candidate's capitalist stances could indicate more support for foreign investment in Bolivia's vast lithium reserves - the key ingredient for batteries used in many electric cars, laptops and solar a change in government could mark closer ties with the US, after two decades of strengthening ties between Bolivia and China, Russia and Iran.A recent US Congress report briefing described US-Bolivia relations as "strained" under the socialist party's governance. The country's turn to the right comes as it is experiencing its worst economic crisis in years, with shortages of fuel, foreign reserves and some food items and high inflation and polls ahead of the election suggested that many voters wanted to vote for change, or to punish the incumbent Movimiento al Socialismo (MAS) current president, Luis Arce, mired in deep unpopularity, decided not to seek punishment of the left is not just electoral, but physical in some candidate for MAS, Eduardo del Castillo, was booed out of the school where he cast his vote. Bolivian media reported that some fellow voters told him to "wait in line like they do for fuel" rather than skip the voting also threw stones at the highest-polling left-wing candidate, Andrónico Rodríguez, when he went to cast his ballot. Rodríguez was previously a member of MAS before splintering from the in Bolivia also said that an explosive device was set off at the polling station where Rodríguez cast his vote. There were no reports of significant damage or injuries. Rodríguez described it as an "isolated incident" orchestrated by a "small group" to a Bolivian left has not just faced recent unpopularity over the economy. It is also deeply divided. For the first time in about two decades, the former president, Evo Morales, was not on the ballot. Morales ruled the country from 2006-2019 and was barred from running again, despite attempts to challenge legal and constitutional rulings to let him run for a fourth has urged his supporters to null their was once seen as a protégé of Morales, but has since distanced himself from last election in 2019 was disputed and protests erupted. Morales was accused of fraud after auditors found irregularities with the poll and he resigned under pressure from the 2020, Luis Arce - a former finance minister under Morales - took office as president. Morales then announced he would return to politics in Bolivia, and deprived Arce of a majority - turning the pair from allies to rifts and power struggles have existed in the ruling MAS party ever since. Morales's supporters have held protests and roadblocks against the re-election ban imposed on him, which have at times turned deadly with some emergency responders being ordered an arrest warrant for Morales over an alleged sexual relationship and rape of a 15-year-old girl. He has called the accusations has been living and operating from Chapare in Bolivia, protected at times by his supporters.
The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
Fifa consider holding Club World Cup every two years from 2029 – and could expand it
Fifa will consider holding the Club World Cup every two years from 2029 in a move that would put more pressure on the international calendar and trigger another backlash from the Premier League and Uefa. The next Club World Cup is due to take place in four years' time, following the first expanded 32-team tournament held in the US this summer, but the world governing body is under pressure from leading clubs to make it a biennial event. Real Madrid are understood to have raised the issue of moving to a two-year cycle during talks with Fifa in Miami in June, a proposal that has gained support from other clubs who failed to qualify for this year's tournament, including Barcelona, Manchester United, Liverpool and Napoli. Chelsea received £85m in prize money for winning the competition and other big European clubs want the opportunity to take advantage of Fifa's huge revenue streams, which are being funded largely by Saudi Arabia's Surj Sports Investments. Liverpool in particular were unfortunate not to take part this year, as they met one of the qualifying criteria by being among the top eight ranked clubs in Europe, but missed out as Fifa opted to admit a maximum of two sides from a country. Chelsea and Manchester City took the English slots as recent Champions League winners. There is an exception to the limit if more than two clubs from a country win their continental competition during the qualifying period, as was the case with Brazil this year. Fifa sources said that while there is no serious consideration being given to staging the Club World Cup in 2027, the situation is likely to change after 2029, with the prospect of another tournament being held in 2031 to be explored. Fifa's hands are tied in the short-term as the international match calendar is fixed until 2030, with only the 2029 Club World Cup in the schedule, as part of a memorandum of understanding signed between Fifa and the European Clubs Association two years ago. With Fifa already facing legal action from World Leagues, an international lobby group that includes the Premier League, there is no appetite to inflame it further by ripping up the current schedule. World Leagues has filed a legal complaint to the European Commission with support from the global players' union Fifpro, accusing Fifa of 'abuse of dominance' for allegedly failing to consult them over the scheduling of the Club World Cup. Staging the new competition every two years would increase tensions still further, but there is an acknowledgement on both sides that the entire global calendar after 2030 is open for negotiation. As part of a quid pro quo for moving into the club game, sources have indicated that Fifa may be willing to remove the June international break to ease player workloads and create space for events such as the Club World Cup, although that would be opposed by Uefa, which uses summer dates to stage the finals of its Nations League competition. Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion In a pre-season address last week the Premier League chief executive, Richard Masters, outlined his concerns with expanding the Club World Cup, although the biggest top-flight clubs appear to disagree. 'Fifa was put on earth really to regulate the global game and to run international football, and the Club World Cup is a move into club football,' Masters said. 'The leagues and the players have not been consulted at all on the timing and scheduling of the competition, and I think whatever iteration of it may come next, we do need to be consulted on that. 'Obviously, it does have an impact on the scheduling of the Premier League season, that much is clear. We're asking for a seat at the table, a proper discussion for the leagues.' Fifa is the process of reviewing the qualifying criteria for the 2029 Club World Cup and may lift the cap of two clubs per country, and as previously reported by the Guardian it is consulting on whether to increase the number of teams involved from 32 to 48. The men's World Cup next year and the 2031 Women's World Cup will involve 48 teams for the first time, so expanding the Club World Cup would be consistent with Fifa's tournament model. Having awarded hosting rights to this year's competition to the US without inviting tenders, Fifa is planning to run formal bidding process for future tournaments. Qatar, Spain and Morocco have all expressed interest in staging the 2029 Club World Cup, with details of the tender process expected later this year.
