First MP to come out as gay is named Cambridge chancellor
Lord Smith of Finsbury will replace Lord Sainsbury of Turville, a fellow Labour peer, to become the university's 109th chancellor.
He beat nine rivals to the role, including Sandi Toksvig, the former host of the Great British Bake Off, Gina Miller, the anti-Brexit campaigner, and Lord Browne of Madingley, the former chief executive of BP and a cross-bench peer.
The chancellorship is a largely ceremonial position at the head of the university, representing it at events and in fundraising initiatives. The role is unpaid, but its extensive foreign travel is covered by the university.
Around 25,000 Cambridge alumni and staff cast their votes in the chancellorship race, which was the first to take place both online and in person in the role's 800-year history.
Mohamed El-Erian, an Egyptian-American businessman and the current president of Queen's College, Cambridge, won the most first choice votes in the ballot, but the single transferable vote system saw Lord Smith emerge the victor.
The politician has been the master of Pembroke College, Cambridge since 2015 and became a Labour peer last year, having previously served as the party's MP for Islington South and Finsbury.
Lord Smith's 22-year stint as a Labour MP saw him serve as secretary of state for culture, media and sport for four years during the Blair administration. He later became chairman of both the Environment Agency and the Advertising Standards Authority.
In his candidate statement to become Cambridge chancellor, Lord Smith said his experience as the first openly gay MP showed his commitment to 'diversity, openness and ethics'.
He won 4,500 votes in the initial count compared to Mr El-Erian's 4,818, but scooped up other votes in the ranked ballot to become the overall winner.
In a statement announcing his election, Lord Smith said: 'To be elected as chancellor of the university I love is a huge honour. I'm thrilled. I look forward to being the best possible ambassador for Cambridge, to being a strong voice for higher education more generally, and to working closely together with the vice-chancellor and her team.'
Prof Deborah Prentice, Cambridge's vice-chancellor, said: 'On behalf of everyone at the university, I offer my warm congratulations to Chris on his election. I very much look forward to working with him and building on the strong relationship that we have developed since I became vice-chancellor.
'Chris has had a long involvement with the university, and brings a wealth of relevant experience to this important role. I would like to thank the other nine candidates for standing for the role and their willingness to serve Cambridge.'
Lord Sainsbury stepped down earlier this year after 14 years as chancellor.
Lord Smith, who will serve a reduced term of 10 years under new chancellorship rules, inherits Cambridge's figurehead position at a difficult time for the university sector as it grapples with a worsening financial crisis and increasingly polarised debate over free speech.
His appointment comes on the day Cambridge was been granted a year-long injunction banning pro-Palestinian protests on campus.
Cambridge has been granted several previous injunctions to stop protest activity on campus, but those have all covered specific events, such as forthcoming graduation ceremonies.
Lord Smith has previously supported the university's use of legal action to shut down pro-Palestine encampments on campus, citing potential disruption to students' exams.
The university returned to the High Court on Wednesday seeking a more sweeping 12-month injunction, which will also cover Chestnut Tree Lawn – a plot of land in front of King's College – as well as Senate House, the Old Schools and Greenwich House.
The Russell Group institution said in written submissions to the court that there was 'an increase in the risk and threat of direct action taking place against the university'. It added that 'the possibility of further war in the Middle East involving Israel and Iran amongst other countries is also likely to lead to further unrest over the summer period'.
Kester Lees KC, for the university, said the harm caused to the university by previous protests was 'substantial', including thousands of people being disrupted during graduations, staff being unable to work, and more than £230,000 being spent on extra security, cleaning, and legal costs.
The European Legal Support Centre and the human rights group Liberty both intervened in the case to express opposition to the move, with the university's students' union, which is not involved in the legal proceedings, also criticising the injunction bid.
Mr Justice Butcher, the judge presiding over the case, said he would set out his reasons for granting the injunction at a later date.
The injunction could place Lord Smith in a difficult position, with his pitch for chancellorship centred around a commitment to freedom of speech.
In an interview with The Telegraph last month he criticised those who attempt to 'no-platform' controversial figures in the university, saying: 'Free speech is about allowing people to say controversial things, but then challenging them and debating with them.'
He also criticised the BBC for livestreaming 'Death to the IDF' chants on a Glastonbury stage by the punk duo Bob Vylan last month.
Lord Smith told The Telegraph: 'Urging death to anyone, including the IDF, is completely unacceptable. If I were the BBC, I would have pulled the feed immediately. It's what they should have done.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK Government urged to reconsider decision to cut cash for peace fund
The UK Government has been urged to reconsider its decision to cut its backing for a significant Irish peace fund. The Government confirmed it had decided not to continue with the £1 million contribution to the International Fund for Ireland (IFI) in 2024-25, citing a 'very challenging fiscal position'. The IFI was originally set up by the UK and Irish governments as an independent international organisation in 1986. It delivers a range of peace and reconciliation initiatives across Northern Ireland and Irish border counties, including supporting communities to work towards removal of the remaining peace walls. Sinn Fein North Belfast MP John Finucane said he is concerned about the move, and said he will raise it directly with Secretary of State Hilary Benn. 'It is extremely concerning that the British Government is to cut funding for IFI,' he said. 'IFI was established to promote peace, reconciliation and a better future for all communities across Ireland. 'Peace is hard-won and hard-fought. It can never be taken for granted, and crucial funds like this must continue to be supported. 'The British Government should be increasing funding in light of the withdrawal of US support, not imposing further hardship. 'I will be writing to British Secretary of State Hilary Benn, calling for his Government to reverse this decision and ensure IFI can continue its vital grassroots-led programmes.' Responding, a UK Government spokesperson said: 'This Government inherited a very challenging fiscal position, and needed to take difficult but necessary decisions to place the public finances on a sustainable footing. 'As a result, the Government has decided not to continue with the £1 million contribution to the International Fund for Ireland in 2024-25. 'The Government remains supportive of the IFI's aims of promoting peace and reconciliation.'
BBC News
13 minutes ago
- BBC News
County council votes against expanded Leicester city boundary
County councillors have voted for a motion opposing any future expansion of Leicester's political city's Labour mayor Sir Peter Soulsby has proposed a new political map which would see its boundaries move outwards to take in towns and villages currently served by neighbouring district idea is one of three potential options to be considered by the government, which wants to end the existing two-tier council system in England, and create new authorities with greater devolved at a special meeting on Wednesday, members of Leicestershire County Council voted by 23 to 22 to oppose a city expansion. Soulsby said he was disappointed by the result of the vote but that he hoped to continue having constructive discussions with the county council before making final submissions on future boundaries to ministers in November. The motion was proposed by the county council's Tory opposition group leader Deborah Taylor said the proposed expansion ignored the views of residents who could find themselves incorporated in a greater Leicester."Many of our residents moved out of the city into the county and they certainly have no wish to be moved back into the city against their will."This is about land grabbing and council tax payers to prop up a failing city council."She said residents feared their council tax would rise and services would decline should they become part of the city. The county council's Reform UK leader Dan Harrison described the Tory motion as "grandstanding and waving flags" but added he thought the city boundary would ultimately expand."There's a lot of hype, there's a lot of talk," he added."I am trying to defend our future."[The Tories] would say just sit back and let government decide but believe me with a Labour mayor and a Labour minister - who would get the best deal out of that?"We are trying to negotiate, talk and have realistic conversations."Harrison said modelling was now being done with the aim of getting a clearer picture of future plans by UK, which runs the council as a minority administration, proposed having a referendum on local government reorganisation but the move was voted down by 24 votes to the meeting, about 40 residents had joined Tory councillors in a protest outside County Hall. Under its proposal, the city council said Leicester's current population of 372,000 would increase to 623,000 by told the BBC: "In private, all political groups accept the case for extending the city boundary is overwhelming."It would unlock devolution and help meet the city's housing needs. "I've said to Dan Harrison, and the county council, we have to work with them to get a model for appropriate city boundaries."I do understand why people may have concerns but council tax would not be hiked."They would not be taken over. It's about becoming part of another council over which they would have considerable influence." The city council has proposed the rest of Leicestershire and Rutland should fall under a single council serving a population of 578, County Council has already outlined proposals to create one unitary authority for the whole county - replacing itself and the districts and boroughs - sitting around the city's current districts' favoured model is for three unitary councils across Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland.A North Leicestershire and Rutland council would serve the area currently covered by Charnwood borough, North West Leicestershire district, Melton borough and Rutland County Council.A separate South Leicestershire council would cover the areas of Blaby district, Harborough district, Hinckley and Bosworth borough and Oadby and Wigston borough city would remain are proposing more public engagement in the summer, as final proposals for local government reform must be submitted by 28 November 2025.
The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Zack Polanski faces Ellie Chowns at Green party leadership hustings
Update: Date: 2025-07-30T18:56:17.000Z Title: Adrian Ramsay Content: Would-be co-leader, standing with , faces 'eco-populist' Andrew Sparrow (now) with Nadeem Badshah and Joe Coughlan (earlier) Wed 30 Jul 2025 20.56 CEST First published on Wed 30 Jul 2025 09.54 CEST From 6.57pm CEST 18:57 Andrew Sparrow Hi, I'm Andrew Sparrow, picking up again from Nadeem Badshah, and blogging from Hoxton Hall in north London, where chairs are being set up into a handsome auditorium for leadership hustings for the Green party of England and Wales. (The Scottish Green party is a separate entitity.) It is due to start at 6.15pm. There have been quite a few hustings already, and four more are scheduled, but we have not covered the contest much on the Politics Live blog, and we certainly have not reported from a hustings. So tonight it is going to get full attention for two hours. The Greens are a smallish party, they normally hold leadership contests every two years, often it ends up as a co-leader job share and, because members have much more control over policy and other matters then they do in other parties, the leader or leaders have surprisingly little power. 'The primary purpose of the Green party leader is to provide visionary leadership and direction for the party,' is how the party explains it. But this contest is attracting more interest than most previous Green party leadership elections have. That is partly because the party is stronger than it has ever been before. It has four MPs at Westminster, more than 800 council seats and it is regularly picking up about 10% support in opinion polls. Where do they go next? That is the other reason why the contest deserves more attention, because the choice facing members is sharper, and spikier, than it normally is in a party with collegiate, herbivore instincts. On the one side, and Ellie Chowns are running on a 'more of the same [success]' platform. They are both MPs, Ramsay is a current co-leader and they say they can 'can inspire teams, grow trust and deliver results'. They were both meant to be here tonight, but Ramsay can't be here because of a family reason. And it is a job share; they have not always appeared together at hustings. And they are up against Zack Polanski who is running on an 'eco-populist' platform promising what is crudely seen as out-Faraging Reform UK from the left. He is a skilled social media performer, and is also widely seen as the favourite - although, because the Greens are a small party (around 65,000 members), they are hard to poll, and no one knows for sure. 8.56pm CEST 20:56 In his final statement, Polanski said that this election was about 'who can cut through'. He went on: This is not just about who leads the Green party. This is about the fact we are facing down the barrel of a Reform government. Nigel Farage could be prime minister, and I don't think it's hyperbolic to say the Green Party could play a pivotal role in stopping that happen. But we cannot stop that happen if we are just asking questions in parliament, as important as questions are. We cannot stop that happening if we look at slow, steady, incremental change. We will stop that happening by being bold - being very clear about exactly what we stand for and exactly what we stand against. 8.49pm CEST 20:49 The final question was about what the candidates would do to develop talent in the party. Polanski says future talent needs to be developed. He says all four Green MPs are either leaders, ex-leaders, or running to be leader. He says he wants to be an MP. But if he were leader, with two deputies, that would be seven Green figures with a big platform. Updated at 8.55pm CEST 8.43pm CEST 20:43 Polanski says he has given more than 80 interviews since this contest started – not just comments to journalists, but proper conversations about policy. He goes on: I don't agree that it's binary between clickbait and substance. I think we need substance with clickbait. And that takes him to Nigel Farage. So when we look at Nigel Farage, I despise Nigel Farage's politics, but it is undeniable he is one of the most effective politicians this country has ever had. I hated Brexit, but he caused Brexit without even being in parliament, just through the power of his storytelling. Now he's playing politics on easy mode so he can tell lies and misinformation. And I agree, and I hope Ellie wouldn't say for a second I was dabbling in that. We should never go into lies and misinformation. But what he does is he takes those lies and he tells a powerful story that's easy mode. We're in difficult mode. We need to take science research and truth, but that, on its own, is not enough. People aren't interested in graphs and spreadsheets. We need to take that science research and truth and tell a powerful story that cuts through, and this, for me, is the very centre of this leadership campaign. Updated at 8.50pm CEST 8.38pm CEST 20:38 The next question follows up on this. What are you going to do to make sure the Greens get as much media attention as Nigel Farage? Chowns says it is frustrating how much attention Reform UK get. She says she has spoken to the BBC about this, and they take into account not just the number of MPs (Reform UK are now on four, the same as the Greens). They take into account polling, she says. But she says she thinks the Greens have 'hugely increased' their visibility as a party. Updated at 8.51pm CEST 8.34pm CEST 20:34 Chowns says people tell her that she has not caught the national attention in the way that Nigel Farage has. She goes on: I would say I don't aspire to being a Nigel Farage. I aspire to a different type of politics. And yeah, maybe it's slightly slower burn, certainly it's less simplifying, certainly it's far less polarising, certainly I don't lie and scapegoat and all the rest of it in the way that Nigel Farage has done. And I don't think we should be aspiring to learn those sorts of lessons at all. I think our USP as Greens is a different style of politics. Updated at 8.51pm CEST 8.31pm CEST 20:31 Polanski says he was on a platform with John McDonnell recently. Asked about cooperation between the Greens and Labour or other leftwing parties, McDonnell said at this point he was not interested in electoral pacts, but in intellectual pacts. Polanski says that is his view too. 8.29pm CEST 20:29 Polanski says he does now know what will happen to the Corbyn-Sultana party. As deputy leader, he knows how hard it is to get a party to agree on something, he says. He goes on: But if they get up and running, great, let's talk about how we work with them. And if they don't get up and running, let's make sure we're the party that was proud about our values … I think that's about reaching open the hands of friendship, cooperation, and recognising the real threat here is Reform, not Jeremy Corbyn and Zara Sultana. In response, Chowns plays down the extent of her disagreement with Polanski on this. She suggests she is not against cooperation with the Corbyn-Sultana party. She just stresses that she thinks it is too early to be taking decisions about this, because it is not clear what is going to happen to the Corbyn-Sultana proposal. Updated at 8.34pm CEST 8.24pm CEST 20:24 Polanski says the Greens need to do some 'self-reflection' about the fact that, when Jerermy Cobyn and Zarah Sultana said they would start a new party, 500,000 signed up to say they were interested. He says he would like those people in the Green party. But the Greens need to recognise that 'this half a million people, for whatever reason, aren't connecting that yet with our values'. We need to step up. We need to be bolder. We need to make sure that those people know that if they align with our values, which I believe they do, that they are welcome in the Green party. I consider Jeremy Corbyn and Zara Sultana, both personally and politically, people I want to work with. That does not mean I am talking down the Green party. That doesn't mean I believe we should go out there and fight for every vote and win every seat we can. Polanski says he was 'disappointed' to see on Twitter saying that the Greens would not become a Jeremy Corbyn support act. He goes on: Of course we are not the support act, but I also think that's a way of shutting down conversations before they've even begun. He says he does not know where those conversations might go. But the Greens should not be sending out 'tribal tweets'. He goes on: I think it's the time to be curious about what does a new politics look like? What does it look like when we get in the room and say, 'if we work together, how do we stop Reform? Updated at 8.30pm CEST 8.17pm CEST 20:17 The next question is about working with other parties. Could an alliance with other leftwing parties work? Chowns says cooperation is 'central to the DNA of the greens at so many levels in councils around the country'. As an MEP, she worked with other parties, she says. She is passionate about PR, she says. That is partly because it will force parties to cooperate more with each other. She goes on: So I am always up for considering cooperating with members of other parties wherever there is common ground. We've cooperated in parliament on all sorts of votes already. It's quite early to be thinking about the specifics of the next general election, it's probably four years down the road. And if you look back at the last couple of decades of politics, if you looked at any four-year period in that, any two-year, one-year period in that, you would be really hard put to predict where things would be at the end of that period … The prospect of a Reform government, or a Reform-led government, should really, really worry us. Polanski welcomes this. He says he thinks this is 'a shift in tone' from Chowns, who has previously played down the prospect of working with the Corbyn party. Updated at 8.22pm CEST 8.11pm CEST 20:11 The next question is about tackling antisemitism in the Green party. Polanski, who is Jewish, says it is not enough not being racist. The party has to be actively anti-racist. Chowns says it is possible to fight antisemitism, but also to oppose the policies of Israel. Updated at 8.12pm CEST 8.08pm CEST 20:08 Polanski says ecological boundaries matters as well as economic ones. He says London City airport is a good example. There is no need for it to exist, he says. There is no reason for London City airport. And actually, what would it look like if we made sure that there was a big public space there, we built thousands, if not tens of thousands, of social homes and council homes there to make sure people actually had a place to live. One in every 12 minutes a private jet takes off, some of them from London City Airport. That is completely the pinnacle of climate injustice. That is very wealthy people in the middle of our city polluting an area that has a lot of people living in poverty, a lot of Black and Asian communities there, all breathing in that terrible air pollution. Danny Keeling, the chair, seems to approve. He is a councillor in Newham and he says it is the worst borough in the UK for people having to live in temporary accommodation because of a housing shortage. 7.57pm CEST 19:57 The second question is about what can be done to keep rents down for small businesses and community organisations. Chowns says as a councillor she worked on this. She was a cabinet member of Herefordshire council, and they worked up a scheme for a three-tier rent system, specifically to help the organisations mentioned by the questioners. She says, in a Conservative-facing areas, Green policies on supporting small businesses are very popular. Polanski starts by saying somone will soon need to ask a question on which they disagree. He refers to the Sparks hub in Bristol as an example of how space can be used to benefit the community. In London Oxford Street is being pedestrianised. He says that should be a good thing, but campaigners need to check who gets to have the final say on how the space is used, he says. He says he is concerned about corporations being allowed to restrict what happens in their space. Updated at 8.14pm CEST 7.51pm CEST 19:51 Chowns says, when she came to parliament, she told people she would be happy if she became knowns as 'Mrs Solar Panels'. She says the government has responded, and is investing in this. Keeling thanks 'Mrs Solar Panels'. It's 'Dr Solar Panels,' she corrects him. Chowns has a PhD in sustainable economics. 7.49pm CEST 19:49 The first question comes from a member who is also a member of Unite. He asks how the party can show that net zero policies will be good for voters, and that workers in the oil and gas sector won't lose out. Polanski picks up on the fact the questioner is a union member. He says he has been endorsed by the president of the Bakers' Union. He claims this is the first time a trade union has endorsed someone outside the Labour party for decades. He says the Greens need to campaign for a just transition. And he attacks Reform UK for taking money from the carbon sector. Politicians, like racing drivers, should have to wear uniforms saying who their sponsors are, he says. Chowns also attacks Reform UK. She says they are whipping up fears about net zero. We're seeing those costs already flooding, overheating, excess heat deaths. We are seeing that already. The thing we've got to do as Greens is connect those stories and explain how it is that green policies [work]. For example, home insulation. Everyone wants to live in a warm home. Nobody wants to live in a home that leaks heat where their bills are going up while the heat is literally going out the chimney and the windows. But the government has missed opportunity after opportunity … Previous governments have actively refused to take the role that they should have done to support home insulation. We need a nationwide home insulation programme to get everybody's home up to scratch. Updated at 8.15pm CEST 7.42pm CEST 19:42 Polanski goes next. He starts by saying he agrees with Chowns. He says journalists try to suggest there is animosity in the contest. He says he does not accept that; it is an election, they are campaigning, but at the end they will come together. He talks about his campaigning as a member of the London assembly – on issues like homelessness, accessible transport for the disabled, the quality of social housing, the record of Labour councils. He has backed people on picket lines. He says people assume London is rich, but there is a lot of poverty. What I'm really talking about here is the deep inequality that's happening all across England and Wales, but it's really prominent in our city. People think London is a very wealthy place, and there are certainly places that have huge wealth in London .. And we know as a party that we want to tax multi-millionaires and billionaires, because it is corporations who are destroying our environment, destroying our democracy, and destroying our communities. Polanski says the Greens agree on strategy and policy. But the election is about communication, he says. He says that is people should think about when they start voting on Friday. The central question that is with you tonight is, who do you want communicating for you? Who do you want on that debate stage, taking it to the prime minister? Who do you want on the media and who do you want going up and down this country at rallies, in community halls, in faith organisations and community centres, saying it is time for a bold party of environmental, social, racial and economic justice. 7.35pm CEST 19:35 Chowns gets to go first with an opening statement. She starts by saying the venue is amazing (and it is lovely). She says there have been differences of tone in the contest. But it is important to remember what unites them, she says. She says her strap line, with , is 'together we win'. That is the point. She would not be an MP if it had not been for the 450 people who helped her campaign. She says at least one person in the room, from north London, went to North Herefordshire to campaign for her. Only in recent years have they learned how to win parliamentary and council seats. That has happened under the leadership of Ramsay and Carla Denyer (who is stepped down as co-leader.) And she mentions Zack Polanski's contribution too, as deputy leader. She talks about Green campaigning in parliament: Who is it in parliament that's standing up, calling for taxing wealth fairly? Who is it in parliament that's standing up, calling out our country's complicity and genocide in Gaza? Who is it in parliament who's been there at the forefront of the campaigns to reverse the universal credit and Pip bill, to reverse the winter fuel cuts, to campaign for social housing targets – a particular campaign of mine – to fix social care, to have the real climate action that we so desperately need to tackle the climate crisis. On all of those things. Greens have been at the centre of these debates in parliament, holding government to account in connecting the frustration indeed. She says that is the leadership she and Ramsay offer. 7.30pm CEST 19:30 We're starting. Danny Keeling, coordinator of the London Green party, is chairing. He introduces Zack Polanski and Ellie Chowns. 7.21pm CEST 19:21 The hustings will start at 6.30pm, we've now been told. 7.16pm CEST 19:16 Here are some of the main stories or articles from the Green party leadership contest so far. Novora Media reports that the Green party membership has grown by at least 8% since Zack Polanski launched his campaign. Polanski launches a well-received campaign video with an attack aimed at Nigel Farage denouncing 'racist narratives about strangers destroying everything' as 'bullshit'. finds it hard to admit he likes Polanski in an interview with LBC's Iain Dale. Adam Ramsay, a journalist and Green party member (not related to Adrian), explains in a Guardian article what he thinks the contest is about, and why he prefers Polanksi. Some longstanding members, Corbynites joining to 'back Zack' is scary. Some fear Polanski's mooted ecopopulism, worrying it will attract people who 'aren't really Green'. Much of this fear isn't about policy difference, but culture. Older fundi-types who liked Corbyn's socialism but feared that the movement behind his leadership was a 'cult of personality' now have similar worries about Polanski. Chowns and Ramsay, on the other hand, exude the kind of gentle, conflict-averse, consensual leadership style that the fundis used to advocate (sitting uncomfortably with their hyper-realo insistence on the centrality of Westminster). In other words, the Green party division isn't really so much about left and centre as it is about differing ideas about political power and how to wield it. For me, Polanski takes the realo acceptance of the need for charismatic leadership and blends it with the fundis' belief in extraparliamentary organising and social movements. Polanski says he would be open to working with Jeremy Corbyn's new party. But Ellie Chowns plays down the prospect of working with the Corbyn party. Ramsay says the party should avoid the 'posturing of populist politicians like Farage', in what HuffPost interprets as a dig at Polanski. Ramsay and Chowns tell the Guardian that Polanski's 'eco-populism' would prove polarising, divisive and likely to put off more moderate voters.
