logo
How Do I Know You're Listening?

How Do I Know You're Listening?

Forbes09-07-2025
When your words say one thing ('Keep talking, I'm listening') but your body language indicates the opposite, people are forced make a choice. And when choosing between what you say and how you look and sound while saying it, they will intuitively discount your words in favor of the nonverbal messages you're sending.
Here are 3 nonverbal cues that signal listening, engagement, and interest.
1) Eye contact
Eye contact
If people are looking at us, we believe we have their interest. If they meet our gaze more than two-thirds of the time, we sense that they find our ideas appealing or valuable. That's why greater eye contact, especially in intervals lasting four to five seconds, almost always leads to greater liking.
The impact of eye contact is so powerful because it is instinctive and connected with humans' early survival patterns. Children who could attract and maintain eye contact, and therefore increase attention, had the best chance of being fed and cared for.
And eye contact retains its power with adults, as over the course of a conversation, eye contact is made through a series of glances – to gauge reactions or indicate attention. It is also used as a synchronizing signal. People tend to look up at the end of utterances, which gives their listeners warning that the speaker is about to stop talking.
When you decrease eye contact by checking texts messages or looking around the room, people don't feel heard -- even if you tell them you're listening and can repeat every word they said.
2) Tone of voice
Speaking in a warm tone of voice
When I coach business leaders, I remind them that whenever they are active listening (summarizing, asking questions to clarify, acknowledging emotions, etc.) people won't only be evaluating their words, they will be 'reading' voices, searching for clues to possible hidden agendas, concealed meanings, disguised emotions, undue stress.
The voice conveys subtle but powerful clues into feelings and meanings. Think, for example, how tone of voice can indicate sarcasm, concern, or confidence. Or how an increase in volume and intensity grabs attention because of the heightened emotion (passion, anger, assertiveness, certainty) it signals. Researchers from the University of Geneva in Switzerland discovered that they could tell whether a subject had just heard words spoken in anger, joy, relief, or sadness by observing the pattern of activity in the listener's brain. As a listener, responding with a warm tone of voice is more powerful than you might know.
3) Limbic synchrony
Mirroring
Babies do it even before birth; their heartbeats and body functions take on a rhythm that matches that of their mothers. As adults, we do it automatically when we are listening to someone we like, are interested in, or agree with.
It's called limbic synchrony, and it's hardwired into the human brain. It's the process by which we switch our facial expressions and body posture to match that of the other person – mirroring that person's nonverbal behavior and signaling that we are connected and engaged.
The neuroscience behind limbic synchrony begins with the discovery of mirror neurons and research into how empathy develops in the brain. In the late 1980s, researchers at the University of Parma in Italy found that the brain cells of macaque monkey fired in the same way whether they were making a particular motion (like reaching for a peanut) or watching another monkey or human make that movement. In terms of motor cell activity, the monkey's brain could not tell the difference between doing something and seeing it done. The scientists named those brain cells "mirror neurons.'
In human beings, it was found that mirror neurons not only simulate actions, they also reflect intentions and feelings. It's your mirror neurons that give you the capacity to empathize with the joys and sorrows of others by connecting with them on an emotional level. This explains why mirroring is such a powerful part of listening.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Transcripts Reveal Confusion and Frustration in Black Hawk Cockpit Before Deadly Crash
Transcripts Reveal Confusion and Frustration in Black Hawk Cockpit Before Deadly Crash

New York Times

time27 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Transcripts Reveal Confusion and Frustration in Black Hawk Cockpit Before Deadly Crash

Pilots flying an Army Black Hawk above the Potomac River on Jan. 29 expressed confusion and frustration in the last minutes before the helicopter collided with a commercial passenger jet, according to a transcript of its cockpit voice recording. Communications with the air traffic controller who was monitoring the helicopter from Ronald Reagan National Airport were flawed throughout the flight's final phase, according to the transcript, which was released Wednesday by the National Transportation Safety Board, the agency investigating the accident. 'Is he pretty muffled?' the Black Hawk pilot, Captain Rebecca M. Lobach, asked at one point, in reference to an instruction from the controller. 'Yeah. I definitely didn't catch what he said,' replied Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Loyd Eaves, who was instructing Ms. Lobach that evening. 'I'm glad you did.' The investigative agency released the documents as part of a three-day hearing on the factors that contributed to the accident. Investigators on Wednesday discussed a number of troubling discoveries, including the likely possibility that the altimeter that indicates the helicopter's flying height gave incorrect readings, leading the pilots to believe they were flying lower than they actually were. The garbled communication made it difficult for the pilot flying the Black Hawk and her instructor to hear important information from the control tower during the fatal flight. In the final moments of the flight, based on what he thought they were being asked, Mr. Eaves told Capt. Lobach to turn east. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Man Wants to Buy His Family's Home at a $100K Discount, But Partner Says It'll Never Feel Like Hers
Man Wants to Buy His Family's Home at a $100K Discount, But Partner Says It'll Never Feel Like Hers

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Man Wants to Buy His Family's Home at a $100K Discount, But Partner Says It'll Never Feel Like Hers

He sees it as a rare opportunity, but she says it feels like giving up her independenceNEED TO KNOW A man wants to buy his family's home at a $100k discount, but his partner refuses She says it would never feel like hers and insists on buying a home with no family ties Despite offering compromises, he wonders if this emotional divide is a dealbreakerA man turns to the Reddit community for advice following a difficult disagreement with his long-term partner over their future home. The couple is planning to buy a house within the next year, but they find themselves at a standstill when it comes to choosing the right one. He explains in his post that his family owns a spacious, well-maintained home he can purchase for significantly below market value — about "$100k less" than similar properties. 'It's spacious, has a garden, and would require minimal monthly expenses compared to most other options,' he writes. The house also comes with solar panels, updated heating and no pressing need for renovations, making it a practical and financially wise choice. But despite the deal's many upsides, his partner is firmly against it. Not because of the house itself, but because it belongs to his family. 'She says it wouldn't feel like 'her' home,' he explains, adding that she believes she would always feel like 'she's living in someone else's life.' Even with the offer of a full renovation and freedom to make it her own, she remains resistant. Instead, she wants to start fresh — ideally with an apartment that doesn't carry any history from either side. The man notes that this option would be 'smaller, more expensive over time, no garden, older infrastructure,' but she sees the blank slate as emotionally necessary. He's tried offering a range of compromises, including symbolic distance from his family. 'They'd have no say in anything,' he promises her, emphasizing that this would be their space, not an extension of his past. But for her, the issue isn't about what his family says or does — it's about what the house represents. 'She says it would feel like giving up her sense of independence,' he shares, revealing that she'd even prefer to rent or spend more just to have something that feels like 'ours' from day one. The man says he understands the emotional aspect, but he's struggling to balance it with what he sees as a rare and stable opportunity. 'It feels like I'm being asked to ignore a rare and stable opportunity because of a symbolic rejection of anything tied to my past,' he writes. He emphasizes that he's not trying to pressure her, just hoping she'll meet him halfway. But despite his efforts, he admits, 'all signs point to this being a dealbreaker for her.' In a follow-up edit, he adds context about their relationship. 'We're not married, but we're headed that way (but not yet proposed). We've been together for 8 years, no other issues in the relationship, she's the person I'll be spending my life with,' he says. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Readers respond with empathy and sharp insight, with one commenter noting, 'The thing is that she doesn't believe that your family won't be involved for whatever reason.' This user suggests that no matter what he says, she may still worry his family is 'too involved in your life.' Another points out that both perspectives carry weight. 'Someone who looks at this purely from a financial angle will never see the emotional side,' they write. 'Someone who believes this house will always be more yours than hers will not care how good of an investment it is because they will never feel truly at home.' The man acknowledges this complexity in a second update, admitting he's started to reconsider his approach. 'I also understood I'm the one being pushy about it,' he says. 'So I'll take a step back and start seriously considering other options, given also the possible downsides of purchasing a family home.' Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

DART train fire causes service disruptions for Downtown Dallas
DART train fire causes service disruptions for Downtown Dallas

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

DART train fire causes service disruptions for Downtown Dallas

Dallas fire crews are battling a fire involving a DART train near the Pearl/Arts District Station Wednesday evening. There may be significant delays for passengers as all train service through Downtown Dallas is currently suspended, officials said. Crews were called to the area just after 3:30 p.m. Firefighters are currently working at the entry of the tunnel system as DART trains move from downtown to Mockingbird Station, Dallas Fire-Rescue said. DART said shuttle buses are available to assist passengers at Victory, EBJ/Union, West End, Akard, St. Paul, Pearl/Arts District, Deep Ellum, Cityplace/Uptown and SMU/Mockingbird stations. Video from the CBS New Texas chopper shows burn and scorch marks on top of one of the train cars. DART said no injuries have yet been reported. It is unknown if there were passengers on the train when the fire started. This is a developing story.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store