Perlis MB fails to oust Arau PAS chief as allies suffer major defeats in state party polls
Malaysiakini reported that Shukri lost his bid for the division chief post to Solahhudin Azmi, the current officeholder and Perlis PAS election director.
'Shukri failed to win the post of Arau PAS division chief, losing to Solahhudin Azmi,' the report quoted an anonymous party source.
Razali Saad, another ally of Shukri and a Perlis state executive councillor, also reportedly lost his position as division vice-chief to Nur Yusairy Mansor.
Meanwhile, Perlis state assembly speaker Russele Eizan was unseated as division deputy chief by Ridzuan Hashim, a rank-and-file member.
Russele also holds the role of Perlis Perikatan Nasional vice-chairman II, but his alignment with Shukri remains unclear.
These losses come amid previous controversies involving Shukri's family, notably his son Syafeeq who was charged last year with submitting a false claim.
In May 2024, Syafeeq pleaded not guilty in the Sessions Court in Kuala Lumpur to a charge of submitting a false claim amounting to RM19,505.10.
He was charged with submitting a document, 'Pesanan Kerajaan (Bekalan/Perkhidmatan) Kerajaan Negeri Perlis', containing a false claim to Nurul Nabilah Mohd Sukri, an Administrative Assistant at the District Administration Division, Perlis State Secretary's Office, on February 19 this year with an intent to deceive the latter.
The charge was framed under Section 18 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act 2009 (Act 694), punished under Section 24(2) of the same law, which provides imprisonment for up to 20 years and a fine of not less than five times the amount or value of the bribe or RM10,000, whichever is higher upon conviction.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
42 minutes ago
- The Sun
German minister warns of China's aggressive stance in Asia-Pacific
TOKYO: Germany's foreign minister has condemned China for what he described as increasingly aggressive actions in the Asia-Pacific region, including threats to alter borders. Johann Wadephul accused Beijing of openly seeking to shift territorial boundaries in its favour, particularly in the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas. 'Any escalation in this sensitive hub of international trade would have serious consequences for global security and the world economy,' he said after meeting Japanese counterpart Takeshi Iwaya. A pre-visit statement released on Sunday highlighted China's challenge to international law while asserting regional dominance. 'China's increasingly aggressive behaviour in the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas also has implications for us in Europe,' the statement quoted Wadephul as saying. He also criticised China's role in sustaining Russia's war efforts in Ukraine, calling it a key enabler of Moscow's aggression. 'Without it, the war of aggression against Ukraine would not be possible,' Wadephul said, noting China's supply of dual-use goods and energy purchases from Russia. Ahead of US-led talks on Ukraine, he stressed the importance of security guarantees for Kyiv to ensure long-term defence capabilities. Wadephul referenced Donald Trump's recent summit with Vladimir Putin, urging continued pressure on Moscow until it takes concrete steps toward peace. Monday's discussions in Washington aim to outline a negotiated solution for Ukraine, with security assurances being a critical component. 'Ukraine must be able to defend itself effectively even after a ceasefire and peace agreement,' he said. – AFP


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Australians more anxious about Trump tariffs than China, poll shows
FILE PHOTO: A Chemist Warehouse store in Sydney, Australia, on Thursday, Feb. 13, 2025. While Australia received the minimum 10 per cent levy on its exports to the US, it could still be in the firing line for sectoral tariffs on industries such as pharmaceuticals. - Bloomberg CANBERRA: Australians are more worried about the Trump administration's protectionist trade policies than China's military buildup in the Asia-Pacific region, a new opinion poll showed. Some 42 per cent of respondents named US tariffs as their top concern compared with 37 per cent who cited the strategic threat from China, according to a Newspoll published Monday (Aug 18) in The Australian. A further 21 per cent said neither bothered them, the survey conducted Aug. 11-14 for the newspaper showed. It had a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points. While Australia received the minimum 10 per cent levy on its exports to the US, it could still be in the firing line for sectoral tariffs on industries such as pharmaceuticals. More generally, it is heavily exposed to global trade as an export-reliant nation and could also see blowback on import duties from its largest trading partner, China. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese undertook a six-day visit to China last month that included meetings with President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang in Beijing. While there, he focussed heavily on boosting business and trade ties, sidestepping thornier issues around US-China competition, Taiwan and Beijing's military assertiveness. University-educated voters were more worried about US tariffs than China's military expansion, according to the survey. The results were more evenly split for those without university education, it said On local politics, Newspoll showed Albanese's Labour Party leading the centre-right coalition 56 to 44 per cent, slightly up on the May 3 election result that delivered Labour 94 seats in the 150-member parliament. The prime minister's net satisfaction rating also turned positive for the first time since September 2023, it showed. - Bloomberg


The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Stories that shaped us
THERE is a question that often arises when something big happens – a historic moment, a national milestone, a collective high. It usually begins like this: 'Where were you when...?' Most of the time, it is not about geography but memory – about anchoring ourselves to something larger, remembering not just what happened but how it made us feel. For me, one such moment was the night of the 1992 Thomas Cup finals. Malaysia versus Indonesia. Badminton, of course. It was a Saturday, and I was a 17-year-old schoolboy at Malay College Kuala Kangsar. I watched it from the common room of our hostel – surrounded by boys in kain pelikat, clutching pillows, Milo mugs and SPM notes – all eyes fixed on a grainy television screen, struggling to keep up with the speed of the shuttle. We won. We brought the cup home after 25 years. And for a few beautiful hours, everything else faded – prep class, homesickness, SPM trial stress – replaced by a kind of joy that felt bigger than sport, bigger than school; something national, something shared. That moment and others like it become personal chapters in a larger story: the story of how we remember Malaysia. Another such chapter came in May 2018, when Malaysians went to the polls in what would become one of the most significant general elections in our history. For the first time, the ruling coalition was changed. Not through force or upheaval but through the quiet, determined power of the vote. People queued in the heat, some for hours. Some travelled across borders, taking buses and flights home just to mark an X on a ballot. There was tension, yes. But there was also something else: hope. Hope that this country belonged to its people – that we were no longer just passengers but co-pilots, that power could change hands peacefully and that we, the rakyat, are the ones responsible for deciding the direction of this country moving forward. You didn't need to be in Putrajaya or Dataran Merdeka to feel it; you could have been watching from a living room in Penang or a mamak stall in Johor Bahru or a hostel room in Sarawak. It did not matter where you were because the moment still reached you. That is what makes these memories powerful. They become shared reference points in the timeline of our lives. Of course, not every Merdeka memory is tied to politics or spectacle. Sometimes, it is quieter – a flag being raised in your neighbourhood, a conversation over teh tarik about what independence really means, a late-night drive on empty roads, with patriotic songs playing softly on the radio. These small moments matter too because nationhood is built not just on events but on experience. It is not just the milestones we remember; it is the way they made us feel connected, even when we were far apart. And that is the thread I keep coming back to: our shared experiences. You and I may have grown up in different towns, spoken different dialects, attended different schools but the moment the Sidek brothers stepped onto the court or when the results rolled in after GE14, we were there – one in spirit. Yet, these memories, whether personal or collective, are slowly fading. We live in an era of fast timelines and short attention spans. Moments come and go, swallowed by algorithms and speed. The things that once glued us together are being replaced by smaller, more personalised stories – meaningful, yes, but often disconnected from the larger whole. That is why I believe now, more than ever, we need to start recording our stories, not for history books, but for each other. For the generations who did not grow up with the Thomas Cup or the Reformasi years or who never saw a transfer of power that felt truly earned. It does not have to be big, just honest. Write about where you were when something mattered. Tell your children what Merdeka meant to your parents. Share with a friend that memory you have always carried but never voiced, because if we don't pass these stories on, who will? So this Merdeka, ask someone: 'Where were you when...?' and listen carefully. Then share your own. Memories, like nationhood, live best when it is passed from hand to hand. Dr Nahrizul Adib Kadri is a professor of biomedical engineering at the Faculty of Engineering, and the principal of Ibnu Sina Residential College, Universiti Malaya. Comments: letters@