Broward Judge Gary Farmer suspended without pay over off-color statements
A Broward judge with a penchant for off-color humor and tough-talking discipline will be suspended without pay until further notice as the Florida Supreme Court decides whether to permanently remove him from the bench.
The suspension of Broward Circuit Judge Gary Farmer takes effect at 11:59 p.m. Monday, by order of the Florida Supreme Court.
The action came just a few days after Farmer, through attorney Michael Dutko, argued that he should not be suspended without pay because the allegations of misconduct against him did not include any allegation that Broward residents were 'victimized by any illegal, dishonest, or immoral conduct.'
What he did do, by his own admission, was make statements from the bench that called into question how seriously he was taking his job as an overseer in the administration of justice.
In one afternoon last summer, he was recorded telling one defendant to wear a condom while on probation, nearly using profanity while having another defendant removed from his courtroom, and repeating flamboyant gay stereotypes from the 1990s sketch comedy show 'In Living Color.'
At the time, Farmer presided over third-degree felony cases, many of which resulted in little to no prison time for first-time offenders, depending on the severity of the case. According to Dutko, Farmer was trying to provide some degree of relief for those who found themselves appearing before him.
Earlier this year, the Judicial Qualifications Commission, which is the state's watchdog for judicial misconduct, filed formal charges accusing Farmer of violating the rules governing judges' behavior on and off the bench.
Farmer was elected to the bench in 2022 after serving in the Florida Legislature, where he rose to the position of minority leader until his fellow Democrats ousted him from the role in 2021.
His suspension is the third ordered against a Broward judge this month. Last week, Circuit Judge Mardi Levey Cohen was ordered to serve a 10-day suspension for spreading unverified information about her opponent in the 2024 election, while Circuit Judge Stephanie Moon was suspended for 10 days after she admitted questioning a lawyer about her campaign from the bench.
In the cases against Levey Cohen and Moon, the suspensions appear to signal the end of the disciplinary action they face. But the Florida Supreme Court made it clear that the case against Farmer was just getting started, and he will not be able to serve as a judge or as an attorney until it's resolved.
Also last week, the JQC filed formal ethics charges against County Judge Lauren Peffer, who was accused of spreading false information during her campaign without vetting it for accuracy.
Rafael Olmeda can be reached at rolmeda@sunsentinel.com or 954-356-4457. Follow him on Threads.net/@rafael.olmeda.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Democrats Have an Authenticity Gap
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Since President Donald Trump's victory last fall, Democrats have been trying to reengage with male voters, find a 'Joe Rogan of the left,' and even fund a whole left-leaning 'manosphere.' Young men—Rogan's core audience—were among the voting blocs that definitively moved toward the GOP in 2024, as a comprehensive postmortem by the data firm Catalist recently illustrated. In response, many powerful liberal figures have obsessively returned to the same idea: If we can't compete with their influential manosphere, why not construct our own? One high-profile progressive group, the Speaking With American Men project, is embarking on a two-year, $20 million mission to build 'year-round engagement in online and offline spaces Democrats have long ignored—investing in creators, trusted messengers, and upstream cultural content,' though its leaders say they're not looking for a liberal Rogan. Another effort, AND Media (AND being an acronym for 'Achieve Narrative Dominance'), has raised $7 million and, according to The New York Times, is looking to amass many times that amount over the next four years to back voices that will break with 'the current didactic, hall monitor style of Democratic politics that turns off younger audiences.' But in recent conversations with people in all corners of Democratic politics—far-left Bernie bros, seasoned centrists of the D.C. establishment, and rising new voices in progressive media—I came away with the sense that Democrats don't have simply a podcast-dude issue, one that could be solved with fresh money, new YouTube channels, and a bunch of studio mics. The party has struggled to capitalize on Trump's second-term missteps. It has yet to settle on a unifying message or vision of the future. Given this absence, such a tactical, top-down fix as deputizing a liberal Rogan looks tempting. The big problem is: That fix is both improbable and illogical. [Read: Democrats have a man problem] The party's 'podcast problem' is a microcosm of a much larger likability issue. 'We are a little bit, you know, too front-of-the-classroom,' Jon Lovett, a former Obama speechwriter and a co-host of Pod Save America, told me. In a sense, the show's production company, Crooked Media, already tested the 'make your own media ecosystem' proposition: Five years after its independent founding in 2017, Crooked announced that it had received funding from an investment firm run by the Democratic megadonor George Soros. Lovett seemed less skeptical of the new initiatives than other Democrats I interviewed, but also acknowledged some limitations. 'We believe how important it is to invest in progressive media,' Lovett told me. 'But in the same way you can't strategize ways to be authentic, you can't buy organic support.' The limits of this approach have already become clear. 'If you're trying to identify and cultivate and create this idea of a 'liberal Joe Rogan,' by definition, you're manufacturing something that's not authentic,' Brendan McPhillips, who served as campaign manager during John Fetterman's successful Pennsylvania Senate bid in 2022, told me. 'This fucking insane goose chase that these elite donors want to pursue to create some liberal oasis of new media is just really harebrained and misguided.' Joe Rogan, Theo Von, and other prominent voices in the existing manosphere are not inherently political and, even when they do touch politics, don't adhere to GOP or conservative orthodoxy. Although Rogan and Von did attend Trump's second inauguration, both have also been enamored with Senator Bernie Sanders, of Vermont; and recently, Von delivered an emotional monologue about the destruction in Gaza, drawing ire from many of his listeners on the right. In short, these guys are guided not by ideology, but by their own curiosity and gut instinct. Fluidity in belief is central to their appeal, and helps explain their cross-party success. Their audiences also blossomed over time, not after the stroke of a donor's pen. Throughout my interviews, I heard constant lamentations over the inescapable 'D.C. speak' in both Democratic politics and the left-leaning press. 'Normal people aren't out here talking about and paying attention to the kind of things that tie senior Democratic strategists up in knots,' McPhillips, who lives in Philadelphia, told me. You can't read white papers and study what goes on in the states from afar, he argued; you have to be there at eye level, living among real people, talking like a real person. What politicians have been advised to do for decades—stick to short cable-news hits, repeat the same few points over and over—are habits that today's voters find, in the words of a senior official who worked both in the Joe Biden White House and on the Kamala Harris campaign, 'repulsive.' Although this person, who asked for anonymity in order to speak freely about party strategy, discounted the premise of finding a 'Rogan of the left' as a fool's errand, they did say that, from now through 2028, Democrats should try to infiltrate sports-focused podcasts, paying particular attention to YouTube. This operative has come to view the current moment less as center-left versus center-right, and more as a larger battle of institutionalists versus anti-institutionalists: 'The psyche of a liberal in this moment is institution defense.' Also: fear. Too many Democrats, they believe, approach every public conversation and media interview with a level of trepidation about what they're saying—not in fear of Trump, but in fear of the wrath of their own potential voters. During her 2024 campaign, Harris reportedly feared the potential blowback within her own team from sitting down with Rogan. 'There was a backlash with some of our progressive staff that didn't want her to be on' his show, Jennifer Palmieri, who advised the second gentleman Doug Emhoff, said a week after the election. (Palmieri later revised her comments.) This year, some progressives have found a way to break through. Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who's proved capable of acing a hostile Fox News interview, has now grown facial scruff and has been popping up on the podcast circuit. Several Democrats I spoke with praised both Buttigieg's recent media tour—his appearance on the brash bro show Flagrant was singled out—and Sanders's ability to win over certain manosphere hosts. 'They're able to do that because they have the confidence and the skill to go on a program like that and just be themselves, and people believe what they say because they're being honest,' McPhillips told me. On the Fighting Oligarchy Tour, and in his frequent podcast appearances, Sanders has positioned himself as an accessible and righteously angry force. Faiz Shakir, Sanders's 2020 campaign manager and now an adviser to the senator, told me that Democrats 'are too far removed from organic and interesting conversations that people want to hear about, and have become too reliant on a one-way push at people about the things we want to tell them,' rather than actually listening to voters. Although he himself is a Harvard alumnus who lives and works in D.C., Shakir criticized the Democratic Party's perpetually buttoned-up ethos, the opposite of an unstructured podcast hang. He spoke about the power of anger—the defining emotion of the past political decade—as something that many Democrats don't know how to wield effectively. 'If you're angry, you're uncouth,' Shakir said. 'Calm down! That's not professional!' Unless Democrats stop worrying about politely conforming to pre-Trump communication mores, he believes the chasm with voters will continue to exist, hypothetical new-media ecosystem be damned. [John Hendrickson: Jake and Logan Paul hit the limits of the manosphere] Two things can be true at the same time: Many centrist Democrats may be too timid or genteel, and lack the moxie to speak with the anger that resonates with voters. But the cause of men's alienation from liberal politics cannot be distilled simply into perceptions of gentility. Nor is voicing rage a plausible way to hack the manosphere. When it comes to podcasts—the medium of the moment—a different emotion reigns: curiosity. Hosts such as Rogan and Von succeed across party lines not because they're indignant, but because they're inquisitive and, crucially, persuadable. Their talent is to seem real and relatable without trying. Throughout my conversations, I asked why liberals have not organically produced a figure of Rogan's magnitude and influence. No one really had an answer. But one thing became abundantly clear: No amount of strategic parsing will let Democrats fake their way through this moment. You can't buy authentic communication. Article originally published at The Atlantic
San Francisco Chronicle
20 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Americans still have faith in local news − but few are willing to pay for it
(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) Jennifer Hoewe, Purdue University (THE CONVERSATION) Many Americans say they have lost trust in national news – but most still believe they can rely on the accuracy of local news. In 2023, trust in national newspapers, TV and radio reached historic lows. Just 32% of Americans said they have a 'great deal' or 'fair amount' of trust in these news sources. In 1976, by comparison, 72% of Americans said they had a 'great deal' or 'fair amount' of trust in mass media, including newspapers, TV and radio. And in 2021, the United States ranked last among 46 countries in the trust citizens placed in news outlets. Yet even as the local news industry is declining in the U.S. – more than 3,200 local and regional newspapers have closed since 2005 – Americans still place much more trust in local news than they do in national news. In 2024, 74% of Americans said they had 'a lot of' or 'some' trust in their local news organizations, and 85% believed their local news outlets are at least somewhat important to their community. I am a former local journalist who studies the effects that media content can have on people. Local news can help people understand what their local government is doing, stay aware of day-to-day events, such as local weather, traffic, sports, schools and crime, and even feel a greater sense of community. The decline of local news News organizations in the U.S. have long relied on commercial business practices – such as advertising from companies and subscriptions from readers – that have not been financially sustainable since the mid-2000s. Newspapers' advertising revenue peaked around 2005 and has since rapidly declined from more than $49 billion a year in 2005 to less than $10 billion in 2020, according to the Pew Research Center. This drop was driven by the rise of the internet. As a result, the U.S. has lost more than a third of its local and regional newspapers since 2004. Of the local newspapers that remain, 80% are weeklies, as opposed to the daily local newspapers that were more common in the past. With fewer reporters and editors who closely follow the ins and outs of local and state issues, local newspapers are now less able to hold state and local government officials accountable for their actions. Americans also read local newspapers less than they once did. Since 2015, print and digital circulation numbers have dropped 40% for weekday news editions and 45% for Sunday editions among locally focused daily newspapers and their websites. Instead, a larger percentage of Americans now turn to their family members, friends and neighbors than their local news outlets for local news. Despite local news' problems with declining revenue and readership, Americans still trust local news – and this trust crosses partisan lines. A 2024 Pew Research Center survey found that both Republicans and Democrats think local journalists are in touch with their local communities. The majority of Democrats and Republicans in this survey agreed that local news media 'report news accurately,' 'are transparent about their reporting,' 'cover the most important stories/issues' and 'keep an eye on local political leaders.' This might be because local newspapers can focus on issues people encounter in their day-to-day lives rather than on national politics. In many cases, readers are also able to more easily connect with local journalists in their communities and share story ideas or feedback. People learn about their elected officials and become more informed about local issues from their local news, making it an important component of developing a well-informed public. The current local news environment When people no longer have access to local news sources, or they stop following local news coverage, their faith in the integrity of local elections decreases, their ability to assess elected officials is worse, and voter turnout is lower in local elections, compared with those who do follow, read, watch or listen to local news. Some Americans started relying more heavily on national news when local newspapers shut down, which research shows led to increases in political polarization. My research found that when people trust a partisan-leaning national news source, for example, they're very likely to agree with the partisan-slanted news stories published by that source. As nonpartisan local newspapers have vanished or downsized, partisan-leaning online local news content has cropped up over the past several years. These sites publish news stories that are focused on local issues but approach it with a partisan bent. As a result, people looking for local news information may take in unreliable information that is presented as local news and interpret it as trustworthy. Verifying the origins and intentions of information continues to be paramount for news consumers to make sure they are receiving accurate information – including when it comes to local news.
Politico
35 minutes ago
- Politico
Major escalations in LA as Newsom, Trump fight over Guard troops
Presented by Californians for Energy Independence DRIVING THE DAY — Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to file a lawsuit early this morning to challenge President Donald Trump's move to deploy the National Guard in Los Angeles, his office confirmed. But that was hardly the only provocation over the weekend. Newsom bristled at the Trump administration's threat to arrest California officials if they get in the way of his crackdown on immigration protests and civil unrest in Los Angeles. 'Arrest me. Let's just get it over with, tough guy. I don't give a damn … Tom, arrest me. Let's go,' Newsom told MSNBC as he recoiled at the statements from President Donald Trump and his border czar, Tom Homan. The tension in Los Angeles County is only growing as protests enter their fourth day and immigration agents continue to conduct raids. FIRE WITH FIRE — Newsom had tried to avoid skirmishing with Trump over immigration. But the governor now finds himself locked in an increasingly incendiary power struggle with the president as he fights for control of the state's National Guard. Trump's move to commandeer control of the troops to thwart protests over ICE raids in LA is exceedingly rare in modern American political history. Not since the civil rights era of 1965 has a U.S. president deployed the National Guard without a governor's consent. COURT CHALLENGE INCOMING … Democrats — including blue-state governors — were shell-shocked by Trump's sweeping assertion of federal executive powers. Newsom called the move an 'illegal act' and vowed, in an interview on MSNBC Sunday night, to file a lawsuit 'very early' today. 'He's exacerbated the conditions,' Newsom said. 'He's lit the proverbial match, he's putting fuel on this fire ever since he announced he's taking over the National Guard.' While Democratic officials said the protests were largely peaceful, there were instances of rioting. Videos posted on social media Sunday evening showed multiple Waymo vehicles on fire. In an AP video, protesters blocked off a major roadway, many of them waving Mexican flags and holding signs as traffic came to a standstill. 'Governor Gavin Newscum and 'Mayor' Bass should apologize to the people of Los Angeles for the absolutely horrible job that they have done, and this now includes the ongoing L.A. riots,' Trump posted on Truth Social. NEWSOM WARNS OF FASCISM … Newsom on Sunday suggested Trump's actions were steps toward fascism. 'These are the acts of a dictator, not a President,' Newsom posted on X. He accused Trump of deliberately inciting violence in LA so he could send the military into a major American city. Newsom urged Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Sunday to back down as demonstrators clashed with law enforcement. As Blake reported, the governor's legal affairs secretary wrote in a letter to Hegseth that the deployment came without necessary coordination with California officials. Newsom said state and local law enforcement agencies had the protests under control and that federal intervention would only intensify the conflict. But the Guard might not be the extent of the unwanted federal intervention; Hegseth has also threatened to send in the U.S. Marines. A Defense official told POLITICO that 500 members of the military branch were given 'prepare to deploy' orders and could be sent to the region. DEM GOVERNORS UNITE … Every Democratic governor in the nation spoke out in support of Newsom on Sunday, releasing a joint statement calling Trump's actions an 'ineffective and dangerous' override of California's authority that sets a frightening precedent. 'President Trump's move to deploy California's National Guard is an alarming abuse of power,' the Democratic chief executives wrote. GOOD MORNING. It's Monday. Thanks for waking up with Playbook. You can text us at 916-562-0685 — save it as 'CA Playbook' in your contacts. Or drop us a line at dgardiner@ and bjones@ or on X — @DustinGardiner and @jonesblakej. WHERE'S GAVIN? In Los Angeles, meeting with local leaders and law enforcement. STATE CAPITOL LEADER LIMÓN? — State Sen. Monique Limón's allies say she is closing in on the votes necessary to succeed Senate leader Mike McGuire, and edging out her top competition, Senate Majority Leader Lena Gonzalez, several people with direct knowledge of the race told Playbook. But several senators and people briefed on the matter said they hadn't seen evidence of Limón securing the votes. Like McGuire, Limón would be a relative short-timer in the post. She has represented Santa Barbara in the Legislature since 2016, and her final term ends in 2028. McGuire, meanwhile, leaves office after the end of next year — a timeline that has periodically caused succession chatter to pick up in the upper house since his first year as president pro tempore. McGuire has signaled to colleagues that he wants to stay in his role until next year, an adviser for him previously told Playbook. But he could be replaced sooner, depending on the succession timeline. McGuire's office didn't respond to a request for comment. — With help from Jeremy B. White and Melanie Mason FIRST IN POLITICO: BUDGET DEAL IN FOCUS — The broad strokes of a budget agreement among California lawmakers came into focus Friday, according to five people familiar with the negotiations, as legislative leaders scramble to close a $12 billion deficit. As Dustin and our colleague Eric He scooped for subscribers, the deal between leaders of the state Senate and Assembly would look in part to close the deficit with deferrals and various accounting maneuvers, though details were still unclear. Any budget would require a negotiation after passage with Newsom. Five major points being discussed, according to people briefed on the tentative agreement who were granted anonymity to discuss private negotiations: DEFERRING HEALTH CUTS: Lawmakers' budget plan would avoid imposing some of the most severe Medi-Cal cuts that Newsom laid out in his May budget proposal by deferring reductions for two to three more years. Putting off such cuts would soften Newsom's proposal to cap Medi-Cal benefits for undocumented immigrants and overtime pay for in-home supportive service providers. TRANSIT BAILOUT LOAN: Transit advocates had requested $2 billion for a fiscal lifeline to ailing transit systems in the Bay Area and Los Angeles, including BART, MUNI and LA Metro. Now, lawmakers want to provide at least a portion of that relief in the form of a long-term loan, which would help transit agencies cover their operating expenses and avoid steep service cuts to bus and rail service. PARTIAL HOMELESSNESS FUNDING: Cities and counties have pleaded for more state money to address the homelessness crisis. The Legislature is expected to propose sending $500 million in new funding for the Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention program, which issues grants to local governments. That's less than the $1 billion they received in prior years, though Newsom had proposed no new funding for the program. REVENUE DEBATE PUNT: Progressive Democrats have floated an array of corporate tax proposals, from targeting offshore tax havens to penalizing companies that employ large shares of Medi-Cal recipients, to help the state address its shortfall while minimizing cuts. Those proposals aren't expected to be part of the initial deal and will likely be punted to a later date, possibly in the fall — depending on the extent to which California loses federal funding. HOLLYWOOD LIFELINE: Lawmakers overwhelmingly support Newsom's proposal to double the state's film tax credit. Newsom's proposal for a revamped $750 million tax break is designed to lure back production companies that have fled in droves to other states and countries. Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and McGuire declined to comment, as did a spokesperson for Newsom. CAMPAIGN YEAR(S) FIRST IN PLAYBOOK: JOINING FORCES — Former state Sen. Steven Bradford is out of the race for lieutenant governor, but he's still hoping to boost a political ally's fortunes in the contest. Bradford will today endorse State Treasurer Fiona Ma, as the duo exclusively told Playbook. Ma will, in turn, endorse Bradford for state insurance commissioner. The two previously served together in the state Assembly and have been friends and political allies for over 16 years. 'From expanding affordable housing to protecting taxpayers, she has the vision and experience we need in our next lieutenant governor,' Bradford said. WAGE WARRIOR — Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis was the only candidate for governor at a recent CalChamber forum to unabashedly advocate for raising California's minimum wage, and her campaign is seeking to capitalize with digital ads pointing that out. 'I was proud to be the ONLY Democratic candidate for governor to advocate for raising the minimum wage, while my opponents turned their backs on our workers and unions,' reads a digital ad written from Kounalakis' point of view. — Kounalakis at the event said the state should work toward a $20 an hour minimum wage, rather than 'throw poor people under the bus.' — Former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa said 'I believe in a higher minimum wage,' before cautioning, 'We can't just keep on raising the minimum wage. We address affordability, and we don't have to do that.' — Former Rep. Katie Porter at the forum made a similar argument: 'We can't endlessly keep raising wages. It isn't the solution.' — And former legislative leader Toni Atkins said 'we should be working toward' a higher statewide minimum, 'but now is not the moment.' ON THE AIRWAVES FIRST IN PLAYBOOK: INJURY ATTORNEYS ASSEMBLE — The beef between consumer attorneys and corporations pushing for tort reform in Sacramento is quickly escalating with dueling ad campaigns. As Playbook exclusively learned, the Consumer Attorneys of California will today launch digital ads and a website targeting Uber and other companies behind a new advocacy group that's pushing for legislation to limit civil lawsuits in California and other states. The ads accuse corporations of seeking to 'roll back consumer protections and shield powerful interests from accountability in court.' The attorneys are specifically taking aim at Protecting American Consumers Together (or PACT), an independent-expenditure group that recently urged Georgia lawmakers to pass a landmark tort reform bill. 'It's time to hit the brakes on corporate greed,' states one of the ads. It's a counteroffensive that comes after PACT launched its own ad blitz earlier this year, with a roughly $1 million buy that includes cheeky spots designed to mock highway billboard ads typical of the personal injury legal industry. PACT has previously disclosed that its funders include Uber and Waffle House Inc. CLIMATE AND ENERGY FISH VS. FARMS — California's water wars have long pitted fishermen and farmers against each other. But old battle lines are shifting as both sides grow increasingly desperate about the decline in salmon populations, which is triggering fishing restrictions as well as cuts in water deliveries to farmers. Read more in California Climate's interview with Lisa Damrosch, the executive director of a major commercial fishing group that teamed up with farmers on a first-ever joint trip to Washington to lobby for more money for salmon hatcheries. TOP TALKERS CAN THEY BE FRIENDS? — The messy breakup between billionaire Elon Musk and Trump appears to have quieted down — at the very least, a shaky detente in the social media strife between the two held over the weekend. The possible truce followed a call between representatives for both sides Friday, as our Washington colleagues Dasha Burns and Julia Marsh reported. 'He's stopped posting, but that doesn't mean he's happy,' said a White House official, who was granted anonymity to speak freely about Trump's reaction. 'The future of their relationship is totally uncertain.' THE OTHER GIULIANI — Andrew Giuliani, the son of former New York City Mayor and onetime Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, is the new head of the White House's World Cup Task Force. He's charged with coordinating the federal government's role in the 2026 games in LA. As our colleague Sophia Cai reports, the younger Giuliani faces a tough task. The task force promises an 'America welcoming the world' tournament even as the administration bans travel from countries hoping to compete and Trump's policies have inflamed relations with co-hosts Canada and Mexico. AROUND THE STATE —- Bay Area residents from the Middle East and Northern Africa are anxious over Trump's recent order banning travel to the U.S. from 12 countries. (San Francisco Chronicle) — San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria won't attend Pride in his city, citing objections to headlining performer Kehlani, who has been accused of amplifying antisemitism in their lyrics about the war in Gaza. (The San Diego Union-Tribune) — The Oakland Unified School District could soon exit state financial oversight, but the district could quickly slip back into receivership as it spends its rainy day fund to alleviate a budget deficit. (KQED) — Rancho Cucamonga, a suburb in east LA County, could be home to the first bullet train hub in the U.S. as Brightline breaks ground on its high-speed rail line to connect Las Vegas and SoCal. (Bloomberg) PLAYBOOKERS SPOTTED: RAINBOW CITY HALL — San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie hosted a Pride flag raising ceremony at City Hall on Friday. Among the politicians in the crowd: Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis; state Sen. Scott Wiener; Assemblymember Matt Haney; Board of Supervisors President Rafael Mandelman; Supervisors Bilal Mahmood and Joel Engardio; former Supervisor Leslie Katz; city Treasurer José Cisneros; Honey Mahogany, director of the city's Office of Transgender Initiatives; Community College Board Member Luis Zamora; SF Pride Executive Director Suzanne Ford; BART Board Member Janice Li; and drag queen Juanita More. While the mood was largely celebratory, Wiener offered a sober take on the state of LGBTQ+ rights in America. He railed against the Trump administration's effort to remove Harvey Milk's name from a U.S. naval ship. 'What a petty, despicable move to remove his name,' Wiener said of Milk, the first openly gay man elected in the U.S. PEOPLE MOVES — Kevin Orellana will be a legislative assistant for Rep. Vince Fong (R-Calif.), handling his financial services portfolio. He previously was a legislative aide for Rep. Young Kim (R-Calif.). — Josh Korn is now head of public policy at Whatnot. He previously was tech policy head at Netflix. — Alex Khan has been promoted to principal at Valencia Government Relations Inc., and the firm is rebranding to Valencia Khan Government Relations. He was previously its senior legislative advocate. BIRTHDAYS — director Aaron Sorkin … actress Natalie Portman … Raphael Ouzan at … Ria Strasser-Galvis at JPMorgan Chase … Brad Gallant … tech entrepreneur Raj Goyle BELATED B-DAY WISHES — (was Sunday): Rep. Ken Calvert … actress Julianna Margulies … author Mel Levine … Kaitlin Kirshner at Microsoft … comms strategist Elizabeth Thorp … Helga Zheutlin … (was Saturday): Blake Johnson at Child Action, Inc. WANT A SHOUT-OUT FEATURED? — Send us a birthday, career move or another special occasion to include in POLITICO's California Playbook. You can now submit a shout-out using this Google form.
