
Marshall Mitchell: Mitchell City Council to consider purchasing Main Street lot for $1
Mar. 16—MITCHELL — During its regular meeting on Monday, March 17, the Mitchell City Council will consider an agreement with downtown developer John Adamo to purchase the empty gravel lot at 301 N. Main St, on the corner of Third Avenue for $1.
The city plans to purchase the property to turn the gravel lot into a parking lot, with Adamo retaining a corner portion of the parking lot.
The parking lot is part of Tax Increment District (TID) No. 26, which was approved by the Mitchell City Council for $1.2 million in 2021 for the Mitchell Area Development Corporation (MADC), which owned the Old Crafty Fox building before MADC sold the building to Adamo. Over the last three years, $15,917.80 has been collected through TID No. 26, according to city of Mitchell Finance Officer Michelle Bathke.
Adamo owns a number of buildings on Main Street, including the Woolworth building and the Old Crafty Fox building at Third Avenue, which are on opposite corners of North Main Street and share a line of sight with the proposed parking lot. The lot became gravel after a building slowly crumbled and was
finally demolished in 2019.
The fourth corner at Third Avenue and Main Street is a park-like area with trees and benches next to the Diamond Store.
In fall 2021, Adamo's
plan for the lot included turning the retail space into a parking garage, and commercial retail space.
In late 2022, the plan lost the parking garage, but included
57 parking spaces with benches and greenspace
for Adamo's retail patrons and tenants. In mid-2024,
streetscape improvements reduced parking along Main Street at Third Avenue,
reducing available
parking for Main Street businesses.
Now, the city is taking on downtown parking, and the cost of installing a parking lot.
"Originally, they were going to use that for parking for themselves, and now they're selling it to the city, for the city to do parking for not just them, but for anybody else," City Planner Mark Jenniges said.
According to Jenniges, there is enough parking downtown for residents and retail patrons of the Woolworth and Old Crafty Fox buildings without the gravel lot becoming a parking lot.
"You've got city parking behind Lucky's, you've got it across and in front of the movie theater. There's ample parking down there. You may have to walk," Jenniges said.
TID No. 26 covers eight city blocks from North Rawley Street to North Lawler Street, and from Fourth Avenue to Second Avenue. The estimated value loss from the parking lot area not being developed is an estimated $27,784 per year in tax revenue, or $555,680 over the 20-year lifespan of the tax district,
according to 2021 estimates.
The agreement can be read on the city's website.
The city will also consider an easement agreement regarding the Charlie's Shoe Repair building, to allow it to be 34 inches past the property line of the city-owned parking lot at the corner of North Main Street and Second Avenue.
The Mitchell City Council will also consider sponsoring a community block grant for LifeQuest's mini home village, renaming the Kelley property, and will consider approving various agreements, change orders, and grant applications.
The council will also have the first reading of Ordinance #O2025-02, which is for supplemental appropriations for the city of Mitchell's 2025 fiscal year.
A full agenda can be
found on the city's website.
The council meeting starts at 6 p.m. on Monday, March 17 at 612 N. Main St.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Calls for delayed West Lothian train station to be funded by Scottish Government
A veteran councillor in West Lothian called on the Scottish Government to 'put its money where its mouth is' on plans for a railway station in Winchburgh. As the council and Winchburgh Developments prepare to meet potential funders of the long delayed station , Labour's Linlithgow councillor Tom Conn called on the SNP government to 'stop ducking and diving.' Designs were revealed on Friday with the news that a planning application would come to West Lothian Council 'imminently.' READ MORE: Two major roads through Bathgate will see upgrades and resurfacing work A report to the Executive described the recently published Scottish Government Programme for Government 2025/26. It said: 'The programme makes specific reference to a railway station at Winchburgh in the section on A Safe Sustainable Transport System for Scotland.' Having committed to that, Councillor Conn called for a commitment to meet costs of the £22.5m development. Welcoming the news that progression had been made in the ten months of cooperation between the council, Winchburgh developments, Transport Scotland Network Rail - councillors echoed concerns that there have been no concrete guarantees of funding. Councillor Conn said: 'There needs to be public money invested directly by Scottish Government in Winchburgh. They cannot continually suggest it's other people, other organisations that need to find the money. 'This is an abdication of responsibility by the Scottish Government. If they don't want to take responsibility for it, they shouldn't put it in Programme for Government 2025/26. 'The Scottish government needs to stop ducking and diving and need to put their money where their mouth is. This is talking about rail investment strategy. If all it is is words, not backed up with cash, stop speaking. It's not helping.' Fellow Linlithgow councillor Sally Pattle said the progress had been like wading through treacle as she sought clarification of when a business plan could come to the council. When told it would be two to three months she responded: 'I would just like to welcome the fact that the Scottish Government reference Winchburgh in their programme for government although I'm slightly unclear as to what that will mean in practical terms to actually getting this project moving forward. 'I do welcome all the work that has been undertaken collaboratively between key stakeholders since last September but I have to say that still feels like we are moving through treacle. I would also very much like it to be recognised by officers and key stakeholders that the longer this drags on the greater the negative impact it is having on my ward of Linlithgow because of all the commuters that come into use the train station and then park anti-socially across the town to do so so it would be good if that could recognised going forward.' The report detailed passenger usage at neighbouring stations, including Linlithgow which sees 1,400 a day using the station. Gordon Brown, Roads and Transportation Manager told the meeting: 'Progress on the Outline Business Case now allows the steering group to progress discussions with the Scottish Government on the case for investment, alignment with the overall rail strategy, public value and contribution to government priorities. 'These matters will be addressed as part of the funding application subject, of course, to the City Region Deal Joint Committee supporting an application via that route.' The City Region Deal is a mechanism for accelerating growth. It is made up of six local authorities, universities and the private sector working with the Scottish and UK government to pull in investment.' Winchburgh councillor Angela Doran-Timson pressed Mr Brown on what other alternative investment options there would be if the City Region Deal did not agree to fund the station. ' Was there a plan B?" she asked. Mr Brown said there was ' no plan B' but to date 'no alternative funding sources had been identified' Councillor Doran-Timson said: 'I'll echo what Tom Conn said. I welcome the report, fingers crossed that the funding does come forward from the Scottish Government." A spokesperson for Transport Scotland responded by issuing a joint statement issued on behalf of West Lothian Council, Winchburgh Developments Ltd, Transport Scotland, Network Rail and ScotRail which said: 'Further work continues to explore opportunities for innovative construction techniques to support efficient and low-disruption delivery. 'A stakeholder meeting with Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity, Jim Fairlie MSP, is scheduled to take place in Winchburgh on 18 June. This will offer the minister the opportunity to see first-hand the progress made by the project partners.' That same statement contained comments from council leader Lawrence Fitzpatrick: 'It's extremely encouraging to see this project continuing to move forward at pace. With the planning application submitted and business case prepared, we're entering an important phase, which reflects the positive collaboration between all parties." Sign up to Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox

Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Sibson to take Mitchell's tax increment district complaints before SD audit committee
May 30—MITCHELL — Mitchell resident Steve Sibson is taking Mitchell's increment tax districts before a state legislative committee, raising concerns that the number of tax districts in the city lacks proper scrutiny and may not follow state approval procedures. On May 19, Sibson gave the city council an update on his conversations with the South Dakota Department of Revenue, particularly with regard to TID No. 41. According to previous discussions, increment districts no longer have to be pre-approved by the revenue department before going before a city council or county commission. However, Sibson shared that this was not the case, and that Mitchell was receiving special treatment because of the volume of TIDs the city has. "When I brought up the push back on that requirement for a pre-approved submission as to classification type, I was told that is still in place," Sibson said. "It seems like the Department of Revenue is rubber stamping what we're doing here." The Mitchell Republic reached out to the South Dakota Department of Revenue to confirm Sibson's statements to the council, but the department had not responded by the time this article was published. During its May 19 regular meeting, the Mitchell City Council approved a developer agreement for Tax Increment District (TID) No. 41 for affordable housing and street construction, and also approved a developer agreement for TID No. 42 to expand the Dale's A1 Transmission service building on South Burr Street. The council previously approved the creation and project plans of these tax districts on May 5. TID No. 41 includes two projects, which Sibson took as an issue to the revenue department. In particular, the TID No. 41 agreement lays out what will happen to increment-generated tax funds once the affordable housing units are completed, specifically the construction of Mattie Street. Sibson raised concerns with the revenue department that property owners along Mattie Street, some of whom are outside of Mitchell city limits in Davison County, will be taxed to complete Mattie Street. The city's response is that they don't know if that will happen yet. City Attorney Justin Johnson told the Mitchell Republic that the city won't know how much of the Mattie Street construction can be supported by TID No. 41 until the apartments have been built and the property values have been established. In the coming years, if the council decides to construct Mattie Street without enough support from TID No. 41, then the rest of the project will have to be paid for somehow, according to Johnson. "It's possible that part of it could be done by special assessment, which neighboring properties would be responsible for," Johnson said. If TID No. 41 covers part of the cost of constructing Mattie Street, property owners along Mattie Street would likely be paying less than if there was no tax district at all, Johnson noted. If there were no tax district funds available and the council decided to move forward, assessments for those properties along Mattie Street would cover the whole construction cost of Mattie Street. In other words, if TID No. 41 doesn't pay for all of the construction costs and the city doesn't pay for it out of general funds, Mattie Street property owners are on the hook to complete the road. The boundaries of Mattie Street are within the Mitchell city limits. However, only the right of way for the street is within the city limits while the properties on either side of Mattie Street on the south side are outside of the city limits. A tax increment is only generated from property within the boundaries of the TID, but no tax funds will be generated from the street itself, which is a right-of-way, and therefore tax-exempt, according to Mitchell Finance Officer Michelle Bathke. If a special assessment were levied against property owners, then even those property owners outside of city limits would be liable for paying a share of the burden to finish construction of Mattie Street to East Havens Avenue. In addition to the city potentially raising a tax levy against individual property owners along Mattie Street, the status of TID No. 41 may result in a special levy to maintain tax funds for the Mitchell School District. According to Sibson, the city of Brookings passed a TID that required a special assessment in the amount of $470,000, which taxpayers had to pay. Sibson raised concern with Davison County auditors that the same thing could happen in Mitchell. TID No. 41 was passed to fund Paul Groeneweg's Woods Apartments, a proposed 70-unit complex with two-and-three-bedroom apartments across 12 buildings, which Sibson found no fault with. It is estimated that the developer's infrastructure will be covered by TID No. 41 at an estimated $2.28 million in tax funds. However, Sibson had problems with the city including street construction as a separate project on the same TID. A violation of TID rules, according to Sibson's research. This TID is unique in that it also has a plan to construct the area of Mattie Street south of First Avenue and north of East Havens Avenue, including intersections, with a projected $2.02 million in tax funds. This is not the first TID to seek to complete a portion of Mattie Street. In 2012, TID No. 17 was introduced to cover the construction cost of a portion of Mattie Street, but ultimately failed to complete the task. TID No. 17 was paid off in nine years and resulted in $12,849,130 of assessed value growth when it was dissolved, according to City Administrator Stephanie Ellwein. At the time TID No. 17 was approved in 2012, it was estimated that $200,000 would be raised toward the construction of roughly 450 feet of Mattie Street. TID No. 17 included five phases, with the last phase being Mattie Street's road, sewer and water installation. This would have connected the area of Mattie Street between East Birch Avenue and Charles Avenue, but would not have connected to East Havens Avenue. TIDs have four kinds of classifications with the Department of Revenue — local, industrial, economic development and affordable housing. Previously, Sibson told the council he was concerned about the Mattie Street project, that if it included a local TID classification then it would be denied at the state level for tax reimbursement for the school district. In a local TID, projects usually benefit the local government instead of having a regional or statewide benefit, according to the Department of Revenue. Local TID projects are subject to a special levy protection for school districts by the county auditor. This means that even if a local TID is passed, it may result in additional levies on all property in the Mitchell School District, not just those properties within the TID boundaries. "This is not just about the city of Mitchell. This is statewide concerning how our property taxes are being impacted by things like this," Sibson told the council. A revenue department employee offered Sibson the opinion to refer TID No. 41 to a vote of the people, which Sibson told the council he would not do. Instead, Sibson is tackling the issue at the state level by addressing legislative committees directly. Sibson said he would take the issue to the South Dakota Government Operations and Audit Committee, which is made up of a mix of senators and representatives. "I just want to give the city council a heads up that if some things come up at the state level about this particular project, I don't want it to be me giving the city of Mitchell a black eye for doing something that's going on statewide," Sibson said.
Yahoo
19-05-2025
- Yahoo
Seminole's funding plan for indoor events center: ‘Math doesn't work'
When Seminole County decided last February to let hotels put a new $1.75 per-night fee on local hotel rooms, the idea was to raise millions of dollars to build a new indoor events center. But with an estimated price tag of upwards of $100 million for the 172,000 square-foot facility — roughly twice what the hotel fee could support — county leaders now realize their plan has a big hole. 'The math doesn't work,' Commissioner Andria Herr said Tuesday during a staff presentation. 'We all need to have realistic expectations or be willing to have realistic expectations elsewhere in the spending of the county dollars.' Advocates had hoped it might be possible for the complex to be built entirely with revenue from Seminole's new tourism improvement district fee, or TID. Now they are asking whether Seminole should tap other revenue sources for the additional millions needed, such as its penny sales tax, sponsorships, or the taxpayers' money set aside for parks in the county's general fund. Seminole's new TID fee — which hotel guests started seeing on their bills April 1 — is expected to raise $3.2 million annually. The assessment is added on top of the county's 5% tourist tax — also known as a bed tax — and 7% sales tax. But at that TID rate, Seminole would be able to borrow only up to $51.2 million toward building the new indoor facility, according to county records. The latest estimates, from 2023, showed a facility expense between $66 million and $100 million, and county officials acknowledged this week that inflation likely has driven up the cost. Seminole — which lacks the big-name theme parks and other flashy tourist attractions as neighboring Orange County — has relied on amateur athletic tournaments to draw visitors for at least the past decade. The county boasts six outdoor athletic facilities, including the Boombah Sports Complex off East Lake Mary Boulevard near the Orlando Sanford International Airport A new multi-million dollar indoor arena near Boombah would more than double the number of people booking local hotel rooms, according to county projections. Such an indoor venue also could be used for small conventions, banquets and high school graduations, as well as amateur athletic competitions for volleyball, cheerleading and martial arts. In an effort to move the project forward, Seminole commissioners on Tuesday agreed to hire a consultant — or a facility program plan manager — to put together a detailed plan on an indoor complex and how to pay for it. The consultant would answer: 'Here's what the development project needs to be. Here's the size that we're looking for, and then develop not just the scope, but also a budget for the project, so we can narrow that [financial] gap and really land where we think the sweet spot might be for this,' said Rick Durr, Seminole's director of parks and recreation department. The indoor facility — proposed for an old vegetable field at the northwest corner of Moore's Station Road and East Lake Mary Boulevard in Sanford — would have enough space for 12 basketball courts or 24 volleyball courts, according to preliminary plans. It could seat at least 6,000 spectators. It also could include meeting rooms, café, and a stage. By comparison, the Addition Financial Arena — at the University of Central Florida — is 252,000 square feet and can seat 10,000 spectators. Supporters of an indoor complex say Seminole has long lacked an indoor venue for banquets, conventions and graduations. This month, graduating seniors from Seminole's nine public high schools will head to the UCF arena for commencement ceremonies. 'It's not just about sports,' Durr said in support of building the facility. But Commissioner Amy Lockhart said athletic tournaments that fill Seminole hotels could conflict with local events at the center. She pointed out that when the Boombah Sports Complex was built nearly a decade ago, it was seen as a facility for local sports leagues. But it is now frequently booked for large amateur athletic events. 'I can foresee a potential conflict where we have seven high school graduations, all in a particular month, and we've got a great offer on the table from someone who wants to host an event that's going to generate a ton of revenue,' Lockhart said of the indoor complex. 'We need to be able to allow our locals to be able to use it.' In 2024, Seminole had nearly 2.3 million visitors, including an estimated 60,860 that came for athletic tournaments. By comparison, Orange County — a worldwide tourist destination with its large theme parks — had nearly 60 million visitors last year. A new indoor complex would bring in an additional 49,794 visitors into Seminole in its first year, and 85,437 additional visitors in its fifth year, according to county forecasts.