Big money shaping GOP primaries for Texas attorney general, comptroller
In the race for attorney general, former Department of Justice lawyer Aaron Reitz raised $2.1 million in the first three weeks of his campaign, outpacing the combined haul of his two GOP primary rivals, state Sens. Joan Huffman and Mayes Middleton. But Middleton, an oil and gas businessman, kicked in $10 million of his own money, giving him a massive financial edge to start the race. Huffman raised nearly $764,000, mostly from her establishment Republican base in Houston, leaving her with $3 million in her campaign account.
For comptroller, Republican Texas Railroad Commission Chair Christi Craddick outraised Kelly Hancock, the interim comptroller, by almost $1.5 million — though Hancock reported having more cash on hand. A third contender, former state senator Don Huffines, previously announced an eye-popping $15 million haul for the fundraising period, but his filing with the state ethics commission was not yet available Wednesday morning.
The reports provide the first glimpse of the financial and political fault lines that will shape these hotly contested races. The filings outline each candidate's fundraising and spending activity over the first six months of the year, though current elected officials were under a fundraising moratorium during the legislative session that lifted June 23, giving them just eight days to raise money before the end of the reporting period.
The attorney general and comptroller seats have been held by incumbents for a decade. Three-term Attorney General Ken Paxton is leaving the office to challenge U.S. Sen. John Cornyn in the Republican primary, leaving a critically important vacancy for the conservative legal movement, which has relied on Paxton's agency as its battering ram to advance right-wing causes through the courts nationally.
Former comptroller Glenn Hegar, meanwhile, was named chancellor of the Texas A&M University System in March and left his longtime elected post on July 1. The comptroller's office, a sprawling agency that handles the state's finances, has become even more politically important after lawmakers gave it authority to administer a new $1 billion school voucher program.
Paxton and Hegar each took office in 2015 alongside Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, both of whom have announced plans to run for reelection in 2026. Neither is expected to face a competitive primary, but that didn't stop Abbott from flexing his prodigious fundraising skills. He raised more than $20 million in just over a week, leaving him with a formidable $86 million cash on hand.
Patrick raised $5 million over the same period and has about $37 million in his campaign account.
Attorney general
When Middleton announced his candidacy for attorney general, he vowed to spend $10 million of his own money on his 'campaign kickoff,' indicating he might kick in more over the course of the campaign.
This first campaign finance report shows the oil and gas executive and longtime GOP donor has made good on that promise. It's not the first time Middleton has self-funded a campaign: He spent $2 million of his own money to unseat an incumbent House member in 2018. He was elected to the state Senate in 2022, where he's earned a reputation as one of the body's most conservative members.
Despite being the first serious candidate to declare, Middleton raised the least money after the moratorium lifted, bringing in just over $165,000. But he has the most money on hand, thanks to his $10 million loan, and a slew of endorsements from other members of the Legislature.
Reitz, meanwhile, came out strong with a fundraising haul of more than $2 million, fueled by several high-dollar donations from major GOP donors. He entered the race with deep connections among conservative legal circles in Texas and Washington, having previously served as Paxton's deputy attorney general for legal strategy and GOP Sen. Ted Cruz's chief of staff. Most recently, he led the Office of Legal Policy at the Department of Justice as an appointee of President Donald Trump.
His biggest donations included $250,000 from Pennsylvania billionaire and GOP megadonor Jeff Yass, who previously kicked in $12 million to help bankroll Abbott's efforts to unseat Texas House Republicans who opposed private school vouchers. Also among Reitz's top donors were Gary Heavin, founder of the Curves chain of fitness centers, and Jonathan Knutz, the CEO of a medical device company.
While Reitz has less name recognition in Texas than his opponents, he's generated vocal support from his former colleagues in the Trump administration. Close to 15% of his donors are from Washington or its suburbs, including a $75,000 donation from Keller Postman, a law firm Paxton has tapped to handle two major Texas lawsuits against tech companies.
As the only candidate not currently in office, Reitz had a two-week fundraising advantage over his opponents, helping him significantly outraise both Middleton and Huffman.
Huffman, a 17-year senator and chair of the powerful Senate finance committee, raised about $764,000 in the week after the moratorium. A former Harris County prosecutor and judge, Huffman is running on a law and order platform — focusing on her work stiffening Texas' bail, immigration and election laws — as well as her experience overseeing the state budget and redistricting in the Texas Senate.
Her recent fundraising came from just 29 donors, primarily from Houston and its suburbs. Her largest backers were Alan Hassenflu, a commercial real estate developer who previously served on the board of the tort reform group Texans for Lawsuit Reform; beer distributor John Nau; Houston philanthropist Jan Duncan; and horseracing magnate Herbert Graham.
State Sen. Nathan Johnson, who became the first major Democrat to declare for the race on Tuesday, reported about $58,000 raised and $435,000 on hand.
Comptroller
In the comptroller's race, Craddick — in the middle of a six-year term as railroad commissioner — raised $2.9 million, with big donations from Brint Ryan, a Republican megadonor, and Texas oil mogul Javaid Anwar. She reported having $3.2 million cash on hand.
Hancock, who until last month served in the Texas Senate before stepping down to become acting comptroller, raised $1.5 million and had $6 million in the bank. His contributions came from a variety of Abbott allies and establishment-aligned Republican donors, including a quarter-million-dollar contribution from Nau, $50,000 from Dallas pipeline billionaire Kelcy Warren and another from Texas billionaire Harlan Crow.
The source of the $15 million reported last week by Huffines' campaign was not yet clear. In 2022, Huffines — a businessman and GOP donor — unsuccessfully challenged Abbott for governor, during which he self-financed part of his campaign.
The comptroller of state accounts serves as the state's chief executive officer, treasurer and revenue estimator — and will be tasked with rolling out the state's new private school voucher program, which was Abbott's top priority during this year's legislative session.
Democratic Rep. Gina Hinojosa of Austin, who has said she's considering a run for the seat, reported raising $4,400 and about $24,000 cash on hand.
Disclosure: Texans for Lawsuit Reform, Texas A&M University and Texas A&M University System have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today!
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta Platforms (META) Price Target Raised by Bernstein on AI and Ad Growth
Meta Platforms Inc. (NASDAQ:META) ranks among the . Bernstein analyst Mark Shmulik maintained his Outperform rating on Meta Platforms Inc. (NASDAQ:META) and increased the stock's price target from $700 to $775 on July 22. According to Bernstein's research report, the price target hike highlights Meta's status as 'a clear AI winner,' with positive advertising checks bolstering the company's claims of increasing ad success. The introduction of WhatsApp ads and the ongoing robust increase in Threads adoption have supported Meta's prospects for revenue growth, allaying earlier worries about declining returns on time spent growth. Though it acknowledged the existence of short-term concerns regarding the company's capacity to finance AI infrastructure while preserving free cash flow and earnings per share, Bernstein identified a number of long-term growth drivers for Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ:META) beyond 2025, including wearables, business messaging, generative AI ad creative, and Meta AI. Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ:META) is a renowned technology company known primarily for its flagship platforms Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, as well as its revolutionary advances in augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR). While we acknowledge the potential of META as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. Read More: and Disclosure: None. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump ramps up pressure on the Fed to slash rates to 1% — but would that be risky for US jobs, savings and investments?
Despite President Trump ramping up pressure on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to cut interest rates, the Fed held rates steady at 4.25% to 4.5% on Wednesday, July 30. Trump has been insistent on a major cut all the way down to 1%. Those who support the idea argue that a lower rate would reduce borrowing costs for consumers, mortgages, auto loans and corporations. Governors Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller voted against the rates, the first time since 1993 that multiple governors voted against a rate decision. But critics, including economists, former Fed officials and business leaders, warn that such heavy-handed interference in monetary policy could backfire, risking higher inflation, market instability and long-term damage to the Fed's independence. Here's what Trump's push could mean for your job prospects, investments and savings, and why experts say it's not that simple. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it What experts say a Fed rate cut could mean for your wallet While Trump is pressuring the Fed to slash the federal funds rate, some experts argue that bond yields are far more important to the broader economy. In an interview with Fox Business earlier this year, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the administration is paying closer attention to the 10-year Treasury yield, not the fed funds rate. That distinction matters. The Fed funds rate primarily affects short-term borrowing — like credit cards and personal loans. But long-term borrowing, including mortgages and auto loans, is more closely tied to the yield on government bonds. For example, over the past year, even as the Fed cut its policy rate from 5.5% in September 2024 to 4.5% by August 2025, mortgage rates didn't follow suit. That's because bond yields have climbed, pushing borrowing costs higher, according to The Wall Street Journal. In fact, many economists warn that if the Fed cuts rates too quickly, bond yields could rise even further, potentially driving up mortgage rates and undermining the very goal of making borrowing cheaper. Capital flight and higher inflation In an interview with the Harvard Gazette, Daniel Tarullo, Nomura Professor of International Financial Regulatory Practice at Harvard Law School and former Federal Reserve governor, warned that Trump's efforts to pressure or potentially remove Fed leadership could be deeply counterproductive. He argues that bond yields and investor confidence are shaped by the belief that the central bank will act independently and responsibly, and that ndermining that independence could have serious consequences. The Harvard Gazette reported on the subject in April, saying 'What markets fear is that if a president removes the chair or other members of the Board of Governors, it would be with the intent of having a looser monetary policy. At that point, the markets' trust in the central bank will be substantially undermined, and thus, the central bank's credibility as an inflation fighter will be undermined. Longer-term interest rates will then rise, probably dramatically.' A similar scenario played out in Turkey, where President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan repeatedly pressured the country's central bank to cut rates against economic advice. According to the American Enterprise Institute, the result was a collapse in the value of the Turkish lira and a surge in inflation. In the U.S., there are multiple layers of protection in place, including institutional norms and legal safeguards, that make it difficult for any president to unilaterally reshape Fed leadership or monetary policy. But experts say the pressure alone can still erode market confidence. Read more: Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can What comes next? With Powell's term as Fed chair set to end in May 2026, investors and consumers will see a change in leadership at the central bank in the not-too-distant future. Trump will have the authority to nominate a new chair or choose to re-nominate Powell, and the nominee must be confirmed by the Senate. Still, a new chair wouldn't have the power to set rates alone. The federal funds rate is determined by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which includes the chair, six Fed governors and 12 regional Federal Reserve bank presidents. 'There's no question that the chair is far and away the most important individual on the FOMC,' Tarullo says. 'But it's not the case that the chair can simply dictate what policy is going to be and the rest of the FOMC will fall into line.' For consumers, experts say the takeaway is more complicated than it might seem. While aggressive rate cuts could reduce borrowing costs in the short term, economists warn they could also lead to higher inflation and long-term instability, especially if the Fed's independence is weakened. In their view, unless inflation cools or the economy slows, rates on mortgages, credit cards and auto loans are unlikely to drop significantly anytime soon. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
These Pictures Of Trump's Finished White House Rose Garden Patio Are Going Viral For All Of The Wrong Reasons
As you all know by now, Donald Trump has paved over the White House Rose Garden lawn. Why? Because it's being modeled after his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida, duh. The famous garden was redesigned by Jackie Kennedy in the 1960s to add that lawn, some trees, and more flowers. That layout has remained largely unchanged, like here's a picture from the 2010s: Here's Obama on it: And then, as you may remember, Melania Trump did her own remodel of it in 2020 when she took out some trees and added in that limestone path: Well, now we've got a patio. ABC News' Chief Washington Correspondent posted pictures of the "new Rose Garden:" jonkarl/Twitter: @jonkarl As you can see, the sewer drainage is mini American flags. And it's A LOT of concrete. Perfect for those DC summers! Needless to say, people aren't big fans. "'Garden.' I do not think that word means what you think it means," one person pointed out. "Who in god's name thought this was a good idea?" another person asked. And a bunch of people are wondering what the heck is up with the hatred of grass: "Why do they hate grass?" Then you have the comparisons. This person said it looked like a food court during Covid. Another person said it looked like a drained pool at a bankrupt casino. And this person said it reminded them of an "overpriced wedding venue in New Jersey." One small detail people are pointing out is the position/design of the sewer drain, "Trump put his Presidential seal right next to a sewer drain. Feels right." "The 'Stars & Stripes' drainage seems appropriate.'" And finally, you have the people hoping the next President tears it up: "We're tearing it out and putting the roses back in beginning on January 21, 2029, right?" "The next president should rip this up and put the garden back. He really has no sense of taste, and I say this as a guy whose house is a monument to my love of kitsch and mid-century American barcaloungers." Thoughts?
