logo
Forging a brave new world

Forging a brave new world

The Star30-05-2025
POSTERITY, I dare say, will regard the recently concluded Asean-Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Summit in Kuala Lumpur on May 27 as a historic turning point.
While the 46th Asean Summit and its related meetings like the 2nd Asean-GCC Summit were equally historic for their role in progressing Asean's agenda, current trade wars and geopolitical fragmentation have somehow made many quarters perceive the inaugural Asean-GCC-China Summit as the game changer during the recent gathering.
Malaysia could stand proud not merely for arranging such a smoothly-run summit, but also for the bridging of minds that have arguably emerged as key voices of the newly resurgent Global South – particularly through the successful issuance of a joint statement, usually the most difficult feat in any multilateral meeting.
As part of their joint statement, the Asean-GCC-China leaders condemned the continued atrocities on the people of Gaza and called for a ceasefire, echoing the sentiments of all right-minded peoples across the world. Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz: Asean can be a strategic gateway to the East Asian markets.
Beyond politics, a deeper trilateral economic integration makes perfect sense. For context, the combined numbers for Asean, the GCC and China speak for themselves: 2.15 billion people (or just over a quarter of the world's population) and a collective GDP of almost US$25 trillion.
Figures for foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows, too, stack up nicely: In 2024, Asean attracted US$235bil in FDI inflows, representing about 17% of global FDI. China received US$114.76bil, while the GCC secured US$70bil. Collectively, these figures accounted for roughly 30% of global FDI inflows.
From such data alone, the significance of this combined economic might was clear to the leaders from China and the two economic blocs.
Asean can be a strategic gateway to the East Asian markets. Malaysia in particular – with our well-established trade and industrial ecosystem, rule of law and ease of investor journey – is also well poised to facilitate such investments into the broader Asean and East Asian markets.
The GCC's economic dynamism, strategic location connecting Europe, Asia and Africa, and its shared religious and cultural values with Malaysia as well as Asean make it an ideal partner for deeper economic integration.
Indeed, in 2023, Asean's trade with the GCC stood at US$130.7bil and FDI inflows were US$390.2mil.
On a wider scale, China was Asean's largest trading partner with US$696.7bil in trade and US$17.3bil in FDI.
China and the GCC are hence crucial economic partners for Asean and for Malaysia. It therefore is totally appropriate for us to want to engage with them, both on a bilateral and trilateral format.
That is also why Malaysia will soon start negotiations for a free trade agreement (FTA) with the GCC, because there is so much potential to increase the current total trade of US$22bil.
But I want to go a bit more granular and show how engaging on an Asean-GCC-China scale can benefit ordinary Malaysians, including the youth, women and MSMEs.
Through the 18 Priority Economic Deliverables (PEDs) under the Economic Pillar of Malaysia's 2025 Asean Chairmanship, the Investment, Trade and Industry Ministry and other related ministries are working diligently to ensure substantial progress for these PEDs by year's end.
Some of these are of course directly linked to the GCC and China. For instance, we have completed negotiations to not only upgrade the Asean Trade in Goods Agreement but also the Asean-China Free Trade Area 3.0.
Both of these will be signed in October, boosting both intra-Asean and Asean's trade with China – which as we know will be key to tide our region over during this period of geopolitical instability.
Separately, another of our PEDs, namely the Joint Declaration on Economic Cooperation Between the Asean-GCC was also completed in full.
Through this, our two regions will explore new avenues of cooperation like market integration, sustainability, decarbonisation, digital transformation and inclusion, including for MSMEs.
Sectorally, Asean's PED on the Development of Policy Recommendations and Guidelines to Support Asean EV Implementation Roadmap will benefit from China's global leadership in electrical vehicles (EVs).
Accounting for more than 70% of global electric car production in 2024, China also produced more than 70% of all EV batteries ever manufactured.
Consider also the Endorsement of the Asean Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation 2026-2030, which is clearly in alignment with the GCC's ramping up of its efforts to diversify its economies and energy mix away from oil and gas in pursuit of renewable energy (RE). They have pledged an US$100bil investment in RE by 2030 to transition to clean energy and reduce carbon emissions.
There are, indeed, many synergies for economic integration. Development of Asean Tourism Outlook? China and GCC are key tourist markets for Asean. An Asean Framework for Integrated Semiconductor Supply-Chain? China is both a major chip buyer and maker.
In conclusion, when Malaysia proposed the PEDs for its Chairmanship year, we were clear on how we could boost Asean's socio-economic dynamism and ergo, the Asean-GCC-China trilateral relationship can likewise contribute to this.
Furthermore, global demand for halal products is currently valued at over US$3 trillion and will grow to US$5 trillion by 2030. This is a market Asean, GCC and China can collaborate to tap into and even corner together.
Also, as a combined market of more than two billion people, Asean, GCC and China should be regions where young Malaysian men and women, including those in small business, look for job or business opportunities.
We are paving the way for all our Malaysian 'jaguh' to enter wider markets for their goods and services, while ensuring that their interests will always be safeguarded through well-negotiated FTAs.
But one would argue that even spreading one's wings to Asean really is just a waypoint for the truly ambitious. While other regions may draw inwards, our three are seeking even greater connectivity for our people and businesses.
The coming together of Asean-GCC-China's leaders signals that we refuse for our horizons to be limited – by ourselves or others – to our own borders or backyards.
Indeed, deeper economic integration would do well to better support regional security, which feeds into Asean's Political Security deliverables.
This is also why Asean – with its principles of centrality, neutrality, non-alignment – must matter to not only its member states, but also to partners like the GCC, China and indeed, other dialogue partners like Australia, Canada, the European Union, India, Japan, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea, Japan and New Zealand.
Truth be told, what we can achieve together through this nascent Asean-GCC-China trilateral configuration is only limited by our imaginations.
Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz is the Investment, Trade and Industry Minister.
The views expressed here are his own.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump slaps 25% tariff on ‘friend' India
Trump slaps 25% tariff on ‘friend' India

Free Malaysia Today

time28 minutes ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Trump slaps 25% tariff on ‘friend' India

Donald Trump's decision dashes hopes of a limited trade agreement between the US and India. (AP pic) WASHINGTON : President Donald Trump said today the US will impose a 25% tariff on goods imported from India starting on Aug 1. He said India, which has the world's fifth largest economy, will also face an unspecified penalty on Aug 1, but did not elaborate on the amount or what it was for. 'While India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. 'They have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE — ALL THINGS NOT GOOD!' India's commerce ministry, which is leading the trade negotiations with the US, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump's decision dashes hopes of a limited trade agreement between the two countries, which had been under negotiation for several months. US and Indian trade negotiators had held multiple rounds of discussions to resolve contentious issues, particularly over market access for American agricultural and dairy products. Despite progress in some areas, Indian officials resisted opening the domestic market to imports of wheat, corn, rice and genetically modified soybeans, citing risks to the livelihood of millions of Indian farmers. The new tariffs are expected to impact New Delhi's goods exports to the US, estimated at around US$87 billion in 2024, including labour-intensive products such as garments, pharmaceuticals, gems and jewellery, and petrochemicals. The US currently has a US$45.7 billion trade deficit with India. India now joins a growing list of countries facing higher tariffs under Trump's 'Liberation Day' trade policy, aimed at reshaping US trade relations by demanding greater reciprocity. The White House had previously warned India about its high average applied tariffs – nearly 39% on agricultural products, with rates climbing to 45% on vegetable oils and around 50% on apples and corn. The setback comes despite earlier commitments by prime minister Narendra Modi and Trump to conclude the first phase of a trade deal by autumn 2025 and expand bilateral trade to US$500 billion by 2030, up from US$191 billion in 2024. US manufacturing exports to India, valued at around US$42 billion in 2024, as well as energy exports such as liquefied natural gas, crude oil and coal, could also face retaliatory action if India chooses to respond in kind. Indian officials have previously indicated that they view the US as a key strategic partner, particularly in counter-balancing China. But they have emphasised the need to preserve policy space on agriculture, data governance and state subsidies.

Brokering Cambodia-Thailand ceasefire is not about vainglory
Brokering Cambodia-Thailand ceasefire is not about vainglory

New Straits Times

time39 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

Brokering Cambodia-Thailand ceasefire is not about vainglory

WHAT did they say about trust being like a vase, which once broken, will never be the same again? So, do we leave it in tatters, or try to fix it back to form? This could well describe the state of play between Cambodia and Thailand sharing a border which has long been an unruly frontier, where old maps, national pride and political survival intersect. The trust deficit between the two considerably outweighs the cultivated goodwill, leaving no illusion that whatever peace struck on the anvil of diplomacy will be ironclad. Thus, the brokering of a ceasefire between the two following recent clashes is a reminder that diplomacy's true measure lies not in sweeping settlements, but in holding the line against worse outcomes. Tensions that began simmering in May erupted as Cambodian and Thai troops exchanged fire in disputed territory along the Dangrek mountains. Thanks to the trust shortfall, what began as a familiar border clash escalated sharply when Cambodia deployed multiple launch rocket systems that hit a hospital, among other targets, prompting Thailand to respond with F-16 jet strikes, possibly the first time its air force had fired in anger since a brief border war with Laos in 1987. Tens of thousands fled to makeshift camps. The fighting was the most intense in more than a decade. On July 28, Cambodia and Thailand agreed to halt hostilities from midnight. Meeting in Putrajaya under Malaysia's chairmanship of Asean, both prime ministers accepted an immediate and unconditional ceasefire. The agreement was the product of painstaking, unglamorous but by no means lacklustre facilitation by Malaysia, with the United States playing a consequential, parallel role. US President Donald Trump added urgency by warning that tariff negotiations with both countries would not proceed until "fighting stops". China, present as an observer, lent additional weight to the talks — particularly important for Cambodia, which counts Beijing as its most dependable backer. The optics mattered: the message was that de-escalation was in everyone's interest, and that Malaysia's convening role was part of a wider diplomatic effort, not an exercise in rivalry. Reaching the ceasefire was never a foregone conclusion as, not surprisingly, the two sides took diametrically opposed approaches to handling the dispute. Phnom Penh sought to internationalise the issue, reviving old appeals to the International Court of Justice and casting itself as the aggrieved party. Bangkok insisted on tackling it bilaterally, out of the global spotlight and far from anything that might invite international arbitration. Neither could be seen to back down. Into this maelstrom stepped Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who engaged both Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai with care but never so much as to box either side in. By bringing the two leaders to Putrajaya and offering to coordinate observers, Malaysia showed that an Asean chair willing to act and quick on the draw could still shape events. The ceasefire was framed as an initial measure to halt the fighting and stabilise the situation, not even as a prelude to dispute resolution. Follow-up arrangements rely largely on bilateral mechanisms between Cambodia and Thailand, with Asean in a supporting role. That was by design. A heavier Asean role might have triggered resentment and made the arrangement harder to sustain. But this doesn't preclude Anwar, in his personal capacity, from doing the nudging and cajoling to both parties, more as Asean family members than as chair sitting in council. All said, while the crucial role of political leaders is undeniable, a lasting pause will require more than cabinet orders. It will need continued discipline from commanders of both sides on the ground. Anwar stressed that point to members of the Asean diplomatic corps during an interface session in Jakarta, on the sidelines of his visit to Indonesia. Complaints that Asean failed to resolve the dispute swiftly miss the point entirely. There was never any prospect of conjuring fantasy settlements overnight, a standard at which no international body performs any better. For Malaysia, this is not a pursuit in vainglory. The role of Asean chair is designed to be facilitative, not proprietorial. Asean works best when the chair is willing to act, not by trying to foist solutions, but by creating the space and opportunity in which they might one day emerge.

MAF Joins Diplomatic Military Visit To Cambodia-Thailand Border
MAF Joins Diplomatic Military Visit To Cambodia-Thailand Border

Barnama

timean hour ago

  • Barnama

MAF Joins Diplomatic Military Visit To Cambodia-Thailand Border

KUALA LUMPUR, July 30 (Bernama) – The Malaysian Armed Forces (MAF) today joined a diplomatic military delegation invited to observe the hotspot area along the Cambodia-Thailand border, which has reportedly been experiencing cross-border tensions. In a social media post, the MAF said the visit, specifically to the Anlong Veng-Phnom An Ma (Chong An Ma) zone, reflects Malaysia's commitment to regional defence diplomacy and its active role in fostering confidence and transparency among ASEAN nations. 'The visit was also joined by representatives from several major world powers and other neighbouring countries, including the United States, China, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Australia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Singapore, Laos, Vietnam and Myanmar. 'According to Cambodian local media reports, the Cambodian government initiated the invitation of foreign military delegations as a show of openness and confidence in its position that no border violation has occurred,' the statement said. The post further stated that Cambodia had instead emphasised that all actions taken were to ensure the security of its own territory. 'The Chong An Ma zone has previously been a point of contention between Cambodia and Thailand, particularly during incidents involving the Preah Vihear Temple. 'In this context, Cambodia's hosting of the observation visit is seen as part of an information warfare strategy and military diplomacy to shape a narrative favourable to them at the international level,' the post added. It also noted that, so far, Thai authorities have not issued any official response regarding the move, and like other invited nations, Malaysia has yet to release any public statement on the findings from the visit. In a related development, Malaysia's Chief of Defence Forces General Tan Sri Mohd Nizam Jaffar is scheduled to make official visits to Thailand and Cambodia as part of regional diplomatic efforts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store