Karnataka High Court Intervenes To Halt Transport Strike Until August 7
The court's intervention came as the indefinite strike by employees of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporations severely affected both inter-state and intra-state bus services across the state, creating significant hardships for commuters and the general public. The unions, representing KSRTC employees, claimed they had not received the court's earlier order, but the High Court firmly rejected this explanation as inadequate justification for continuing the disruptive action.
Justice Joshi demanded a comprehensive status report on the outcomes of meetings held between the state government and union representatives, emphasizing that if the strike continues beyond the court's directive, strict action must be taken under the Essential Services Maintenance Act. The court scheduled the next hearing for August 7, when the matter will be reviewed for further proceedings and potential resolution.
The strike has created widespread disruption across Karnataka, with visual evidence from major transportation hubs highlighting the severity of the situation. Shivajinagar Bus Stand in Bengaluru showed sparse services, while key transit points like Majestic Metro Station experienced heavy passenger rushes due to increased dependency on the Namma Metro system. The regions of Kalyana Karnataka and North-West Karnataka have been particularly hard hit by the transportation disruption.
State government officials attempted to minimize the impact by claiming that all Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation buses were operational within Bengaluru city limits. However, district services operated at only 50 percent capacity, significantly affecting rural and inter-city connectivity. Transport Minister Ramalinga Reddy expressed optimism that normalcy would be restored by the afternoon and confirmed that a Public Interest Litigation had been filed regarding the strike situation.
The fundamental dispute centers around the transport employees' longstanding demand for a 25 percent salary increase over their base pay of Rs 1,124, along with payment of arrears accumulated over 38 months, which amounts to an estimated Rs 1,800 crore. This substantial financial demand has created a significant standoff between the unions and the state government, with both sides maintaining firm positions on their respective demands and offers.
Chief Minister Siddaramaiah attempted to resolve the crisis by offering arrears payment for 14 months and inviting the unions to call off their strike action. However, the unions firmly refused this compromise offer, arguing that their demand was entirely justified since employees had worked throughout all 38 months in question and deserved full compensation for their services during this period.
The Chief Minister pointed out that the previous BJP government had already approved a 15 percent salary hike and provided arrears covering the period from January 2022 to February 2023. He characterized the fresh demand for additional increases as excessive, particularly given the poor financial condition of the state transport corporations, though he maintained that the government remained open to further negotiations and discussions.
Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar made emotional appeals to the striking employees, urging them to consider the significant hardship their action was causing to the general public and requesting their cooperation in finding a mutually acceptable solution. He emphasized the broader social impact of the strike and the need for public servants to prioritize citizen welfare in their decision-making process.
The strike has highlighted the ongoing financial challenges facing Karnataka's state transport corporations, which must balance employee welfare demands with operational sustainability and public service obligations. The substantial arrears amount of Rs 1,800 crore represents a significant financial burden for the state government, which must also consider its overall fiscal responsibilities and budget constraints.
The court's intervention reflects the judiciary's role in balancing workers' rights to protest with the essential nature of public transportation services. The Essential Services Maintenance Act provides legal framework for preventing disruptions to critical public services, and the High Court's firm stance demonstrates the legal system's commitment to protecting public interests during labor disputes.
With negotiations between the government and unions remaining deadlocked, the August 7 court hearing will be crucial in determining the next steps for resolving this transportation crisis that has affected millions of Karnataka residents and commuters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
9 minutes ago
- Hans India
Congress protest a ‘praise parade' for mother-son duo, fumes Kishan
Hyderabad/New Delhi: Union Minister G. Kishan Reddy launched a scathing attack on the Congress party following its protest meeting at Jantar Mantar in Delhi, accusing Telangana Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy of staging a political spectacle to gain favor with the Gandhi family. Speaking to reporters in the national capital on Wednesday, Kishan Reddy dismissed the event as a 'praise parade' for Rahul and Sonia Gandhi, noting that over half of Revanth Reddy's 31-minute speech was dedicated to lauding the Congress leadership. 'The Jantar Mantar meeting was not about BC welfare—it was about securing blessings from the Gandhi family to survive political pressure in Telangana,' Reddy said. He criticized the Congress government in Telangana for failing to implement the Kamareddy Declaration, which promised extensive welfare measures for Backward Classes (BCs). 'They pledged lakhs of crores over five years. By now, Rs 40,000 crore should have been allocated. But not a single rupee has been spent,' Reddy alleged, adding that no corporations have been formed for BC communities as promised. Reddy accused the Congress of deliberately delaying local body elections to avoid public backlash. 'They are playing dramas in the name of reservations. The BC community sees through this insincerity,' he said. Highlighting the GHMC elections, Reddy pointed out that Muslims contested and won 31 out of 50 BC-reserved seats. He alleged that both BRS and Congress were acting under the influence of the AIMIM party. 'Now, with the inclusion of 10% Muslims in BCs and a proposed 42% reservation, the Congress is undermining BC representation,' he said. He further criticized the Congress for conducting an 'unscientific' survey that reduced the BC population count and accused the party of continuing the same mistakes made by the previous BRS government. 'The BJP will oppose any religious-based reservations that violate constitutional principles,' Reddy declared. Taking aim at the Congress's historical record, Reddy said the Nehru family had consistently failed BCs—citing the shelving of the Kaka Kalelkar Commission report in 1955 and the neglect of the Mandal Commission recommendations by Indira and Rajiv Gandhi. 'The Congress has suffered crushing defeats in three consecutive elections and struggles to cross 100 seats. Their dream of returning to power at the Centre is delusional,' Reddy said. He dismissed Revanth Reddy's criticism of Prime Minister Narendra Modi as futile. 'Mocking Modi ji is like spitting at the sky. The country is witnessing stable governance under his leadership,' he concluded, advising Congress to abandon hopes of gaining power at the Centre for the next 30 years.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
50% tariffs: Here's how India can flip the script on Trump's trade offensive
Synopsis India is preparing to counter the impact of Trump's 50% tariff through alternative markets and dedicated fund support, as key sectors such as textiles, gems & jewellery, and shrimp brace for the impact. With the India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement at a standstill despite several rounds of negotiations, industry leaders and experts are exploring ways to contain the tariff impact. As US President Donald Trump hit India on Wednesday with an additional 25% tariff for purchasing Russian oil, raising the total tariff to 50%, Indian businesses and exporters are bracing for the economic repercussions. In response, experts and industry leaders are actively discussing measures to mitigate the impact of these tariff US is a major trading partner of India. In FY25, India exported products valued at $86.51 billion to the US across various categories, including shrimp, textiles, and gems and jewellery. With the India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement at a standstill despite several rounds of negotiations, industry leaders and experts are exploring ways to contain the tariff Indian government is reportedly preparing a Rs 20,000 crore export promotion mission aimed at protecting exporters from global trade uncertainties. This mission is being jointly implemented by the ministries of commerce and industry, micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME), and finance. It is expected to be finalised by August and come into effect by mission, according to sources, will have five components—trade finance, non-trade finance dealing with regulation, standards and market access, better brand recall for Brand India, e-commerce hubs and warehousing, and trade facilitation. Ajay Sahai, DG & CEO of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO), explained that when the mission was announced in the Union Budget this year, it aimed to increase access to export credit. From that perspective, there may be some softening of collateral on one hand; there may also be an element of the Interest Equalisation Scheme. 'We have also requested that the Interest Equalisation Scheme for MSME manufacturers be extended to all countries, with a specific emphasis on ensuring that all exporters receive this support for exports to the US, as it will enhance their competitiveness,' he said. He noted that there is a temporary problem, assuming that by September-October this year, India and the US are able to work out the Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). However, he pointed out that any losses faced by Indian exporters will be for a limited duration. 'The good thing is that in that scenario, both buyers and sellers want to maintain the equation, and both sides want to look at absorbing the cost. They can look at increasing productivity.'However, 'they have been forced to be innovative' due to Trump tariffs, so there is always a silver lining in all these things as well,' he said. 'Even if the replacement of the US market happens, it will take time. If we are not through with the BTA, we must be prepared for some setbacks in exports. That is undeniable,' he Taneja, Professor, ICRIER, asserted that allocating a dedicated fund to support and shield exporters from the disruptions caused by US tariffs is a commendable and timely initiative. 'This is much in line with what countries like Australia, Spain, and South Korea are doing. The Australian government announced a $1-billion zero‑interest loan package to support businesses facing market disruptions. Spain has combined direct aid and soft loans in its proposed relief package. Similarly, the South Korean EXIM Bank manages the Supply Chain Resilience Fund (SCRF), allowing exporters to respond swiftly to trade wars and geopolitical conflicts,' she a similar view, Shravan Shetty, Managing Director, Primus Partners, said that the fund can prove beneficial, especially for vulnerable segments like textiles, gems & jewellery, and auto ancillaries, wherein production-linked schemes can help provide relief. 'The funds can also be deployed for strategic trade promotion activities and brand-building in alternate markets, such as Africa, the UK, the European Union, and Central Asia,' he Sen, Trade Policy Leader at EY India, emphasised the importance of understanding what percentage of this fund percolates down to the actual exporters who need it. This is important, given the undefined nature of the new Trump tariff regime, he said. 'The arbitrage possible between exports of the same product from different countries; the lack of finality in the rates; the definitional issues, such as what would be considered as 'transhipping', etc., make a structured support scheme difficult to formulate. In case we see a significant downturn in US demand, the amounts from the fund would be needed to explore newer markets,' he also noted the necessity of placing greater emphasis on countries with which we have recently signed FTAs, as they remain underutilised. 'We have one with the UK that will be operationalised; now is the time to start focusing on the UK market and the EU, where an early harvest is expected in the coming months.''So, I think the strategy should be focusing on diversification because with the kind of tariff that has been imposed by the US and the threat issued every day, we cannot rely on the US. Even if BTA happens and an additional tariff in the form of India's relations with Russia is imposed, we can be subjected to any kind of tariff. So, this is the time we should look at diversification in the medium to long term. And we should exploit opportunities with FTAs,' he mentioned that the fund relief and the development of alternative markets will only help in the short to medium term. India must build structural competitiveness and export reliance frameworks in the long term, he said. 'The answer lies in building an export ecosystem that can withstand geopolitical shocks, price wars, and shifting consumer preferences.'He proposed that the government should provide MSMEs and exporters with digital platforms and single windows to facilitate export credit, insurance, and risk cover, while noting that many smaller firms lack awareness or access to EXIM Bank schemes, ECGC support, or interest equalisation benefits. 'Digitising access and simplifying application processes can significantly boost participation,' he other measures, officials have indicated that lowering testing charges for smaller exporters, levied by the Export Inspection Council, can ease exporters' concerns. Additionally, measures like providing customs relief, accelerating GST for exports and increasing RoDTEP can also mitigate tariff impacts, as per industry RoDTEP and RoSCTL schemes, as per Sen of EY India, should be expanded to cover all exports between them. He said that increasing the RoDTEP/RoSCTL rates to directly refund a wider range of embedded taxes and duties not covered by other schemes would reduce overall production costs for exporters, enhance the price competitiveness of their products in the international market and partially alleviate the tariff Kumar Gulati, Chairman at the Compound Livestock Feed Manufacturers Association (CLFMA) of India, said that lowering the charges and simplifying the process for mandatory testing and certification (especially for food, agriculture, pharma, and chemicals) significantly reduces compliance costs. 'It's particularly vital for smaller exporters and for sectors with low margins, directly supporting their ability to remain price-competitive internationally,' he said. Sector-specific Looking at the sectors, textiles could be one of the worst hit with $4 billion of business, such as t-shirts and home textiles bearing the brunt, especially due to lower tariffs imposed on India's rivals—Bangladesh and Vietnam at 20%. At 50%, US tariffs on India are now the highest Thakur, Secretary General of the Apparel Export Promotion Council, commended the 'expected' export promotion mission and suggested an increase in the mission budget, which is currently set at Rs 20,000 crore. He also recommended including specific measures for the textile sector in the mission, considering that the sector is the second-largest employer after agriculture in the country.'We need incentives to offset India's cost disadvantage vis-à-vis competing countries,' he said, adding that 'reviving the Interest Equalisation Scheme for five years at an enhanced rate of 5% for all exporters, without any value cap, is crucial.' He emphasised the need for continuity of schemes such as RoSCTL, a moratorium on loan repayments, expedited India-EU trade negotiations, and the quick disbursal of outstanding dues and claims from shrimp exports, totalling nearly $7 billion, to the US could suffer significantly. Even before the new tariffs, Indian seafood exporters were facing stiff price competition and falling prices thanks to increased supply from Ecuador (which faces only a 10-14% tariff).'Shrimp prices dipped by 20-25% in the last year. The oversupply continues to depress global prices, which further erodes profits and export earnings for Indian producers. It's estimated that Indian exporters are already facing losses of Rs 600 crore due to order cancellations and containers stuck in transit as these tariffs take effect. Margins in the industry are a slim 4-5%, making it impossible to absorb such steep tariff hikes, and exporters fear a significant long-term loss of market share, with Ecuador likely to replace India as the top shrimp supplier to the US,' pointed out added that the government's Rs 20,000-crore scheme will focus on making export credit accessible, enhancing brand building, and addressing non-tariff barriers. The aim is to provide liquidity, promote market diversification, and support value addition. 'While this injection can help tide over some immediate financial distress, industry experts warn it cannot fully compensate for the cost disadvantage created by the high US tariffs and ongoing oversupply and price drops due to Ecuador's surge in production and exports,' he said.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Indiramma Housing scheme sees remarkable progress in Nizamabad
Nizamabad: The Indiramma housing initiative in Nizamabad district has registered exceptional progress, with State Housing Corporation Secretary and Managing Director V.P. Gautam commending the district administration for its performance. During his visit on Wednesday, Gautam praised the rapid advancements made in the past two months, particularly in the second phase of house sanctioning and grounding. Accompanied by District Collector T. Vinay Krishna Reddy, Gautam inspected housing sites in Tirmanpalli (Indalvai mandal) and Ghanpur (Dichpalli mandal), interacting with beneficiaries and reviewing aspects such as free sand supply, bill payments, and mason charges. He encouraged the beneficiaries to speed up the construction process and assured them of ongoing support. At the Integrated District Office Complex, a comprehensive review meeting was held with municipal commissioners, MPDOs, and engineering officials. Collector Vinay Krishna Reddy presented a mandal-wise progress report, revealing that out of the targeted 19,306 houses, 17,291 have been sanctioned. Out of these, 9,360 have been grounded, while 5,541 are at various stages of construction: 4,647 are at the basement level, 665 at the wall level, and 229 at the slab level. Loans of up to Rs 1 lakh are being provided to financially constrained beneficiaries through self-help groups. So far, Rs 30.07 crore has been disbursed to 2,637 beneficiaries. The administration is actively enrolling new members into women's groups to expand loan access and encourage construction. For those unwilling to proceed despite support, written declarations are being obtained, and their allocations are being redirected to other eligible individuals. Gautam emphasized that no eligible person should be excluded and that Indiramma houses must not be sanctioned to ineligible applicants. He warned officials of accountability in case of irregularities. To ease construction logistics, Gautam directed coordination between housing officials and MPDOs for free sand token distribution and regulated transport charges. He also instructed the Mandal-level Price Control Committees to ensure fixed rates for materials and mason fees. Highlighting the importance of timely payments, Gautam assured that there is no fund shortage and that bills are cleared weekly. Aadhaar-linked bank accounts will soon be used for direct payments to avoid technical issues. He also called for the immediate uploading of beneficiary details on the Pradhan Mantri Awas portal and faster geo-tagging. Proposals to construct G+3 Indiramma houses on 4.32 acres in Abhayahastam Colony were discussed.
