Thailand, Cambodia officials start talks on maintaining ceasefire
The four-day meeting began on Monday in Malaysia, which is this year's chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
Malaysia helped broker the ceasefire, four days after deadly clashes erupted between Thai and Cambodian forces on July 24.
ASEAN officials say Monday's talks focused on ways to uphold the ceasefire and have ASEAN form a team to monitor the agreement.
Thai and Cambodian officials are said to disagree on the conditions for maintaining the ceasefire and the handover of 18 Cambodian troops detained by Thai forces.
A defense minister-level meeting is scheduled for the final day of the talks, with representatives from the US and China expected to attend.
Whether progress can be achieved remains unclear, as Thailand and Cambodia continue to trade accusations against each other.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
6 hours ago
- NHK
Death toll continues to rise amid plan of expanding military operation in Gaza
Local authorities in Gaza say the death toll in the enclave has exceeded 61,000, as Israeli military operations and severe food shortages continue. Israeli forces issued evacuation orders for parts of Gaza on Wednesday, as they continue their attacks against the Islamic group Hamas. Local health officials said on Tuesday that 87 residents had died in the past 24 hours, bringing the death toll to 61,020 since the conflict began in October 2023. They also said 188 people had died from famine and malnutrition as of Tuesday, with half of the dead being children. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has reportedly decided on a plan to expand the military operation in Gaza to destroy Hamas. On Tuesday, the prime minister's office announced that the chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces presented to Netanyahu the options for continuing the campaign in Gaza. Israeli media say the chief of staff expressed concerns over endangering hostages held in Gaza, but said the military is preparing to implement the decision once it is made. Media also say the Israeli security cabinet is scheduled to convene on Thursday. There are concerns that, if the military operation is actually expanded, it could lead to further casualties among Gaza residents.
Japan Times
8 hours ago
- Japan Times
The Japan-Australia frigate sale is a big deal. Here's why.
This week, the Australian government announced that Japan has won the hard-fought competition to provide the Royal Australian Navy's next surface warfare vessel and that it will purchase up to 11 Mogami-class frigates. The amount of money in the deal is a whopping 10 billion Australian dollars (¥950 billion) to be committed over about 20 years. While the price tag and length of the deal are substantial, they are only partly why this agreement is so significant. For Japan, it signals a key step in the evolution of its defense industry. For Australia, it offers a viable near-term solution to modernizing its navy while also supporting its own domestic shipbuilding industries. Equally important is what it means for the deepening relationship between the two countries based on the long-term commitment they are embarking upon together. Japan and Australia have dubbed their relationship the 'Special Strategic Partnership,' but it has taken time and effort from both sides to evolve it to this point, particularly in the realm of security. In the mid-1990s, the two governments started to routinize defense-related engagements. This accelerated after cooperation in the early 2000s in Iraq where Australian forces were directly responsible for protecting Japanese engineering units, as well as through burgeoning trilateral cooperation with the United States. The two governments recognized their mutual interests both in the region and abroad and signed their first joint declaration on security cooperation in 2007. By the mid-2010s, the Japan-Australian security relationship seemed to be on an irreversible path of alignment. Which is why it came as such a shock to the Japanese when the precursor to this frigate deal fell through. A decade ago, the Australian military was in the market for a new diesel-powered submarine to replace its aging Collins-class vessels. The deal came down to two options: the Japanese Soryu-class or the French Suffren-class. The Australian government opted for the French deal, in part because of guarantees on the amount that local Australian shipbuilding industries would be incorporated into the procurement process. The Japanese government felt slighted by the decision for two reasons: first, it believed the Soryu was the superior submarine; and second, it saw the deal as emblematic of deepening security ties. For the Australians, the submarine deal with France ended up collapsing anyway. Amid delays and cost increases, the government decided in 2021 that it would abandon diesel submarines altogether and move to acquire nuclear-powered vessels under the new AUKUS pact. The result is that Australia still has no new submarines almost 10 years after eschewing the Japanese option. Thus, one of the things that this deal does is erase the memory of the Soryu-class submarine deal gone wrong. With this frigate deal, Japan and Australia get a mulligan — that is, they have another opportunity at a big, multiyear procurement agreement with a guarantee for new vessels to be delivered in the near term. However, even this recent outcome was not guaranteed for the two defense partners. Like the last submarine competition, it came down to Japan and a European competitor — this time, it was the Germans. The German Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems A-200 Frigate held an early advantage based on the fact that Australia already had previous experience with procurement of its Anzac-class vessels from a Thyssen group subsidiary. But with an aim of guaranteeing near-term delivery, the Japanese Mogami-class prevailed. There are still additional steps that must be taken. Australia's Department of Defence must now engage Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and the Japanese government in negotiating and entering binding commercial contracts. Their aim is to complete this process next year, with the delivery of the first Mogami-class frigate to Australia by 2029. For the Japanese government, this will make for the largest defense export to date. It is a huge milestone that entices Japanese companies to invest more heavily into their defense-related industries. Up to this point, export controls and the Japanese government's inability to facilitate the conclusion of deals have hampered progress in achieving these kinds of deals even when Japan has had top-of-the-line products. While the Soryu-class submarine offers one salient example, another is the ShinMaywa US-2 rescue seaplane — a one-of-a-kind search and rescue craft that still has not been exported overseas despite foreign interest. The fact that the Japanese government has finally netted something of this magnitude may be the kind of signal to Japan's big conglomerates that this sector can promise a worthwhile return on investment. For Australia, this deal is significant because it accelerates the procurement of its next-generation frigates. The administration of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is touting that this new design will enable the delivery of the new frigate five years ahead of the previous government's designs. The successful integration of this new vessel will help modernize the Australian Navy as it continues its important efforts to preserve the rules-based international order in the maritime domain. Further, the deal allows for investment in local Australian manufacturers. While the final contours of the deal will be worked out next year, a key parameter for this recent agreement-in-principle is that the shipbuilding will eventually transition from Japan to Australian soil in cooperation with domestic shipbuilders. Thus, this is not just a deal that satisfies government interests but creates important and enduring links to private sector interests as well. As the Australian government announced, this deal will underpin a 20-year program of record, and that is not even including the longer-term sustainment initiatives. Considering that vessels operate for decades, this agreement signals long-term investment from both countries. As for interoperability between defense forces, the deal promises both information-sharing and like systems. Licensed assembly in Australia means that there will be a necessary transfer of information on defense technology and operational designs. Further, interoperability becomes easier when the systems being used are alike. And, if all goes well, there is potential for similar procurement options in the future. It also offers additional synergy with the U.S. ally. As the Japanese touted to the Australian government, the Mogami-class frigate is designed to operate principally with Japanese and American technologies (e.g., weapons targeting systems, radars, datalink systems, etc.), meaning that Australia can leverage its existing relationships with U.S. defense companies for long-term sustainment and potential future upgrades. Understanding all this, it is easier to recognize why this frigate agreement is such a big deal. With it, the growing Japan-Australia Special Strategic Partnership just added another foundational pillar. [bio]Michael MacArthur Bosack is the special adviser for government relations at the Yokosuka Council on Asia-Pacific Studies. He previously served in the Japanese government as a Mansfield fellow.[bio]
NHK
9 hours ago
- NHK
US report initially estimated 100,000 fatalities after Hiroshima atomic bombing
Newly declassified documents show that the US military estimated shortly after the atomic bombing of Hiroshima City in 1945 that at least 100,000 people had died. The National Security Archive at The George Washington University in Washington published the documents on Tuesday ahead of the 80th anniversary of the attack on August 6. The institution has been disclosing declassified US government files on the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. One six-page document titled "Hiroshima Mission" is a report on the bombing of the city written by the US military. It is dated August 8, two days after the attack. It says, "Hiroshima is no more" because "the entire area within a radius of 18,000 feet," or about 5,000 meters, "from the heart of the city has been wiped clean as though it had never existed." The report says, "the most conservative estimate here is that at least 100,000 of Hiroshima's inhabitants had been needlessly sacrificed by their military leaders." Hiroshima City estimates that about 140,000 people died by the end of 1945 due to the atomic bombing.
