Is this the end of an era for a 50-year-old tradition in Australia? Bitter feud erupts over a very controversial change
A new campaign group, Protect Mardi Gras, is urging members to reject what it calls 'division and exclusion' ahead of a pivotal annual general meeting.
At the heart of the dispute is whether LGBTQIA+ police officers should be permitted to march in uniform in the 2025 parade.
Protect Mardi Gras claims a 'group of activists' is using the AGM to push an 'exclusionary agenda'.
That group is Pride in Protest, a self-described 'grassroots political organisation focusing on queer liberation'.
Veteran activist Peter Murphy, who was brutally bashed by police during the first Mardi Gras in 1978, called on members to defend the parade's inclusive spirit.
Mr Murphy is a '78er,' a term used to describe those who took part in the original 1978 march, which was met with police violence and arrests.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Protect Mardi Gras (@protectmardigras)
Mr Murphy reflected on the event's evolution, calling Mardi Gras a 'beacon of hope' for LGBTQIA+ communities in Sydney, Australia, and around the world.
He highlighted the 1998 decision to allow LGBTQIA+ police officers to march as a milestone moment.
'When the LGBTQIA+ police joined our parade in 1998, it was a fabulous victory,' Mr Murphy said.
'But its beautiful, inclusive character is under sustained attack from within our community here in Sydney.'
He urged members to join the Mardi Gras organisation, attend the AGM and vote, or hand over their proxy to a Protect Mardi Gras member.
Protect Mardi Gras organiser Peter Stahel told Daily Mail Australia the campaign consists of 'ordinary volunteers who care deeply about the power of Mardi Gras'.
'Mardi Gras is made possible by the hard work of hundreds of volunteers and the participation of a very diverse group of people, businesses, and activists that don't necessarily agree with each other on every issue,' he said.
'Mardi Gras has many voices, but it's one parade. That's what makes it powerful.'
Mr Stahel acknowledged the NSW Police's history of harm toward LGBTQIA+ communities, but urged a pragmatic, inclusive approach.
'I agree we must constantly acknowledge that many institutions, including the NSW Police, continue to cause harm to LGBTQIA+ people and many others,' he said.
'If only one in 100 police are allies, we start with them and build from there. We don't reject the one to spite the 99, that's just silly, unstrategic, and frankly, dangerous.'
Protect Mardi Gras is encouraging people to join the organisation and vote to maintain the parade's inclusive tradition.
Meanwhile, Pride in Protest has campaigned to ban police from marching in the event since 2018.
Their most recent attempt to formally exclude officers from the 2025 parade was narrowly defeated.
In 2024, NSW Police officers marched out of uniform in a compromise following the deaths of Luke Davies and Jesse Baird, who were allegedly murdered by Beau Lamarre-Condon, a serving police officer at the time.
Earlier this month, Pride in Protest renewed its call to ban police from participating in Mardi Gras following the death of Collin Burling, a 45-year-old man who died in police custody on July 15.
Mr Burling's partner, Taite Collins, captured distressing footage of the incident, in which Burling cried out: 'I've done nothing wrong. I can't breathe. I am dying. Help.'
'The police institution is an oppressive one laced with racism, queerphobia, and violence, and one that is not held accountable for its actions,' Pride in Protest said.
'We renew our demands that the disgraced NSW Police Force be removed from the Mardi Gras parade float and for Operation Mardi Gras to end, putting a stop to the dangerous and overwhelming police presence in Sydney's queer spaces and events.'
The Mardi Gras annual general meeting will be held later this year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Judy, 89, worked hard all her life and lives in one of Australia's richest suburbs. She has launched a stunning bid to stop new homes being built nearby - and Gen Z is FURIOUS
An 89-year-old resident of one Sydney 's most exclusive areas has sparked controversy by launching a landmark legal challenge against the construction of high-rise apartment buildings in her suburb. Judith Pearson, who has lived near Balmoral Beach in Mosman for over three decades, is challenging the NSW Government's sweeping new housing reforms as a private citizen in court. The state government is trying to encourage the construction of housing in the Harbour City with a policy known as the Low and Mid-Rise Housing SEPP (State Environmental Planning Policy). The SEPP overrides local council planning controls and removes their ability to assess developments on a case-by-case basis. Mosman - one of the wealthiest suburbs in Australia, with a median weekly family income of $4,500 - has been given a relatively modest target of constructing 500 new homes by 2029, compared to Ryde's 11,600 and North Sydney's 5,900. Even the posh eastern suburbs council of Woollahra is taking on more than three times the number of homes than Mosman, with 1,900 new builds - but that hasn't stopped Pearson from taking drastic action. Pearson, an accountant who says she supports the need for more housing, argues the reforms enforce a 'one-size-fits-all' model that strips councils and communities of their ability to shape local development and protect heritage-listed homes. 'I couldn't just stand by and watch the value and character of what makes the area special being destroyed,' she told The Sydney Morning Herald. 'I thought somebody has got to stop this.' 'Someone asked me if (the court challenge) is about being 'entitled' and my reply to that was: 'Yes, we are entitled because we've worked hard to live here'. I am entitled to live here'," she told the Herald. The Daily Mail took to the streets to ask locals how they really feel about high-density builds popping up in their suburb. Amanda, a young professional currently hunting for a rental in the area, said she supported new planning rules if it helped to improve housing supply. 'If it helps people break into the market, that'd be better, and make it easier to live around here,' she said. 'At the moment, it's pretty restricted.' Former Sydney University student Tom, who grew up on the city's northern beaches and north shore, slammed Ms Pearson's legal bid as 'entitled and selfish'. 'There are lots of people who have grown up around this area and have dreams of owning a place where they grew up someday,' he said. 'If you look at places in Auckland, it's very clear that building more homes makes rents cheaper and homeownership possible for people my age.' But not everyone agrees, with Virginia, a baby boomer, arguing building high-rise buildings would damage the character of the suburb. 'Three or four storeys max, but nothing more than four,' she said. Her friend Gabriel agreed. 'Four to six is too high. Six is way too much for this area,' she said. Titia said the government should reconsider height allowances. 'It's not good. There should be a regulated height limit,' she said. Housing advocate group Sydney YIMBY was scathing of the legal challenge. 'Sydney YIMBY calls upon Pearson to donate her $500,000 to a homelessness charity instead of fighting homes for people who weren't lucky enough to buy in for pennies 40 years ago,' Chairman Justin Simon told the Daily Mail. 'Mosman is one of the richest, highest demand areas in the country and it's an absolute joke that they only have to deliver 100 homes a year. We hope this draws attention to the matter and the next target is 10x higher.' Only two development applications have been lodged with the Mosman Council under the Low and Mid-Rise Housing Policy. One of the proposals is for a four-storey build on Muston Street, Ms Pearson's street, which would feature four spacious three-bedroom residences. The second is for a larger six-storey development on nearby Awaba Street, which if built would comprise 29 units. On Tuesday, Mosman Council voted to hold an urgent meeting with Ms Pearson, her legal team and community supporters, to discuss the case and consider whether the suburb should formulate its own strategic housing plan. The motion was moved by Mosman councillor Simon Menzies, who has been contacted by Daily Mail for further comment. Supporters of Ms Pearson's campaign point to Kuring-Gai Council, where the SEPP was paused to allow for a localised planning approach. They argue Mosman should be afforded the same opportunity. In a surprising twist, it can be revealed Ms Pearson is no stranger to luxury property development and previously worked with four business associates to acquire land to build high-end homes. The group's first development, completed in 2006, reportedly sold for $5.4million, according to a 2008 article by the Australian Financial Review. A second property was expected to fetch around $12million.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Donald Trump's war on statistics is an authoritarian attack on democracy and countries like Australia should call it out
Whether it be the judicial system, universities, or health organisations, Donald Trump cannot abide by anything that does not confirm his world view. So it was not a shock when late last week he came for statistics – or, more pointedly, the person in charge of the economic statistics. On Friday, the US's Bureau of Labor Studies released the July US employment figures. They were not good. Just 73,000 non-farm jobs were added and annual employment growth was the worst it has been since the GFC years (excluding the pandemic): If the graph does not display click here In response, Trump did what any autocrat would do when told bad news: he shot the messenger – at least only figuratively. Trump argued that Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of labor statistics, had faked bad figures purely to hurt him. And so he fired her. But this should not be dismissed as 'oh that's just Trump', nor should we just sigh and say we have been in a fact-free era for nearly a decade. Reality might be hanging on to the political debate for dear life, but this move threatens to fling it off the cliff. The BLS data is vital for understanding not just what is going on in the USA but to guide other nations – like here in Australia. For example, Australia is doing very well compared with the US. Unlike the US, our employment rate is higher now than it was before the pandemic: If the graph does not display click here These comparisons can influence future policies. For example, we did very well during the GFC; the US did not. We also did much better during the pandemic than the US. They also give insight into the future. The US is still the world's biggest economy and – as we have seen with inflation – what happens there, often happens here, in Australia: If the graph does not display click here If Trump doesn't like weak employment growth numbers, you think he'll be happy with inflation data that shows his tariffs are causing higher prices? And this is not just some academic exercise. US welfare payments are indexed to inflation, so the official data vitally affects the livelihood of many people. Trump thinks when he closes his eyes the rest of the world disappears. But not measuring inflation or unemployment or global temperatures doesn't disappear the problems. And loss of trust in official data will affect business investment decisions, borrowing costs and – as with all attacks on institutions – faith in democracy. For example, in Australia, the Australian Bureau of Statistics has revealed that in the past year the cost of living for all households except 'self-funded' retirees rose faster than did inflation: If the graph does not display click here This is not the greatest news for the Australian government – no politician likes data that says things might be worse than what they previously argued. Cost of living, unlike inflation, includes mortgage repayments. Despite falling interest rates, repaying a mortgage is still around 4.4% higher than it was a year ago, and since March 2022 mortgage repayments have accounted for nearly half of the increase in cost of living: If the graph does not display click here Does it help the Australian government for the ABS to reveal this? Not really. It could blame our Reserve Bank, but generally governments are blamed for high interest rates. It certainly doesn't help the government for the ABS to release figures that some journalist like me can use to show that the value of wages are 8.6% lower than they were in March 2021 when you use cost of living rather than CPI: If the graph does not display click here That type of information makes life hard for the government – but so it should! In a democracy you have to face your critics, argue your case and convince voters you have the best plans and way forward. Political parties are already working hard to make you question reality. But at least till now, even in the US, where Trump would like there to be a new kind of maths where prices can fall by more than 100% (1,000%, 1,100, 1,200, 1,300!!), reality has been counted and presented. The end of impartial economic data would not just be another case of Trump 'flooding the zone'. It would be a fundamental attack on democracy, designed to ensure those who are suffering from his polices are not able to demonstrate that things are worse – either for them or for the nation. They are the actions usually associated with authoritarian regimes, and we should not shy away from making that clear. Greg Jericho is a Guardian columnist and policy director at the Centre for Future Work
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australia news live: Gareth Ward in legal bid to avoid expulsion from NSW parliament; Acoss says it's time to roll back property tax breaks for investors
Update: Date: 2025-08-06T21:59:17.000Z Title: Chalmers says he will err on the side of workers when it comes to AI Content: Treasurer Jim Chalmers appeared on 7:30 Report last night, where he was talking about how AI will be a key topic at the government's productivity roundtable in a few weeks. He was asked if he would support the Australian Council of Trade Unions' call for workers to be able to veto AI in their workplace. He said he would err on the side of workers: We need to be realistic about it. And certainly, I agree that workers need to be part of the conversation when it comes to rolling out a technology that has this gamechanging potential. And where there's very real potential risks in the labour market. I would always err on the side of workers having a say in how their work is done. Update: Date: 2025-08-06T21:54:54.000Z Title: Good morning Content: and welcome to our live news blog. I'm Nick Visser, I'll be bringing you updates as the day gets rolling. Let's start with this: The Australian Council of Social Services (Acoss) is calling for the government to roll back tax breaks for property investors before the treasurer's productivity roundtable. Acoss is calling for the 50% capital gains tax discount to be halved 'so there'd be some tax reward for property investment but nowhere near as generous', the group's chief told the ABC. Also today, a court is expected to hear jailed MP Gareth Ward's bid to prevent the NSW parliament from expelling him. We'll bring you all the developments. Stick with us.
