Labour defence spending 'one of most inefficient ways' to create jobs
It was one of the key tenets of the Strategic Defence Review (SDR) – which was published in June and accepted in its entirety by Labour.
'The SDR will help make defence an engine for growth—boosting prosperity, jobs and security for working people across the UK,' the document read.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer's defence plan will not make UK safer, says ex-UN adviser
Keir Starmer quickly announced the [[UK Government]] would open six new munitions factories, build up to 12 new nuclear-powered submarines and invest £15 billion in nuclear warheads – as well as a raft of other commitments.
'Through this strategy we will bring the whole of society with us, creating jobs, growth and wages for working people,' the Prime Minister said.
In Scotland, meanwhile, Ian Murray launched a £250 million investment at the base housing the UK's nuclear weapons – HMNB Clyde at Faslane – in July, to be spent over the next three years to improve infrastructure at the site.
The Scottish Secretary described the spending as a 'defence dividend' as he also talked up the economic impact of investing in the sector in Scotland, including through the Clyde 2070 programme, which will see billions pumped into the industry in the coming decades.
But the extent to which this investment will positively impact Scotland and create jobs across the UK is a matter of debate.
It's not that jobs won't be created, James Meadway – who is the host of the podcast Macronomics – told The National.
Defence minister John Healey
'Look. If the government spends a bit more money on something in the real world, it will – other things being equal – mean that there is more economic activity,' the economist, who is also a member of the Progressive Economy Forum and a former economic adviser to the shadow chancellor, said.
'There'll be a bit more growth somewhere, there'll be a few more jobs somewhere. That's kind of what's going to happen.'
He added: 'The trouble is it's just not very many for the obvious reason that if you look at military investment now and the kind of things that arms companies are producing – this is all really high tech stuff,' he said.
'This is not just churning out millions of shells or bullets. This is stuff that you use a great deal of high technology to produce, and that is also quite high technology. And if you are producing millions of shells, it's also now very capital intensive, rather than labour intensive, due to big machines making them.'
Meadway added: 'And if you've got lots of high-tech stuff, like you're making drones and you're making quite sophisticated drones. It's capital intensive. You don't have many people employed doing it. You don't actually create many jobs and investment.
'So, as a starting point, if the Government is saying military spending, ramping up defence production will create more jobs, this is a bad way to do that.'
He went on: 'The stuff that really creates jobs, it's actually probably fairly obvious. If you go to the NHS and you put more money into that, that means you're pretty immediately going to employ more nurses, more doctors, more people to your hospitals – all sorts of people working in a pretty labour-intensive healthcare occupation.
'Same thing goes for social care, same thing goes for education, to a significant extent. If you spend more on schools, you're going to need to employ more teachers. So, these things create lots of jobs. Military spending does not create lots of jobs.'
Mark Seddon, a professor of economic history at Sheffield University and the director of the Centre for United Nations Studies, also suggested that defence spending was an inefficient way of creating jobs.
READ MORE:
'Building new royal naval craft, ships and submarines at Govan or Barrow-in-Furness, that's got to be a good thing. I'm all in favour of keeping skilled jobs and expanding them in key sectors like that,' he said.
'But I'm not persuaded by this substantial increase in defence spending that it's going to actually result in a lot of jobs in Britain.'
Seddon added: 'It's not just the [[UK Government]], but the EU – which to my mind is becoming synonymous with NATO – seem to have a policy, which is increasing military spending in an effort to save their economy.
"I don't think it will, I think it makes life a lot easier for the extreme-right politically, and I don't think it's going to bring jobs in any large numbers into the industrial areas.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
a minute ago
- Reuters
Europe's bond market losing Dutch pension fund buyers as retirement payouts shift
LONDON, Aug 7 (Reuters) - As if Europe's cash-hungry finance ministers didn't have enough to worry about. An overhaul of the Dutch pension system is depriving the euro zone's $10 trillion government bond market of a key buyer of its long-term debt, just as state funding needs surge. The Dutch private pension sector, the bloc's largest which oversees more than 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) of assets, will move to a defined contribution system - as opposed to defined benefit - from next year. For governments looking to issue debt to fund their spending needs, it's a big change. Long-term debt has many advantages for governments because they are able to plan out their interest liabilities for longer. But under the new Dutch system, pension funds will have less need to buy bonds - and longer-dated bonds in particular - as they will no longer promise specific long-term benefits and will be able to take on more risk overall. Dutch pension funds are already stepping back from buying longer-dated bonds, according to a senior trader at BofA, just as Germany prepares to triple its borrowing. It's unclear how quickly funds will unwind their bond holdings and their hedges against risk, and how they will invest in future, adding to the uncertainty. "You're in a paradigm shift where you've had the largest-duration buyer in Europe disappear," said BofA's EMEA head of linear rates trading Kal El-Wahab. "They haven't been buying all year." "In a world where there's already a supply-demand imbalance going on, as sovereigns need to raise more cash than they ever have, losing one of the largest buyers of duration in Europe is very, very material." Longer-dated government bonds have been under pressure globally this year, prompting Japan and Britain to shorten the maturities of their issuance, as other key buyers have stepped back there too. But in the euro zone, pension fund reform "comes when Germany has to do more than it has ever done on the issuance front," said Barclays' head of euro rates strategy Rohan Khanna. The additional premium that benchmark borrower Germany pays for 30-year debt over shorter maturities has already risen this year. Traders say anticipation of the reform has been one driver. So far, the long end of the German yield curve has steepened roughly in line with other regions , , but the trend may have further to run. "The market's consensus is still for steepeners," said Credit Agricole CIB's head of European government bond trading Bruno Benchimol. BofA's El-Wahab expects the German 10/30-year yield curve, currently at around 50 basis points, could steepen another 20-25 basis points and lead other markets from here. Declining demand from Dutch pension funds is "something (governments) have to take into account when coming up with (funding) plans," said ABN AMRO rates strategist Jaap Teerhuis, who previously headed the Dutch Treasury's dealing room. Dutch banks estimate pension funds will eventually sell around 100 billion euros of government bond holdings. But their holdings aren't as long-dated and many of the long-dated bonds they bought have rolled down the curve over the years, BofA's El-Wahab noted. "It's not clear they're going to be selling long-dated bonds in order to do this transition ... The very seismic shift is just the absence of them on a forward-looking basis." The biggest source of uncertainty is how quickly funds will reduce those holdings and what role bonds will play in funds' post-transition portfolios, ABN's Teerhuis said. A plan from ABP, the country's largest pension fund, which manages 520 billion euros in assets, points to a gradual shift. It suggests ABP will shed around 25 billion euros of government bonds by 2030, but its exposure will remain unchanged in 2027 compared with 2023. Analysts said they expect even greater curve steepening in the swaps market. Pension funds have hedged their interest-rate risk by putting on long-dated swap trades to receive fixed-rate payments, but will now raise cash to close those trades, most likely by selling bonds. The next hurdle for markets is January 2026, when three of the five biggest funds plan to start switching to the new system, according to Barclays. But analysts aren't ruling out delays, which could stoke volatility at year-end. One of the three, PMT, has said it will assess in December and once again in January whether it's ready to transition. "We will know about the final 'go, no-go' very perilously close to the transition date," Khanna said.
Telegraph
a minute ago
- Telegraph
Don't call rural voters Nimbys, Labour MPs tell Starmer
Sir Keir Stamer has been told to stop calling rural voters 'Nimbys' by Labour MPs representing rural seats. The Rural Research Group, which represents seats the party won for the first time at last year's election, branded the term 'toxic' and said may alienate voters in the countryside. Sir Keir and risked a further drop in the 'goodwill' shown by rural voters that handed Labour a historic election win last year. Labour has already been accused of betraying those voters by limiting inheritance tax relief for family farms in last year's Budget. The Prime Minister has regularly used the phrase, which means 'not in my back yard', to describe those he believes are blocking new housing and infrastructure which Labour sees as crucial to boosting economic growth. He said previously: 'For too long, blockers have had the upper hand in legal challenges - using our court processes to frustrate growth. 'We're putting an end to this challenge culture by taking on the Nimbys and a broken system that has slowed down our progress as a nation.' Jenny Riddell-Carpenter, the Labour MP who chairs the Labour Rural Research Group, said many people 'despise' the term. Ms Riddell-Carpenter told The Mirror: 'The term Nimby isn't just toxic, it's politically pointless. We win nothing by labelling people 'anti development' or 'anti growth'.' The Rural Research Group - set up to champion rural issues - published their first report on Wednesday on the attitudes of their countryside constituents. Their survey of 1,412 people found 56 per cent 'firmly do not see themselves as Nimbys'. More than 60 per cent also agreed developments in their areas should go ahead 'as long as it is delivered thoughtfully, and with consideration for local needs and identity'. The group's intervention will be seen as evidence of growing concern amongst rural MPs about Labour's poll ratings. Research group caucuses are becoming more popular in parliament, reflecting how Conservative factions sought to wield power under previous administrations. The Prime Minister has been told to show more recognition for rural identity, which Rural Research Group said had 'for too long been misunderstood and overlooked by policymakers'. A Rural Research Group poll showed that 65 per cent of voters have little trust in politicians. The MPs said: 'This should serve as a clear warning sign to all parties: disillusionment in rural Britain runs deep, and restoring trust will require more than promises - it must be backed by visible, long-term local action rooted in authenticity.'
The Herald Scotland
27 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Moral Minister Kate Forbes will be missed when she leaves politics
Her Christian faith and integrity meant she did not receive a civil or warm reception by many in her party who confused her moral stance with bigotry. Her character came from finding her 'core identity and strength in other ways', which for her meant her Creator. This was the reason she could continue despite hostility, while contributing so much in her constituency work and Deputy First Minister post, while being so well thought of by many. There is dismay felt by many in Scotland, who see the loss of a brave and talented politician of such calibre diminishing the future governing of our country. Irene Munro, Conon Bridge Hamas depravity A SKELETAL Jewish man digging a hole implied to be his own grave under the watchful eyes of his captors – it should be a scene from history, not 2025. Horrifically, it is a video released by the depraved terrorists of Hamas. We should not forget this war started with mass murder and dozens of gang rapes at the Supernova music festival, the slaughter of hundreds of Jewish civilians in their own homes and the abduction of both the living and the dead. The UN's own figures say that over 80% of aid to Gaza is hijacked, mostly by Hamas. At the same time, the terrorists and their Western cheerleaders use the hunger resulting from the war to build support for their atrocious behaviour. Israel is a Western democracy with a wide diversity of opinion, some favouring return of the hostages and others the destruction of Hamas. While Israel isn't perfect it is vastly better than the evil sadists of Hamas and other terrorist groups. Otto Inglis, Fife. Read more Morality gone missing THE idea of ethical investments ('Spotify CEO is bankrolling high-tech military warfare', The Herald, August 3), reminds me of a client who instructed her stockbrokers not to invest in anything relating to armaments. Said stockbroker recommended shares in a company manufacturing underfelt for carpets. Later, it transpired that the underfelt was, to a large extent, sold to the MOD for use in submarines. Is there such a thing as ethical investment? David Miller, Milngavie. Humankind not so kind HOMO SAPIENS, wise human; that's us, apparently. Hard to believe we deserve the name when you look at our world: war in Ukraine, genocide in Gaza, famine in Sudan. And this week it's 80 years since the US dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki ('Nuclear explosion survivors tell their story', The Herald, August 4.) Looking back through history, there's a long list of man-made catastrophes. In my lifetime alone there's been Biafra, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, Ethiopia and Rwanda. Along the way, our species has unwisely trashed the environment of the planet. It's hard being optimistic when many of the world's leaders are oblivious to the lessons of the past. But I've always believed there are many more good people than there are bad. It's time their voices were heard, demanding real change in the way we treat each other and our planet. Until then, let's call ourselves what we really are: homo stultus, foolish human. Doug Maughan, Dunblane. Hydrogen storage just a pipe dream THE lead article in a recent edition ('Ministers snub talks that aim to pause green energy push', The Herald, August 6) demonstrate that selecting a Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh was a major mistake for providing a voice for rural Scots. The snub by the Scottish Government to attend talks to pause the Green Energy push, and the failure by the SNP to complete an assessment on ferry resilience, simply demonstrates that Holyrood is just a Parliament in Edinburgh that only serves Scots living in the Forth Valley. In addition, note that the Economic Secretary has yet to provide an estimate for the installation of 25,000MW on hydrogen fuelled gas turbine plants to keep the lights on under dunkelflaute weather conditions. There are also no details over the location of the 500 electrolyser plants or the hydrogen storage vessels. But it should be noted that they must be sited around Glasgow, Stirling and Edinburgh to minimise the pipe runs between production facilities and the generation plant to ensure minimum leakage of hydrogen. When will the SNP be transparent with rural Scots over the costs and physical impact of the plant on the central belt? Ian Moir, Castle Douglas CalMac have been beset by problems (Image: Image: Archive) Risky business WHAT a joke the Scottish Government's long-awaited Island Business Resilience Fund (IBRF) is turning out to be ('Row over island ferry resilience fund deepens', The Herald, August 6). As your report explained: "To qualify under the criteria used by the Scottish Government, islands had to have suffered more than 15% of service cancellations across three seasons — far above the 7% average across the CalMac network." Will they rely upon CalMac's own reliability figures which are calculated from revised timetables of reduced sailings excluding the vessels taken out of service? After all, how can CalMac achieve a 95% reliability of service when 20% of their over 80 metre length vessels are regularly out of service? The compensation fund of £4.4 million is derisory, it actually works out at £1.5 million per season when it is calculated over three seasons, and how many businesses will still be trading having suffered three season's losses? In reality it is not even enough to paint the windows or buy the door handles for the crew accommodation on one of their new-build behemoths. This illustrates just where the Scottish Government's priorities and attitude to the island communities lie. Peter Wright, West Kilbride.
